Population health outcomes in Nigeria compared with other west African countries, 1998-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.

BACKGROUND: Population-level health and mortality data are crucial for evidence-informed policy but scarce in Nigeria. To fill this gap, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the burden of disease in Nigeria and compared outcomes to other west African countries. METHODS: In this systematic analysis, using data and results of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019, we analysed patterns of mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), life expectancy, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and health system coverage for Nigeria and 15 other west African countries by gender in 1998 and 2019. Estimates of all-age and age-standardised disability-adjusted life-years for 369 diseases and injuries and 87 risk factors are presented for Nigeria. Health expenditure per person and gross domestic product were extracted from the World Bank repository. FINDINGS: Between 1998 and 2019, life expectancy and HALE increased in Nigeria by 18% to 64·3 years (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 62·2-66·6), mortality reduced for all age groups for both male and female individuals, and health expenditure per person increased from the 11th to third highest in west Africa by 2018 (US$18·6 in 2001 to $83·75 in 2018). Nonetheless, relative outcomes remained poor; Nigeria ranked sixth in west Africa for age-standardised mortality, seventh for HALE, tenth for YLLs, 12th for health system coverage, and 14th for YLDs in 2019. Malaria (5176·3 YLLs per 100 000 people, 95% UI 2464·0-9591·1) and neonatal disorders (4818·8 YLLs per 100 000, 3865·9-6064·2) were the leading causes of YLLs in Nigeria in 2019. Nigeria had the fourth-highest under-five mortality rate for male individuals (2491·8 deaths per 100 000, 95% UI 1986·1-3140·1) and female individuals (2117·7 deaths per 100 000, 1756·7-2569·1), but among the lowest mortality for men older than 55 years. There was evidence of a growing non-communicable disease burden facing older Nigerians. INTERPRETATION: Health outcomes remain poor in Nigeria despite higher expenditure since 2001. Better outcomes in countries with equivalent or lower health expenditure suggest health system strengthening and targeted intervention to address unsafe water sources, poor sanitation, malnutrition, and exposure to air pollution could substantially improve population health. FUNDING: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

National Surgical Healthcare Policy Development and Implementation: Where do We Stand in Africa?

BACKGROUND: National surgical policies have been increasingly adopted by African countries over the past decade. This report is intended to provide an overview of the current state of adoption of national surgical healthcare policies in Africa, and to draw a variety of lessons from representative surgical plans in order to support transnational learning. METHODS: Through a desk review of available African national surgical healthcare plans and written contributions from a committee comprising six African surgical policy development experts, a few key lessons from five healthcare plans were outlined and iteratively reviewed. RESULTS: The current state of national surgical healthcare policies across Africa was visually mapped, and lessons from a few compelling examples are highlighted. These include the power of initiative from Senegal; regional leadership from Zambia; contextualization, and renewal of commitment from Ethiopia; multidisciplinary focus and creation of multiple implementation entry points from Nigeria; partnerships and involvement of multiple stakeholders from Rwanda; and the challenge of surgical policy financing from Tanzania. The availability of global expertise, the power of global partnerships, and the critical role of health ministries and Ministers of Health in planning and implementation have also been highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: Strategic planning for surgical healthcare improvement is at various stages across the continent, with potential for countries to learn from one another. Convenings of stakeholders and Ministers of Health from countries at various stages of strategic surgical plan development, execution, and evaluation can enhance African surgical policy development through the exchange of ideas, lessons, and experiences.

Routine Pediatric Surgical Emergencies: Incidence, Morbidity, and Mortality During the 1st 8000 Days of Life-A Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: Many potentially treatable non-congenital and non-traumatic surgical conditions can occur during the first 8000 days of life and an estimated 85% of children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) will develop one before 15 years old. This review summarizes the common routine surgical emergencies in children from LMICs and their effects on morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A narrative review was undertaken to assess the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of common surgical emergencies that present within the first 8000 days (or 21.9 years) of life in LMICs. Available data on pediatric surgical emergency care in LMICs were aggregated. RESULTS: Outside of trauma, acute appendicitis, ileal perforation secondary to typhoid fever, and intestinal obstruction from intussusception and hernias continue to be the most common abdominal emergencies among children in LMICs. Musculoskeletal infections also contribute significantly to the surgical burden in children. These "neglected" conditions disproportionally affect children in LMICs and are due to delays in seeking care leading to late presentation and preventable complications. Pediatric surgical emergencies also necessitate heavy resource utilization in LMICs, where healthcare systems are already under strain. CONCLUSIONS: Delays in care and resource limitations in LMIC healthcare systems are key contributors to the complicated and emergent presentation of pediatric surgical disease. Timely access to surgery can not only prevent long-term impairments but also preserve the impact of public health interventions and decrease costs in the overall healthcare system.

Financing Pediatric Surgery: A Provider's Perspective from the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Half the world's population is at risk of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE, out-of-pocket spending of more than 10% of annual expenditure) should they require surgery. Protection against CHE is a key indicator of successful health care delivery and has been identified as a priority area by the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery (GICS). Data specific to pediatric surgical patients is limited. This study examines the financial risks for pediatric surgical patients and their families from a provider's perspective. METHODS: We surveyed GICS members about the existing financial protection mechanisms and estimated expenditures for their patients. Questions were structured based on the National Surgical, Obstetric and Anesthesia Planning Surgical Indicators and finalized based on multi-institutional consensus between high-income country and low-and middle-income country (LMIC) providers. Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and student's t-test were used as appropriate. RESULTS: Among 107 respondents, 72.4% were from low income or lower-middle income (LIC/LMIC) countries, and 55.1% were attending or consultant physicians. Families were most likely to decline surgery in LIC/LMIC due to inability to afford treatment (mean Likert = 3.77 ± 1.06). The odds of incurring CHE after children's surgery are up to 17 times greater in LIC/LMIC (P = 0.001, unadjusted OR 17.28, 95%CI 2.13-140.02). Over 50% of families of children undergoing major surgery in these settings face CHE. An estimated 5.1% of providers in LIC/LMIC and 56.2% (P < 0.001) of providers in UMIC/HIC reported that families are able to pay for their direct medical costs with the assistance available to them and were more likely to sell assets (74.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients in LMICs are at greater risk for CHE and have less financial risk protection than their HIC counterparts. Given this disparity, intervention is needed to make safe surgery affordable for children worldwide.

Defining Surgical Workforce Density Targets to Meet Child and Neonatal Mortality Rate Targets in the Age of the Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: To reduce preventable deaths of newborns and children, the United Nations set a target rate per 1000 live births of 12 for neonatal mortality (NMR) and 25 for under-5 mortality (U5MR). The purpose of this paper is to define the minimum surgical workforce needed to meet these targets and evaluate the relative impact of increasing surgeon, anesthesia, and obstetrician (SAO) density on reducing child mortality. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 192 countries to define the association between surgical workforce density and U5MR as well as NMR using unadjusted and adjusted B-spline regression, adjusting for common non-surgical causes of childhood mortality. We used these models to estimate the minimum surgical workforce to meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs) for U5MR and NMR and marginal effects plots to determine over which range of SAO densities the largest impact is seen as countries scale-up SAO workforce. RESULTS: We found that increased SAO density is associated with decreased U5MR and NMR (P < 0.05), adjusting for common non-surgical causes of child mortality. A minimum SAO density of 10 providers per 100,000 population (95% CI: 7-13) is associated with an U5MR of < 25 per 1000 live births. A minimum SAO density of 12 (95% CI: 9-20) is associated with an NMR of < 12 per 1000 live births. The maximum decrease in U5MR, on the basis of our adjusted B-spline model, occurs from 0 to 20 SAO per 100,000 population. The maximum decrease in NMR based on our adjusted B-spline model occurs up from 0 to 18 SAO, with additional decrease seen up to 80 SAO. CONCLUSIONS: Scale-up of the surgical workforce to 12 SAO per 100,000 population may help health systems meet the SDG goals for childhood mortality rates. Increases in up to 80 SAO/100,000 continue to offer mortality benefit for neonates and would help to achieve the SDGs for neonatal mortality reduction.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pediatric Surgical Volume in Four Low- and Middle-Income Country Hospitals: Insights from an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care delivery in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has been challenging to assess due to a lack of data. This study examines the impact of COVID-19 on pediatric surgical volumes at four LMIC hospitals. METHODS: Retrospective and prospective pediatric surgical data collected at hospitals in Burkina Faso, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Zambia were reviewed from January 2019 to April 2021. Changes in surgical volume were assessed using interrupted time series analysis. RESULTS: 6078 total operations were assessed. Before the pandemic, overall surgical volume increased by 21 cases/month (95% CI 14 to 28, p < 0.001). From March to April 2020, the total surgical volume dropped by 32%, or 110 cases (95% CI - 196 to - 24, p = 0.014). Patients during the pandemic were younger (2.7 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.001) and healthier (ASA I 69% vs. 66%, p = 0.003). Additionally, they experienced lower rates of post-operative sepsis (0.3% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001), surgical site infections (1.3% vs 5.8%, p < 0.001), and mortality (1.6% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, children's surgery in LMIC saw a sharp decline in total surgical volume by a third in the month following March 2020, followed by a slow recovery afterward. Patients were healthier with better post-operative outcomes during the pandemic, implying a widening disparity gap in surgical access and exacerbating challenges in addressing the large unmet burden of pediatric surgical disease in LMICs with a need for immediate mitigation strategies.

Estimates of Treatable Deaths Within the First 20 Years of Life from Scaling Up Surgical Care at First-Level Hospitals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is an important, yet often neglected component of child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examines the potential impact of scaling up surgical care at first-level hospitals in LMICs within the first 20 years of life. METHODS: Epidemiological data from the global burden of disease 2019 Study and a counterfactual method developed for the disease control priorities; 3rd Edition were used to estimate the number of treatable deaths in the under 20 year age group if surgical care could be scaled up at first-level hospitals. Our model included three digestive diseases, four maternal and neonatal conditions, and seven common traumatic injuries. RESULTS: An estimated 314,609 (95% UI, 239,619-402,005) deaths per year in the under 20 year age group could be averted if surgical care were scaled up at first-level hospitals in LMICs. Most of the treatable deaths are in the under-5 year age group (80.9%) and relates to improved obstetrical care and its effect on reducing neonatal encephalopathy due to birth asphyxia and trauma. Injuries are the leading cause of treatable deaths after age 5 years. Sixty-one percent of the treatable deaths occur in lower middle-income countries. Overall, scaling up surgical care at first-level hospitals could avert 5·1% of the total deaths in children and adolescents under 20 years of age in LMICs per year. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the capacity of surgical services at first-level hospitals in LMICs has the potential to avert many deaths within the first 20 years of life.

Global surgery, obstetric, and anaesthesia indicator definitions and reporting: An Utstein consensus report.

BACKGROUND: Indicators to evaluate progress towards timely access to safe surgical, anaesthesia, and obstetric (SAO) care were proposed in 2015 by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. These aimed to capture access to surgery, surgical workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality rate, and catastrophic and impoverishing financial consequences of surgery. Despite being rapidly taken up by practitioners, data points from which to derive the indicators were not defined, limiting comparability across time or settings. We convened global experts to evaluate and explicitly define-for the first time-the indicators to improve comparability and support achievement of 2030 goals to improve access to safe affordable surgical and anaesthesia care globally. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Utstein process for developing and reporting guidelines through a consensus building process was followed. In-person discussions at a 2-day meeting were followed by an iterative process conducted by email and virtual group meetings until consensus was reached. The meeting was held between June 16 to 18, 2019; discussions continued until August 2020. Participants consisted of experts in surgery, anaesthesia, and obstetric care, data science, and health indicators from high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Considering each of the 6 indicators in turn, we refined overarching descriptions and agreed upon data points needed for construction of each indicator at current time (basic data points), and as each evolves over 2 to 5 (intermediate) and >5 year (full) time frames. We removed one of the original 6 indicators (one of 2 financial risk protection indicators was eliminated) and refined descriptions and defined data points required to construct the 5 remaining indicators: geospatial access, workforce, surgical volume, perioperative mortality, and catastrophic expenditure. A strength of the process was the number of people from global institutes and multilateral agencies involved in the collection and reporting of global health metrics; a limitation was the limited number of participants from low- or middle-income countries-who only made up 21% of the total attendees. CONCLUSIONS: To track global progress towards timely access to quality SAO care, these indicators-at the basic level-should be implemented universally as soon as possible. Intermediate and full indicator sets should be achieved by all countries over time. Meanwhile, these evolutions can assist in the short term in developing national surgical plans and collecting more detailed data for research studies.

National surgical, obstetric, anaesthesia and nursing plan, Nigeria.

