Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(8): 1459-63, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25767155

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess drug survival and the reasons for switching anti-TNF-α therapy in SpA patients in a Spanish nationwide study. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. Sample size was calculated to represent all regions and hospitals throughout the country. Demographic data, patient characteristics and disease activity parameters were obtained. Drug survival and reasons for switching anti-TNF therapy were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 467 SpA patients receiving at least one anti-TNF agent were identified. Among patients who received a first, second and third anti-TNF course, 39.4%, 37.4% and 23.1% discontinued treatment, respectively. The main reasons for switching anti-TNF agents in the first course were lack or loss of efficacy (LOE) and adverse events (AEs) in 40% and 30% of switchers, respectively. Similarly, reasons for switching during the second anti-TNF course were LOE in 48% and AEs in 28% of switchers. Of the 467 SpA patients starting anti-TNF therapy, 28% switched to a second and 8% switched to a third therapy. Mean drug survival for the first, second and third anti-TNF courses were 84.4 (95% CI 78.4, 90.5), 70.2 (95% CI 61.6, 78.9) and 64.8 (95% CI 51.1, 78.5) months, respectively (P = 0.315). CONCLUSION: Twenty-eight per cent of SpA patients starting anti-TNF therapy switched to a second anti-TNF agent. Drug survival did not differ among anti-TNF courses. The main reason for switching anti-TNF therapy was LOE. Switchers were more frequently women and had higher disease activity parameters at the time of the study than non-switchers.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Sustitución de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Espondiloartropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología , Espondiloartropatías/diagnóstico , Espondiloartropatías/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Open Access Rheumatol ; 6: 39-47, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790033

RESUMEN

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) is an inflammatory arthritis produced by the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals in the synovium and periarticular soft tissues. It is the third most common inflammatory arthritis. Diagnosis is suspected on the basis of the clinical picture and radiographic/laboratory findings. The reference standard for the diagnosis of CPPD is based on the identification of CPP crystals in synovial fluid by light microscopy, compensated polarized light microscopy, or phase contrast microscopy. Most treatment approaches for CPPD are based upon clinical experience and not upon controlled trials. They range - depending on the subtype and the characteristics of symptoms - from no treatment to interleukin-1 blockade antibodies or specific therapy for an underlying disease. This review summarizes all we know so far about the diagnosis and management of CPPD.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA