Selective androgen receptor modulation for muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised control trial.

BACKGROUND: Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) increase muscle mass via the androgen receptor. This phase 2A trial investigated the effects of a SARM, GSK2881078, in conjunction with exercise, on leg strength in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and impaired physical function. METHODS: 47 postmenopausal women and 50 men with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 30%-65% predicted; short physical performance battery score: 3-11) were enrolled into a randomised double-blind, placebo control trial. Patients were randomised 1:1 to once daily placebo or oral GSK2881078 (females: 1.0 mg; males: 2.0 mg) for 13 weeks with a concurrent home-exercise programme, involving strength training and physical activity. Primary endpoints were change from baseline in leg strength at 90 days (one-repetition maximum; absolute (kg) and relative (% change)) and multiple safety outcomes. Secondary endpoints included lean body mass, physical function and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: GSK2881078 increased leg strength in men. The difference in adjusted mean change from baseline and adjusted mean percentage change from baseline between treatment and placebo were: for women, 8.0 kg (90% CI -2.5 to 18.4) and 5.2% (90% CI -4.7 to 15.0), respectively; for men, 11.8 kg (90% CI -0.5 to 24.0) and 7.0% (90% CI 0.5 to 13.6), respectively. Lean body mass increased, but no changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed. Reversible reductions in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and transient elevations in hepatic transaminases were the main treatment-related safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: GSK2881078 was well tolerated and short-term treatment increased leg strength, when expressed as per cent predicted, in men with COPD more than physical training alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03359473.

An open label trial of nemiralisib, an inhaled PI3 kinase delta inhibitor for the treatment of Activated PI3 kinase Delta Syndrome.

Activated PI3Kδ Syndrome (APDS) is a rare inherited inborn error of immunity caused by mutations that constitutively activate the p110 delta isoform of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3Kδ), resulting in recurring pulmonary infections. Currently no licensed therapies are available. Here we report the results of an open-label trial in which five subjects were treated for 12 weeks with nemiralisib, an inhaled inhibitor of PI3Kδ, to determine safety, systemic exposure, together with lung and systemic biomarker profiles (Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT02593539). Induced sputum was captured to measure changes in phospholipids and inflammatory mediators, and blood samples were collected to assess pharmacokinetics of nemiralisib, and systemic biomarkers. Nemiralisib was shown to have an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with cough being the most common adverse event, and no severe adverse events reported during the study. No meaningful changes in phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3; the enzyme product of PI3Kδ) or downstream inflammatory markers in induced sputum, were observed following nemiralisib treatment. Similarly, there were no meaningful changes in blood inflammatory markers, or lymphocytes subsets. Systemic levels of nemiralisib were higher in subjects in this study compared to previous observations. While nemiralisib had an acceptable safety profile, there was no convincing evidence of target engagement in the lung following inhaled dosing and no downstream effects observed in either the lung or blood compartments. We speculate that this could be explained by nemiralisib not being retained in the lung for sufficient duration, suggested by the increased systemic exposure, perhaps due to pre-existing structural lung damage. In this study investigating a small number of subjects with APDS, nemiralisib appeared to be safe and well-tolerated. However, data from this study do not support the hypothesis that inhaled treatment with nemiralisib would benefit patients with APDS.

Joint longitudinal model-based meta-analysis of FEV1 and exacerbation rate in randomized COPD trials.

Model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) is an approach that integrates relevant summary level data from heterogeneously designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study not only evaluated the predictability of a published MBMA for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and its link to annual exacerbation rate in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but also included data from new RCTs. A comparative effectiveness analysis across all drugs was also performed. Aggregated level data were collected from RCTs published between July 2013 and November 2020 (n = 132 references comprising 156 studies) and combined with data used in the legacy MBMA (published RCTs up to July 2013 - n = 142). The augmented data (n = 298) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the published MBMA using goodness-of-fit plots for assessment. Furthermore, the model was extended including drugs that were not available before July 2013, estimating a new set of parameters. The legacy MBMA model predicted the post-2013 FEV1 data well, and new estimated parameters were similar to those of drugs in the same class. However, the exacerbation model overpredicted the post-2013 mean annual exacerbation rate data. Inclusion of year when the study started on the pre-treatment placebo rate improved the model predictive performance perhaps explaining potential improvements in the disease management over time. The addition of new data to the legacy COPD MBMA enabled a more robust model with increased predictability performance for both endpoints FEV1 and mean annual exacerbation rate.

Improved Confidence in a Confirmatory Stage by Application of Item-Based Pharmacometrics Model: Illustration with a Phase III Active Comparator-Controlled Trial in COPD Patients.

PURPOSE: The current study aimed to illustrate how a non-linear mixed effect (NLME) model-based analysis may improve confidence in a Phase III trial through more precise estimates of the drug effect. METHODS: The FULFIL clinical trial was a Phase III study that compared 24 weeks of once daily inhaled triple therapy with twice daily inhaled dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Patient reported outcome data, obtained by using The Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS:COPD) questionnaire, from the FULFIL study were analyzed using an NLME item-based response theory model (IRT). The change from baseline (CFB) in E-RS:COPD total score over 4-week intervals for each treatment arm was obtained using the IRT and compared with published results obtained with a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis. RESULTS: The IRT included a graded response model characterizing item parameters and a Weibull function combined with an offset function to describe the COPD symptoms-time course in patients receiving either triple therapy (n = 907) or dual therapy (n = 894). The IRT improved precision of the estimated drug effect compared to MMRM, resulting in a sample size of at least 3.64 times larger for the MMRM analysis to achieve the IRT precision in the CFB estimate. CONCLUSION: This study shows the advantage of IRT over MMRM with a direct comparison of the same primary endpoint for the two analyses using the same observed clinical trial data, resulting in an increased confidence in Phase III.

Investigating the effect of TRPV4 inhibition on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability following segmental endotoxin challenge.

BACKGROUND: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with increased pulmonary-vascular permeability. In the lung, transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4), a Ca2+-permeable cation channel, is a regulator of endothelial permeability and pulmonary edema. We performed a Phase I, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, proof-of-mechanism study to investigate the effects of TRPV4 channel blocker, GSK2798745, on pulmonary-vascular barrier permeability using a model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung inflammation. METHODS: Healthy participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 single doses of GSK2798745 or placebo, 12 h apart. Two hours after the first dose, participants underwent bronchoscopy and segmental LPS instillation. Total protein concentration and neutrophil counts were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples collected before and 24 h after LPS challenge, as markers of barrier permeability and inflammation, respectively. The primary endpoint was baseline adjusted total protein concentration in BAL at 24 h after LPS challenge. A Bayesian framework was used to estimate the posterior probability of any percentage reduction (GSK2798745 relative to placebo). Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram, clinical laboratory and haematological evaluations, and spirometry. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants were dosed and 45 completed the study (22 on GSK2798745 and 23 on placebo). Overall, GSK2798745 was well tolerated. Small reductions in mean baseline adjusted BAL total protein (~9%) and neutrophils (~7%) in the LPS-challenged segment were observed in the GSK2798745 group compared with the placebo group; however, the reductions did not meet pre-specified success criteria of at least a 95% posterior probability that the percentage reduction in the mean 24-h post LPS BAL total protein level (GSK2798745 relative to placebo) exceeded zero. Median plasma concentrations of GSK2798745 were predicted to inhibit TRPV4 on lung vascular endothelial cells by ~70-85% during the 24 h after LPS challenge; median urea-corrected BAL concentrations of GSK2798745 were 3.0- to 8.7-fold higher than those in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: GSK2798745 did not affect segmental LPS-induced elevation of BAL total protein or neutrophils, despite blood and lung exposures that were predicted to be efficacious. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03511105.

Bayesian approach to investigate a two-state mixed model of COPD exacerbations.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic obstructive disease of the airways. An exacerbation of COPD is defined as shortness of breath, cough, and sputum production. New therapies for COPD exacerbations are examined in clinical trials frequently based on the number of exacerbations that implies long-term study due to the high variability in occurrence and duration of the events. In this work, we expanded the two-state model developed by Cook et al. where the patient transits from an asymptomatic (state 1) to a symptomatic state (state 2) and vice versa, through investigating different semi-Markov models in a Bayesian context using data from actual clinical trials. Of the four models tested, the log-logistic model was shown to adequately characterize the duration and number of COPD exacerbations. The patient disease stage was found a significant covariate with an effect of accelerating the transition from asymptomatic to symptomatic state. In addition, the best dropout model (log-logistic) was incorporated in the final two-state model to describe the dropout mechanism. Simulation based diagnostics such as posterior predictive check (PPC) and visual predictive check (VPC) were used to assess the behaviour of the model. The final model was applied in three clinical trial data to investigate its ability to detect the drug effect: the drug effect was captured in all three datasets and in both directions (from state 1 to state 2 and vice versa). A practical design investigation was also carried out and showed the limits of reducing the number of subjects and study length on the drug effect identification. Finally, clinical trial simulation confirmed that the model can potentially be used to predict medium term (6-12 months) clinical trial outcome using the first 3 months data, but at the expense of showing a non-significant drug effect.