Recent evidence suggests that strengthening surgical care within existing health systems will strengthen the overall health-care system. However, Nigeria's national strategic health development plan 2018-2022 placed little emphasis on surgical care. To address the gap, we worked with professional societies and other partners to develop the national surgical, obstetric, anaesthesia and nursing plan 2019-2023. The aim was to foster actions to prioritize surgical care for the achievement of universal health coverage. In addition to creating a costed strategy to strengthen surgical care, the plan included children's surgery and nursing: two key aspects that have been neglected in other national surgical plans. Pilot implementation of the plan began in 2020, supported by a nongovernmental organization with experience in surgical care in the region. We have created specific entry points to facilitate the pilot implementation. In the pilot, an electronic surgery registry has been created; personnel are being trained in life support; nurses are being trained in safe perioperative care; biomedical technicians and sterile supplies nurses are being trained in surgical instrument repair and maintenance; and research capacity is being strengthened. In addition, the mainstream media are being mobilized to improve awareness about the plan among policy-makers and the general population. Another development partner is interested in providing support for paediatric surgery, and a children's hospital is being planned. As funding is a key challenge to full implementation, we need innovative domestic funding strategies to support and sustain implementation.

De récentes preuves suggèrent que le renforcement des soins chirurgicaux au sein des systèmes de santé existants entraînera un renforcement du système tout entier. Pourtant, le plan 2018­2022 de développement stratégique de la santé au Nigeria n'accorde que peu d'importance à ces soins. Pour remédier au problème, nous avons travaillé avec des associations professionnelles ainsi que d'autres partenaires afin de mettre au point le plan national de chirurgie, d'obstétrique, d'anesthésie et de soins infirmiers 2019­2023. Objectif: favoriser les mesures privilégiant les soins chirurgicaux, en vue d'offrir une couverture maladie universelle. Outre l'élaboration d'une stratégie chiffrée servant à consolider le secteur, le plan a intégré les unités de soins infirmiers et de chirurgie pédiatrique, deux aspects clés qui ont été négligés dans d'autres plans nationaux relatifs à la chirurgie. La mise en œuvre de la version pilote du plan a démarré en 2020, avec l'aide d'une organisation non gouvernementale possédant de l'expérience en matière d'interventions chirurgicales dans la région. Nous avons établi des points de départ spécifiques pour faciliter cette mise en œuvre. Dans le cadre de la version pilote, un registre de chirurgie électronique a été créé; le personnel a été formé à l'assistance vitale; les infirmiers ont découvert comment administrer des soins périopératoires sûrs; les techniciens biomédicaux et les infirmiers en stérilisation du matériel ont appris à réparer les instruments chirurgicaux; et enfin, les capacités de recherche et de maintenance ont été revues à la hausse. Par ailleurs, les médias traditionnels ont été sollicités afin d'informer les législateurs et la population en général au sujet du plan. Un partenaire de développement supplémentaire a proposé son aide en matière de chirurgie pédiatrique, et un hôpital pour enfants est prévu. Les fonds constituant l'un des principaux défis d'une mise en œuvre complète, nous avons besoin de stratégies de financement innovantes à l'échelle nationale pour la soutenir et la maintenir.

Las evidencias recientes sugieren que el fortalecimiento de la atención quirúrgica dentro de los sistemas sanitarios existentes reforzará el sistema general de la atención sanitaria. Sin embargo, el plan nacional estratégico para el desarrollo de la salud 2018-2022 de Nigeria dio poca importancia a la atención quirúrgica. Para abordar esta carencia, trabajamos con sociedades profesionales y otros asociados con el fin de elaborar el plan nacional de intervención quirúrgica, obstetricia, anestesia y enfermería 2019-2023. El objetivo era impulsar acciones para priorizar la atención quirúrgica en pro del logro de la cobertura sanitaria universal. Además de crear una estrategia con costes para reforzar la atención quirúrgica, el plan incluía intervenciones quirúrgicas y cuidados de enfermería para niños, que son dos aspectos clave que se han ignorado en otros planes nacionales de intervención quirúrgica. La implementación piloto del plan comenzó en 2020, con el apoyo de una organización no gubernamental que tiene experiencia en la atención quirúrgica en la región. Se han creado puntos iniciales específicos para facilitar la implementación piloto. En el plan piloto, se ha creado un registro electrónico de intervenciones quirúrgicas; se está capacitando al personal en apoyo vital; se está capacitando al personal de enfermería en cuidados perioperatorios seguros; se está capacitando a los técnicos biomédicos y al personal de enfermería de suministros estériles en la restauración de instrumentos quirúrgicos; y se está fortaleciendo la capacidad de mantenimiento e investigación. Además, se está recurriendo a los principales medios de comunicación para dar a conocer el plan a los responsables de formular las políticas y a la población en general. Otro asociado para el desarrollo está interesado en prestar apoyo a la intervención quirúrgica pediátrica, y se está planificando un hospital infantil. Como el financiamiento es un desafío clave para implementar el plan en su totalidad, se requieren estrategias innovadoras de financiamiento nacional para apoyar y sostener la implementación.

