Early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resections: an integrated systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and feasibility of early loop defunctioning ileostomy closure, within 2 weeks of index surgery, in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on published randomized controlled trials reporting the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection using the principles of meta-analysis on RevMan 5.4 statistical software was undertaken. RESULTS: Four randomized, controlled trials on 446 patients evaluating the feasibility and outcomes on early vs delayed closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing low colorectal resection were analysed. There were 176 patients in the early closure group and 270 patients in the delayed closure group. The risk of anastomotic leak [risk ratio 0.37 (CI: 0.10-1.42), P = 0.15], anastomotic stenosis [risk ratio 4.79 (CI: 0.23-98.47), P = 0.31] and postoperative complications [risk ratio 0.75 (CI: 0.48-1.16), P = 0.19] was similar in both groups. In addition, there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the duration of operation [standardized mean difference -0.49 (CI: -01.09, -0.12), P = 0.12] and length of hospitalization [standardized mean difference -0.04 (CI: -0.25, -0.18), P = 0.75]. CONCLUSIONS: Early closure of loop defunctioning ileostomy in patients undergoing distal colorectal resection is feasible with comparable outcomes to delayed closure.

Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

AIM: Conventional air insufflation (AI) may cause prolonged abdominal bloating, excessive abdominal pain and discomfort during colonoscopy. Carbon dioxide may be an acceptable alternative to avoid these complications. The object of this study was to evaluate systematically the effectiveness of carbon dioxide insufflation (CI) for colonoscopy compared with AI. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of CI with that of AI during colonoscopy were retrieved from medical electronic databases and combined analysis was performed using the RevMan statistical package. The combined outcome of dichotomous and continuous variables was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs comprising 3607 patients were included in the study. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among included studies. CI showed a significant trend towards reduced procedural pain [SMD -1.34; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -2.23 to -0.45; z = 2.96; P < 0.003] and also postprocedural pain at 1 h (SMD -1.11; 95% CI -1.83 to -0.38; z = 2.97; P < 0.003), 6 and 24 h (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.85; z = 2.44; P < 0.01). CI was associated with faster caecal intubation (SMD -0.20; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.02; z = 2.23; P < 0.03) but the caecal intubation rate was similar (P = 0.59) in both colonic insufflation techniques . CONCLUSION: CI seems to have clinical advantages over AI for colonoscopy with regard to pain during and after the procedure.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection in the management of early rectal cancer.

AIM: A systematic analysis was conducted of trials comparing the effectiveness of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) with radical resection (RR) for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. METHOD: An electronic search was carried out of trials reporting the effectiveness of TEMS and RR in the treatment of T1 and T2 rectal cancers. RESULTS: Ten trials including 942 patients were retrieved. There was a trend toward a higher risk of local recurrence (odds ratio 2.78; 95% confidence interval 1.42, 5.44; z = 2.97; P < 0.003) and overall recurrence (P < 0.01) following TEMS compared with RR. The risk of distant recurrence, overall survival (odds ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval 0.49, 1.66; z = 0.33; P = 0.74) and mortality was similar. TEMS was associated with a shorter operation time and hospital stay and a reduced risk of postoperative complications (P < 0.0001). The included studies, however, were significantly diverse in stage and grade of rectal cancer and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery appears to have clinically measurable advantages in patients with early rectal cancer. The studies included in this review do not allow firm conclusions as to whether TEMS is superior to RR in the management of early rectal cancer. Larger, better designed and executed prospective studies are needed to answer this question.

Systematic review of the use of topical diltiazem compared with glyceryltrinitrate for the nonoperative management of chronic anal fissure.

AIM: The study analyzed clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of diltiazem (DTZ) and glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) for the nonsurgical management of chronic anal fissure (CAF). METHOD: Randomized trials on the effectiveness of DTZ and GTN were analyzed systematically using RevMan(®) where combined outcome was expressed as risk ratio (RR). RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials that included 481 patients were analyzed. Two-hundred and thirty-eight patients were treated with DTZ and 243 patients were treated with GTN. There was significant heterogeneity [Tau(2) = 0.24, χ2 = 13.16, d.f. = 6 (P < 0.05); I(2) = 54%] among the included trials. In the random-effects model, DTZ was associated with a lower incidence of side effects (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.27, 0.86; z = 2.46; P < 0.01), headache (RR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.24, 0.66; z = 3.54; P < 0.004) and recurrence (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.52, 0.89; z = 2.77; P < 0.006) of CAF. Both GTN and DTZ were equally effective (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.34; z = 0.92; P = 0.36) in the nonsurgical management of CAF. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of seven trials validates and strengthens the finding of a previously published meta-analysis of two randomized trials. Both DTZ and GTN are equally effective in the management of CAF. However, DTZ is associated with a lower incidence of headache and recurrent fissure. Therefore DTZ should be the preferred first line of treatment for CAF.

Retraction techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a literature-based review.

AIM: To systematically review the published literature and describe the various techniques of bowel and mesentery retraction available for use in laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHOD: A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken using MESH terms 'retraction', 'laparoscopic' and 'colorectal'. All articles describing methods of retraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included. RESULTS: Twelve methods of retraction in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were described. Five case-based series and three case studies were reported on 108 patients. Techniques were classified into those offering retraction of the small or large bowel or according to the mode of retraction. CONCLUSION: Many retraction methods are available to the surgeon varying in cost, invasiveness and complexity. Adequate retraction remains a challenge for optimal exposure and dissection during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of published, randomized, controlled trials comparing suture anastomosis to stapled anastomosis for ileostomy closure.

The objective of this article is to systematically analyze the randomized, controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of suture anastomosis (SUA) versus stapled anastomosis (STA) in patients undergoing ileostomy closure. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of SUA versus STA in patients undergoing ileostomy closure were analyzed using RevMan(®), and combined outcomes were expressed as odds risk ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD). Four randomized, controlled trials that recruited 645 patients were retrieved from electronic databases. There were 327 patients in the STA group and 318 patients in the SUA group. There was significant heterogeneity among included trials. Operative time (SMD -1.02; 95 % CI -1.89, -0.15; z = 2.29; p < 0.02) was shorter following STA compared to SUA. In addition, risk of small bowel obstruction (OR 0.54; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.30, 0.95; z = 2.13; p < 0.03) was lower in the STA group. Risk of anastomotic leak (OR 0.87; 95 % CI 0.12, 6.33; z = 0.14; p = 0.89), surgical site infection, reoperation and readmission were similar following STA and SUA in patients undergoing ileostomy closure. Length of hospital stay was also similar between STA and SUA groups. In ileostomy closure, STA was associated with shorter operative time and lower risk of postoperative small bowel obstruction. However, STA and SUA were similar in terms of anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, readmission, reoperations and length of hospital stay.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was systematically to analyse published randomized trials comparing lightweight mesh (LWM) with heavyweight mesh (HWM) in open inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: Randomized trials on LWM versus HWM were selected from the standard electronic databases. Reported outcomes were analysed systematically using RevMan. Pooled risk ratios were calculated for categorical outcomes, and mean differences for secondary continuous outcomes, using the fixed-effects and random-effects models for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Nine randomized trials containing 2310 patients were included. There was significant heterogeneity among trials. There was no difference in duration of operation, postoperative pain, recurrence rate, testicular atrophy and time to return to work between LWM and HWM groups. The two mesh types had a similar risk of perioperative complications, but LWM was associated with a reduced risk of developing chronic groin pain (risk ratio (RR) 0·61, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·50 to 0·74) and a reduced risk of developing other groin symptoms, such as stiffness and foreign body sensations (RR 0·64, 0·50 to 0·81). CONCLUSION: The use of LWM for open inguinal hernia repair was not associated with an increased risk of hernia recurrence. LWM reduced the incidence of chronic groin pain as well as the risk of developing other groin symptoms.

