Infection site is predictive of outcome in acute lung injury associated with severe sepsis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is a leading cause of acute lung injury (ALI); however, the characteristics and outcome of sepsis-associated ALI are poorly understood. We aimed to elucidate factors that predict patient outcome in sepsis-associated ALI. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study was performed. RESULTS: Among 624 patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, 251 (40.2%) fulfilled the definition of American-European Consensus Conference definition of ALI. All-cause 28-day and in-hospital mortalities were 30.7% and 38.6%, respectively. More than 40% of ALI patients had neurological, cardiovascular and haematological dysfunctions or disseminated intravascular coagulation, all of which were associated with higher mortality. We report a significant correlation between infection site and mortality in patients with ALI, but not in those without ALI. The proportion of ALI was significantly higher in pulmonary sepsis; further, a complication of ALI was associated with higher mortality in sepsis from pulmonary and other sources, but not in abdominal sepsis. Among the other sepsis sites, urinary tract, central nervous system, catheter-related and undetermined foci of infection had worse outcomes when associated with ALI. None of the individual severe sepsis bundles, including fluid resuscitation and early antibiotic administration, correlated with mortality. Compliance with a set of sepsis management bundles was associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSION: In severe sepsis and septic shock, the proportion and effect on outcome was not uniform among infection sites. The infection site was predictive of outcome in patients with ALI but not in those without ALI.

Epidemiology of severe sepsis in Japanese intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study.

Severe sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in Japanese ICUs. The patients were registered at 15 general critical care centers in Japanese tertiary care hospitals when diagnosed as having severe sepsis. Of 14,417 patients, 624 (4.3%) were diagnosed with severe sepsis. Demographic and clinical characteristics at enrollment (Day 1), physiologic and blood variables on Days 1 and 4, and mortality were evaluated. Mean age was 69.0 years, and initial mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 23.4 and 8.6, respectively. The 28-day mortality was 23.1%, and overall hospital mortality was 29.5%. SOFA score and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score were consistently higher in nonsurvivors than survivors on Days 1 and 4. SOFA score, DIC score on Days 1 and 4, and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without septic shock. SOFA score on Days 1 and 4 and hospital mortality were higher in patients with than without DIC. Logistic regression analyses showed age, presence of septic shock, DIC, and cardiovascular dysfunction at enrollment to be predictors of 28-day mortality and presence of comorbidity to be an additional predictor of hospital mortality. Presence of septic shock or DIC resulted in approximately twice the mortality of patients without each factor, whereas the presence of comorbidity may be a significant predictor of delayed mortality in severe sepsis.

A multicenter, prospective evaluation of quality of care and mortality in Japan based on the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.

To elucidate the standard Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines-based quality of care and mortality related to severe sepsis in Japan, we conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study using a new web-based database between June 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011. A total of 1104 patients with severe sepsis were enrolled from 39 Japanese emergency and critical care centers. All-cause hospital mortality was 29.3% in patients with severe sepsis and 40.7% in patients with septic shock. Pulmonary, renal, hepatic, and hematological dysfunctions were associated with significantly higher mortality, and hematological dysfunction, especially coagulopathy, was associated with the highest odds ratio for mortality. Compliance with severe sepsis bundles in our study was generally low compared with that in a previous international sepsis registry study, and glycemic control was associated with lowest odds ratio for mortality. Despite higher complication rates of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and low compliance with severe sepsis bundles on the whole, mortality in our study was similar to that in the international sepsis registry study. From these results, we concluded that our prospective multicenter study was successful in evaluating SSC guidelines-based standard quality of care and mortality related to severe sepsis in Japan. Although mortality in Japan was equivalent to that reported worldwide in the above-mentioned international sepsis registry study, compliance with severe sepsis bundles was low. Thus, there is scope for improvement in the initial treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in Japanese emergency and critical care centers.