Applying LEAN Healthcare in Lean Settings: Launching Quality Improvement in Resource-Limited Regions.

BACKGROUND: Lean methodology is frequently utilized in high income settings to maximize capacity and operational efficiency during process improvement (PI) initiatives. To date there has been little published on the application of these techniques in low- and-middle-income countries (LMIC) despite the potential benefits in resource limited settings. We describe a pilot project developed in 2018 to promote sustainable operating theater efficiency at two hospitals in Abuja, Nigeria. This study details the first known attempt to use Lean techniques to improve surgical care systems in LMIC. METHODS: Perioperative committees were established at two Nigerian institutions to evaluate current processes, identify problems, and compile a list of priorities. A physician champion and a PI specialist in conjunction with local physician-partners held a workshop to teach practical applications of PI methodology as part of an ongoing collaboration. Pre and post-workshop surveys were administered, and theme coding was used to categorize free responses. Results were compared with a chi-square test. RESULTS: In total, 42 individuals attended the PI workshop. After the workshop, 37 respondents reported the workshop as valuable both personally and for the perioperative committee (P < 0.001), and all reported that PI methodology could benefit the institution overall. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying stakeholders, holding a workshop to teach tools of PI, and establishing a committee for ongoing improvement, it is possible to implement quality improvement techniques at LMIC hospitals, which may be of future benefit. Sustainability in this project will be facilitated by tele mentoring, and future efforts include expansion beyond the perioperative setting.

Academic Global Surgery Curricula: Current Status and a Call for a More Equitable Approach.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to search the literature for global surgical curricula, assess if published resources align with existing competency frameworks in global health and surgical education, and determine if there is consensus around a fundamental set of competencies for the developing field of academic global surgery. METHODS: We reviewed SciVerse SCOPUS, PubMed, African Medicus Index, African Journals Online (AJOL), SciELO, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) and Bioline for manuscripts on global surgery curricula and evaluated the results using existing competency frameworks in global health and surgical education from Consortium of the Universities for Global Health (CUGH) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) professional competencies. RESULTS: Our search generated 250 publications, of which 18 were eligible: (1) a total of 10 reported existing competency-based curricula that were concurrent with international experiences, (2) two reported existing pre-departure competency-based curricula, (3) six proposed theoretical competency-based curricula for future global surgery education. All, but one, were based in high-income countries (HICs) and focused on the needs of HIC trainees. None met all 17 competencies, none cited the CUGH competency on "Health Equity and Social Justice" and only one mentioned "Social and Environmental Determinants of Health." Only 22% (n = 4) were available as open-access. CONCLUSION: Currently, there is no universally accepted set of competencies on the fundamentals of academic global surgery. Existing literature are predominantly by and for HIC institutions and trainees. Current frameworks are inadequate for this emerging academic field. The field needs competencies with explicit input from LMIC experts to ensure creation of educational resources that are accessible and relevant to trainees from around the world.

The Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions in Improving Surgical Infections and Mortality in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality in surgical systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain high compared to high-income countries. Quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure are essential in the effort to improve peri-operative outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies assessing quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure in developing country surgical systems was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they were conducted in an LMIC, occurred in a surgical setting, and measured the effect of an implementation and its impact. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were rates of rates of hospital-acquired infection (HAI) and surgical site infections (SSI). Prospero Registration: CRD42020171542. RESULT: Of 38,273 search results, 31 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis, and 28 articles were included in a meta-analysis. Implementation of multimodal bundled interventions reduced the incidence of HAI by a relative risk (RR) of 0.39 (95%CI 0.26 to 0.59), the effect of hand hygiene interventions on HAIs showed a non-significant effect of RR of 0.69 (0.46-1.05). The WHO Safe Surgery Checklist reduced mortality by RR 0.68 (0.49 to 0.95) and SSI by RR 0.50 (0.33 to 0.63) and antimicrobial stewardship interventions reduced SSI by RR 0.67 (0.48-0.93). CONCLUSION: There is evidence that a number of quality improvement processes, interventions and structural changes can improve mortality, HAI and SSI outcomes in the peri-operative setting in LMICs.

Effectiveness of Quality Improvement Processes, Interventions, and Structure in Trauma Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trauma mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains high compared to high-income countries. Quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure are essential in the effort to decrease trauma mortality. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies assessing quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure in developing country trauma systems was conducted from November 1989 to August 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they were conducted in an LMIC population according to World Bank Income Classification, occurred in a trauma setting, and measured the effect of implementation and its impact. The primary outcome was trauma mortality. RESULTS: Of 37,575 search results, 30 studies were included from 15 LMICs covering five WHO regions in a qualitative synthesis. Twenty-seven articles were included in a meta-analysis. Implementing a pre-hospital trauma system reduced overall trauma mortality by 45% (risk ratio (RR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.75). Training first responders resulted in an overall decrease in mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.78). In-hospital trauma training with certified courses resulted in a reduction of mortality (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.78). Trauma audits and trauma protocols resulted in varying improvements in trauma mortality. CONCLUSION: There is evidence that quality improvement processes, interventions, and structure can improve mortality in the trauma systems in LMICs.

Potentially Avertable Child Mortality Associated with Surgical Workforce Scale-up in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Global Study.

BACKGROUND: Expansion of access to surgical care can improve health outcomes, although the impact that scale-up of the surgical workforce will have on child mortality is poorly defined. In this study, we estimate the number of child deaths potentially avertable by increasing the surgical workforce globally to meet targets proposed by the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. METHODS: To estimate the number of deaths potentially avertable through increases in the surgical workforce, we used log-linear regression to model the association between surgeon, anesthetist and obstetrician workforce (SAO) density and surgically amenable under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), infant mortality rate (IMR), and neonatal mortality rate (NMR) for 192 countries adjusting for potential confounders of childhood mortality, including the non-surgical workforce (physicians, nurses/midwives, community health workers), gross national income per capita, poverty rate, female literacy rate, health expenditure per capita, percentage of urban population, number of surgical operations, and hospital bed density. Surgically amenable mortality was determined using mortality estimates from the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation adjusted by the proportion of deaths in each country due to communicable causes unlikely to be amenable to surgical care. Estimates of mortality reduction due to upscaling surgical care to support the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery (LCoGS) minimum target of 20-40 SAO/100,000 were calculated accounting for potential increases in surgical volume associated with surgical workforce expansion. RESULTS: Increasing SAO workforce density was independently associated with lower surgically amenable U5MR as well as NMR (p < 0.01 for each model). When accounting for concomitant increases in surgical volume, scale-up of the surgical workforce to 20-40 SAO/100,000 could potentially prevent between 262,709 (95% CI 229,643-295,434) and 519,629 (465,046-573,919) under 5 deaths annually. The majority (61%) of deaths averted would be neonatal deaths. CONCLUSION: Scale up of surgical workforce may substantially decrease childhood mortality rates around the world. Our analysis suggests that scale-up of surgical delivery through increase in the SAO workforce could prevent over 500,000 children from dying before the age of 5 annually. This would represent significant progress toward meeting global child mortality reduction targets.

Inclusion of Children's Surgery in National Surgical Plans and Child Health Programmes: the need and roadmap from Global Initiative for Children's Surgery.

About 1.7 billion children and adolescents, mostly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack access to surgical care. While some of these countries have developed surgical plans and others are in the process of developing theirs, children's surgery has not received the much-needed specific emphasis and focus in these plans. With the significant burden of children's surgical conditions especially in low- and middle-income countries, universal health coverage and the United Nations' (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) will not be achieved without deliberate efforts to scale up access to children's surgical care. Inclusion of children's surgery in National Surgical Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) can be done using the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery (GICS)-modified Children's Surgical Assessment Tool (CSAT) tool for baseline assessment and the Optimal Resources for Children Surgical Care (OReCS) as a foundational tool for implementation.

Online action planning forums to develop a roadmap to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the delivery of global children's surgical care.

