EVI1 expression in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of the EVI1 (ecotropic viral integration site 1) oncogene has recently been implicated as a prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC), particularly in triple-negative BC (TNBC). In this study we aimed to investigate frequency and clinical relevance of EVI1 expression in newly diagnosed BC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: EVI1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry using H-score as a cumulative measurement of protein expression in pretherapeutic biopsies of BC patients treated with anthracycline/taxane based neoadjuvant chemotherapy within the GeparTrio trial. EVI1 was analyzed as a continuous variable and dichotomized into low or high based on median expression. Endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 993 tumors analyzed, 882 had available subtype information: 50.8% were HR + /HER2-, 15% HR + /HER2 + , 9.8% HR-/HER2 + , and 24.5% TNBC. Median EVI1 H-score was 112.16 (range 0.5-291.4). High EVI1 expression was significantly associated with smaller tumor size (p = 0.002) but not with BC subtype. Elevated EVI1 levels were not significantly associated with therapy response and survival in the entire cohort or within BC subtypes. However, TNBC patients with high EVI1 showed a trend towards increased pCR rates compared to low group (37.7% vs 27.5%, p = 0.114; odds ratio 1.60 (95%CI 0.90-2.85, p = 0.110) and numerically better DFS (HR = 0.77 [95%CI 0.48-1.23], log-rank p = 0.271) and OS (HR = 0.76 [95% 0.44-1.31], log-rank p = 0.314) without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: EVI1 was not associated with response to neoadjuvant therapy or patient survival in the overall cohort. Further analyses are needed to verify our findings especially in the pathological work-up of early-stage HER2-negative BC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00544765.

Modification of Dargent's radical vaginal trachelectomy to facilitate ureteral dissection: description of technique.

OBJECTIVE: Radical vaginal trachelectomy is the fertility-preserving surgery for patients with early stage cervical cancer. However, it has not gained widespread approval by gynecologic oncologists because of difficulties in the dissection of the bladder pillars and identification of the ureter during the vaginal portion of the surgery. METHOD: We describe a modification of radical vaginal trachelectomy for easier dissection of the bladder pillar. Following pelvic lymphadenectomy, the vesicovaginal space is widely opened laparoscopically. After identification of the uterine arteries, one should proceed along the course of the arteries laterally and, thus, visualize the overcrossing of the artery with the ureter. The medial aspect of the supraureteric bladder pillar is transected and the ureter marked with vessel loops on both sides close to its entry into the bladder. The lateral portion of the supraureteric bladder pillar remains intact. During the vaginal part of radical vaginal trachelectomy, the ureter may be easily found by grasping the formerly placed vessel loop and dissection of the infraureteric bladder pillar may be done without risk of ureteral injury. RESULTS: Between October 2018 and August 2019 our group has performed radical vaginal trachelectomy using this modified ureteral dissection in 12 patients. Median operation time was 239 min (range 127-290) and median blood loss was 25 mL (range 10-100). No intra- or post-operative urologic complication occurred. Median time to normal bladder function was 4 days (range 3-13). CONCLUSION: The vaginal portion of radical vaginal trachelectomy may be simplified using this technique, especially when difficult circumstances such as endometriosis, prior operations, or unusual anatomy in nulliparous women are encountered.

Comparison of surgical and pathological parameters after laparoscopic transperitoneal pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomies.

OBJECTIVE: Lymphadenectomy is an integral part of surgical staging and treatment for patients with gynecologic malignancies. Since its introduction, laparoscopic lymphadenectomy has proved feasible, safe, and oncologically adequate compared with open surgery while morbidity is lower and hospital stay considerably shorter. The aim of this study was to examine if surgical outcomes may be improved after the initial learning curve is complete. METHODS: An analysis of 2535 laparoscopic pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomies was performed between July 1994 and March 2018 by one team of gynecologic oncology surgeons but with the consistent supervision of a consultant surgeon. Data were collected prospectively evaluating operative time, intra-operative and post-operative complications, number of lymph nodes, and body mass index (BMI). Previously published data of 650 patients treated after introduction of the method (period 1, 1994-2003) were compared with the latter 524 patients (period 2, 2014-2018). RESULTS: The median age of the 2535 patients was 43 years (IQR 34-57). The most common indication for pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy was cervical cancer (n=1893). Operative time for para-aortic lymph node dissection was shorter in period 2 (68 vs 100 min, p<0.001). The number of harvested lymph nodes was increased for pelvic (19.2 (range 2-52) vs 21.9 (range 4-87)) and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (10.8 (range 1-52) vs 14.4 (range 4-64)), p<0.001. BMI did not have a significant influence on node count or operative time, with BMI ranging from 14.6 to 54.1 kg/m2. In contrast to period 1 (n=18, 2.9%), there were no intra-operative complications in period 2 (n=0, 0.0%, p<0.001) whereas post-operative complications were similar (n=35 (5.8%) in period 1; n=38 (7.6%) in period 2; p=0.32). CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients who underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal lymphadenectomy, lymph node count and peri-operative complications improved after the initial learning curve.

A randomized phase II study to determine the efficacy and tolerability of two doses of eribulin plus lapatinib in trastuzumab-pretreated patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (E-VITA).

The E-VITA study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of two schedules of eribulin and lapatinib in patients with trastuzumab-pretreated HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. This multicenter, open-label phase II trial, randomly assigned patients with trastuzumab-pretreated HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer to lapatinib 1000 mg daily with eribulin 1.23 mg/m (equivalent to 1.4 mg/m eribulin mesylate) days 1+8 every 21 days (split-dose arm) or eribulin 1.76 mg/m (equivalent to 2.0 mg/m eribulin mesylate) day 1 every 21 days (3-weekly arm). Time to progression and tolerability were defined as primary end points; no sample size calculation for formal comparison of efficacy data has been performed. Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and overall survival. Overall, 43 patients of a planned number of 80 patients were recruited. At a median follow-up of 28.7 months, the median time to progression was 8.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.8-9.4] in the split-dose arm and 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.6-13.4) in the 3-weekly arm. Objective response rate was 52.4% (95% CI: 31.0-73.7) in the split-dose arm and 45.0% (95% CI: 23.2-66.8) in the 3-weekly arm, and clinical benefit rate was 71.4% (95% CI: 52.1-90.8) and 75.0% (95% CI: 56.0-94.0), respectively. Overall survival was also similar in both arms. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (58.5%) and leukopenia (39.0%). The combination of eribulin and lapatinib showed an acceptable safety profile with less toxicity observed in the eribulin 1.23 mg/m day 1+8 group. This might be an alternative regimen when other treatment options are exhausted. Therefore, further clinical studies are warranted.

Mesothelin as a target for cervical cancer therapy.

PURPOSE: The cell surface glycoprotein Mesothelin is overexpressed in several tumor entities and novel immune-based therapies are currently under the early clinical evaluation for the treatment of malignant pleura mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Cervical cancer has not been recognized as a suitable target for Mesothelin-directed immune therapies so far. METHODS: To exploit a possible role of Mesothelin in cervical cancer treatment, we analysed Mesothelin expression in 79 cervical carcinomas and aligned expressions patterns with tumor growth parameters. A novel anti-Mesothelin drug conjugate (Anetumab Ravtansine) was applied for dose-efficiency studies in a Mesothelin positive tumor model for cervical cancer in Scid mice. RESULTS: In more than three-quarters (77%) of cervical adenocarcinomas, Mesothelin was expressed to high levels. Among squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix uteri expression levels were lower and expression patterns were less intense, but still ranged between 50-60% (57%). A significant correlation between Mesothelin expression levels and tumor grade, metastatic behaviour, and lymph- or hemangiosis was not found. The novel anti-Mesothelin-drug conjugate (Anetumab Ravtansine) showed a substantial dose-dependent therapeutic efficiency in a xenotransplant model for cervical cancer in SCID mice (hela cell tumors). Applying the ADC at a dose of 10 mg/kg twice weekly induced complete tumor regression in 88% of animals within 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Mesothelin should be taken into account as a target in cervical cancer therapy and histological determination of Mesothelin expression should be considered in routine diagnostics of cervical carcinomas.

Vulvar cancer in Germany: increase in incidence and change in tumour biological characteristics from 1974 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of vulvar cancer in Germany is increasing. Moreover, gynaecological oncologists reported observing increasing numbers of women presenting with small tumours. The aim of the present study is to validate this observation on a population level and to extend available incidence data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from the population-based Saarland Cancer Registry were used and included 1136 women diagnosed with invasive vulvar cancer (ICD-9 codes: 181.1-181.4, ICD-10 code: C51) between 1974 and 2013. Multiple imputation methodology was used to overcome loss of precision and potential bias resulting from incomplete data. Incidence trends were investigated with regard to age at diagnosis, tumour size and clinical stage, morphology and histopathologic grade. RESULTS: The age-standardised incidence rate of vulvar cancer increased from 1.6 cases per 100,000 women per year in 1974-78 to 7.9 in 2009-13, representing an increase across all age groups. Since 1989-93, an almost exclusive increase in the incidence of small tumours ≤2 cm in the greatest dimension from 1.2 to 6.6 and of squamous cell carcinomas from 1.7 to 7.1 was observed, whereas the number of larger tumours and other invasive cancers remained rather constant. Patients aged ≥75 years generally suffered from more advanced tumours at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in vulvar cancer incidence of a size as observed in this study has not been reported thus far for any other European region. Furthermore, the analyses confirmed the observation of increasing numbers of women presenting with small tumours. The results of the age-specific analyses point to both human papillomavirus infection and non-infectious factors as explanations for the observed increase in squamous cell carcinomas.

A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PELICAN study.

PURPOSE: The PELICAN trial evaluates for the first time efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter trial enrolled first-line MBC patients who were ineligible for endocrine or trastuzumab therapy. Cumulative adjuvant anthracyclines of 360 mg/m2 doxorubicin or equivalent were allowed. Left ventricular ejection fraction of >50 % was required. Patients received PLD 50 mg/m2 every 28 days or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time-to-disease progression (TTP). RESULTS: 210 patients were randomized (n = 105, PLD and n = 105, capecitabine). Adjuvant anthracyclines were given to 37 % (PLD) and 36 % (capecitabine) of patients. No significant difference was observed in TTP [HR = 1.21 (95 % confidence interval, 0.838-1.750)]. Median TTP was 6.0 months for both PLD and capecitabine. Comparing patients with or without prior anthracyclines, no significant difference in TTP was observed in the PLD arm (log-rank P = 0.64). For PLD versus capecitabine, respectively, overall survival (median, 23.3 months vs. 26.8 months) and time-to-treatment failure (median, 4.6 months vs. 3.7 months) were not statistically significantly different. Compared to PLD, patients on capecitabine experienced more serious adverse events (P = 0.015) and more cardiac events among patients who had prior anthracycline exposure (18 vs. 8 %; P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: Both PLD and capecitabine are effective first-line agents for MBC.

Intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conservative surgery--still in use?

A positive margin in breast conserving surgery is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. Failure to achieve clear margins results in re-excision procedures. Methods for intraoperative assessment of margins have been developed, such as frozen section analysis, touch preparation cytology, near-infrared fluorescence optical imaging, x-ray diffraction technology, high-frequency ultrasound, micro-CT, and radiofrequency spectroscopy. In this article, options that might become the method of choice in the future are discussed.

Differences in the receptor status between primary and recurrent breast cancer--the frequency of and the reasons for discordance.

OBJECTIVE: Receptor discordances between primary and recurrent breast cancer have been described for years, but only a few analyses have elucidated the factors that influence receptor changes. METHODS: Explorative analyses of prospective data from a breast cancer database of a tertiary breast cancer unit. RESULTS: Recurrent tumours that had expressed oestrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as primary tumours were negative for the respective receptor in 22.8, 41.4 and 40.8% of cases. ER, PR and HER2 expression was found in 19.8, 16.7 and 11.5% of recurrent tumours, although no expression had been observed in primary tumours. Receptor discordances in recurrent disease leading to different therapeutic approaches were noted in 126 of 411 patients (30.7%). In patients with tumours expressing primary ER and HER2, independent factors associated with discordance were endocrine therapy and treatment with trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: High rates of receptor discordance were found. The impact of factors that influence receptor changes is small so that no subgroup of patients with recurrent breast cancer should be excluded from biopsy. Whenever possible, a biopsy should be taken to confirm the diagnosis of a possible relapse as well as the receptor status of patients with breast cancer.

Outcome of early breast cancer treated in an urban and a rural breast cancer unit in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence has been published concerning survival disadvantages in the outcome of breast cancer patients in relationship to their residency in urban or rural communities. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate differences in patients and treatment characteristics between an urban and a rural breast cancer unit. Therefore, all early breast cancer patients treated consecutively between 1999 and 2007 in a rural and an urban breast cancer unit were included. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment strategies, and guideline adherence were included to evaluate the prognoses of both populations. RESULTS: Overall, data from 2,566 patients were included in this analysis. The 610 patients treated in the rural unit showed significantly more negative prognostic criteria than the 1,956 patients treated in the urban center. No differences were observed with respect to surgical and systemic treatment after adjustment for prognostic parameters. Adherence to national guidelines did not differ significantly between both settings and ranged between 78.0 and 95.6%. Furthermore, no differences regarding recurrence-free and overall survival were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The stage-adjusted pattern of care was similar in 2 German breast care units in a rural region and an urban area. Nevertheless, an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer should be enforced in rural areas to avoid extended treatment burden.

Outcome of immediate re-operation or interval debulking after chemotherapy at a gynecologic oncology center after initially incomplete cytoreduction of advanced ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer is largely determined by completeness of tumor resection achieved during primary surgery. Incomplete initial debulking occurs frequently in non-specialized centers and there is an ongoing discussion about the best time for re-surgery after referral to tertiary centers. METHODS: Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (FIGO IIIB-IV) admitted between 1999 and 2007 who had primary incomplete surgery including those with initiated chemotherapy at an outside institution were included. Surgical results, morbidity and prognosis were evaluated in patients with immediate re-operation before chemotherapy and those with interval debulking. RESULTS: 48 eligible patients were identified in our tumor registry. Self-referral by patient was the most frequent mode of admission (n=21, 43.8%). 22 patients (45.8%) underwent immediate re-surgery and 26 patients (54.2%) had an interval debulking after chemotherapy. In 12 patients (54.5%), macroscopically complete tumor removal could be achieved by immediate re-operation and in 17 patients (65.4%) after chemotherapy. Major complications were observed more frequently in patients with interval debulking (26.9 vs. 9.1%, p=0.324). Median overall survival time was 53 and 34 months (p=0.110) after immediate and delayed re-operation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront re-operation before start of chemotherapy is feasible and successful in an expertise referral center in more than half of patients with incomplete primary surgery elsewhere. Complete resection even after initial incomplete debulking could improve outcome. Therefore, referral to expertise centers in those patients should be considered. Progression-free survival and overall survival showed a non-significant trend and complication rate is a remarkable advantage in favor of upfront re-operation.

Monitoring serum HER2 levels during neoadjuvant trastuzumab treatment within the GeparQuattro trial.