The impact of body temperature abnormalities on the disease severity and outcome in patients with severe sepsis: an analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Abnormal body temperatures (Tb) are frequently seen in patients with severe sepsis. However, the relationship between Tb abnormalities and the severity of disease is not clear. This study investigated the impact of Tb on disease severity and outcomes in patients with severe sepsis. METHODS: We enrolled 624 patients with severe sepsis and grouped them into 6 categories according to their Tb at the time of enrollment. The temperature categories (≤ 35.5 °C, 35.6-36.5 °C, 36.6-37.5 °C, 37.6-38.5 °C, 38.6-39.5 °C, ≥ 39.6 °C) were based on the temperature data of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring. We compared patient characteristics, physiological data, and mortality between groups. RESULTS: Patients with Tb of ≤ 36.5 °C had significantly worse sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores when compared with patients with Tb >37.5 °C on the day of enrollment. Scores for APACHE II were also higher in patients with Tb ≤ 35.5 °C when compared with patients with Tb >36.5 °C. The 28-day and hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients with Tb ≤ 36.5 °C. The difference in mortality rate was especially noticeable when patients with Tb ≤ 35.5 °C were compared with patients who had Tb of >36.5 °C. Although mortality did not relate to Tb ranges of ≥ 37.6 °C as compared to reference range of 36.6-37.5 °C, relative risk for 28-day mortality was significantly greater in patients with 35.6-36.5 °C and ≤ 35.5 °C (odds ratio; 2.032, 3.096, respectively). When patients were divided into groups based on the presence (≤ 36.5 °C, n = 160) or absence (>36.5 °C, n = 464) of hypothermia, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) as well as SOFA and APACHE II scores were significantly higher in patients with hypothermia. Patients with hypothermia had significantly higher 28-day and hospital mortality rates than those without hypothermia (38.1% vs. 17.9% and 49.4% vs. 22.6%, respectively). The presence of hypothermia was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality, and the differences between patients with and without hypothermia were observed irrespective of the presence of septic shock. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe sepsis, hypothermia (Tb ≤ 36.5 °C) was associated with increased mortality and organ failure, irrespective of the presence of septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR ID UMIN000008195.

A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: To validate the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scoring system in patients with severe sepsis, we conducted a multicenter, prospective study at 15 critical care centers in tertiary care hospitals. METHODS: This study included 624 severe sepsis patients. JAAM DIC was scored on the day of diagnosis of severe sepsis (day 1) and day 4. Scores for disease severity and organ dysfunction were also evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of JAAM DIC was 46.8% (292/624), and 21% of the DIC patients were scored according to the reduction rate of platelets. The JAAM DIC patients were more seriously ill and exhibited more severe systemic inflammation, a higher prevalence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and worse outcomes than the non-DIC patients. Disease severity, systemic inflammation, MODS and the mortality rate worsened in accordance with an increased JAAM DIC score on day 1. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated lower 1-year survival in the JAAM DIC patients than in those without DIC (log-rank test P<0.001). The JAAM DIC score on day 1 (odds ratio=1.282, P<0.001) and the Delta JAAM DIC score (odds ratio=0.770, P<0.001) were independent predictors of 28-day death. Dynamic changes in the JAAM DIC score from days 1 to 4 also affected prognoses. The JAAM DIC scoring system included all patients who met the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt DIC criteria on day 1. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system missed a large number of nonsurvivors recognized by the JAAM scoring system. CONCLUSIONS: The JAAM DIC scoring system exhibits good prognostic value in predicting MODS and poor prognosis in patients with severe sepsis and can detect more patients requiring treatment. Conducting repeated daily JAAM scoring increases the ability to predict the patient's prognosis.

Impact of serum glucose levels on disease severity and outcome in patients with severe sepsis: an analysis from a multicenter, prospective survey of severe sepsis.

Aim: To determine whether glycemic abnormality and pre-existing diabetes are associated with disease severity and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Methods: Six hundred and nineteen patients with severe sepsis were grouped into four categories according to their blood glucose levels (<100, 100-199, 200-299, and ≥300 mg/dL). We compared disease severity and mortality between glycemic categories. In addition, we examined whether there was any relationship with pre-existing diabetes status. Results: There were no significant differences in disseminated intravascular coagulation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, or Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and mortality rates between patients with or without pre-existing diabetes. However, in patients without pre-existing diabetes, those with blood glucose level <100 mg/dL had higher disseminated intravascular coagulation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores than those with levels of 100-299 mg/dL. In addition, those with level ≥300 mg/dL had a higher hospital mortality rate than those with levels of 100-199 mg/dL (odds ratio = 4.837). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a blood glucose level ≥300 mg/dL is an independent predictor of hospital mortality in these patients. In contrast, no significant differences among severity scores or mortality were observed in patients with pre-existing diabetes. Conclusions: In patients with severe sepsis, the impact of glycemic abnormality on disease severity and hospital mortality depends on the pre-existing diabetes status. Specifically, a blood glucose level ≥300 mg/dL may be associated with increased mortality in patients without pre-existing diabetes.