Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology.

BACKGROUND: Many cancer patients in phase I clinical trials are treated at doses of chemotherapeutic agents that are below the biologically active level, thus reducing their chances for therapeutic benefit. Current phase I trials often take a long time to complete and provide little information about interpatient variability or cumulative toxicity. PURPOSE: Our objective was to develop alternative designs for phase I trials so that fewer patients are treated at subtherapeutic dose levels, trials are of reduced duration, and important information (i.e., cumulative toxicity and maximum tolerated dose) needed to plan phase II trials is obtained. METHODS: We fit a stochastic model to data from 20 phase I trials involving the study of nine different drugs. We then simulated new data from the model with the parameters estimated from the actual trials and evaluated the performance of alternative phase I designs on this simulated data. Four designs were evaluated. Design 1 was a conventional design (similar to the commonly used modified Fibonacci method) using cohorts of three to six patients, with 40% dose-step increments and no intrapatient dose escalation. Designs 2 through 4 included only one patient per cohort until one patient experienced dose-limiting toxic effects or two patients experienced grade 2 toxic effects (during their first course of treatment for designs 2 and 3 or during any course of treatment for design 4). Designs 3 and 4 used 100% dose steps during this initial accelerated phase. After the initial accelerated phase, designs 2 through 4 resorted to standard cohorts of three to six patients, with 40% dose-step increments. Designs 2 through 4 used intrapatient dose escalation if the worst toxicity is grade 0-1 in the previous course for that patient. RESULTS: Only three of the actual trials demonstrated cumulative toxic effects of the chemotherapeutic agents in patients. The average number of patients required for a phase I trial was reduced from 39.9 for design 1 to 24.4, 20.7, and 21.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients who would be expected to have grade 0-1 toxicity as their worst toxicity over three cycles of treatment is 23.3 for design 1, but only 7.9, 3.9, and 4.8 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients with grade 3 toxicity as their worst toxicity increases from 5.5 for design 1 to 6.2, 6.8, and 6.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The average number of patients with grade 4 toxicity as their worst toxicity increases from 1.9 for design 1 to 3.0, 4.3, and 3.2 for designs 2, 3, and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Accelerated titration (i.e., rapid intrapatient drug dose escalation) designs appear to effectively reduce the number of patients who are under-treated, speed the completion of phase I trials, and provide a substantial increase in the information obtained.

New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Anticancer cytotoxic agents go through a process by which their antitumor activity-on the basis of the amount of tumor shrinkage they could generate-has been investigated. In the late 1970s, the International Union Against Cancer and the World Health Organization introduced specific criteria for the codification of tumor response evaluation. In 1994, several organizations involved in clinical research combined forces to tackle the review of these criteria on the basis of the experience and knowledge acquired since then. After several years of intensive discussions, a new set of guidelines is ready that will supersede the former criteria. In parallel to this initiative, one of the participating groups developed a model by which response rates could be derived from unidimensional measurement of tumor lesions instead of the usual bidimensional approach. This new concept has been largely validated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group and integrated into the present guidelines. This special article also provides some philosophic background to clarify the various purposes of response evaluation. It proposes a model by which a combined assessment of all existing lesions, characterized by target lesions (to be measured) and nontarget lesions, is used to extrapolate an overall response to treatment. Methods of assessing tumor lesions are better codified, briefly within the guidelines and in more detail in Appendix I. All other aspects of response evaluation have been discussed, reviewed, and amended whenever appropriate.

Prospective evaluation of a model for predicting etoposide plasma protein binding in cancer patients.

Etoposide protein binding in cancer patients is variable and has been related mathematically to a linear model consisting of serum albumin and total bilirubin [percentage unbound = (1.4 x total bilirubin) - (6.8 x albumin) + 34.4]. In this prospective evaluation of the model, plasma samples were obtained following the administration of etoposide in 31 patients, and the unbound percentage (% unbound) of etoposide in plasma was determined by equilibrium dialysis. The mean measured % unbound was 15.3 +/- 11.6 (SD), and the mean model predicted % unbound was 16.7 +/- 10.1. The relation between predicted and measured etoposide % unbound was highly correlated (r2 = 0.92, P = 0.001). The model was precise but with a slight bias toward overpredicting % unbound (mean prediction error, 1.36%; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 2.6%). In patients with abnormal total bilirubin (i.e., greater than 1.5 mg/dl) or with hypoalbuminemia (i.e., less than 3.3 g/dl), the model was both precise and unbiased. These results demonstrate that etoposide % unbound can be predicted using serum albumin and total bilirubin. This model should be useful in prospectively identifying patients at increased risk of experiencing altered pharmacological effects due to altered protein binding of etoposide.

A phase I study of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil plus calcium leucovorin in combination with N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.

Preclinical studies suggest that the biochemical effects of N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA), an inhibitor of aspartate carbamoyltransferase (ACTase), may increase the metabolic activation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and enhance its cytotoxicity through both RNA- and DNA-directed mechanisms. In this Phase I trial, 22 evaluable patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract were entered at escalating doses of 5-FU starting at 1150 mg/m2/day given as a concurrent 72-h i.v. infusion with a fixed dose of leucovorin (LCV), 500 mg/m2/day. The dose of 5-FU was escalated within patients according to individual tolerance, and then PALA at 250 mg/m2 was added 24 h prior to the initiation of the 5-FU/LCV infusion of the subsequent cycle. Dose-limiting mucositis and myelosuppression occurred during the initial cycle in 3 of 5 patients treated with 2300 mg/m2/day 5-FU; therefore, the recommended dose of 5-FU with concurrent LCV is 2000 mg/m2/day. Twenty-seven additional patients were then treated with escalating doses of PALA ranging from 375 to 2848 mg/m2, i.v., followed 24 h later by 2000 mg/m2/day 5-FU with high-dose LCV. Dose-limiting mucositis and myelosuppression occurred during the initial cycle in 2 of 3 patients entered at 2848 mg/m2 PALA. Dose-limiting mucositis and skin rash ultimately required both PALA and 5-FU dose reductions in 4 of 6 patients treated with 1899 mg/m2 PALA. Toxicity was similar, however, in patients receiving PALA at doses ranging from 375 to 1266 mg/m2. The mean steady-state plasma concentration of 5-FU at 2000 mg/m2/day was 6.5 +/- 0.9 microM; patients with 5-FU levels > 9 microM had a significantly higher incidence of serious gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity. Compared to each patient's own baseline, a significant trend for decreasing ACTase activity with increasing PALA dose was evident using cytosol isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells 24 h after PALA treatment (P2 = 0.01). PALA < or = 844 mg/m2 failed to appreciably inhibit ACTase activity at 24 h in most patients; furthermore, a decrease in ACTase activity by > 50% from baseline was seen in only 29% of cycles. More consistent inhibition of ACTase activity was seen with PALA > or = 1266 mg/m2. Even with the highest PALA doses, however, ACTase activity returned to baseline by 96 h in most patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Unpredicted clinical pharmacology of UCN-01 caused by specific binding to human alpha1-acid glycoprotein.

The pharmacokinetics of UCN-01 after administration as a 72- or 3-h infusion to cancer patients in initial Phase I trials displayed distinctive features that could not have been predicted from preclinical data. The distribution volumes (0.0796-0.158 liters/kg) and the systemic clearance (0.0407-0.252 ml/h/kg) were extremely low, in contrast to large distribution volume and rapid systemic clearance in experimental animals. The elimination half-lives (253-1660 h) were unusually long. In vitro protein binding experiments demonstrated that UCN-01 was strongly bound to human alpha1-acid glycoprotein. The results suggest that unusual pharmacokinetics of UCN-01 in humans could be due, at least in part, to its specifically high binding to alpha1-acid glycoprotein.

Clinical applications of the camptothecins.

The camptothecin topoisomerase I-targeting agents are new class of antitumor drugs with demonstrated clinical activity in human malignancies, such as colorectal cancer and ovarian cancer. Currently, irinotecan and topotecan are the most widely used camptothecin analogs in clinical use and clinical trials are ongoing to better characterize their spectra of clinical activity, to determine their optimal schedules of administration and to define their use in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Newer camptothecin analogs in clinical development, such as 9-aminocamptothecin, 9-nitrocamptothecin, GI147211 and DX-8951f, are also being studied to determine if they have improved toxicity and efficacy profiles compared with existing analogs. Other potential clinical applications include the use of camptothecin derivatives as radiation sensitizers or as antiviral agents. The successful development of the camptothecins as antitumor agents highlights the importance of topoisomerase I as a target for cancer chemotherapy.

Fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in previously untreated patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: results of a phase II trial.

Forty-two previously untreated patients with advanced, measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with weekly fluorouracil (5-FU; 600 mg/m2 intravenous [IV]) and leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. A median of 11 (range, one to 76) doses were given. There were three partial responses (three of 42 [7%]; exact 95% confidence interval, 1% to 19%) and no complete responses. Median survival was 6.2 months, with seven patients surviving longer than 12 months. The most common toxicity was diarrhea; there was one treatment-related death. Despite promising results in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, this dose schedule of 5-FU and leucovorin does not appear to be superior to 5-FU alone for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Alternative investigative approaches are needed.

Changes in the clearance of total and unbound etoposide in patients with liver dysfunction.

The disposition of total and non-protein-bound etoposide was investigated in 21 cancer patients receiving etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy. Etoposide plasma concentrations were determined using a specific high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, and etoposide plasma protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. The patients had a wide range of renal function (creatinine clearance, 32 to 159 mL/min/m2) and hepatic function (total bilirubin range, 0.3 to 21.5 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase [AST] range, 14 to 415 IU/L; serum albumin range, 2.7 to 4.1 g/dL). The mean etoposide total systemic clearance was not different in 15 patients with total bilirubin less than 1.0 mg/dL versus six patients with total bilirubin 1.1 to 21.5 mg/dL (18.7 +/- 5.9 mL/min/m2 v 26.4 +/- 10.7 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .06), with a trend toward higher total clearance in the patients with abnormal bilirubin values. However, the mean clearance of unbound etoposide was significantly lower in patients with increased total bilirubin (220 +/- 90 mL/min/m2 v 135 +/- 61 mL/min/m2; t-test P = .027). The fraction of etoposide unbound (fu) in plasma was significantly higher in patients with increased bilirubin (9% +/- 3% v 27% +/- 15%; t-test P = .002), explaining the trend toward higher total clearance in these patients. Etoposide clearance (total or unbound) in the 14 patients with measurable hepatic metastases was not different from the clearance in the seven patients without hepatic metastases. This study provides an explanation for why patients with increased bilirubin do not have lower total systemic clearance of etoposide, and indicates that such patients have a higher exposure to unbound etoposide. The results of ongoing pharmacodynamic studies of total and unbound etoposide in patients with increased bilirubin will determine the clinical relevance of altered etoposide protein binding.

Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: are new approaches needed?

Preclinical data suggest that some new anticancer agents directed at novel targets demonstrate tumor growth inhibition but not tumor shrinkage. Such cytostatic agents may offer clinical benefits for patients in the absence of tumor shrinkage. In addition, lower doses of some of these agents may be just as effective as higher doses, implying that toxicity may not be an ideal end point for dose finding. Because of these factors, the sequence and design of traditional phase I, II, and III trials used for cytotoxic agents (which typically shrink tumors and in a dose-dependent manner) may not be appropriate for cytostatic agents. This article discusses options for modifying trial designs to accommodate cytostatic agents. Examples are given where these options have been tried or are currently being tried. Recommendations given for choosing among the trial designs depend on what is known preclinically about the agents (eg, does one have a validated and reproducible biologic end point that can be used to guide a dose escalation?), what is known about the patient population being studied (eg, does one have a well-documented historical progression-free survival rate at 1 year for comparison with the experience of the new agent?), and the numbers of agents and patients available for participation in trials. Planned and ongoing trials will test the utility of some of these new approaches.

