Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Límite
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 115(11): 389-97, 2003 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12879737

RESUMEN

METHODOLOGY: The survival of 357 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in three treatment groups reflecting different time-periods of diagnosis (A: 1982-1984; B: 1994/1995; C: 1996-1998) was analysed to assess the impact and the potential improvement of changing treatment strategies in our tertiary-care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Group A (n = 100) included all consecutive patients diagnosed from 1982 to 1984 and served as the historical control. Group B (n = 93) included all consecutive patients diagnosed in 1994/1995 and group C (n = 164) those diagnosed from 1996 to 1998. Survival in the three treatment groups (A vs. B vs. C) was analysed according to treatment given after neurosurgical intervention (i.e. no specific therapy versus radiotherapy versus combined radio-/chemotherapy), and according to first-line chemotherapy, age (< 40, 40-60, > 60), sex, and tumor location (hemispheric versus bilateral or multifocal tumors, and tumors involving eloquent brain areas). Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier's non-parametric method. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients in groups A and B received radio- and/or chemotherapy to a varying extent (radiotherapy: group A: 22%, group B: 62%; chemotherapy: group A: 6%, group B: 33%). Chemotherapy was administered after termination of radiotherapy in both groups. In group C, 96% of patients received combined radio-/chemotherapy which was administered concomitantly and started within three weeks after surgery. Median survival was 5.2 months in group A, 5.1 months in group B and 14.5 months in C (p < 0.0001). Nine patients in group A (9%), 9 in group B (10%) and 40 in group C (25%) survived more than 18 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Survival improvement in group C might be attributable to the early start of combined radio-/chemotherapy. Therapy was administered on a complete outpatient basis, enabled by a dedicated interdisciplinary neuro-oncologic team caring for group C. Toxicity was mild and patients' acceptance excellent.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Glioblastoma/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Radioisótopos de Cobalto/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Glioblastoma/cirugía , Humanos , Lomustina/administración & dosificación , Lomustina/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Nitrosourea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Nitrosourea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organofosforados/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organofosforados/uso terapéutico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA