RESUMEN
Background: Ceftriaxone is a commonly used antibiotic for the treatment of susceptible Enterobacterales infections. There is currently limited clinical data on the optimal dose of ceftriaxone for Enterobacterales bacteremia. Objectives: To evaluate the rate of clinical failure of ceftriaxone 1 g versus 2 g daily in patients with Enterobacterales bacteremia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to any of the 3 New York University Hospitals: Long Island, Tisch, or Brooklyn, with ceftriaxone-susceptible Enterobacterales bacteremia, receiving ceftriaxone 1 or 2 g daily from October 2019 to September 2020. The primary outcome was 90-day rate of clinical failure. Clinical failure was defined as escalation of therapy, relapse of infection, or all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 124 patients, 58% in the 1-g group and 42% in the 2-g group, were included. There was no statistically significant difference found in the primary outcome. The 90-day rate of clinical failure was 16.7% versus 9.6%, P = 0.260. There were no statistically significant secondary outcomes, although infection relapse rates at 90 days were numerically greater in the 1-g group (11.1% vs 1.9%, P = 0.078). Hypoalbuminemia was the only variable associated with an increased risk of clinical failure (odds ratio = 4.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-14.50, P = 0.033). Conclusion: In our exploratory findings, there was no statistically significant difference with the 90-day rate of clinical failure between ceftriaxone 1 g versus 2 g daily, although there was a numeric trend toward an increased rate of infection relapse within the 1-g group. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with an increased risk of clinical failure. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
RESUMEN
Background: Cefepime is used for the treatment of nosocomial infections and serves as a carbapenem-sparing agent for treating AmpC inducible bacteria. Cefepime induced neurotoxicity (CIN) is a well-documented adverse effect, although data describing the risk of CIN in patients with a history of seizures (HOS) remains limited. Objectives: The primary and secondary objectives were to compare the rates of CIN in patients with and without HOS and identify risk factors associated with CIN, respectively. Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study of patients admitted to University Hospital from January 2019 to December 2022 that were initiated on cefepime with and without a baseline HOS. Patients were matched at a rate of 1:1 by age (+/- 5 years), sex, and month of admission (+/- 1 month). Results: A total of 150 patients were included, 75 in each group. There was no statistically significant difference in CIN between the two groups (9 vs 7, P = 0.7923). The only risk factors associated with CIN were age >65 (OR, 5.8 [95% CI, 1.194-27.996]), acute kidney injury (AKI) during cefepime administration (OR, 13.8 [95% CI, 2.528-75.206]), and an intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR, 8.6 [95% CI, 1.735-42.624]). Conclusion: There was no increased risk of CIN observed in patients with HOS. Patients age >65, AKI while receiving cefepime and those admitted to the ICU were 5.8, 13.8, and 8.6 times more likely to experience CIN. These results suggest that it may be safe to administer cefepime to patients with HOS in the appropriate clinical setting.