Correction to: Bayesian approach to investigate a two-state mixed model of COPD exacerbations.

The article [Bayesian approach to investigate a two-state mixed model of COPD exacerbations], written by [Anna Largajolli, Misba Beerahee, Shuying Yang], was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal (currently SpringerLink) on [13 June 2019] without open access. With the author(s)' decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on [November 2019] to © The Author(s) [2019] and the article is forthwith distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Dose-response modelling of umeclidinium and fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium in asthma.

PURPOSE: In two dose-ranging crossover studies, the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) was assessed as monotherapy in patients with asthma not treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (NCT01641692 [study 1]) and combined with the ICS fluticasone furoate (FF) in patients with asthma symptomatic on ICS (NCT01573624 [study 2]). The present study aimed to further characterise the UMEC dose-response relationship with change from baseline trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (day 15). METHODS: A model-based approach using non-linear mixed-effects analyses was used to assess data from studies 1 and 2. RESULTS: Within the Study 1 dose range, no significant dose-response was demonstrated. In study 2, the slope-intercept on log-dose model showed a mild dose-response, with a 10 % probability of a 0.075-L FEV1 improvement with FF/UMEC 100/250 mcg; period 1 data (with an absent carryover effect) indicated an 88 % probability of a 0.075-L FEV1 improvement. CONCLUSION: The model-based approach in study 2 identified FF/UMEC doses warranting further investigation.

Exploring the roles of UGT1A1 and UGT1A3 in oral clearance of GSK2190915, a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor.

Pharmacokinetic variability in drug exposure is a concern for all compounds in development including those for the treatment of asthma and other respiratory disorders. Substantial variability in the oral clearance of GSK2190915, a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor that attenuates the production of leukotriene B4 and cysteinyl leukotrienes, is largely unaccounted for by clinical variables. A study of 41 patients, 78% (32/41) of whom were non-Hispanic whites, with mild to moderate asthma identified an association of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A3*2 with the oral clearance of GSK2190915 (P=3.8×10⁻4 and 1.2×10⁻5, respectively). However, in a subsequent replication study of 403 non-Hispanic white patients with asthma, we failed to observe a statistically significant association between oral clearance of GSK2190915 and either UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A3*2 (P>0.05). Therefore, genetic effects that could explain the systemic exposure level variability of GSK2190915 were not identified.

Inhibition of capsaicin-driven nasal hyper-reactivity by SB-705498, a TRPV1 antagonist.

AIMS: To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of intranasal SB-705498, a selective TRPV1 antagonist. METHODS: Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical studies were performed: (i) an intranasal SB-705498 first time in human study to examine the safety and PK of five single escalating doses from 0.5 to 12 mg and of repeat dosing with 6 mg and 12 mg twice daily for 14 days and (ii) a PD efficacy study in subjects with non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) to evaluate the effect of 12 mg intranasal SB-705498 against nasal capsaicin challenge. RESULTS: Single and repeat dosing with intranasal SB-705498 was safe and well tolerated. The overall frequency of adverse events was similar for SB-705498 and placebo and no dose-dependent increase was observed. Administration of SB-705498 resulted in less than dose proportional AUC(0,12 h) and Cmax , while repeat dosing from day 1 to day 14 led to its accumulation. SB-705498 receptor occupancy in nasal tissue was estimated to be high (>80%). Administration of 12 mg SB-705498 to patients with NAR induced a marked reduction in total symptom scores triggered by nasal capsaicin challenge. Inhibition of rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion and burning sensation was associated with 2- to 4-fold shift in capsaicin potency. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal SB-705498 has an appropriate safety and PK profile for development in humans and achieves clinically relevant attenuation of capsaicin-provoked rhinitis symptoms in patients with NAR. The potential impact intranasal SB-705498 may have in rhinitis treatment deserves further evaluation.

Dose response of umeclidinium administered once or twice daily in patients with COPD: a randomised cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: Umeclidinium bromide (UMEC) is an inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonist in development for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way cross-over, incomplete block study to evaluate UMEC 15.6, 31.25, 62.5, and 125 µg administered once daily (QD), and UMEC 15.6 µg and 31.25 µg administered twice daily (BID), over 7 days in patients with COPD. Tiotropium was included as an open-label treatment arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) on Day 8. Secondary efficacy endpoints included weighted mean FEV1 over 0-24 hours after morning dosing on Day 7, and serial FEV1 at each time point over 24 hours after morning dosing on Day 7. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also examined. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-three patients (mean age 59.5 years, 52% female) were randomised. Based on the population dose-response model of trough FEV1 data, the geometric mean potency (ED50) of UMEC was 37 µg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18, 57) with a predicted maximum intrinsic efficacy (Emax) at trough of 0.185 L (95% CI: 0.153, 0.218) after QD dosing. UMEC 125 µg QD demonstrated the greatest improvements in measure of lung function compared with doses of 62.5 µg and below. UMEC 125 µg QD exhibited more consistent increases in FEV1 from baseline across serial time points over 24 hours compared with other UMEC doses and tiotropium. Increases in FEV1 over 0-12 hours were similar to those observed over 12-24 hours after the second dose of UMEC was administered. UMEC was rapidly absorbed following inhaled dosing and eliminated from plasma. Adverse events, generally mild, were highest with UMEC 125 µg QD (18%) compared with placebo (8%), tiotropium (4%) and other UMEC doses (5-12%). CONCLUSIONS: UMEC is a potent QD bronchodilator with geometric mean ED50 of 37 µg. A dose ordering over the range of UMEC 15.6-125 µg QD doses was observed, with UMEC 125 µg showing the greatest improvement in trough FEV1.

Population model of longitudinal FEV1 data in asthmatics: meta-analysis and predictability of placebo response.

Asthma is an obstructive lung disease where the mechanism of disease progression is not fully understood hence motivating the use of empirical models to describe the evolution of the patient's health state. With reference to placebo response, measured in terms of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s), a range of empirical models taken from the literature were compared at a single trial level. In particular, eleven GSK trials lasting 12 weeks in mild-to-moderate asthma were used for the modelling of longitudinal placebo responses. Then, the chosen exponential model was used to carry out an individual participant data meta-analysis on eleven trials. A covariate analysis was also performed to find relevant covariates in asthma to be accounted for in the meta-analysis model. Age, gender, and height were found statistically significant (e.g. the taller the patients the higher the FEV1, the older the patients the lower the FEV1, and females have lower FEV1). By truncating each trial at week 4, the predictive properties of the meta-analysis model were also investigated, showing its ability to predict long-term FEV1 response from truncated trials. Summarizing, the study suggests that: (i) the exponential model effectively describes the placebo response; (ii) the meta-analysis approach may prove helpful to simulate new trials as well as to reduce trial duration in view of its predictive properties; (iii) the inclusion of available covariates within the meta-analysis model provides a reduction of the inter-individual variability.

Losmapimod concentration-QT relationship in healthy volunteers: meta-analysis of data from six clinical trials.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to describe the losmapimod concentration-QT relationship using meta-analysis of data from clinical trials with healthy volunteers and to evaluate the covariates that have significant impact on the QT prolongation. METHODS: Losmapimod plasma concentration and QT interval data were collected from six early clinical studies with healthy volunteers. The electrocardiograms (ECGs) were collected at baseline and at a number of post-dose time points (losmapimod or placebo). The population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling approach was applied to investigate the relationship between losmapimod concentration and QT prolongation. RESULTS: The dataset for analysis comprised 190 healthy adults who took at least one dose of losmapimod or placebo. Of the 2,494 QT observations collected, 1,532 observations had matched QT and losmapimod plasma concentration data. Population PK/PD analyses indicated that the model with the individual heart rate correction factor (α) fitted the data better than those using fixed α (0.33 for Fridericia's correction or 0.5 for Bazett's correction) and that there was no relationship between losmapimod concentration and QT interval. Female volunteers had about a 3 % higher QT interval at baseline than the male volunteers. No other covariates had a significant effect on the QT interval. CONCLUSIONS: It is appropriate to apply population PK/PD analysis to investigate the effect of drug concentration on QT prolongation. Our meta-analysis of healthy volunteer data indicated no relationship between systemic losmapimod concentration and QT interval in healthy volunteers.

Pediatric Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Exposure-Response Analysis of Ambrisentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Comparison With Adult Data.