Phase I and pharmacologic studies of intraperitoneal leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer.

Many patients with gastrointestinal (GI) tumors develop extensive peritoneal and serosal metastasis and/or malignant ascites which respond poorly to available treatments. Twelve patients with tumors confined primarily to the intraabdominal cavity were treated with intraperitoneal (IP) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in escalating concentrations (2 to 4 mmol/L) in combination with leucovorin (dl-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid or folinic acid; dl-CF) in a 2-L volume, either by eight consecutive four-hour dwells or once daily for five days. CF dose was 20.8 or 104 mumol/L. Nine of the patients had pancreatic carcinoma, one had stomach carcinoma, and two had hepatobiliary neoplasms. Median age was 62.5 years and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 3. Toxicity included mucositis, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, leucopenia, skin rash, and abdominal pain, and was similar to that previously reported for IP 5-FU used as a single agent. Four episodes of peritonitis occurred, but all patients responded to antibiotics. At the 20.8 mumol/L dose, dl-CF concentration in the peritoneal fluid declined from 10.4 +/- 3.0 3.0 mumol/L at one hour to 4.9 +/- 2.2 mumol/L at four hours, corresponding to a mean absorption half-life of 127 +/- 49 minutes and a mean peritoneal clearance of 13.0 +/- 4.5 mL/min. Decline was biphasic in all but five of the 19 exchanges evaluated. The levels of l-CF (biologically active isomer of dl-CF) were 2.8 +/- 2.5 mumol/L after 60 minutes and 1.2 +/- 0.7 mumol/L after four hours. The peritoneal area under the concentration v time curve (AUC) for 5-FU increased proportionally with dose. For example, the AUC at 2.0 and 3.5 mmol/L was 129 +/- 25 and 201 +/- 23 mmol/L X minute, respectively. However, the maximal peritoneal to plasma AUC ratio was 461 at the 2 mmol/L dose, but decreased with increasing doses as systemic clearance decreased. This regimen was well tolerated in patients with advanced cancer, but must be evaluated further to determine its clinical efficacy.

