Acute Periprosthetic Hip Fractures With Short, Uncemented Femoral Stems.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented femoral stems in hip arthroplasty have shown excellent long-term results, and several systematic studies indicate satisfactory performance of short stems. However, biomechanical and finite element analysis studies have suggested that shorter stems allow greater micromotion, producing greater strain at the implant-bone interface, which potentially increases the risk for periprosthetic fracture (PPF). We sought to assess this risk within our unit. METHODS: Our institution's arthroplasty database was searched for all primary total hip arthroplasties using short femoral stems performed between July 14, 2009 and August 29, 2022. The overall PPF rate and the PPF rate for individual femoral stems were established. Preoperative X-rays for each case were analyzed to characterize individual proximal femoral geometry. A data analysis was performed to identify risk factors for PPF. RESULTS: For the time period assessed, 3,192 short femoral stems were implanted. This included 1,561 of stem A and 1,631 of stem B. Women constituted 55.37% of the cohort. The average patient age was 66 years (range, 22 to 95). The PPF rate was 0.6%, with 19 PPFs identified at a follow-up of 3 months. There was a significantly higher fracture rate in stem A (0.96%) compared to stem B (0.25%) (P ≤ .01). Proximal femoral geometry, age, and sex were not determined to be risk factors for PPF in our cohort. Individual surgeons and surgical approaches appeared to confer no increased risk. There was no significant difference in average stem length, but multivariate analysis identified stem type and stem length as an independent risk factor for PPF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified individual stem and stem length as independent risk factors for PPF within our cohort. PPF is a multifactorial issue, and consensus on emerging risk factors such as implant design will hopefully inform decisions that can provide further risk reduction for individual patients.

Post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis: a retrospective case series of 10 patients in Kuwait.

BACKGROUND: The development of radioulnar synostosis due to post-traumatic injuries of the elbow or forearm can lead to debilitating outcomes. Several treatment options are available to hinder the progression and prevent recurrence. We used a combination of these treatments in a series of patients and observed the outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 10 patients with post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis (9 men and 1 woman) who required surgical intervention in a tertiary orthopedic center. All of these patients were subjected to the same treatment combination (preoperative radiotherapy, tissue interposition after heterotopic ossification resection, and adjuvant indomethacin postoperatively). Improvement in range of motion (flexion, extension, and rotation) and the Mayo score was assessed and compared preoperatively and postoperatively via statistical analysis. RESULTS: In comparison to the patients' preoperative state, which ranged from poor to fair, all 10 patients reported excellent Mayo scores after intervention with the triple therapy combination, with a mean Mayo score of 36 ± 10.2 points. Flexion, extension, and rotation improved by mean values of 55.2° ± 38.7°, 50.2° ± 34.0°, and 47.9° ± 40.0°, respectively. There was 1 complication that has subsided on follow-up. CONCLUSION: The triple therapy combination was found to provide good functional and prophylactic results preventing recurrence.

Clinical outcomes and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty used for failed prior shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is frequently performed in the revision setting as a salvage procedure. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complication, reoperation, and revision rates after revision RSA (RRSA) stratified according to the primary shoulder procedure undergoing revision. METHODS: Four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were searched for eligible studies published between January 1985 and September 2017. The primary outcomes of interest included pain, active range of motion, and functional outcome scores. Secondary outcomes included complication, reoperation, and revision rates. RESULTS: A total of 43 studies (1041 shoulder arthroplasties) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean follow-up period of 43.8 months (range, 31.1-57.2 months). Pain scores improved in all groups; however, none reached statistical significance. Range of motion improved in all groups, except for external rotation in the RSA category. RRSA demonstrated significant improvements in the Simple Shoulder Test score and Constant score (CS) in the group undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for fracture, CS in the group undergoing HA for other indications, and CS in the group undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Pooled complication rates were highest in the failed RSA group (56.2%), followed by the group undergoing HA for other indications (27.7%), total shoulder arthroplasty group (23.6%), soft-tissue repair group (20.6%), open reduction and internal fixation group (19.0%), and group undergoing HA for fracture (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other revision indications, RRSA for failed HA demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, whereas the highest complication and revision rates were observed in the RSA subgroup. This information is useful when establishing patient expectations regarding the risks, benefits, and complication and revision rates of RRSA.