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of ambrisentan in pediatric patients (8 to <18 years) with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and compare pediatric ambrisentan systemic exposure with previously reported adult data. Association of ambrisentan exposure with efficacy (6-minute walking distance) and safety (adverse events) were exploratory analyses. A population PK model was developed using pediatric PK data. Steady-state systemic exposure metrics were estimated for the pediatric population and compared with previously reported data in adult patients with PAH and healthy subjects. No covariates had a significant effect on PK parameters; therefore, the final covariate model was the same as the base model. The pediatric population PK model was a 2-compartment model including the effect of body weight (allometric scaling), first-order absorption and elimination, and absorption lag time. Steady-state ambrisentan exposure was similar between the pediatric and adult population when accounting for body weight differences. Geometric mean area under the concentration-time curve at steady state in pediatric patients receiving ambrisentan low dose was 3% lower than in the adult population (and similar in both populations receiving high dose). Geometric mean maximum plasma concentration at steady state in pediatric patients receiving low and high doses was 11% and 18% higher, respectively, than in the adult population. There was no apparent association in the pediatric or adult population between ambrisentan exposure and change in 6-minute walking distance or incidence of ambrisentan-related adverse events in pediatric patients. The similar ambrisentan exposure and exposure-response profiles observed in pediatric and adult populations with PAH suggests appropriateness of body-weight-based dosing in the pediatric population with PAH.

Longitudinal Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Lung Function Response to Support Phase III Study Design in Chinese Patients With Asthma.

Asthma is a chronic disease of the lungs characterized by airway inflammation, bronchoconstriction, and increased airway responsiveness. Forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) is used as a measure of lung function and to help diagnose and monitor lung diseases, including asthma. An exponential longitudinal model has been previously developed to adequately describe the FEV1 response in asthma patients with placebo. This model was the basis of a longitudinal model-based meta-analysis which was undertaken to describe the trough FEV1 responses ranging up to 1 year from nine clinical studies in a population with asthma (N = 3,896), following placebo, dual combination (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol), and triple combination (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol) given via inhalation. Numerical, graphical and simulation-based diagnostics showed that a Weibull model adequately characterized the longitudinal trough FEV1 response with time. Automatic covariate selection supported by statistically based regression models identified a range of patient characteristics influencing the model parameters. Race was a significant covariate on baseline but not on the parameters that impact the FEV1 trajectory. Based on the trough FEV1, all active treatments were found to be significantly different when compared with placebo and showed clinically meaningful improvement in FEV1. The model was able to predict the longitudinal FEV1 response in Chinese patients with inadequately controlled asthma and was used to provide additional support with respect to the design for a shorter-duration phase III study to the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA).

Power estimation using a population pharmacokinetics model with optimal design by clinical trial simulations: application in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article was to determine the power for pharmacokinetic interaction investigations using population a pharmacokinetic modelling approach with optimal sampling designs and clinical trial simulations. METHODS: A clinical trial simulation approach was proposed to estimate the power for pharmacokinetic effects in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies. This approach consisted of: (1) population pharmacokinetic (PK) model(s) was characterised for the drug(s) studied; (2) D-optimal design strategy was applied based on these model(s) to determine optimal sampling times for DDI investigation; (3) clinical trial simulations under particular study designs, for example a randomised parallel design, were used to evaluate the sample size needed for studying PK interaction. The approach was described using an example investigating the impact of a new anti-inflammatory drug on methotrexate (MTX) exposure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. RESULTS: The power for evaluating PK interaction largely depended on the interindividual variability (IIV) in PK parameters. Residual variability was also influential to a lesser degree in the sample size determination using the proposed approach. It required 40-60 participants for scenarios where IIV was relatively low in order to achieve 90% power. However, a sample size of 80 individuals was required to reach 90% power where both IIV and residual variances were high. Under the same IIV assumptions, the proposed approach in general required a smaller sample size compared with the standard noncompartmental analysis method with intensive blood samples to attain the target power. When IIV was low, the difference in the power between the two approaches was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK modelling with optimal design and clinical trial simulation to determine sample size when designing drug-drug interaction studies was efficient and cost effective.

