Toxicities and outcomes of 616 ibrutinib-treated patients in the United States: a real-world analysis.

Clinical trials that led to ibrutinib's approval for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia showed that its side effects differ from those of traditional chemotherapy. Reasons for discontinuation in clinical practice have not been adequately studied. We conducted a retrospective analysis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with ibrutinib either commercially or on clinical trials. We aimed to compare the type and frequency of toxicities reported in either setting, assess discontinuation rates, and evaluate outcomes. This multicenter, retrospective analysis included ibrutinib-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients at nine United States cancer centers or from the Connect® Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Registry. We examined demographics, dosing, discontinuation rates and reasons, toxicities, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Six hundred sixteen ibrutinib-treated patients were identified. A total of 546 (88%) patients were treated with the commercial drug. Clinical trial patients were younger (mean age 58 versus 61 years, P=0.01) and had a similar time from diagnosis to treatment with ibrutinib (mean 85 versus 87 months, P=0.8). With a median follow-up of 17 months, an estimated 41% of patients discontinued ibrutinib (median time to ibrutinib discontinuation was 7 months). Notably, ibrutinib toxicity was the most common reason for discontinuation in all settings. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort were 35 months and not reached (median follow-up 17 months), respectively. In the largest reported series on ibrutinib- treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, we show that 41% of patients discontinued ibrutinib. Intolerance as opposed to chronic lymphocytic leukemia progression was the most common reason for discontinuation. Outcomes remain excellent and were not affected by line of therapy or whether patients were treated on clinical studies or commercially. These data strongly argue in favor of finding strategies to minimize ibrutinib intolerance so that efficacy can be further maximized. Future clinical trials should consider time-limited therapy approaches, particularly in patients achieving a complete response, in order to minimize ibrutinib exposure.

Emerging therapies in relapsed and refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

The peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) account for 5% to 10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. In the up-front setting, approximately one-quarter of patients experience a long-term remission. In the setting of relapsed and refractory disease, the median progression-free survival and overall survival are reported to be only 3.7 and 6.5 months, respectively. Unfortunately, the molecular and genetic characterization of PTCL has lagged well behind that of the B-cell lymphomas, although several recent experiences are shedding light on the remarkable molecular heterogeneity that has come to define these diverse diseases. The need to identify new active drugs for patients with PTCL has been addressed in part over the last several years, as 4 drugs have now been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with relapsed or refractory disease, and a plethora of new studies exploring novel combinations have begun to emerge. More advanced techniques in molecular biology, such as next-generation sequencing, gene expression profiling, and comparative genomic hybridization, have helped identify subtleties among subtypes and potentially identify new targets. Many of these recent clinical advances have been based on the recognition that PTCL is a disease that may be broadly characterized by gross epigenetic dysregulation with sensitivity to histone deacetylase inhibitors. In this report, we discuss emerging new therapies in relapsed and refractory PTCL and try to place these new findings in the evolving biological understanding of the disease.

Evolving Strategies for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in the Upfront Setting.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of marked clinical heterogeneity, and while some patients have a normal life expectancy, others develop rapidly progressive disease shortly after diagnosis. The current standard for upfront treatment of CLL is chemoimmunotherapy for younger fit patients, FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab) being the prototype. For older patients, BR (bendamustine and rituximab) exhibits excellent activity with decreased toxicity. For the frailest patients, CD20 monoclonal antibodies with or without chlorambucil have proven to be efficacious. The novel oral kinase inhibitors ibrutinib and idelalisib are FDA-approved in the relapsed/refractory setting, and ibrutinib is approved upfront for those with del(17p). These drugs have produced long-term durable responses in the relapsed/refractory setting, and studies are underway using these as single agent upfront or in combination with both chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies. Here, we review standard upfront therapies and new agents and combinations that are on the horizon for CLL.