Phase II trial of 9-aminocamptothecin administered as a 72-hour continuous infusion in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The camptothecin derivative irinotecan has demonstrated clinical activity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma in both chemotherapy-naive and fluorouracil-refractory patients. 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC; NSC 603071), another camptothecin derivative, was selected for clinical development based on preclinical activity, including cures in human tumor xenografts resistant to standard anticancer agents. We report a phase II trial of 9-AC in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Colorectal cancer patients with measurable disease, a performance status of 0 to 2 (Zubrod), and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received 9-AC. A cycle of therapy was 35 microg/m2/h for 72 consecutive hours (840 microg/m2/d for 3 days) and rest on days 4 to 14; a course of therapy was defined as two cycles (28 days). Patients were assessed for response after two courses. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this trial. No complete or partial responses were noted. Treatment was well tolerated; toxic effects consisted mainly of neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, fatigue, and anemia. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity was limited to neutropenia (grade 3 in four patients and grade 4 in six), anemia (grade 3 in two patients), and vomiting (grade 3 in two patients). No grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred. Only two patients had their 9-AC dose reduced to 30 microg/m2/h. The median nadir absolute granulocyte count (AGC) was 1,500/microL. The median number of courses given was two and the median time to disease progression was 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: At the dose and schedule used in this trial, 9-AC lacked antitumor activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. 9-AC infusion schedules of longer duration are currently being investigated in this disease.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor given in combination with fluorouracil plus calcium leucovorin in metastatic gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities and potential for dose escalation of intravenous (IV) bolus fluorouracil (5-FU) given with 500 mg/m2/d leucovorin (LCV) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients received escalating doses of 5-FU/LCV on days 1 to 5 with subcutaneous GM-CSF either 5 or 10 micrograms/kg/d starting on day 6 or 3 micrograms/kg/d starting on day 1. 5-FU was escalated from 370 mg/m2/d by 15% increments between patient cohorts and within patients according to tolerance. RESULTS: With GM-CSF starting on day 6, dose-limiting toxicity occurred during cycle no. 1 in all three patients entered at 5-FU 490 mg/m2/d. However, individual patients tolerated 5-FU doses up to 644 mg/m2/d. When all cycles were analyzed, grade 3 to 4 mucositis and grade 4 granulocytopenia complicated < or = 15% and < or = 6% of cycles with 5-FU doses < or = 560 mg/m2/d (115 cycles). With GM-CSF starting on day 1, dose-limiting granulocytopenia occurred during cycle no. 1 in five of 10 patients entered at 5-FU 490 mg/m2/d. Although the granulocyte nadirs were significantly lower at each 5-FU dose level with the concurrent GM-CSF schedule (eg, 490 mg/m2/d: median, 879/microL v3,286/microL; two-tailed P [P2] < .001), dose-limiting granulocytopenia complicated < or = 16% of cycles with 5-FU < or = 560 mg/m2/d (99 cycles); > or = grade 3 mucositis occurred in < or = 20% of cycles. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was unusual with either GM-CSF schedule. Most patients treated with GM-CSF > or = 5 micrograms/kg/d required dose reductions for constitutional toxicity; 3.0 to 3.8 micrograms/kg/d was better tolerated. Venous thrombosis occurred in 17% of patients (concurrent v sequential GM-CSF, 29% v 5%; P2 = .08). The median delivered 5-FU dose-intensity for GM-CSF starting either on day 6 or on day 1 was 615 and 647 mg/m2/wk (P2 = .41), respectively. Pharmacologic exposure to 5-FU increased with higher doses of 5-FU, and concurrent GM-CSF administration did not affect 5-FU clearance. CONCLUSION: A starting dose of 425 mg/m2/d of 5-FU with LCV on days 1 to 5 could be safely combined with GM-CSF starting either on day 1 or day 6, with further 5-FU dose escalation according to individual tolerance.

Etoposide pharmacokinetics in patients with normal and abnormal organ function.

Precise guidelines for dose modification of etoposide in patients with hepatic dysfunction have not been determined. Etoposide pharmacokinetics were determined in 17 patients. Nine patients had bilirubin less than or equal to 1 mg/dL and eight had bilirubin ranging from 1.9 to 23 mg/dL. Twelve patients received etoposide 100 mg/m2 days 1, 3, and 5, in combination with cisplatin 70 mg/m2 or iproplatin 225 mg/m2 on day 1. Five patients received only one dose of etoposide. Etoposide was measured using a published high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method which also quantitates picro etoposide and its hydroxy acid. Systemic clearance, Vdss and t1/2 beta averaged (+/- SD) 21.4 (+/- 7.4) mL/min/m2, 10.7 (+/- 4.1) L/m2, and 8.1 (+/- 2.8) hours in the nine patients with bilirubin less than or equal to 1 mg/dL, and 22.4 (+/- 9.6) mL/min/m2, 13.6 (+/- 11.3) L/m2, and 8.4 (+/- 3.9) hours in the eight patients with bilirubin 1.9 to 23.0 mg/dL. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of liver and renal function tests and other patient-specific variables identified creatinine clearance as the strongest predictor of etoposide systemic clearance (r2 = 40.8). Serum albumin was identified as the next strongest predictor, improving the r2 to 57.3%. Cumulative biliary excretion of unchanged etoposide and glucuronide or sulfate conjugates over 48 hours accounted for less than 3% of the dose in six patients studied. Toxicity occurred in patients with normal and abnormal bilirubin and was unrelated to etoposide clearance. Patients with total bilirubin 1.9 to 23 mg/dL, but creatinine clearance greater than 30 mL/min/m2 had etoposide clearance within the range for patients with normal liver function (16.8 to 35 mL/min/m2). Although these patients did not have reduced etoposide clearance, the major routes of etoposide non-renal elimination remain to be clearly defined. Additional patients should be evaluated to establish more precise guidelines for dosing etoposide in patients with abnormal liver function.

