RESUMEN
This retrospective study aimed to compare the accuracy of the pediatric dental surgeon's estimated operative times for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia (DRGA) in pediatric patients. This study population included 674 pediatric patients who underwent DRGA at the study facility between January 2022 and December 2022, using convenience sampling to select patients who met our inclusion criteria. Data were collected from electronic medical and anesthesia records based on several factors, including patient-related factors such as age and gender, surgeon-related factors such as rank and experience, and anesthesia-related factors such as induction and recovery time (in minutes). This study highlights a significant difference between the surgeon's estimated time (SET) and actual operative time (AOT) for pediatric DRGA procedures, with a mean difference of 19.28 min (SD = 43.17, p < 0.0001), indicating a tendency for surgeons to overestimate surgery time. Surgical procedure time was the strongest predictor of this discrepancy, with an R square value of 0.427 and a significant p-value of 0.000. Experience with surgeons, anesthesia induction, and recovery time were also significant predictors. Meanwhile, age, gender, and rank of surgeons did not significantly predict the difference between SET and AOT. Therefore, the study suggests that surgeons should adjust their estimates for pediatric DRGA procedures, specifically emphasizing a more accurate estimation of surgery time, to ensure adequate resource allocation and patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background: The prevalence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in hospitals characterizes one of the most significant problems in healthcare. This study aims to assess whether the implementation of impact of key performance indicators (KPIs) checklist reduces the number of CAUTI in adults present in intensive care unit (ICU) with indwelling catheters. Methods: This is a retrospective analytical study conducted in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from June 2020 to June 2021. One hundred and thirty-four patients with CAUTIs met the criteria and were included in the study. Socio-demographic data was collected to enable informed analysis based on personal information (age, gender, marital status, monthly income, level of education, and department) and medical history (duration of catheterization, types of organisms, history of chronic illness, and duration of hospitalization). The research also used a prevention of CAUTI checklist containing 26 items. The outcome measures were 1) the rate of CAUTIs measured pre- and post-implementing performance measurement indicators (KPI) of CAUTIs prevention practice and 2) the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in three areas: general information recording, insertion practices, and maintenance practices. Results: The study found that there was compliance with the prevention of CAUTIs in terms of recording the general patient's information (72%), insertion practices (52%), and maintenance practices (50%). However, most safety practices, including poor hygiene and safety standards, patient handling, and audited protocol programs, were not strictly followed, resulting in increased risk factors for CAUTIs. Conclusion: Compliance with the prevention of CAUTIs in terms of recording the general patient's information, insertion practices, and maintenance practices lies within the range of 50-75%, and the recommended practices are usually followed. A targeted education on CAUTI-prevention practices curtailing the most aggravating risk factors and adopting a safety culture driven by a patient handling and audited protocol program should be explored to reduce hospital CAUTIs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the level of resilience of medical workers in radiology departments in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, during the COVID-19 outbreak and to explore associated factors. SETTING: Medical staff, including nurses, technicians, radiology specialists and physicians, working in radiology departments at government hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 outbreak. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted among 375 medical workers in radiology departments in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The data collection took place from 15 February 2022 to 31 March 2022. RESULTS: The total resilience score was 29.37±6.760 and the scores of each dimension showed that the higher mean score was observed in the domain of 'flexibility', while the lowest was observed in 'maintaining attention under stress'. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that there was a significant negative correlation between resilience and perceived stress (r=-0.498, p<0.001). Finally, based on multiple linear regression analysis, factors affecting resilience among participants are the availability of psychological hotline (available, B=2.604, p<0.050), knowledge of COVID-19 protective measures (part of understanding, B=-5.283, p<0.001), availability of adequate protective materials (partial shortage, B=-2.237, p<0.050), stress (B=-0.837, p<0.001) and education (postgraduate, B=-1.812, p<0.050). CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the level of resilience and the factors that contribute to resilience in radiology medical staff. Moderate levels of resilience call for health administrators to focus on developing strategies that can effectively help cope with workplace adversities.