Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 767, 2018 Jul 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30055585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers and women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have even poorer survival from it. We assessed the prognosis of ovarian cancer in women with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin, other forms of antidiabetic medication, or statins. METHODS: Study cohort consisted of women with T2D diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Finland 1998-2011. They were identified from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM), being linked to several national registers. Patients were grouped according to their medication in the three years preceding ovarian cancer diagnosis. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to describe cumulative mortality from ovarian cancer and from other causes in different medication groups. Mortality rates were analysed by Cox models, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated in relation to the use of different forms of medication. Main outcome measures were death from ovarian cancer and death from other causes. RESULTS: During the accrual period 421 newly diagnosed ovarian cancers were identified in the FinDM database. No evidence was found for any differences in mortality from ovarian cancer or other causes between different antidiabetic medication groups. Pre-diagnostic use of statins was observed to be associated with decreased mortality from ovarian cancer compared with no such use (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are inconclusive as regards the association between metformin and ovarian cancer survival. However, some evidence was found for improved prognosis of ovarian cancer with pre-diagnostic statin use, requiring cautious interpretation, though.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 636-641, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645427

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To gain further evidence of an association between the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) and the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 92,366 women with newly diagnosed T2D was obtained from a diabetes register (FinDM). 590 endometrioid ECs were observed during the follow-up time. Poisson regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the endometrioid EC in relation to the use of metformin, other oral ADM, insulin and statins. Nested case-control analyses were performed, where up to 20 controls were matched for age and duration of DM for each EC case. The HRs were estimated by conditional logistic regression for never/ever and cumulative use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the case-control analyses the use of metformin (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.51) and other oral ADM (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.04-1.50) was associated with an increased incidence of endometrioid EC compared to no ADM use. No difference was observed between metformin users and those using other oral ADMs. The use of statins was inversely related to the incidence of endometrioid EC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94). Results from the full cohort analysis supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the use of metformin or other oral forms of ADM was not associated with a lowered risk of endometrioid EC in women with T2D. Instead statins were observed to be inversely associated with endometrioid EC in this population.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución de Poisson , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Front Pharmacol ; 12: 621180, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34054515

RESUMEN

Preclinical studies have suggested statins have antiproliferative and anti-metastatic effects on endometrial cancer cells. Similarly, most previous epidemiological studies have reported a better prognosis of endometrial cancer in patients who used statins. In this study, we explored the role of statins in the prognosis of endometrial cancer in women with type 2 diabetes in a hospital-based cohort. This retrospective cohort consisted of 119 women with type 2 diabetes who were diagnosed and treated for endometrial cancer at Oulu University Hospital, Finland, between 2007 and 2014. The patients were classified as statin users (n = 58) and nonusers (n = 61) based on the type of medication they were using at the time of endometrial cancer diagnosis. Statin use showed no association with progression-free survival or overall survival in the whole cohort nor the subgroups with type I or type II histology, in lower or higher body mass index groups, or at an early or advanced stage. The results remained similar in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for the patient's age, cancer stage, and histology. Furthermore, statin use seemed not to have any association with most of the prognostic factors at the time of endometrial cancer diagnosis.

4.
Anticancer Res ; 41(2): 821-828, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preclinical studies on metformin use and endometrial cancer have been promising but epidemiological studies have reported variable results. This study aimed to assess if metformin use is associated with endometrial cancer aggressiveness and survival in women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective hospital-based cohort consisted of women with T2D who were treated for endometrial cancer at the Oulu University Hospital, Finland, between 2007 and 2014. RESULTS: The sample size was 121 patients: 58 metformin users and 63 metformin non-users. Intriguingly, type 2 histology, deep myometrial invasion and the presence of lymphovascular invasion were more common in the metformin user group. However, metformin use showed no association with overall survival and progression-free survival. CONCLUSION: Metformin use was associated with poorer prognostic factors in endometrial cancer patients with T2D.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
5.
Anticancer Res ; 38(7): 4169-4178, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29970546

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) in relation to the use of metformin, other antidiabetic medication (ADM) and statins in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to analyze the incidence and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC, two cohorts were obtained from a nationwide diabetes database (FinDM); 57 non-endometrioid ECs were observed in a cohort of 92,366 women with newly-diagnosed T2D during the follow-up (1996 to 2011) to assess the incidence, and a retrospective cohort of 105 women with T2D diagnosed with non-endometrioid EC (1998 to 2011) was used to estimate cumulative mortality from EC and other causes of death. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for EC incidence were estimated in the full-cohort analysis and in the nested case-control analysis, matched for age and duration of T2D. Cumulative mortality was estimated by using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Cause-specific mortality rates were analyzed by using Cox models regarding the pre-diagnostic use of different forms of ADM and statins. RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, the use of metformin was not associated with the risk of non-endometrioid EC (HR=1.09, 95% CI=0.59-2.00), whereas statin use was associated with a lower risk (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.26-0.84). The results from the full-cohort analysis supported these findings. Mortality from non-endometrioid EC was not different between users of metformin and other types of oral ADM (HR=1.56, 95% CI=0.40-6.07) but was observed to be lower in statin users (HR=0.41, 95% CI=0.20-0.82). CONCLUSION: Our findings were inconclusive regarding the association of metformin with the risk and prognosis of non-endometrioid EC. However, statin use was associated with a lower incidence and mortality from this disease.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA