Treatment of pediatric alopecia areata: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune, nonscarring hair loss disorder with slightly greater prevalence in children than adults. Various treatment modalities exist; however, their evidence in pediatric AA patients is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence of current treatment modalities for pediatric AA. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on the PubMed database in October 2019 for all published articles involving patients <18 years old. Articles discussing AA treatment in pediatric patients were included, as were articles discussing both pediatric and adult patients, if data on individual pediatric patients were available. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 122 total reports discussing 1032 patients. Reports consisted of 2 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective comparative cohorts, 83 case series, 2 case-control studies, and 31 case reports. Included articles assessed the use of aloe, apremilast, anthralin, anti-interferon gamma antibodies, botulinum toxin, corticosteroids, contact immunotherapies, cryotherapy, hydroxychloroquine, hypnotherapy, imiquimod, Janus kinase inhibitors, laser and light therapy, methotrexate, minoxidil, phototherapy, psychotherapy, prostaglandin analogs, sulfasalazine, topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical nitrogen mustard, and ustekinumab. LIMITATIONS: English-only articles with full texts were used. Manuscripts with adult and pediatric data were only incorporated if individual-level data for pediatric patients were provided. No meta-analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: Topical corticosteroids are the preferred first-line treatment for pediatric AA, as they hold the highest level of evidence, followed by contact immunotherapy. More clinical trials and comparative studies are needed to further guide management of pediatric AA and to promote the potential use of pre-existing, low-cost, and novel therapies, including Janus kinase inhibitors.

Psychosocial and psychiatric comorbidities and health-related quality of life in alopecia areata: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune-mediated disease resulting in nonscarring hair loss. Systematic reviews on the psychosocial and psychiatric comorbidities, health-related quality of life, and interventions targeting psychosocial well-being are limited. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the psychosocial comorbidities, health-related quality of life, and treatment options targeting psychosocial well-being in adult and pediatric AA patients. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines within the PubMed database. Specific search terms included, but were not limited to, alopecia areata, psychosocial, psychiatry, and quality of life. Studies were then evaluated for their design and categorized into corresponding levels of evidence according to the guidelines adapted from the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine. FINDINGS: Seventy-three reports met inclusion criteria, involving approximately 414,319 unique participants. AA patients were found to have psychiatric comorbidities, particularly anxiety and depression. Health-related quality of life is reduced in AA patients, but data on pediatric AA quality of life are limited. Psychotherapy is often recommended as adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: AA has substantial psychosocial impact on patients and results in reduced health-related quality of life. Addressing this should be an active part of treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Topical Lovastatin Plus Cholesterol Cream vs Topical Lovastatin Cream Alone for the Treatment of Disseminated Superficial Actinic Porokeratosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis (DSAP) is an inherited or sporadic disorder of keratinization associated with germline variations. There is no effective standard of care therapy for DSAP, but treatment with topical lovastatin combined with cholesterol cream has shown promise. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of topical lovastatin 2% plus cholesterol 2% cream (lovastatin-cholesterol) and topical lovastatin 2% cream (lovastatin) alone in adults diagnosed with DSAP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This patient- and assessor-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Medical University of South Carolina between August 3, 2020, and April 28, 2021. Nonpregnant adults with a previous clinical or histological diagnosis of DSAP were eligible. Data were blindly analyzed after study completion. Interventions: Participants were randomized to once- or twice-daily application of either lovastatin-cholesterol cream (n = 17) or lovastatin cream (n = 14) to symptomatic regions for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was the effect of the treatment on DSAP at the end of treatment (12 weeks) as measured by the DSAP General Assessment Severity Index (DSAP-GASI; scored from 0-4, with 0 indicating clear and 4 indicating severe). Treatment efficacy was based on investigator-standardized photographs provided by the participants because of the need for evaluation via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary efficacy measures included patient-reported outcomes, application frequency, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of the 87 participants screened, 32 were enrolled. One participant randomized to receive lovastatin-cholesterol did not receive the intervention, leaving 17 participants (mean [range] age, 59.2 [40-83] years; 13 females [76.5%]; all White) allocated to receive lovastatin-cholesterol treatment and 14 participants (13 female [92.9%]; mean (range) age, 53.7 [33-71] years; all White) to receive lovastatin treatment. Twelve participants in each treatment group qualified for the analysis. Disease severity decreased from week 1 to week 12 by 50.0% (from 3.08 [95% CI, 2.57-3.60] to 1.54 (95% CI, 1.04-2.05] points on the DSAP-GASI; P < .001) in the lovastatin-cholesterol group and 51.4% (from 2.92 [95% CI, 2.40-3.43] to 1.50 [95% CI, 0.99-2.01] points; P < .001) in the lovastatin group. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups according to application frequency at the end of 12 weeks. Adverse events reported included myalgia (n = 2), elevation in the creatine kinase level (n = 1), application discomfort (n = 4), and rash (n = 1). No serious AEs occurred, and all participants with an AE were able to complete the study. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found improvements in DSAP severity in both treatment groups, without serious AEs, indicating a limited benefit with the addition of cholesterol. These results suggest that lovastatin cream may be a new primary treatment option for patients diagnosed with DSAP. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04359823.

