Risk of Tuberculosis Disease in People With Chronic Kidney Disease Without Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney failure is an established risk factor for tuberculosis (TB), but little is known about TB risk in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who have not initiated kidney replacement therapy (CKD without kidney failure). Our primary objective was to estimate the pooled relative risk of TB disease in people with CKD stages 3-5 without kidney failure compared with people without CKD. Our secondary objectives were to estimate the pooled relative risk of TB disease for all stages of CKD without kidney failure (stages 1-5) and by each CKD stage. METHODS: This review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42022342499). We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies published between 1970 and 2022. We included original observational research estimating TB risk among people with CKD without kidney failure. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to obtain the pooled relative risk. RESULTS: Of the 6915 unique articles identified, data from 5 studies were included. The estimated pooled risk of TB was 57% higher in people with CKD stages 3-5 than in people without CKD (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.22-2.03; I2 = 88%). When stratified by CKD stage, the pooled rate of TB was highest in stages 4-5 (incidence rate ratio: 3.63; 95% CI: 2.25-5.86; I2 = 89%). CONCLUSIONS: People with CKD without kidney failure have an increased relative risk of TB. Further research and modeling are required to understand the risks, benefits, and CKD cutoffs for screening people for TB with CKD prior to kidney replacement therapy.

High-dose rifamycins in the treatment of TB: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in using high-dose rifamycin (HDR) regimens in TB treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HDR regimens remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing HDR to standard-dose rifamycin (SDR) regimens. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies comparing daily therapy with HDRs to SDRs. Rifamycins included rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Our primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs), with secondary outcomes of death, all adverse events, SAE by organ and efficacy outcomes of 2-month culture conversion and relapse. This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020142519). RESULTS: We identified 9057 articles and included 13 studies with 6168 participants contributing 7930 person-years (PY) of follow-up (HDR: 3535 participants, 4387 PY; SDR: 2633 participants, 3543 PY). We found no significant difference in the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SAE between HDR and SDR (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.23, I 2=41%). There was no significant difference when analysis was limited to SAE possibly, probably or likely medication-related (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41, I 2=0%); studies with low risk of bias (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, I 2=44%); or studies using rifampicin (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0. 0.75-1.32, I 2=38%). No significant differences were noted in pooled outcomes of death, 2-month culture conversion and relapse. CONCLUSIONS: HDRs were not associated with a significant difference in SAEs, 2-month culture conversion or death. Further studies are required to identify specific groups who may benefit from HDR.

Poor outcome after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of patients with unclassified inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.

Classification of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFSs) according to clinical and genetic diagnoses enables proper adjustment of treatment. Unfortunately, 30% of patients enrolled in the Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry (CIMFR) with features suggesting hereditability could not be classified with a specific syndromic diagnosis. We analyzed the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in unclassified IBMFSs (uIBMFSs) and the factors associated with outcome. Twenty-two patients with uIBMFSs and 70 patients with classified IBMFSs underwent HSCT. Five-year overall survival of uIBMFS patients after HSCT was inferior to that of patients with classified IBMFSs (56% vs 76.5%). The outcome of patients with uIBMFS who received cord blood was significantly lower than that of patients who received other stem cell sources (14.8% vs 90.9%). Engraftment failure was higher among patients with uIBMFS who received cord blood than those who received bone marrow. None of the following factors were significantly associated with poor survival: transfusion load, transplant indication, the intensity of conditioning regimen, human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling/alternative donor. We suggest that identifying the genetic diagnosis is essential to modulate the transplant procedure including conditioning agents and stem cell sources for better outcome and the standard cord blood transplantation (CBT) should be avoided in uIBMFS.

Prevalence, imaging patterns and risk factors of interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) with substantial variability in prevalence and outcomes reported across CTD subtypes. This systematic review summarises the prevalence, risk factors and ILD patterns on chest computed tomography of CTD-ILD. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in Medline and Embase to identify eligible studies. Meta-analyses were completed using a random effects model to determine the pooled prevalence of CTD-ILD and ILD patterns. RESULTS: 11 582 unique citations were identified with 237 articles included. Pooled prevalence of ILD was 11% in rheumatoid arthritis (95% CI 7-15%), 47% in systemic sclerosis (44-50%), 41% in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (33-50%), 17% in primary Sjögren's syndrome (12-21%), 56% in mixed connective tissue disease (39-72%) and 6% in systemic lupus erythematosus (3-10%). Usual interstitial pneumonia was the most prevalent ILD pattern in rheumatoid arthritis (pooled prevalence of 46%), while nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was the most common ILD pattern in all other CTD subtypes (pooled prevalence range 27-76%). Across all CTDs with available data, positive serology and higher inflammatory markers were risk factors for development of ILD. DISCUSSION: We identified substantial variability in ILD across CTD subtypes suggesting that CTD-ILD is too heterogenous to be considered a single entity.