A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose intravenous leucovorin in gastric carcinoma.

Twenty-eight patients with advanced measurable gastric carcinoma were treated with leucovorin (dl-CF; folinic acid; dl-5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid) 500 mg/m2 administered as a two-hour infusion and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) push midinfusion. Treatment was administered weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. Twelve of them had received previous combination chemotherapy that included 5-FU. Median age was 59 years, and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 2. Three patients had partial responses and two of them had been treated previously with 5-FU. Twelve patients had stable disease. Five of these patients had subjective improvement with improved performance status and/or decreased dysphagia. The 95% confidence interval for response is 3% to 32%. Median survival time for all 28 patients enrolled in the study was 22 weeks. Toxicity was moderate and consisted primarily of diarrhea. Myelosuppression, skin rash, and increased lacrimation also occurred. Plasma concentrations of the active reduced folates, I-CF and 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (5-CH3FH4), were greater than the 10 mumol/L levels that potentiate 5-FU activity in in vitro models, for more than four hours in all five patients in whom pharmacokinetics were studied. 5-FU and high-dose dl-CF has activity in patients with gastric carcinoma including patients who had previously progressed on 5-FU-containing combinations. Further study in a larger patient population is necessary to determine the usefulness of this regimen in gastric carcinoma.

Phase II study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and interferon alfa-2a in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To test the activity of a regimen of interferon alfa-2a (IFN alpha-2a) 5 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously (SC) days 1 through 7 combined with leucovorin 500 mg/m2/d intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes and fluorouracil (5-FU) 370 mg/m2/d through IV push 1 hour after leucovorin days 2 through 6 in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with a good performance status (PS) with measurable colorectal cancer and no prior therapy for metastatic disease were entered. Cycles were repeated at 3-week intervals if toxicity had resolved. The 5-FU dose was increased by 15% if toxicity was mild, and decreased by 15% for grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Three complete responses (CRs) and 21 partial responses (PRs) were seen among 44 assessable patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 39% to 70%). A moderately strong association was noted between PS and response: PS O (n = 26), two CRs and 15 PRs (65%); PS 1 (n = 13), one CR and six PRs (54%); PS 2 (n = 5), zero CRs and zero PRs (0%; two-tailed P = .026). With a median follow-up duration of 18.8 months, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and survival were 7.8 months and 16.3 months, respectively. Doses were escalated to 425 mg/m2/d 5-FU in 10 patients, but only four tolerated the higher dose. When expressed as the most severe degree of toxicity experienced by each patient across all cycles, grade 3 to 4 toxicity of the following types was observed; mucositis, 37%; diarrhea, 40%; rash, 7%; fatigue, 14%; granulocytopenia, 13%. Dose-limiting toxicity at 370 mg/m2/d 5-FU eventually occurred in 28 patients (61%). Twelve patients (26%) required an IFN alpha-2a dose reduction for constitutional toxicity. CONCLUSION: This regimen has promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer, particularly in patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 0 to 1.

Fluorouracil modulation in colorectal cancer: lack of improvement with N -phosphonoacetyl- l -aspartic acid or oral leucovorin or interferon, but enhanced therapeutic index with weekly 24-hour infusion schedule--an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

PURPOSE: To investigate mechanism-directed regimens in maximizing the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced colorected cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Based on promising phase II data, a randomized comparison of various methods for the biochemical modulation of 5-FU was undertaken in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The control group received single-agent 5-FU as a 24-hour infusion weekly. Patients (N = 1,120) with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized to one of the following arms: arm A, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion, weekly; arm B, N-phosphonoacetyl-l-aspartic acid 250 mg/m2 day l, 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion day 2, weekly; arm C, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with oral leucovorin (LV) 125 mg/m2 hourly for the preceding 4 hours, weekly; arm D, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 with intravenous (IV) LV 600 mg/m2, weekly; arm E, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/d IV by continuous infusion for 5 days, then 750 mg/m2 weekly, and recombinant interferon alfa-2a 9 million units subcutaneously three times weekly. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. RESULTS: Of the 1,098 assessable patients, 57% had measurable disease. The toxicity of all the regimens was tolerable. Grade 4 or worse toxicity occurred in 11%, 11%, 30%, 24%, and 22% on each arm, respectively; diarrhea was the most common adverse effect. These toxicity patterns favored significantly (P <.001) the 24-hour infusion arms. Median survival (months) by arm was A, 14.8; B, 11.9; C, 13.5; D, 13.6; and E, 15.2. These survival durations did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a weekly infusion regimen of 5-FU is significantly less toxic than and as effective as 5-FU bolus regimens modulated by either LV or interferon in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Phase I trial of continuous infusion flavopiridol, a novel cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in patients with refractory neoplasms.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, flavopiridol (National Service Center [NSC] 649890), to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacology of flavopiridol given as a 72-hour infusion every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with refractory malignancies with prior disease progression were treated with flavopiridol, with first-cycle pharmacokinetic sampling. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients defined our first MTD, 50 mg/m2/d x 3 with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of secretory diarrhea at 62.5 mg/kg/d x 3. Subsequent patients received antidiarrheal prophylaxis (ADP) to define a second MTD, 78 mg/m2/d x 3 with DLT of hypotension at 98 mg/m2/d x 3. Other toxicities included a proinflammatory syndrome with alterations in acute-phase reactants, particularly at doses >50 mg/ m2/d x 3, which in some patients prevented chronic therapy every 2 weeks. In some patients, ADP was not successful, requiring dose-deescalation. Although approximately 70% of patients displayed predictable flavopiridol pharmacology, we observed unexpected interpatient variability and postinfusion peaks in approximately 30% of cases. At the two MTDs, we achieved a mean plasma flavopiridol concentration of 271 nM (50 mg/m2/d x 3) and 344 nM (78 mg/m2/d x 3), respectively. One partial response in a patient with renal cancer and minor responses (n=3) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, colon, and renal cancer occurred. CONCLUSION: The MTD of infusional flavopiridol is 50 mg/m2/d x 3 with dose-limiting secretory diarrhea at 62.5 mg/m2/d x 3. With ADP, 78 mg/m2/d x 3 was the MTD, with dose-limiting hypotension at 98 mg/m2/d x 3. Based on chronic tolerability, 50 mg/m2/d x 3 is the recommended phase II dose without ADP. Antitumor effect was observed in certain patients with renal, prostate, and colon cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Concentrations of flavopiridol (200 to 400 nM) needed for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition in preclinical models were achieved safely.

