RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The world has faced the pandemic of COVID-19 in March 2020 and still it continues to affect in 2021. There is a great variation about the course of the disease and its features. Hence, in the present systemic review, we intend to determine the pooled estimations in the clinical features and prognosis along with the subgroups based on the severity of the disease in various regions of the world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online data were collected from the search engines of EBSCO, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The searched terms were COVID 19, CORONA, SARS-CoV-2, clinical features, Wuhan, etc. The study articles were collected that from January 2020 to February 2021. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5067 articles were selected, of which 176 were finalized for the study. There were a total of 11 countries that were included, with a total of 2½ lakh participants. Mean age was 47.5 years. Around 22.5% had comorbidities. The mortality was 5.5%. We observed a strong association between the medical condition of the patient and the severity of the infection. In severe cases, the most common symptoms were respiratory and gastrointestinal. The mortality was registered in those with pneumonia and end-organ failure. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded from this meta-analysis that in a fourth of the positive patients, the disease was severe. In nearly 6% of the COVID-19 patients, mortality was seen. Patients with comorbidities and the severe form of the disease should be closely monitored.
RESUMEN
This prospective study of internal medicine inpatients treated at 2 hospitals in Toronto, Canada, between September 1, 2016, and September 1, 2017, compared patient-report, physician-report, and detailed medical record review to identify specific hospital-acquired complications. Six complications were assessed: delirium, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hospital-acquired pneumonia, or fall. The study included 207 patients and physician responses were obtained for 156 (75%). Complications were identified in 28 (14%) patients by medical record review, 30 (14%) patients by patient-report, and 11 (7%) patients by physician-report. Fifty-four (26%) patients experienced a complication as identified through at least one of the 3 methods. There was little agreement between the 3 methods (Fleiss' ĸ 0.15, P < 0.001). All 3 sources agreed on the occurrence of a specific complication in only 1 patient (1%). Multiple approaches likely are needed to adequately measure hospital-acquired complications.