Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 290
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(3): 600-603, 2024 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666412

RESUMEN

In a multihospital cohort study of 3392 patients, positive urinalysis parameters had poor positive predictive value for diagnosing urinary tract infection (UTI). Combined urinalysis parameters (pyuria or nitrite) performed better than pyuria alone for ruling out UTI. However, performance of all urinalysis parameters was poor in older women.


Asunto(s)
Piuria , Urinálisis , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/orina , Femenino , Urinálisis/métodos , Urinálisis/normas , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Piuria/diagnóstico , Piuria/orina , Estudios de Cohortes , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Nitritos/orina
2.
N Engl J Med ; 385(25): e90, 2021 12 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34551224

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prioritization of U.S. health care personnel for early receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), allowed for the evaluation of the effectiveness of these new vaccines in a real-world setting. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative case-control study involving health care personnel across 25 U.S. states. Cases were defined on the basis of a positive polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) or antigen-based test for SARS-CoV-2 and at least one Covid-19-like symptom. Controls were defined on the basis of a negative PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, regardless of symptoms, and were matched to cases according to the week of the test date and site. Using conditional logistic regression with adjustment for age, race and ethnic group, underlying conditions, and exposures to persons with Covid-19, we estimated vaccine effectiveness for partial vaccination (assessed 14 days after receipt of the first dose through 6 days after receipt of the second dose) and complete vaccination (assessed ≥7 days after receipt of the second dose). RESULTS: The study included 1482 case participants and 3449 control participants. Vaccine effectiveness for partial vaccination was 77.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.9 to 82.7) with the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) and 88.9% (95% CI, 78.7 to 94.2) with the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna); for complete vaccination, vaccine effectiveness was 88.8% (95% CI, 84.6 to 91.8) and 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3 to 98.4), respectively. Vaccine effectiveness was similar in subgroups defined according to age (<50 years or ≥50 years), race and ethnic group, presence of underlying conditions, and level of patient contact. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness were lower during weeks 9 through 14 than during weeks 3 through 8 after receipt of the second dose, but confidence intervals overlapped widely. CONCLUSIONS: The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were highly effective under real-world conditions in preventing symptomatic Covid-19 in health care personnel, including those at risk for severe Covid-19 and those in racial and ethnic groups that have been disproportionately affected by the pandemic. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).


Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/etnología , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Estados Unidos
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 62(6): e0014924, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690881

RESUMEN

We identified 23 cases of Mycobacterium immunogenum respiratory acquisition linked to a colonized plumbing system at a new hospital addition. We conducted a genomic and epidemiologic investigation to assess for clonal acquisition of M. immunogenum from hospital water sources and improve understanding of genetic distances between M. immunogenum isolates. We performed whole-genome sequencing on 28 M. immunogenum isolates obtained from August 2013 to July 2021 from patients and water sources on four intensive care and intermediate units at an academic hospital. Study hospital isolates were recovered from 23 patients who experienced de novo respiratory isolation of M. immunogenum and from biofilms obtained from five tap water outlets. We also analyzed 10 M. immunogenum genomes from previously sequenced clinical (n = 7) and environmental (n = 3) external control isolates. The 38-isolate cohort clustered into three clades with pairwise single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distances ranging from 0 to 106,697 SNPs. We identified two clusters of study hospital isolates in Clade 1 and one cluster in Clade 2 for which clinical and environmental isolates differed by fewer than 10 SNPs and had less than 0.5% accessory genome variation. A less restrictive combined threshold of 40 SNPs and 5% accessory genes reliably captured additional isolates that met clinical criteria for hospital acquisition, but 12 (4%) of 310 epidemiologically unrelated isolate pairs also met this threshold. Core and accessory genome analyses confirmed respiratory acquisition of multiple clones of M. immunogenum from hospital water sources to patients. When combined with epidemiologic investigation, genomic thresholds accurately distinguished hospital acquisition.


Asunto(s)
Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Humanos , Genoma Bacteriano , Hospitales , Agua Potable/microbiología , Mycobacterium/genética , Mycobacterium/clasificación , Mycobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Microbiología del Agua , Genómica , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Adulto
4.
J Urol ; 211(5): 690-698, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38330392

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with suspected UTIs are categorized into 3 clinical phenotypes based on current guidelines: no UTI, asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), or UTI. However, all patients may not fit neatly into these groups. Our objective was to characterize clinical presentations of patients who receive urine tests using the "continuum of UTI" approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a random sample of adult noncatheterized inpatient and emergency department encounters with paired urinalysis and urine cultures from 5 hospitals in 3 states between January 01, 2017, and December 31, 2019. Trained abstractors collected clinical (eg, symptom) and demographic data. A focus group discussion with multidisciplinary experts was conducted to define the continuum of UTI, a 5-level classification scheme that includes 2 new categories: lower urinary tract symptoms/other urologic symptoms and bacteriuria of unclear significance. The newly defined continuum of UTI categories were compared to the current UTI classification scheme. RESULTS: Of 220,531 encounters, 3392 randomly selected encounters were reviewed. Based on the current classification scheme, 32.1% (n = 704) had ASB and 53% (n = 1614) did not have a UTI. When applying the continuum of UTI categories, 68% of patients (n = 478) with ASB were reclassified as bacteriuria of unclear significance and 29% of patients (n = 467) with "no UTI" were reclassified to lower urinary tract symptoms/other urologic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest the need to reframe our conceptual model of UTI vs ASB to reflect the full spectrum of clinical presentations, acknowledge the diagnostic uncertainty faced by frontline clinicians, and promote a nuanced approach to diagnosis and management of UTIs.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriuria , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Humanos , Bacteriuria/diagnóstico , Bacteriuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Urinálisis , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
5.
J Med Virol ; 96(3): e29505, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465748

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels may serve as a correlate for immunity and could inform optimal booster timing. The relationship between antibody levels and protection from infection was evaluated in vaccinated individuals from the US National Basketball Association who had antibody levels measured at a single time point from September 12, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of infection within 90 days of serologic testing by antibody level (<250, 250-800, and >800 AU/mL1 ), adjusting for age, time since last vaccine dose, and history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals were censored on date of booster receipt. The analytic cohort comprised 2323 individuals and was 78.2% male, 68.1% aged ≤40 years, and 56.4% vaccinated (primary series) with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine. Among the 2248 (96.8%) individuals not yet boosted at antibody testing, 77% completed their primary vaccine series 4-6 months before testing and the median (interquartile range) antibody level was 293.5 (interquartile range: 121.0-740.5) AU/mL. Those with levels <250 AU/mL (adj hazard ratio [HR]: 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-3.7) and 250-800 AU/mL (adj HR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.98-2.4) had greater infection risk compared to those with levels >800 AU/mL. Antibody levels could inform individual COVID-19 risk and booster scheduling.


Asunto(s)
Baloncesto , COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales
6.
PLoS Biol ; 19(7): e3001333, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34252080

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 infections are characterized by viral proliferation and clearance phases and can be followed by low-level persistent viral RNA shedding. The dynamics of viral RNA concentration, particularly in the early stages of infection, can inform clinical measures and interventions such as test-based screening. We used prospective longitudinal quantitative reverse transcription PCR testing to measure the viral RNA trajectories for 68 individuals during the resumption of the 2019-2020 National Basketball Association season. For 46 individuals with acute infections, we inferred the peak viral concentration and the duration of the viral proliferation and clearance phases. According to our mathematical model, we found that viral RNA concentrations peaked an average of 3.3 days (95% credible interval [CI] 2.5, 4.2) after first possible detectability at a cycle threshold value of 22.3 (95% CI 20.5, 23.9). The viral clearance phase lasted longer for symptomatic individuals (10.9 days [95% CI 7.9, 14.4]) than for asymptomatic individuals (7.8 days [95% CI 6.1, 9.7]). A second test within 2 days after an initial positive PCR test substantially improves certainty about a patient's infection stage. The effective sensitivity of a test intended to identify infectious individuals declines substantially with test turnaround time. These findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 viral concentrations peak rapidly regardless of symptoms. Sequential tests can help reveal a patient's progress through infection stages. Frequent, rapid-turnaround testing is needed to effectively screen individuals before they become infectious.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , ARN Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Replicación Viral/genética , Esparcimiento de Virus/genética , Adulto , Atletas , Baloncesto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/virología , Convalecencia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Salud Pública/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/crecimiento & desarrollo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(8): 1459-1467, 2023 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36444485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are emerging pathogens increasingly implicated in healthcare facility-associated (HCFA) infections and outbreaks. We analyzed the performance of statistical process control (SPC) methods in detecting HCFA NTM outbreaks. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3 NTM outbreaks that occurred from 2013 to 2016 at a tertiary care hospital. The outbreaks consisted of pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) acquisition, cardiac surgery-associated extrapulmonary MABC infection, and a bronchoscopy-associated pseudo-outbreak of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). We analyzed monthly case rates of unique patients who had positive respiratory cultures for MABC, non-respiratory cultures for MABC, and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures for MAC, respectively. For each outbreak, we used these rates to construct a pilot moving average (MA) SPC chart with a rolling baseline window. We also explored the performance of numerous alternative control charts, including exponentially weighted MA, Shewhart, and cumulative sum charts. RESULTS: The pilot MA chart detected each outbreak within 2 months of outbreak onset, preceding actual outbreak detection by an average of 6 months. Over a combined 117 months of pre-outbreak and post-outbreak surveillance, no false-positive SPC signals occurred (specificity, 100%). Prospective use of this chart for NTM surveillance could have prevented an estimated 108 cases of NTM. Six high-performing alternative charts detected all outbreaks during the month of onset, with specificities ranging from 85.7% to 94.9%. CONCLUSIONS: SPC methods have potential to substantially improve HCFA NTM surveillance, promoting early outbreak detection and prevention of NTM infections. Additional study is needed to determine the best application of SPC for prospective HCFA NTM surveillance in other settings.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Humanos , Micobacterias no Tuberculosas , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/microbiología , Complejo Mycobacterium avium , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Atención a la Salud
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 77(7): 1043-1049, 2023 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37279965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two-step testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) aims to improve diagnostic specificity but may also influence reported epidemiology and patterns of treatment. Some providers fear that 2-step testing may result in adverse outcomes if C. difficile is underdiagnosed. METHODS: Our primary objective was to assess the impact of 2-step testing on reported incidence of hospital-onset CDI (HO-CDI). As secondary objectives, we assessed the impact of 2-step testing on C. difficile-specific antibiotic use and colectomy rates as proxies for harm from underdiagnosis or delayed treatment. This longitudinal cohort study included 2 657 324 patient-days across 8 regional hospitals from July 2017 through March 2022. Impact of 2-step testing was assessed by time series analysis with generalized estimating equation regression models. RESULTS: Two-step testing was associated with a level decrease in HO-CDI incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.53 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .48-.60]; P < .001), a similar level decrease in utilization rates for oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin (utilization rate ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, .58-.70]; P < .001), and no significant level (rate ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, .93-1.43]; P = .18) or trend (rate ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, .52-1.39]; P = .51) change in emergent colectomy rates. CONCLUSIONS: Two-step testing is associated with decreased reported incidence of HO-CDI, likely by improving diagnostic specificity. The parallel decrease in C. difficile-specific antibiotic use offers indirect reassurance against underdiagnosis of C. difficile infections still requiring treatment by clinician assessment. Similarly, the absence of any significant change in colectomy rates offers indirect reassurance against any rise in fulminant C. difficile requiring surgical management.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Humanos , Clostridioides , Estudios Longitudinales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención a la Salud
9.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e34-e41, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997795