In the context of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) for breast cancer patients, different targeted therapy approaches are currently evaluated in clinical trials. Serum markers could help to monitor and optimize such treatment strategies. We investigated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 serum (sHER2) levels in 175 breast cancer patients participating in the GeparQuattro trial. This study incorporated NT approaches and additional trastuzumab treatment for all patients with HER2-positive tumors. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 serum levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) before initiation of NT and after NT (pre-surgery) in a HER2-positive (n = 90) and a HER2-negative patient cohort (n = 85). Median pre-chemotherapy sHER2 levels were higher in patients with positive HER2 status of the primary tumor than in patients with negative HER2 status (14.9 ng/ml vs. 7.7 ng/ml, P < 0.001). A pre-chemotherapy sHER2 cut-off level of 10 ng/ml had the best sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between HER2-positive and HER2-negative primary tumors. In HER2-positive patients, we found a significant positive association between pathological complete remission (pCR) and elevated sHER2 levels (above 15 ng/ml, P = 0.045) and a decrease of sHER2 levels during NT (P = 0.02), which was also significant in multivariate analysis (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.001-10.89, P = 0.049). In HER2-negative patients, we observed no association between sHER2 levels and pCR (P > 0.05). Monitoring sHER2 levels in the presence of anti-HER2 treatment might be an adjunct to the clinical evaluation during NT.

Abdominal wall metastases in patients with ovarian cancer after laparoscopic surgery: incidence, risk factors, and complications.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopy is the standard procedure to clarify undefined ovarian masses. However, laparoscopy could induce tumor spread in ovarian cancer (OC). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, the risk factors, and the complications of abdominal wall metastases (AWM) in patients with OC after laparoscopy. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with primary diagnosis of OC who had laparoscopy before cytoreductive surgery and resected port sites in laparotomy between 1999 and 2008 at our institution. Patients with borderline or nonepithelial ovarian tumors were excluded. RESULTS: Of 537 patients with a first diagnosis of OC, 101 had laparoscopy before definitive operation after a median of 31 days. Histological examination at final cytoreductive surgery of the port sites was conducted in 66 patients, whereas 31 patients (47%) showed AWM. Patients experiencing AWM had higher tumor stages and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Ascites with more than 500 mL was a further independent risk factor for AWM (odds ratio: 7.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-35.8; P = 0.016). Abdominal wall metastasis did not impact on survival in our cohort; however, affected patients showed significant larger abdominal wall resections (mean [SD]): 41.0 (angled brace 13.1) cm versus 9.1 (angled brace 1.4) cm in comparison with patients without AWM (P = 0.013), and 2 patients developed abdominal wall recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of AWM in patients experiencing OC was considerably high when laparoscopic surgery was conducted before cytoreductive surgery. Patients experiencing AWM seem to have more surgical burden. However, our series did not show a dramatic impact of AWM on long-term outcome. Patients with highly suspected advanced OC and ascites with more than 500 mL should be referred directly to a gynecologic oncologist who is able to balance risks of laparoscopic staging and direct cytoreductive surgery.

Impact of Nuclear Oestrogen Receptor Beta Expression in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Introduction Oestrogen receptor beta (ER-ß) is abundantly expressed in breast cancer (BC), but its impact on neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome is unknown. Patients and Methods Patients treated in the neoadjuvant GeparTrio trial with available tissue for immunohistochemical analyses were included. Nuclear ER-ß expression was correlated with clinico-pathologic characteristics. The impact of its expression on pathological complete response (pCR [ypT0/ypN0]) and survival was determined. Results Samples of 570 patients were available. Low nuclear ER-ß expression (IRS < 9) was observed in 48.4% of hormone receptor positive and 58.6% of hormone receptor negative tumours. Low nuclear ER-ß expression was associated with higher pCR rates compared to high nuclear ER-ß expression (16.1% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.026). Low ER-ß expression was no independent predictor of pCR in multivariate analyses. Disease-free and overall survival were not statistically different between patients with high and low nuclear ER-ß expression. Triple-negative BCs showed low nuclear ER-ß expression in 57.7%, and pCR rates were 27.1% and 0% (p = 0.23) in low and high ER-ß expressing tumours, respectively. Conclusion Low ER-ß expression is associated with improved pCR rates in univariate analyses. However multivariate analyses and survival analyses do not indicate an impact of ER-ß on survival in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further examination of ER-ß as predictor for endocrine therapy might be of value.

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Vaginal Cancer and Its Precursors. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/042, October 2018).

Purpose This is an official guideline, published and coordinated by the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) and the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). Vaginal cancers are rare tumors, which is why there is very little evidence on these tumors. Knowledge about the optimal clinical management is limited. This first German S2k guideline on vaginal cancer has aimed to compile the most current expert knowledge and offer new recommendations on the appropriate treatment as well as providing pointers about individually adapted therapies with lower morbidity rates than were previously generally available. The purpose of this guideline is also to set up a register to record data on treatment data and the course of disease as a means of obtaining evidence in future. Methods The present S2k guideline was developed by members of the Vulvar und Vaginal Tumors Commission of the AGO in an independently moderated, structured, formal consensus process and the contents were agreed with the mandate holders of the participating scientific societies and organizations. Recommendations To optimize the daily care of patients with vaginal cancer: 1. Monitor the spread pattern; 2. Follow the step-by-step diagnostic workup based on initial stage at detection; 3. As part of individualized clinical therapeutic management of vaginal cancer, follow the sentinel lymph node protocol described here, where possible; 4. Participate in the register study on vaginal cancer.

Primary metastatic breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy - Prognostic impact and the role of breast tumour surgery.

BACKGROUND: Except for meeting the individual palliative need, the benefit of breast surgery in primary metastatic breast cancer (PMBC), also known as de novo metastatic breast cancer, on long-term outcomes remains controversial. Twenty-four hundred and one patients with metastatic breast cancer, enrolled between 2000 and 2011 in two prospective non-interventional studies on targeted therapy, were screened with respect to this question. METHODS: One study investigated trastuzumab therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in addition to mainly first-line chemotherapy. The other observed bevacizumab added to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for mostly HER2-negative disease. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy (24%) patients presented with PMBC, and valid information on resection of the primary tumour was available for 568 women. Out of these, 426 (75%) underwent local resection. The latter group was characterised by less overall metastatic burden and a lower proportion of T4 tumours. No major differences were observed with respect to age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, visceral disease and performance status. Numerically, the surgery group showed a slightly favourable progression-free survival (PFS, medians: 13.6 versus 11.8 months; P = 0.18) and overall survival (OS, 34.1 versus 31.7; P = 0.23). However, in multivariable analysis, including all other univariably significant parameters, no trend for better outcome after surgery remained detectable, neither for PFS (hazard ratio 0.99; P = 0.92) nor for OS (0.95; P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest no major survival benefit for local resection in the overall PMBC population treated with modern targeted therapies. However, further analyses are warranted to define specific risk groups, which may benefit from surgical removal of the primary.

Diarrhea associated with afatinib: an oral ErbB family blocker.

Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are frequently observed in patients receiving EGF receptor (EGFR; also known as HER1 or ErbB1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. GI AEs are among the most common and most impactful on a patient's quality of life. Severe diarrhea can result in fluid and electrolyte losses, leading to dehydration, electrolyte imbalances and renal insufficiency. Afatinib is an irreversible, oral, ErbB family blocker, inhibiting EGFR (ErbB1), HER2 (ErbB2) and ErbB4 receptor kinases. It also inhibits transphosphorylation of ErbB3. Similar to reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors of EGFR, GI AEs - in particular, diarrhea - have frequently been observed in afatinib-treated patients. This article summarizes current data on afatinib-associated diarrhea and provides strategies for its management. Patient education, early identification, timely management and ongoing assessment will help to prevent aggravation, afatinib dose reductions or therapy discontinuation, encouraging patient compliance and allowing patients to obtain the maximum therapeutic benefit from this agent.

Everolimus as treatment for breast cancer patients with bone metastases only: results of the phase II RADAR study.