Improved Decision-Making Confidence Using Item-Based Pharmacometric Model: Illustration with a Phase II Placebo-Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to illustrate how a new methodology to assess clinical trial outcome measures using a longitudinal item response theory-based model (IRM) could serve as an alternative to mixed model repeated measures (MMRM). Data from the EXACT (Exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease tool) which is used to capture frequency, severity, and duration of exacerbations in COPD were analyzed using an IRM. The IRM included a graded response model characterizing item parameters and functions describing symptom-time course. Total scores were simulated (month 12) using uncertainty in parameter estimates. The 50th (2.5th, 97.5th) percentiles of the resulting simulated differences in average total score (drug minus placebo) represented the estimated drug effect (95%CI), which was compared with published MMRM results. Furthermore, differences in sample size, sensitivity, specificity, and type I and II errors between approaches were explored. Patients received either oral danirixin 75 mg twice daily (n = 45) or placebo (n = 48) on top of standard of care over 52 weeks. A step function best described the COPD symptoms-time course in both trial arms. The IRM improved precision of the estimated drug effect compared to MMRM, resulting in a sample size of 2.5 times larger for the MMRM analysis to achieve the IRM precision. The IRM showed a higher probability of a positive predictive value (34%) than MMRM (22%). An item model-based analysis data gave more precise estimates of drug effect than MMRM analysis for the same endpoint in this one case study.

Adaptive study design to assess effect of TRPV4 inhibition in patients with chronic cough.

OBJECTIVE: Airway sensory nerves involved in the cough reflex are activated by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) agonism of P2X purinoceptor 3 (P2X3) receptors. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel activation causes ATP release from airway cells, and it is hypothesised that a TRPV4-ATP-P2X3 axis contributes to chronic cough. An adaptive study was run to determine if TRPV4 inhibition, using the selective TRPV4 channel blocker GSK2798745, was effective in reducing cough. METHODS: A two-period randomised, double blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study was designed with interim analyses for futility and sample size adjustment. Refractory chronic cough patients received either GSK2798745 or placebo once daily for 7 days with a washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected for analysis of GSK2798745 at end of study. The primary end-point was total cough counts assessed objectively during day-time hours (10 h) following 7 days of dosing. RESULTS: Interim analysis was performed after 12 participants completed both treatment periods. This showed a 32% increase in cough counts on Day 7 for GSK2798745 compared to placebo; the pre-defined negative criteria for the study were met and the study was stopped. At this point 17 participants had been enrolled (mean 61 years; 88% female), and 15 had completed the study. Final study results for posterior median cough counts showed a 34% (90% credible interval: -3%, +85%) numerical increase for GSK2798745 compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of an anti-tussive effect of GSK2798745. The study design allowed the decision on lack of efficacy to be made with minimal participant exposure to the investigational drug.

A Novel Method for Analysing Frequent Observations from Questionnaires in Order to Model Patient-Reported Outcomes: Application to EXACT® Daily Diary Data from COPD Patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease with approximately 174 million cases worldwide. Electronic questionnaires are increasingly used for collecting patient-reported-outcome (PRO) data about disease symptoms. Our aim was to leverage PRO data, collected to record COPD disease symptoms, in a general modelling framework to enable interpretation of PRO observations in relation to disease progression and potential to predict exacerbations. The data were collected daily over a year, in a prospective, observational study. The e-questionnaire, the EXAcerbations of COPD Tool (EXACT®) included 14 items (i.e. questions) with 4 or 5 ordered categorical response options. An item response theory (IRT) model was used to relate the responses from each item to the underlying latent variable (which we refer to as disease severity), and on each item level, Markov models (MM) with 4 or 5 categories were applied to describe the dependence between consecutive observations. Minimal continuous time MMs were used and parameterised using ordinary differential equations. One hundred twenty-seven COPD patients were included (median age 67 years, 54% male, 39% current smokers), providing approximately 40,000 observations per EXACT® item. The final model suggested that, with time, patients more often reported the same scores as the previous day, i.e. the scores were more stable. The modelled COPD disease severity change over time varied markedly between subjects, but was small in the typical individual. This is the first IRT model with Markovian properties; our analysis proved them necessary for predicting symptom-defined exacerbations.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol via a Single Inhaler in Patients with COPD.

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted from a subset of samples obtained from the Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy trial to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol in patients with symptomatic COPD following treatment with fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol combined in a single inhaler. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol, 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg; Ellipta inhaler) with twice-daily dual therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 µg/12 µg; Turbuhaler). The analyses were conducted in a subset of 74 patients who received fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol and provided serial or sparse samples. Monte Carlo simulations and a model-based estimation approach both indicated that systemic drug concentrations of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol after administration of fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol triple combination therapy from a single inhaler were within the ranges observed following administration of these drugs as monotherapy (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol) or as dual-combination therapy (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or umeclidinium/vilanterol).