Acute Headache in Adults: A Diagnostic Approach.

A detailed history and physical examination can distinguish between key features of a benign primary headache and concerning symptoms that warrant further evaluation for a secondary headache. Most headaches that are diagnosed in the primary care setting are benign. Among primary headache disorders, tension-type headache is the most common, although a migraine headache is more debilitating and likely to present in the primary care setting. Signs such as predictable timing, sensitivity to smells or sounds, family history of migraine, recurrent sinus headache, or recurrent severe headaches with a normal neurologic examination could indicate migraine headache. Evaluating acute headaches using a systematic framework such as the SNNOOP10 mnemonic can help detect life-threatening secondary causes of headaches. Red flag signs or symptoms such as acute thunderclap headache, fever, meningeal irritation on physical examination, papilledema with focal neurologic signs, impaired consciousness, and concern for acute glaucoma warrant immediate evaluation. For emergent evaluations, noncontrast computed tomography of the head is recommended to exclude acute intracranial hemorrhage or mass effect. A lumbar puncture is also needed to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage if the scan result is normal. For less urgent cases, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is preferred for evaluating headaches with concerning features. Primary headache disorders without red flags or abnormal examination findings do not need neuroimaging.

Acute Coronary Syndrome.

One percent of primary care visits are due to chest pain. It is critical for the primary care physician to have a high index of suspicion for acute coronary syndrome and understand the management of this important condition. This article reviews the outpatient evaluation and management of chest pain and summarizes the key points of inpatient evaluation and treatment of acute coronary syndrome.

Personal Protective Equipment for COVID-19 and Beyond: Occupational and Environmental Exposure Considerations in Primary Care.

In this reflection piece, the authors describe a hypertension follow-up visit and draw attention to an often overlooked aspect of a patient's health: their occupational and environmental history. For years, physicians and clinicians have understood and treated disease secondary to conspicuously harmful environmental exposures; the impacts of everyday exposures on patient health are less understood and appreciated. This article specifically addresses the critical question of how primary care physicians and clinicians can think about, and address, occupational and environmental health hazards in their assessment and treatment of chronic disease in patients. We present 3 strategies that primary care physicians and clinicians can adopt to better account for environmental and occupational risks: good history taking, advising or advocacy, and education.

Perinatal OUD Treatment Provider Understandings of Rural Patients' Experiences.

OBJECTIVES: To present perspectives of substance use treatment providers offering perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in a largely rural, Appalachian region. To demonstrate the extent to which providers sought to understand their patients' experiences accessing treatment and how this understanding informed providers' approach to offering patient-centered care. METHODS: A qualitative study combining semi-structured interviews and participant-observation with perinatal substance use treatment providers, conducted within a comprehensive program. Using purposive and opportunistic sampling with key informants (n = 10), a saturation sample was achieved. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory. RESULTS: Perinatal substance use treatment providers had a good understanding of their patients' experiences seeking treatment for opioid use disorder, including being aware of obstacles patients encountered. This understanding allowed providers to better address patients' needs in and out of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrated a good understanding of what their largely rural, Appalachian patients experienced when attempting to access perinatal OUD treatment. This understanding may enable more patient-centered care.