PURPOSE: Everolimus has shown to stop formation and activity of osteoclasts. Breast cancer patients with bone metastases only are candidates for effective but low toxic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated everolimus in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II, randomized discontinuation study in breast cancer patients with HER2 negative breast cancer patients with bone metastases only. After being stable on 8 weeks of everolimus 10 mg/day, patients were randomized to everolimus-continuation or placebo. Primary outcome was time (from randomization) to progression (TTP). Seventy-six patients would have had to be randomized to show a hazard ration (HR) of 0.5 for everolimus-continuation. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in 4 years. Thirty-nine patients with SD after 8 weeks on everolimus were randomized to everolimus-continuation or placebo. TTP in patients with everolimus-continuation was 37.0 (95 % CI 16.7-40.3) versus 12.6 weeks (95 % CI 7.1-17.9) with placebo [HR 0.554 (95 % CI 0.282-1.09) p = 0.0818], adjusted for endocrine therapy [HR 0.464 (95 % CI 0.226-0.954) p = 0.037]. TTP in everolimus responders (n = 6) was 86 weeks. CONCLUSION: The RADAR study is mainly hypothesis generating. It suggests that everolimus has single-agent activity, and patients with bone metastases only may retrieve long-term benefit from everolimus if they do not progress within 8 weeks of treatment.

Ki67 measured after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The value of Ki67 measured on residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not sufficiently described. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Participants of the GeparTrio study with primary breast cancer randomly received neoadjuvant response-guided [8 cycles TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) in responding and TAC-NX (vinorelbine/capecitabine) in nonresponding patients] or conventional (6 cycles TAC) chemotherapy according to interim response assessment. Ki-67 levels were centrally measured immunohistochemically after neoadjuvant treatment if tumor tissue was available. Here, we analyze 1,151 patients having a pathologic complete response (pCR; n, 484), or residual disease with low (0-15%), intermediate (15.1-35%), or high (35.1-100%) posttreatment Ki67 levels in 488, 77, and 102 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Patients with high posttreatment Ki67 levels showed higher risk for disease relapse (P < 0.0001) and death (P < 0.0001) compared with patients with low or intermediate Ki67 levels. Patients with low Ki67 levels showed a comparable outcome to patients with a pCR (P = 0.211 for disease-free and P = 0.779 for overall survival). Posttreatment Ki67 levels provided more prognostic information than pretreatment Ki67 levels or changes of Ki67 from pre- to posttreatment. Information on pCR plus posttreatment Ki67 levels surmount the prognostic information of pCR alone in hormone-receptor-positive disease [hazard ratios (HR), 1.82-5.88] but not in hormone-receptor-negative disease (HR: 0.61-1.73). Patients with conventional and response-guided treatment did not show a different distribution of posttreatment Ki67 (P = 0.965). CONCLUSIONS: Posttreatment Ki67 levels provide prognostic information for patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Levels were not prognostic for outcome after response-guided chemotherapy. High posttreatment Ki67 indicates the need for innovative postneoadjuvant treatments.

German adjuvant intergroup node-positive study: a phase III trial to compare oral ibandronate versus observation in patients with high-risk early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Bisphosphonates prevent skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Their effect in early breast cancer is controversial. Ibandronate is an orally and intravenously available amino-bisphosphonate with a favorable toxicity profile. It therefore qualifies as potential agent for adjuvant use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The GAIN (German Adjuvant Intergroup Node-Positive) study was an open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Patients with node-positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to two different dose-dense chemotherapy regimens and 2:1 to ibandronate 50 mg per day orally for 2 years or observation. In all, 2,640 patients and 728 events were estimated to be required to demonstrate an increase in disease-free survival (DFS) by ibandronate from 75% to 79.5% by using a two-sided α = .05 and 1-ß of 80%. We report here the efficacy analysis for ibandronate, which was released by the independent data monitoring committee because the futility boundary was not crossed after 50% of the required DFS events were observed. RESULTS: Between June 2004 and August 2008, 2,015 patients were randomly assigned to ibandronate and 1,008 to observation. Patients randomly assigned to ibandronate showed no superior DFS or overall survival (OS) compared with patients randomly assigned to observation (DFS: hazard ratio, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.768 to 1.161; P = .589; OS: HR, 1.040; 95% CI, 0.763 to 1.419; P = .803). DFS was numerically longer if ibandronate was used in patients younger than 40 years or older than 60 years compared with patients age 40 to 59 years (test for interaction P = .093). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant treatment with oral ibandronate did not improve outcome of patients with high-risk early breast cancer who received dose-dense chemotherapy.