Non-surgical management of primary invasive melanoma.

Surgical excision is standard-of-care for primary invasive melanoma, but best care can be unclear for patients who are surgically high-risk or for whom resection may be excessively morbid. Alternatives to surgical excision have emerged for treatment of metastatic melanoma but have not yet been explored for primary invasive melanoma. Two elderly patients with primary invasive melanoma with many medical co-morbidities who were not surgical candidates were determined to be appropriate candidates for an intralesional IL-2 based regimen. Herein we report their clinical and histological outcome. An intralesional-based regimen (intralesional IL-2, topical imiquimod cream 5%, and tretinoin cream 0.1% under occlusion to the treatment site) was administered over the course of six to seven weeks, followed by two weeks of topical-only therapy. A complete response was seen after eight to nine weeks of treating invasive melanomas that were ≥1.85 mm and 5.5 mm thick. For patients with primary invasive melanoma on high morbidity sites and patients who are poor surgical candidates, a neoadjuvant intralesional IL-2-based approach may be a reasonable alternative. The two cases presented here suggest that alternative intralesional-based treatment modalities may minimize the size of the excision site and can be associated with complete histological clearance of invasive melanoma.

Epidemiology of Keratinocyte Carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: To provide a synopsis of recent research advances in the epidemiology of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), with a focus on indoor tanning and known risk factors for other forms of cancer such as cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking. RECENT FINDINGS: The evidence is strong enough to infer that use of UVR-emitting indoor tanning devices cause KC. Epidemiologic studies of cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and menopausal hormone therapy all show some suggestion for increased risk of KC but the evidence is not yet strong enough to determine if there is a true etiologic role. Body mass index is clearly inversely associated with KC risk but this is more likely to be due to lower UVR exposure in overweight and obese individuals than it is due to a true etiologic role. SUMMARY: The epidemic of KC continues unabated, and the causal role of indoor tanning is contributing to this unfavorable trend in KC incidence rates. Advances in understanding the etiology of KC should not divert attention away from the fact that the primary public health strategy to prevent KC is known: minimize population exposure to UVR from the sun and from UVR-emitting indoor tanning devices, particularly among those with sun-sensitive phenotypes.

Nonmelanoma skin cancer and risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality: a systematic review.

Some reports suggest that a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) may be associated with increased mortality. NMSCs have very low fatality rates, but the high prevalence of NMSC elevates the importance of the possibility of associated subsequent mortality from other causes. The variable methods and findings of existing studies leave the significance of these results uncertain. To provide clarity, we conducted a systematic review to characterize the evidence on the associations of NMSC with: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) cancer-specific mortality, and (3) cancer survival. Bibliographic databases were searched through February 2016. Cohort studies published in English were included if adequate data were provided to estimate mortality ratios in patients with-versus-without NMSC. Data were abstracted from the total of eight studies from independent data sources that met inclusion criteria (n = 3 for all-cause mortality, n = 2 for cancer-specific mortality, and n = 5 for cancer survival). For all-cause mortality, a significant increased risk was observed for patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (mortality ratio estimates (MR) 1.25 and 1.30), whereas no increased risk was observed for patients with a history of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (MRs 0.96 and 0.97). Based on one study, the association with cancer-specific mortality was stronger for SCC (MR 2.17) than BCC (MR 1.15). Across multiple types of cancer both SCC and BCC tended to be associated with poorer survival from second primary malignancies. Multiple studies support an association between NMSC and fatal outcomes; the associations tend to be more potent for SCC than BCC. Additional investigation is needed to more precisely characterize these associations and elucidate potential underlying mechanisms.

Improving Pediatric Adverse Drug Event Reporting through Clinical Pharmacy Services.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to summarize adverse drug event (ADE) reporting and to characterize the type of healthcare practitioners involved in reporting over a 10-year period at a 120-bed university-affiliated children's hospital. METHODS: The University of Virginia Children's Hospital ADE database was analyzed for records involving pediatric patients. Data from patients <18 years of age who were admitted to the University of Virginia Children's Hospital between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009, were analyzed. Data collected included drug name and therapeutic class of the suspected causative agent, description of the event, severity, causality, outcome, and the type of healthcare practitioner reporting the event. RESULTS: A total of 863 ADEs were reported over the 10-year period. The 5 most common types reported were extravasation injury (10%), rash (8%), hypotension (5%), pruritus (5%), and renal failure (3%). A total of 196 (21%) cases were categorized as mild, 436 (47%) cases as moderate, and 296 (32%) cases as severe. Further characterization of extravasations was performed to identify trends relating to potential causes. In 45 (57%) reports, parenteral nutrition was identified as the causative agent. Full recovery was documented in 21 (47%) extravasations. Of the total events reported, 83% were reported by pharmacists, 16% by nurses, and <1% by other healthcare practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study are consistent with those of previous studies involving ADE reporting in children's hospitals. This consistency is due in part to system design and use of unit-based pharmacists as the primary reporters.