RESUMEN
Bisphosphonates are recommended in patients with osteolytic lesions secondary to multiple myeloma. We report on the safety of bisphosphonate therapy with long-term follow-up in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX study. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomised to zoledronic acid (ZOL; 4 mg intravenously every 21-28 d) or clodronate (CLO; 1600 mg/d orally) plus chemotherapy. Among 1960 patients (5.9-year median follow-up), both bisphosphonates were well tolerated. Acute renal failure events were similar between groups (ZOL 5.2% vs. CLO 5.8% at 2 years; incidence plateaued thereafter). The overall incidence of confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was low, but higher with ZOL (ZOL 3.7% vs. CLO 0.5%; P < 0.0001). ONJ events were generally low grade and most occurred between 8 and 30 months (median time to ONJ, 23.7 months). Among 10 patients with ONJ recovery data, four patients in the ZOL group completely recovered, two patients improved, and three patients experienced no improvement; one CLO patient experienced no improvement. Dental surgery or trauma preceded ONJ in six ZOL patients. The incidence of renal adverse events was similar for ZOL and CLO. ONJ incidence remained low and was lower with CLO compared to ZOL. We have seen no further ONJ cases to date.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/etiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Ácido Clodrónico/efectos adversos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Ácido Clodrónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Clodrónico/uso terapéutico , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Osteólisis/epidemiología , Osteólisis/etiología , Osteólisis/prevención & control , Ácido ZoledrónicoRESUMEN
Osteolytic bone disease is a major cause of morbidity in patients with multiple myeloma. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma has increased substantially during the past decade. However the underlying mechanisms of bone destruction and the treatments available have, until recently, received relatively little specific attention. In this review, we provide an overview of the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin system; we describe its interaction with other cellular mechanisms, through which malignant plasma cells drive osteolysis, and explain how bisphosphonates can be used to block this action. We also review the supporting evidence for bisphosphonates as the treatment of choice for patients with bone complications related to multiple myeloma, and discuss possible developments for targeted therapy in the future.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/etiología , Huesos/metabolismo , Difosfonatos/farmacología , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteólisis/prevención & control , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Densidad Ósea , Neoplasias Óseas/metabolismo , Quimiocinas/metabolismo , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Ácido Clodrónico/farmacología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipercalcemia/prevención & control , Imidazoles/farmacología , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Osteólisis/etiología , Osteólisis/metabolismo , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácido ZoledrónicoRESUMEN
The t(4;14) translocation is found in approximately 10% of myeloma patients and results in the deregulation of at least two genes, MMSET and fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), with the formation of a fusion product between MMSET and the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus and overexpression of FGFR3. We have analysed a series of 80 patient samples, comprising 67 multiple myeloma (MM) cases and 13 monoclonalgammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) cases, using RT-PCR to detect IgH-MMSET fusions. The t(4;14) translocation was detected in 7/67 (10%) myeloma cases and all seven expressed FGFR3 which was not seen in t(4;14)-negative myeloma cases. In the MGUS cases, a similar proportion of t(4;14)-positive cases was found (2/13; 15%), but none of these expressed FGFR3. All patients with detectable FGFR3 expressed both the FGFR3 IIIb and FGFR3 IIIc isoforms, the result of alternative splicing in the ligand binding domain, and exon-deleted variants of FGFR3. We also identified a cryptic splice site in MMSET which results in a 277 amino acid deletion downstream of the breakpoint on der(4). FGFR3 mutation analysis revealed no mutations in the presenting myeloma or MGUS samples. However, we also had access to paired presentation and relapse samples which had been taken from a patient 13 months apart. Both samples had the t(4;14) translocation and overexpressed FGFR3, but only the relapse sample possessed the K650E mutation in the kinase domain of FGFR3. This suggests that targeted mutation in the translocated FGFR3 gene when under the control of the immunoglobulin promoters can occur and may provide one mechanism for disease progression.