Phase I trial of 72-hour continuous infusion UCN-01 in patients with refractory neoplasms.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the novel protein kinase inhibitor, UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine), administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion (CIV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with refractory neoplasms received UCN-01 during this phase I trial. Total, free plasma, and salivary concentrations were determined; the latter were used to address the influence of plasma protein binding on peripheral tissue distribution. The phosphorylation state of the protein kinase C (PKC) substrate alpha-adducin and the abrogation of DNA damage checkpoint also were assessed. RESULTS: The recommended phase II dose of UCN-01 as a 72-hour CIV is 42.5 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days. Avid plasma protein binding of UCN-01, as measured during the trial, dictated a change in dose escalation and administration schedules. Therefore, nine patients received drug on the initial 2-week schedule, and 38 received drug on the recommended 4-week schedule. DLTs at 53 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days included hyperglycemia with resultant metabolic acidosis, pulmonary dysfunction, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. Pharmacokinetic determinations at the recommended dose of 42.5 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days included mean total plasma concentration of 36.4 microM (terminal elimination half-life range, 447 to 1176 hours), steady-state volume of distribution of 9.3 to 14.2 L, and clearances of 0.005 to 0.033 L/h. The mean total salivary concentration was 111 nmol/L of UCN-01. One partial response was observed in a patient with melanoma, and one protracted period ( > 2.5 years) of disease stability was observed in a patient with alk-positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Preliminary evidence suggests UCN-01 modulation of both PKC substrate phosphorylation and the DNA damage-related G(2) checkpoint. CONCLUSION: UCN-01 can be administered safely as an initial 72-hour CIV with subsequent monthly doses administered as 36-hour infusions.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a 72-hour infusion of 9-aminocamptothecin in adult cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) infused over 72 hours at doses of 5 to 74 micrograms/m2/h. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 9-AC lactone and total (lactone plus carboxylate) plasma concentrations were measured in 44 patients with solid tumors using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay. Fifteen patients underwent extended pharmacokinetic sampling to determine the distribution and elimination kinetics of 9-AC. RESULTS: At steady-state, 8.7% +/- 4.7% (mean +/- SD) of the total drug circulated in plasma as the active 9-AC lactone. Clearance of 9-AC lactone was uniform (24.5 +/- 7.3 L/h/m2) over the entire dose range examined; however, total 9-AC clearance was nonlinear and increased at higher dose levels. In 15 patients treated at dose levels > or = 47 micrograms/m2/h, the volume of distribution at steady-state for 9-AC lactone was 195 +/- 114 L/m2 and for total 9-AC it was 23.6 +/- 10.6 L/m2. The elimination half-life was 4.47 +/- 0.53 hours for 9-AC lactone and 8.38 +/- 2.10 hours for total 9-AC. In pharmacodynamic studies, dose-limiting neutropenia correlated with steady-state lactone concentrations (Css) R2 = .77) and drug dose (R2 = .71). CONCLUSION: Plasma 9-AC concentrations rapidly declined to low levels following the end of a 72-hour infusion and the mean fraction of total 9-AC circulating in plasma as the active lactone was less than 10%. The pharmacokinetics of 9-AC may have a great impact on its clinical activity and should be considered in the design of future clinical trials of this topoisomerase I inhibitor.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of irinotecan administered as a 96-hour infusion weekly to adult cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacologic study of a weekly 96-hour infusion of irinotecan to determine the maximum-tolerated dose, define the toxicity profile, and characterize the clinical pharmacology of irinotecan and its metabolites. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 26 adult patients with solid tumors, the duration and dose rate of infusion were escalated in new patients until toxicity was observed. RESULTS: In 11 patients who were treated with irinotecan at 12.5 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days weekly for 2 of 3 weeks, dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients. The recommended phase II dose is 10 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days given weekly for 2 of 3 weeks. At this dose, the steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of total SN-38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan) was 6.42 +/- 1.10 nmol/L, and the Css of total irinotecan was 28.60 +/- 17.78 nmol/L. No patient experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia during any cycle. All other toxicities were mild to moderate. The systemic exposure to SN-38 relative to irinotecan was greater than anticipated, with a molar ratio of the area under the concentration curve (AUC) of SN-38 to irinotecan of 0.24 +/- 0.08. One objective response lasting 12 months in duration was observed in a patient with metastatic colon cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan of 10 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days weekly for 2 of 3 weeks was extremely well tolerated. Further efficacy testing of this pharmacologic strategy of administering intermittent low doses of irinotecan is warranted.