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a considerable impact on US healthcare systems, straining hospital resources, staff, and operations. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact on healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) across different hospitals with varying level of infectious disease (ID) physician expertise, resources, and infrastructure is lacking. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort study included central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), and ventilator-associated events (VAEs) from 53 hospitals (academic and community) in Southeastern United States from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2021. Segmented negative binomial regression generalized estimating equations models estimated changes in monthly incidence rates in the baseline (01/2018-02/2020) compared to the pandemic period (03/2020-03/2021, further divided into three pandemic phases). RESULTS: CLABSIs and VAEs increased by 24% and 34%, respectively, during the pandemic period. VAEs increased in all phases of the pandemic, while CLABSIs increased in later phases of the pandemic. CDI trend increased by 4.2% per month in the pandemic period. On stratifying the analysis by hospital characteristics, the impact of the pandemic on healthcare-associated infections was more significant in smaller sized and community hospitals. CAUTIs did not change significantly during the pandemic across all hospital types. CONCLUSIONS: CLABSIs, VAEs, and CDIs increased significantly during the pandemic, especially in smaller community hospitals, most of which lack ID physician expertise. Future efforts should focus on better understanding challenges faced by community hospitals, strengthening the infection prevention infrastructure, and expanding the ID workforce, particularly to community hospitals.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Infecciones por Clostridium , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Hospitales Comunitarios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmisibles/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): 433-442, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36167851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sepsis guidelines recommend daily review to de-escalate or stop antibiotics in appropriate patients. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated an opt-out protocol to decrease unnecessary antibiotics in patients with suspected sepsis. METHODS: We evaluated non-intensive care adults on broad-spectrum antibiotics despite negative blood cultures at 10 US hospitals from September 2018 through May 2020. A 23-item safety check excluded patients with ongoing signs of systemic infection, concerning or inadequate microbiologic data, or high-risk conditions. Eligible patients were randomized to the opt-out protocol vs usual care. Primary outcome was post-enrollment antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Clinicians caring for intervention patients were contacted to encourage antibiotic discontinuation using opt-out language. If continued, clinicians discussed the rationale for continuing antibiotics and de-escalation plans. To evaluate those with zero post-enrollment DOT, hurdle models provided 2 measures: odds ratio of antibiotic continuation and ratio of mean DOT among those who continued antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 9606 patients screened, 767 (8%) were enrolled. Intervention patients had 32% lower odds of antibiotic continuation (79% vs 84%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], .47-.98). DOT among those who continued antibiotics were similar (ratio of means, 1.06; 95% CI, .88-1.26). Fewer intervention patients were exposed to extended-spectrum antibiotics (36% vs 44%). Common reasons for continuing antibiotics were treatment of localized infection (76%) and belief that stopping antibiotics was unsafe (31%). Thirty-day safety events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: An antibiotic opt-out protocol that targeted patients with suspected sepsis resulted in more antibiotic discontinuations, similar DOT when antibiotics were continued, and no evidence of harm. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03517007.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Sepsis , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
11.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(33): 20202-20210, 2020 08 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32747578

RESUMEN

In biology, it is often critical to determine the identity of an organism and phenotypic traits of interest. Whole-genome sequencing can be useful for this but has limited power for trait prediction. However, we can take advantage of the inherent information content of phenotypes to bypass these limitations. We demonstrate, in clinical and environmental bacterial isolates, that growth dynamics in standardized conditions can differentiate between genotypes, even among strains from the same species. We find that for pairs of isolates, there is little correlation between genetic distance, according to phylogenetic analysis, and phenotypic distance, as determined by growth dynamics. This absence of correlation underscores the challenge in using genomics to infer phenotypes and vice versa. Bypassing this complexity, we show that growth dynamics alone can robustly predict antibiotic responses. These findings are a foundation for a method to identify traits not easily traced to a genetic mechanism.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae/crecimiento & desarrollo , Enterobacteriaceae/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Microbiología Ambiental , Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Especificidad de la Especie , Factores de Tiempo
12.
JAMA ; 329(3): 244-252, 2023 01 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36648463

