Donor hemosiderosis does not affect liver function and regeneration in the setting of living donor liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) demands a careful assessment of abnormal findings discovered during the evaluation process to determine if there will be any potential risks to the donor or recipient. Varying degrees of elevated hepatic iron levels are not uncommonly seen in otherwise healthy individuals. We questioned whether mild expression of hemosiderin deposition presents a safety concern when considering outcomes of living donation for both the donor and the recipient. We report on three LDLT patients who were found to have low- to moderate-grade hemosiderin deposition on liver biopsy. All other aspects of their evaluation proved satisfactory, and the decision was made to proceed with donation. There were no significant complications in the donors, and all demonstrated complete normalization of liver function postoperatively, with appropriate parenchymal regeneration. The recipients also had unremarkable postoperative recovery. We conclude that these individuals can be considered as potential donors after careful evaluation.

Risk of end-stage renal disease among liver transplant recipients with pretransplant renal dysfunction.

Guidelines recommend restricting simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant to candidates with prolonged dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m(2) for 90 days. However, few studies exist to support the latter recommendation. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and Medicare dialysis data, we assembled a cohort of 4997 liver transplant recipients from February 27, 2002-January 1, 2008. Serial eGFRs were calculated from serum creatinines submitted with MELD reports. We categorized recipients by eGFR patterns in the 90 days pretransplant: Group 1 (eGFR always >30), Group 2 (eGFR fluctuated), Group 3 (eGFR always <30) and Group 4 (short-term dialysis). For Group 2, we characterized fluctuations in renal function using time-weighted mean eGFR. Among liver-alone recipients in Group 3, the rate of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by 3 years was 31%, versus <10% for other groups (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, eGFR Group, diabetes (HR 2.65, p < 0.001) and black race (HR 1.83, p = 0.02) were associated with ESRD. Among liver-alone recipients in Group 2, only diabetics with time-weighted mean eGFR <30 had a substantial ESRD risk (25.6%). In summary, among liver transplant candidates not on prolonged dialysis, SLK should be considered for those whose eGFR is always <30 and diabetic candidates whose weighted mean eGFR is <30 for 90 days.

Clinical features and natural history of hepatocellular adenomas: the impact of obesity.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular adenoma is a benign tumour associated with bleeding and malignant transformation. Obesity has been linked to hepatic tumourigenesis. AIM: To evaluate the presentation of hepatocellular adenoma in obesity, and the impact of obesity on the clinical course. METHODS: Records of 60 consecutive patients (between 2005 and 2010) with a diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma from a single tertiary centre were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty six of 60 patients were women, median age was 36years, 75% had history of contraceptive use, 18% were overweight and 55% were obese (BMI ≥30kg/m(2) ). Majority (63%) were asymptomatic; seven patients presented with bleeding. Single (28%) and multiple adenomas (72%) were encountered; size ranged from 1 to 19.7cm. Obesity was more often associated with multiple adenomas (85% vs. 48%, P=0.005), bilobar distribution (67% vs. 33%, P=0.01), lower serum albumin (P=0.007) and co-morbidities of fatty liver (P=0.006), diabetes (P=0.003), hypertension (P=0.006) and dyslipidemia (P=0.03). During median follow-up of 2.6years, there were no instances of bleeding, malignant transformation or death. Thirty four patients underwent therapeutic intervention (17 surgical resection, nine transarterial embolization and eight both interventions sequentially). The rate of complete resection of adenoma(s) was significantly lower in obese patients (8% vs. 69%, P=0.004). In the 26 patients without intervention, tumour size progression was more frequently observed in obese patients (33% vs. 0%, P=0.05). Three of 15 obese patients (20%) lost ≥5% body weight and there was no progression in the liver lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity and features of metabolic syndrome were frequently observed in hepatocellular adenoma. Multiple and bilobar adenomas were more frequent in obese patients. Among patients who were conservatively managed, tumour progression was more often associated with obesity.

Review article: the evaluation of solitary liver masses.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of imaging modalities has led to the detection of more liver masses. The differential diagnosis of a focal liver mass includes a host of benign as well as malignant conditions. AIM: To provide a comprehensive review on the commonly encountered liver masses, and to help guide an approach to their evaluation and management. METHODS: Pertinent literature that was identified through PubMed search and senior author's experience formed the basis of this review. RESULTS: While most incidentally noted liver masses are benign, it may be difficult to differentiate them from those that are malignant. Furthermore, some benign lesions have malignant potential. Certain lesions such as focal nodular hyperplasia, haemangiomas and focal steatosis are often distinctly diagnosed by an imaging modality alone. The less frequently encountered hepatic adenomas are diagnosed radiologically in those with the appropriate clinical background and the absence of radiological features to suggest haemangioma or focal nodular hyperplasia. CONCLUSIONS: A reasonable approach to the diagnosis, follow-up and management of liver masses is based on a rudimentary knowledge of their presentation, associated clinical and laboratory features, natural history and available treatment options. Most often, the so called 'incidentalomas' are benign and require patient reassurance.