PURPOSE: We aimed to understand the challenges facing children's surgical care providers globally and realistic interventions to mitigate the catastrophic impact of COVID-19 on children's surgery. METHODS: Two online Action Planning Forums (APFs) were organized by the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery (GICS) with a geographically diverse panel representing four children's surgical, anesthesia, and nursing subspecialties. Qualitative analysis was performed to identify codes, themes, and subthemes. RESULTS: The most frequently reported challenges were delayed access to care for children; fear among the public and patients; unavailability of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE); diversion of resources toward COVID-19 care; and interruption in student and trainee hands-on education. To address these challenges, panelists recommended human resource and funding support to minimize backlog; setting up international, multi-center studies for systematic data collection specifically for children; providing online educational opportunities for trainees and students in the form of large and small group discussions; developing best practice guidelines; and, most importantly, adapting solutions to local needs. CONCLUSION: Identification of key challenges and interventions to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on global children's surgery via an objective, targeted needs assessment serves as an essential first step. Key interventions in these areas are underway.

A Survey of Perceptions of Surgical Trainees on Feedback During Training in West Africa.

BACKGROUND: Feedback has become an integral part of learning within the medical profession, particularly as training becomes more trainees'-centered. Feedback from the trainees about their training and trainers is essential for effective and high-quality training. The purpose of this survey was to evaluate trainees' perceptions on feedback on their postgraduate training and trainers in West Africa. METHODS: Cross-sectional self-administered written survey of junior and senior registrar attending the annual revision and update course of the West African College of Surgeons. Information sought included sociodemographic variables, perception on feedback, opportunity to give feedback, trainee-trainers relationship and their opinion on different aspects of the postgraduate program where they would like to give feedback. RESULTS: The response rate was 81.5% (66/81). Median age was 33 years. Sixty trainees (90.9%) were junior registrars. Sixty-four (97%) trainees would like to give feedback about their training and trainers. Only 18 (27.3%) trainees have had opportunity of giving feedback about their training. Most trainees (90.9%) would like to give feedback on patient care and learning environment; 89.4% would like to give feedback on their training curriculum and 87.9% would like to give feedback on their operating room experiences. Most trainees (81.8%) believed trainee feedback is of critical importance to training. With regard to trainees-trainer relationship, 39 (59.1%) trainees were either unsatisfied or reported just a fair relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that many of the trainees lack opportunity of giving feedback on their training but considered feedback critical to their training. Trainees would like to give feedback on patient care, curriculum, learning environment and operative room experience. Trainee feedback should be encouraged in surgical training in West Africa.

Globalization of national surgical, obstetric and anesthesia plans: the critical link between health policy and action in global surgery.

Efforts from the developed world to improve surgical, anesthesia and obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries have evolved from a primarily volunteer mission trip model to a sustainable health system strengthening approach as private and public stakeholders recognize the enormous health toll and financial burden of surgical disease. The National Surgical, Obstetric and Anesthesia Plan (NSOAP) has been developed as a policy strategy for countries to address, in part, the health burden of diseases amenable to surgical care, but these plans have not developed in isolation. The NSOAP has become a phenomenon of globalization as a broad range of partners - individuals and institutions - help in both NSOAP formulation, implementation and financing. As the nexus between policy and action in the field of global surgery, the NSOAP reflects a special commitment by state actors to make progress on global goals such as Universal Health Coverage and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This requires a continued global commitment involving genuine partnerships that embrace the collective strengths of both national and global actors to deliver sustained, safe and affordable high-quality surgical care for all poor, rural and marginalized people.

Infrastructure Expansion for Children's Surgery: Models That are Working.

Children's surgical care is cost-effective and can avert mortality and long-term disability in children, with ramifications throughout life not only for the patient, but for the extended family and community as well. Considering the current gaps and limited capacity for children's surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), it is clear that without expanding and scaling up the infrastructure, World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution 68/15 targets and child-related targets of Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Care are unlikely to be met by 2030. The most promising models to expand infrastructure are those that include ongoing partnerships and capacity building by educating and training local surgeons and healthcare professionals who will not only provide care for children, but who will train future generations of surgical providers as well. Efforts to improve infrastructure necessarily include raising the standard of children's surgical care at all levels of the healthcare system, which will hopefully be guided by National Surgical, Obstetrics, and Anesthesia Plans and by the Optimal Resources for Children's Surgery document. The private sector can be effectively engaged to fill infrastructure and service gaps that cannot be met by government budgets. Ultimately, success of any infrastructure expansion initiative depends on strong advocacy to allocate ample funding for children's surgical care.