RESUMEN

Importance: Approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery will experience infection at or adjacent to the surgical incision site. Compared with patients undergoing surgery who do not have a surgical site infection, those with a surgical site infection are hospitalized approximately 7 to 11 days longer. Observations: Most surgical site infections can be prevented if appropriate strategies are implemented. These infections are typically caused when bacteria from the patient's endogenous flora are inoculated into the surgical site at the time of surgery. Development of an infection depends on various factors such as the health of the patient's immune system, presence of foreign material, degree of bacterial wound contamination, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Although numerous strategies are recommended by international organizations to decrease surgical site infection, only 6 general strategies are supported by randomized trials. Interventions that are associated with lower rates of infection include avoiding razors for hair removal (4.4% with razors vs 2.5% with clippers); decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures (0.8% with decolonization vs 2% without); use of chlorhexidine gluconate and alcohol-based skin preparation (4.0% with chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol vs 6.5% with povidone iodine plus alcohol); maintaining normothermia with active warming such as warmed intravenous fluids, skin warming, and warm forced air to keep the body temperature warmer than 36 °C (4.7% with active warming vs 13% without); perioperative glycemic control (9.4% with glucose <150 mg/dL vs 16% with glucose >150 mg/dL); and use of negative pressure wound therapy (9.7% with vs 15% without). Guidelines recommend appropriate dosing, timing, and choice of preoperative parenteral antimicrobial prophylaxis. Conclusions and Relevance: Surgical site infections affect approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients undergoing surgery and are associated with longer hospital stays than patients with no surgical site infections. Avoiding razors for hair removal, maintaining normothermia, use of chlorhexidine gluconate plus alcohol-based skin preparation agents, decolonization with intranasal antistaphylococcal agents and antistaphylococcal skin antiseptics for high-risk procedures, controlling for perioperative glucose concentrations, and using negative pressure wound therapy can reduce the rate of surgical site infections.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Etanol/uso terapéutico , Glucosa , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(11): 1986-1992, 2022 06 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34460904

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few groups have formally studied the effect of dedicated antibiotic stewardship rounds (ASRs) on antibiotic use (AU) in intensive care units (ICUs). METHODS: We implemented weekly ASRs using a 2-arm, cluster-randomized, crossover study in 5 ICUs at Duke University Hospital from November 2017 to June 2018. We excluded patients without an active antibiotic order, or if they had a marker of high complexity including an existing infectious disease consult, transplantation, ventricular assist device, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. AU during and following ICU stay for patients with ASRs was compared to the controls. We recorded the number of reviews, recommendations delivered, and responses. We evaluated change in ICU-specific AU during and after the study. RESULTS: Our analysis included 4683 patients: 2330 intervention and 2353 controls. Teams performed 761 reviews during ASRs, which excluded 1569 patients: 60% of patients off antibiotics, and 8% complex patients. Exclusions affected 88% of cardiothoracic ICU (CTICU) patients. The AU rate ratio (RR) was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], .91-1.04). When CTICU was removed, the RR was 0.93 (95% CI, .89-.98). AU in the poststudy period decreased by 16% (95% CI, 11%-24%) compared to AU in the baseline period. Change in AU was differential among units: largest in the neurology ICU (-28%) and smallest in the CTICU (-2%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly multidisciplinary ASRs was a high-resource intervention associated with a small AU reduction. The noticeable ICU AU decline over time is possibly due to indirect effects of ASRs. Effects differed among specialty ICUs, emphasizing the importance of customizing ASRs to match unit-specific population, workflow, and culture.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cuidados Críticos , Estudios Cruzados , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e307-e309, 2022 08 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35023553

