Analogue assessment of child behavior problems.

The psychometric properties of analogue assessment measures of child behavior problems are reviewed. Analogue assessment refers to an observational measure of targeted behaviors that are elicited by simulated experimental conditions, which, in turn, are devised to approximate natural circumstances. For the most part, this assessment approach has been used sporadically in the clinical setting with children who are behaviorally disturbed. Lack of standardization of measures and inconsistent findings of ecological validity are among several concerns noted. The paucity of available data limits conclusions that can be drawn at this time about the role of analogue assessment in the evaluation and treatment of child behavior problems.

Detection of methadone, LAAM, and their metabolites by methadone immunoassays.

l-Alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) was recently approved as a substitute for methadone. LAAM, methadone, and their common metabolite, methadol, are extensively N-demethylated. The structural similarities of LAAM and its metabolites to methadone suggest that they may cross-react in methadone immunoassays. To test this hypothesis, drug-free urine was fortified with LAAM, norLAAM, dinorLAAM, methadol, normethadol, dinormethadol, methadone, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), or 2-ethyl-5-methyl-3,3-diphenylpyrroline (EMDP) at 12 concentrations (0.03 to 100 microg/mL). Samples were analyzed using two enzyme immunoassays (Behring Diagnostics, EIA-b; Diagnostic Reagents, EIA-d); a fluorescent polarization immunoassay (Abbott, FPIA); two enzyme-linked immunosorbant immunoassays (Diagnostix, ELISA-d; STC Technologies, ELISA-s); a kinetic microparticles in solution immunoassay (Roche Diagnostic Systems, KIMS); and a radioimmunoassay (Diagnostic Products, RIA). LAAM had high cross-reactivity with ELISA-d (318.3%), RIA (249.5%), EIA-d (100.8%), KIMS (91.1%), and ELISA-s (75.3%). Methadol also displayed relatively high cross-reactivity as follows: EIA-d (97.8%), KIMS (85.4%), ELISA-d (70.3%), and FPIA (37.7%). Successive N-demethylations of LAAM and methadol were associated with loss of cross-reactivity. The methadone metabolites EDDP and EMDP showed little cross-reactivity. These findings suggest that LAAM use could result in positive immunoassay test results when using many of the commercially available methadone immunoassay kits and that confirmation of LAAM and its metabolites should be considered.

Responses to dural puncture during institution of combined spinal-epidural analgesia: a comparison of 27 gauge pencil-point and 27 gauge cutting-edge needles.

Pencil-point spinal needles are popular for combined spinal-epidural analgesia because they cause less dural puncture headache than cutting-edge spinal needles. However many parturients move, grimace, vocalise or experience paraesthesia or dysaesthesia during dural puncture when performing 'needle through needle' combined spinal-epidural analgesia. We compared dural puncture responses induced by pencil-point and cutting-edge needles (both 27 gauge). With institutional approval, 115 parturients presenting for elective caesarean section or labour analgesia were audited. After lignocaine infiltration, a Tuohy-type needle was inserted to loss of resistance to saline at a mid-lumbar interspace, and either a 27 gauge cutting-edge or 27 gauge pencil-point needle was inserted 'needle through needle' through the dura. During dural penetration, the occurrence of patient movement, grimacing or vocalisation was noted by a blinded observer, as was the patient's response to the question "Did you feel that?" asked by the anaesthetist. The audit comprised two similar groups of patients (caesarean section, n=30; labour analgesia, n=85). In both groups, grimacing and movement during thecal penetration occurred more frequently with pencil-point needles (P < 0.05 and P < 0.025, respectively). Pooled data analysis revealed that pencil-point and cutting-edge needles induced grimacing and movement in 17 (22%) and 2 (5%), spontaneous vocalisation in 4 (5%) and 1 (3%) and was perceived by 13 (17%) and 3 (8%) parturients (P < 0.025, P=NS, P=NS), respectively. Overall, 34 and 6 objective and subjective patient responses (P < 0.005) occurred when inserting these needles, respectively. Dural puncture by a 27 gauge pencil-point needle inserted 'needle through needle' when instituting combined spinal-epidural analgesia induces more iatrogenic responses than a 27 gauge cutting-edge needle.