A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to systematically analyse the clinical trials on the effectiveness of transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation (THD) and stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the management of haemorrhoidal disease (HD). METHODS: Clinical trials on the effectiveness of THD and SH in the management of HD were analysed systematically using RevMan(®), and combined outcomes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). RESULTS: Three randomised, controlled trials encompassing 150 patients were analysed systematically. There were 80 THD patients and 70 SH patients. There was no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.40) among included trials. Therefore, in the fixed effects model, THD and SH were statistically equivalent in terms of treatment success rate (P = 0.19), operation time (P = 0.55), postoperative complications (P = 0.11) and recurrence (P = 0.46) of HD. THD was associated with significantly less postoperative pain (MD, -2.00; 95% CI, -2.06, -1.94; z = 63.59; P < 0.00001) compared to SH. CONCLUSIONS: Both THD and SH are equally effective and can be attempted for the management of HD. However, THD is associated with significantly lesser postoperative pain and therefore may be considered a preferred procedure. This conclusion is based only on treating 150 patients by THD or SH in three moderate-quality randomised trials. A major, multicenter, randomised trial is required to validate this conclusion and investigate other variables like hospital stay, cost-effectiveness and health-related quality of life measurement.

Lithotomy-related neurovascular complications in the lower limbs after colorectal surgery.

AIM: To review the literature on lithotomy-related neurovascular complications (LRNVC) of the lower limbs after colorectal surgery. METHOD: Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles, including Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed, CENTRAL and CINHL. RESULTS: LRNVC after prolonged lithotomy position during colorectal surgery can be classified into vascular, neurological and neurovascular combined. Compartment syndrome (CS) is the most common clinical presentation. Seven case reports and 10 case series on 34 patients (27 men, 6 women) with CS have been reported. Risk factors included the lithotomy position and duration of surgery of more than 4 h. CONCLUSION: In colorectal surgery, lower limb LRNCVs, and CS are rare. A high index of clinical suspicion and early decompression may reduce morbidity.

Open vs laparoscopic repair of full-thickness rectal prolapse: a re-meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A re-meta-analysis of available data within the published literature comparing laparoscopic rectopexy (LR) with open repair (OR). METHOD: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the Cochrane databases from January 1990 to October 2008. We searched the following MESH terms: 'laparoscopy', 'prolapse' and 'rectal prolapse'. We used the following text words: 'rectopexy', 'haemorrhoids', 'minimally invasive' and 'keyhole surgery'. The bibliography of selected trials and a Cochrane review was scrutinized and relevant references obtained. Selected trials were analysed to conduct a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twelve comparative studies on 688 patients qualified for the review. There were 330 patients in LR group and 358 in the OR group. LR takes longer to perform compared with OR. This difference was statistically significant [random effects model: standardized mean difference (SMD) 1.63, 95% CI (1.14-2.12), z = 6.56, P < 0.001]. There was a significant reduction in hospital stay between LR vs OR [random effects model: SMD -1.75, 95% CI (-2.45 to -1.05), z = -4.90, P < 0.001]. There was no statistical difference relating to morbidity, constipation, incontinence or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic rectopexy is a safe and effective modality and is comparable to OR, however, there is still a paucity of randomized controlled trials within the literature regarding this subject. Until these trials are conducted, we would advise caution in deriving absolute conclusions.

Open vs laparoscopic approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review.

AIM: A meta-analysis of published literature comparing open vs laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal. METHOD: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the Cochrane databases were searched from January 1993 to August 2008. The bibliography of selected trials was scrutinized and relevant references obtained. A systematic review was performed to obtain a summative outcome. RESULTS: Eight comparative studies involving 450 patients were analysed. One hundred and ninety-three patients were in the laparoscopic and 257 in the open group. Laparoscopic reversal has a significantly reduced complication rate (z = -2.92, P < 0.01), intra-operative blood loss (z = -7.34, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (z = -3.16, P < 0.01) compared with the conventional approach. No difference in leak rates was found. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure is safe, has fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. This approach may be considered for reversal, however, randomized controlled trials are required to strengthen the evidence.

A meta-analysis comparing side to end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis of published literature comparing J-pouch with side to end anastomosis after anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched from January 1980 to March 2009. A systematic review was performed to obtain a summative outcome. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials involving 273 patients were analysed. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were in the J-pouch and 135 in the side to end anastomosis (STEA) group. No significant difference in surgically related outcomes was established (hospital stay, operative time, estimated blood loss, overall morbidity and mortality). Resting pressures at 24 months post-operatively were lower in J-pouch group compared with STEA and approached statistical significance [random effects model: SMD = -1.23, 95% CI (-2.47, -0.01), z = -1.94, P = 0.053]. No statistical difference was found in volumetric parameters (Volume at which the patient first experiences a sensation to defaecate and maximal tolerable volume). No statistical difference except urgency at 6 months [P < 0.05] was elicited in functional outcomes (use of enemas, bowel medications, pads, incomplete defaecation and stool frequency) between J-pouch and STEA groups. CONCLUSIONS: J-pouch or STEA are acceptable and safe options after AR for rectal cancer. Either approach may be considered according to surgeon choice. A randomized controlled trial including a larger number of patients is required to strengthen the evidence.

Endo-anal ultrasound versus endo-anal magnetic resonance imaging for the depiction of external anal sphincter pathology in patients with faecal incontinence: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the endo-anal ultrasound (EAUS) versus endo-anal magnetic resonance imaging (EAMRI) in the diagnosis of external anal sphincter defects (EAS) in patients with faecal incontinence (FI). METHODS: Studies on EAUS and EAMRI were selected and analyzed to generate summative data. RESULTS: Five studies encompassing 347 patients of FI were included in this review. Three studies validated the results of EAUS and EAMRI by surgery (61 patients). In the fixed effect model, EAUS was superior to EAMRI in the depiction of EAS defects. On combined analysis of five studies using fixed effect model, both EAUS and EAMRI were equally effective. However, there was a significant heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION: EAUS and EAMRI are comparable in the diagnosis of EAS defects in patients of FI. Since EAUS is an economical, quicker and easily available imaging modality, it may be used a preferable investigation for the diagnosis of EAS defects in patients of FI.

An isolated lump in right groin: an unusual initial presentation of Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal abscess, extending to the groin as an isolated tender lump, is rare as the first manifestation of Crohn's disease. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes a young, fit and healthy 22 year-old woman with no previous history of gastrointestinal disorder, who presented with an isolated, tender lump in her right groin as the initial presentation of Crohn's disease. The patient, after a conventional incision and drainage of the abscess, was readmitted with enterocutaneous fistula at the right groin. After radiological investigations, she underwent a laparotomy, which showed jejunal perforation through ileocaecal mesentery producing retrocaecal abscess. There was also a suspicious fistulous connection between jejunum and ileo-caecal junction. A segmental small bowel resection and a limited right hemicolectomy with primary anastomoses were performed. The patient made an uneventful post-operative recovery and was discharged home on the fifth post operative day. CONCLUSION: Crohn's disease could manifest as an isolated, tender groin lump which has not been described in the published literature so far. Since retroperitoneal abscess remains a rare but serious complication of Crohn's disease, aggressive operative therapy should be ensued without delay in order to remove the source of the abscess. Groin abscess could conceal surprises and should always be investigated radiologically before proceeding to incision and drainage.

Prolene hernia system versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lichtenstein repair is standard practice for inguinal herniorrhaphy, but there is increasing public concern in the use of mesh and postoperative chronic pain. New mesh technology, such as the prolene hernia system, has a preperitoneal component to reinforce the myopectineal orifice aim to reduce the risk of recurrence and chronic pain. This meta-analysis compares outcomes using prolene hernia system versus lichenstein repair for inguinal hernias. METHODS: Randomized-controlled trials comparing prolene hernia system and Lichtenstein repair were identified using Embase, Medline, and published conference abstracts. Primary outcomes were recurrence and chronic pain. Secondary outcomes were mean operating time, composite complications, surgical reintervention, and time to normal activities. Odds ration and standardized mean differences were calculated. RESULTS: 1377 hernia repairs were identified from a total of 7 trials. Mean follow-up was 12-91 months. There was no difference between the techniques for recurrence [pooled analysis odds ratio: 0.86 (95% CI 0.32-2.28); p = 0.76] and chronic pain [pooled analysis odds ratio: 1.00 (95% CIs 0.65-1.55); p = 1]. Prolene hernia system demonstrated a shorter time to return to normal activities [pooled weighted mean difference - 0.54 (95% CI - 1.07 to - 0.01); p = 0.04]. Other outcomes were similar in mean operating time, composite complications, and surgical reintervention. CONCLUSION: Both prolene hernia system and Lichenstein repair appear comparable acceptable techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Further longer-term studies of new mesh technologies will improve information available to surgeons and their patients.

Validation of the size morphology site access score in endoscopic mucosal resection of large polyps in a district general hospital.

BACKGROUND: Polyp assessment is multimodal and is vital prior to endoscopic mucosal resection. The size, morphology, site and access (SMSA) score has been validated in specialist endoscopic institutions. this study investigated the ability of this score to predict incomplete endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps in a district general hospital. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection of large (≥ 20 mm) colorectal polyps at Worthing Hospital. Clinical, endoscopic and histological data were taken from prospective databases. The primary outcome of the study was to investigate the correlation of the SMSA score with incomplete endoscopic resection. RESULTS: Between February 2015 and August 2018, 114 patients underwent colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. Of these, 67 (59%) were male. The median (interquartile range) age of the study population was 72 years (65-78 years). Some 17 lesions (15%) were pedunculated, 76 (67%) were sessile and 21 were (18%) flat; 84 polyps (77%) were located in the left colon/rectum, with the remainder in the right colon; 51 lesions (45%) were 20-30 mm, 27 (24%) were 30-40 mm and 36 (31%) were greater than 40 mm in diameter. When reclassified into the SMSA score, 9 of the polyps (8%) were level 2, 64 (56%) were level 3 and 41 (36%) were level 4. Incomplete resection was clinically diagnosed in 9/114 (8%). The SMSA score was positively correlated with incomplete endoscopic resection, but not with additional procedure usage, complications or advanced histology. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with large polyps can be managed outside of specialist units. This study has validated that the SMSA score was associated with incomplete endoscopic mucosal resection for large polyps in a district general hospital setting.

Botulinum toxin vs glyceryltrinitrate for the medical management of chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to analyse systematically the prospective randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of botulinum toxin (BTX) and glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) for the pharmacological management of chronic anal fissure (CAF). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Prospective randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of BTX and GTN for the management of CAF were selected according to specific criteria and analysed to generate summative data. RESULTS: Six studies encompassing 355 patients with CAF were retrieved from electronic databases. Only three randomized controlled trials on 180 patients qualified for the meta-analysis according to inclusion criteria. There were 90 patients in BTX and 90 in the GTN group. BTX and GTN were equally effective in healing/improving the CAF. There was no statistically significant difference between the two pharmacotherapies [RR 1.29 (0.98-1.70) 95% CI, z = -1.83, P = 1.93, Fig. 1]. However, there was statistically significant heterogeneity among the trials (Q = 4.03, df = 1, P = 0.042). On fixed effect model, GTN was associated with higher incidence of total side effects [fixed effect model RR 0.14 (0.05-0.40) 95% CI, z = -3.71, P = 0.0002] and headache [RR 0.07 (0.02-0.20) 95% CI, z = -5.05, P = 0.0007] among patients of CAF. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin is as effective as GTN for the management of CAF but it is associated with a lower complication rate. BTX can be recommended as a first-line therapy for chemical sphincterotomy in patients of CAF. However, a major and multi-centre randomized controlled trial is required to support this treatment approach in order to establish stronger evidence.

Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the internet as a source of information for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: Six of the most common search engines (Yahoo, Google, MSN search, Alta Vista, Excite and Lycos) were used for the search of the generic term 'CRC'. First 300 links were analysed and classified by information type, provider, readership and commercial orientation. RESULTS: The average time delay was 1.70 s before matches were located. A total of 3.2827 million matches on CRC were found using the six search engines ranging from 700 (Excite) to 1 417 000 (Lycos) websites. Approximately 50% of the links were based on information from textbooks or governmental websites. Commercial companies giving information about private hospitals and products provided over 50% of the websites on CRC. The distribution of target readers was uneven, although a majority of websites were delivering CRC information to public and patients. Readability of information was difficult to comprehend by the public. CONCLUSION: The internet is becoming an essential tool for disseminating information about CRC to consumers. Half of the links on CRC are commercially oriented, containing information on goods or private health services. Less than 1% information is being provided by professional societies. To provide relevant CRC information, key consensus criteria for evaluating healthcare-related websites have to be established. There is an urgent need for CRC information on the internet to be regulated through the establishment of government-funded organizations (e.g. NHS) or professional societies (e.g. ACPGBI).

Comparison of surgical vs chemical sphincterotomy using botulinum toxin for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse systematically prospective randomized controlled trials dealing with the effectiveness of surgical sphincterotomy (SS) vs chemical sphincterotomy (CS) using botulinum toxin for the management of chronic anal fissure (CAF). METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Prospective randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of SS vs CS using botulinum toxin were selected and analysed to generate the summative outcome. RESULTS: Four prospective randomized controlled trials dealing with SS vs CS using botulinum injection, which included 279 CAF patients, were analysed. Based on the random effects model, there was a higher complication rate [Risk ratio (RR) 14.54 (-9.84, -38.9) 95% CI, df = 2, P < 0.0163] and a higher risk of transient faecal incontinence [RR 6.39 (-2.37, -15.1) 95% CI, df = 3, P < 0.0001] in the SS group than in the CS group. However, there was significant heterogeneity among the trials (Q = 8 408 891, P < 0.0001), indicating a wide confidence interval range; thus, the inferiority of SS could not be shown. SS had a significantly higher healing rate [RR 1.63, (1.34-1.91) 95% CI, df = 3, P < 0.0110] and a significantly lower recurrence rate [RR 0.35 (0.33-0.38) 95% CI, df = 3, P < 0.0221] than CS. CONCLUSION: Both CS and SS are comparable in the management of CAF. There are no differences in the complication rates and incontinence rates between the two procedures. SS has a higher healing rate and a lower recurrence rate than CS. As long as the patient is willing to accept a negligible risk of transient faecal incontinence, SS should be the first-line treatment for CAF.

Health-related quality of life measurement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to discuss the value of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) measurement and describe its development with a few examples. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The methodology is a literature review of various articles published in the last 25 years on health-related quality of life. FINDINGS: HR-QOL tools are health status instruments, which are utilized to assess the changes in the health status of patients. These surveys are of increasingly importance as healthcare providers are challenged to justify treatment approaches and rationale for any intervention. Objective criteria can be used to determine whether there is clinical evidence of disease. However, the impact of disease on the individual's life is not included in such a clinical assessment. The use of validated and reliable health instruments is directed at measuring this impact in a reproducible and valid fashion. In patient-centred research, "experimental" conditions are constantly changing because human beings with values, feelings, perspectives and social relationships are being treated. It is especially important to use valid measurement tools when assessing these impacts. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This article is written from the authors' own experience and knowledge and adds those benefits to the literature already available.