Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023

BACKGROUND: Since publication of the original Position Paper on Olfactory Dysfunction in 2017 (PPOD-17), the personal and societal burden of olfactory disorders has come sharply into focus through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinicians, scientists and the public are now more aware of the importance of olfaction, and the impact of its dysfunction on quality of life, nutrition, social relationships and mental health. Accordingly, new basic, translational and clinical research has resulted in significant progress since the PPOD-17. In this updated document, we present and discuss currently available evidence for the diagnosis and management of olfactory dysfunction. Major updates to the current version include, amongst others: new recommendations on olfactory related terminology; new imaging recommendations; new sections on qualitative OD and COVID-19 OD; updated management section. Recommendations were agreed by all co-authors using a modified Delphi process. CONCLUSIONS: We have provided an overview of current evidence and expert-agreed recommendations for the definition, investigation, and management of OD. As for our original Position Paper, we hope that this updated document will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency, and generalisability of work in this field.

Post-injury smell disorders.

Post-injury smell disorders. PROBLEMS/OBJECTIVES: Head trauma is the third most common aetioiogy of post-traumatic olfactory loss (PTOL). This literature review aims to report the existing knowledge surrounding this issue, exploring the current understanding of the inducing pathogenesis and the assessment and management standards from the early phases to longer-term considerations. METHODOLOGY: Literature search and appraisal in PubMed on the following themes directly associated with PTOL: olfactory disorders, trauma, pathogenesis, examination, recovery and treatment. RESULTS: Scientific evidence was mainly available for epidemiology and exploration tools in cases suffering from PTOL. The current research into obj6ctive batteries of olfactory tests is promising. CONCLUSIONS: This paper highlights the importance of an adequate assessment of PTOL for an early start in olfactory training.

Adaptation of the Sniffin' Sticks Test in South-Kivu.

AIM: The "Sniffin' Sticks" test is widely used in Europe as a standard test to assess olfaction. Several culturally-adapted versions have been developed. However, no version adapted to Sub-Saharan African populations exists. The aims of the present study were (1) to assess the applicability of the Sniffin' Sticks test in the population of South Kivu (DR Congo), and (2) to develop a culturally adapted version with normative values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a first study, 157 volunteers were tested with the original Sniffin' Sticks test. Based on these results, we selected odors that were poorly recognized in the identification test and replaced them by culturally adapted odors. In a second study, we assessed the modified version of the Sniffin' Sticks test in 150 volunteers and defined normative values. RESULTS: In the first study, we found that olfactory function (threshold-discrimination-identification: TDI score) significantly decreased with age and was better in females. Five odors were poorly recognized and were replaced by culturally adapted odors. In the second study, we found that this adapted version led to a higher rate of correctly identified odors. We defined normative values for the South-Kivu population (TDI score: 18-35 years: 30.4±6.0; 36-55 years: 26.2±5.3; >55 years: 25.6±5.0). CONCLUSION: This culturally adapted version of the Sniffin' Sticks test is culturally adapted to the South Kivu population. The normative values will provide the basis for clinical evaluation of pathologic subjects.