RESUMEN

We assessed environmental contamination of inpatient rooms housing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in a dedicated COVID-19 unit. Contamination with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was found on 5.5% (19/347) of surfaces via reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and 0.3% (1/347) of surfaces via cell culture. Environmental contamination is uncommon in hospitals rooms; RNA presence is not a specific indicator of infectious virus.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Técnicas de Cultivo , Contaminación Ambiental/análisis , Hospitales , Humanos , ARN Viral
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(4): 648-656, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34017999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shedding of Clostridioides difficile spores from infected individuals contaminates the hospital environment and contributes to infection transmission. We assessed whether antibiotic selection affects C. difficile shedding and contamination of the hospital environment. METHODS: In this prospective, unblinded, randomized controlled trial of hospitalized adults with C. difficile infection, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive fidaxomicin, oral vancomycin, or metronidazole. The primary outcome was change in environmental contamination rate during treatment. Secondary outcomes included stool shedding, total burden of contamination, and molecular relatedness of stool versus environmental C. difficile isolates. RESULTS: Of 33 patients enrolled, 31 (94%) completed the study. Fidaxomicin (-0.36 log10 colony-forming units [CFUs]/d [95% confidence interval (CI), -.52 to -.19]; P < .01) and vancomycin (-0.17 log10 CFUs/d [-.34 to -.01]; P = .05) were associated with more rapid decline in C. difficile shedding than metronidazole (-0.01 log10 CFUs/d [95% CI, -.10 to .08). Both vancomycin (6.3% [95% CI, 4.7-8.3) and fidaxomicin (13.1% [10.7-15.9]) were associated with lower rates of environmental contamination than metronidazole (21.4% [18.0-25.2]). With specific modeling of within-subject change over time, fidaxomicin (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, .70-.99]; P = .04) was associated with more rapid decline in environmental contamination than vancomycin or metronidazole. Overall, 207 of 233 environmental C. difficile isolates (88.8%) matched patient stool isolates by ribotyping, without significant difference by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Fidaxomicin, and to a lesser extent vancomycin, reduces C. difficile shedding and contamination of the hospital environment relative to metronidazole. Treatment choice may play a role in reducing healthcare-associated C. difficile transmission. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02057198.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Adulto , Aminoglicósidos/farmacología , Aminoglicósidos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clostridioides , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Fidaxomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metronidazol/farmacología , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(3): 503-511, 2022 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34739080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The impact of the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle (SEP-1) core measure on overall antibacterial utilization is unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter longitudinal cohort study with interrupted time-series analysis to determine the impact of SEP-1 implementation on antibacterial utilization and patient outcomes. All adult patients admitted to 26 hospitals between 1 October 2014 and 30 September 2015 (SEP-1 preparation period) and between 1 November 2015 and 31 October 2016 (SEP-1 implementation period) were evaluated for inclusion. The primary outcome was total antibacterial utilization, measured as days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days. RESULTS: The study cohort included 701 055 eligible patient admissions and 4.2 million patient-days. Overall antibacterial utilization increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (relative rate [RR], 1.02 per month [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.00-1.04]; P = .02). Cumulatively, the mean monthly DOT per 1000 patient-days increased 24.4% (95% CI, 18.0%-38.8%) over the entire study period (October 2014-October 2016). The rate of sepsis diagnosis/1000 patients increased 2% each month during SEP-1 preparation (RR, 1.02 per month [95% CI, 1.00-1.04]; P = .04). The rate of all-cause mortality rate per 1000 patients decreased during the study period (RR for SEP-1 preparation, 0.95 [95% CI, .92-.98; P = .001]; RR for SEP-1 implementation, .98 [.97-1.00; P = .01]). Cumulatively, the monthly mean all-cause mortality rate/1000 patients declined 38.5% (95% CI, 25.9%-48.0%) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Announcement and implementation of the CMS SEP-1 process measure was associated with increased diagnosis of sepsis and antibacterial utilization and decreased mortality rate among hospitalized patients.


Asunto(s)
Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Sepsis , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Medicaid , Medicare , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(9): 1682-1685, 2022 05 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34453431

RESUMEN

Findings are described in 7 patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reinfection from the National Basketball Association 2020-2021 occupational testing cohort, including clinical details, antibody test results, genomic sequencing, and longitudinal reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction results. Reinfections were infrequent and varied in clinical presentation, viral dynamics, and immune response.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Reinfección , Investigación
18.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(8): 299-305, 2022 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35202355

RESUMEN

During December 2021, the United States experienced a surge in COVID-19 cases, coinciding with predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant (1). During this surge, the National Football League (NFL) and NFL Players Association (NFLPA) adjusted their protocols for test-to-release from COVID-19 isolation on December 16, 2021, based on analytic assessments of their 2021 test-to-release data. Fully vaccinated* persons with COVID-19 were permitted to return to work once they were asymptomatic or fever-free and experiencing improving symptoms for ≥24 hours, and after two negative or high cycle-threshold (Ct) results (Ct≥35) from either of two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests† (2). This report describes data from NFL's SARS-CoV-2 testing program (3) and time to first negative or Ct≥35 result based on serial COVID-19 patient testing during isolation. Among this occupational cohort of 173 fully vaccinated adults with confirmed COVID-19 during December 14-19, 2021, a period of Omicron variant predominance, 46% received negative test results or had a subsequent RT-PCR test result with a Ct≥35 by day 6 postdiagnosis (i.e., concluding 5 days of isolation) and 84% before day 10. The proportion of persons with positive test results decreased with time, with approximately one half receiving positive RT-PCR test results after postdiagnosis day 5. Although this test result does not necessarily mean these persons are infectious (RT-PCR tests might continue to return positive results long after an initial positive result) (4), these findings indicate that persons with COVID-19 should continue taking precautions, including correct and consistent mask use, for a full 10 days after symptom onset or initial positive test result if they are asymptomatic.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Cuarentena , Volver al Deporte , Reinserción al Trabajo , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Atletas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Fútbol Americano , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 31(5): 511-518, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35225407

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rapid COVID-19 testing platforms can identify infected individuals at the point of care (POC), allowing immediate isolation of infected individuals and reducing the risk of transmission. While lab-based nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is often considered the gold standard to detect SARS-CoV-2 in the community, results typically take 2-7 days to return, rendering POC testing a critical diagnostic tool for infection control. The National Football League (NFL) and NFL Players Association deployed a new POC testing strategy using a newly available reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) rapid test during the 2020 season, and evaluated diagnostic effectiveness compared to other available devices using real-world population surveillance data. METHODS: RT-PCR POC test results were compared to NAAT results from same-day samples by calculation of positive and negative concordance. Sensitivity analyses were performed for three subgroups: (1) individuals symptomatic at time of positive test; (2) individuals tested during the pilot phase of rollout; and (3) individuals tested daily. RESULTS: Among 4989 same-day POC/NAAT pairs, 4957 (99.4%) were concordant, with 93.1% positive concordance and 99.6% negative concordance. Based on adjudicated case status, the false negative rate was 0.2% and false positive rate was 2.9%. In 43 instances, the immediate turnaround of results by POC allowed isolation of infected individuals 1 day sooner than lab-based testing. Positive/negative concordance in sensitivity analyses were relatively stable. CONCLUSION: RT-PCR POC testing provided timely results that were highly concordant with lab-based NAAT in population surveillance. Expanded use of effective RT-PCR POC can enable rapid isolation of infected individuals and reduce COVID-19 infection in the community.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
20.
Ann Intern Med ; 174(8): 1081-1089, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125571

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence to understand effective strategies for surveillance and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 is limited. OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of a rigorous, large-scale COVID-19 testing and monitoring program. DESIGN: The U.S. National Football League (NFL) and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) instituted a large-scale COVID-19 monitoring program involving daily testing using 2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) platforms (Roche cobas and Thermo Fisher QuantStudio), a transcription-mediated amplification platform (Hologic Panther), and an antigen point-of-care (aPOC) test (Quidel Sofia). SETTING: 32 NFL clubs in 24 states during the 2020 NFL season. PARTICIPANTS: NFL players and staff. MEASUREMENTS: SARS-CoV-2 test results were described in the context of medically adjudicated status. Cycle threshold (Ct) values are reported when available. RESULTS: A total of 632 370 tests administered across 11 668 persons identified 270 (2.4%) COVID-19 cases from 1 August to 14 November 2020. Positive predictive values ranged from 73.0% to 82.0% across the RT-PCR platforms. High Ct values (33 to 37) often indicated early infection. For the first positive result, the median Ct value was 32.77 (interquartile range, 30.02 to 34.72) and 22% of Ct values were above 35. Among adjudicated COVID-19 cases tested with aPOC, 42.3% had a negative result. Positive concordance between aPOC test result and adjudicated case status increased as viral load increased. LIMITATIONS: Platforms varied by laboratory, and test variability may reflect procedural differences. CONCLUSION: Routine RT-PCR testing allowed early detection of infection. Cycle threshold values provided a useful guidepost for understanding results, with high values often indicating early infection. Antigen POC testing was unable to reliably rule out COVID-19 early in infection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The NFL and the NFLPA.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Fútbol Americano , Salud Laboral , COVID-19/epidemiología , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Incidencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA