Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(14)2024 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39064280

RESUMEN

Background: Despite the strong declining trends in incidence and mortality over the last decades, gastric cancer (GC) is still burdened with high mortality, even in high-income countries. To improve GC prognosis, several guidelines have been increasingly published with indications about the most appropriate GC management. The Italian Society of Digestive System Pathology (SIPAD) and Gastric Cancer Italian Research Group (GIRCG) designed a survey for both surgeons and patients with the purpose of evaluating the degree of application and adherence to guidelines in GC management in Italy. Materials and Methods: Between January and May 2022, a questionnaire has been administered to a sample of Italian surgeons and, in a simplified version, to members of the Patient Association "Vivere Senza Stomaco" (patients surgically treated for GC between 2008 and 2021) to investigate the diagnosis, staging, and treatment issues. Results: The survey has been completed by 125 surgeons and 125 patients. Abdominal CT with gastric hydro-distension before treatment was not widespread in both groups (47% and 42%, respectively). The rate of surgeons stating that they do not usually perform minimally invasive gastrectomy was 15%, but the rate of patients who underwent a minimally invasive approach was 22% (between 2011 and 2022). The percentage of surgeons declaring to perform extended lymphadenectomy (>D2) was 97%, although a limited lymph node dissection rate was observed in about 35% of patients. Conclusions: This survey shows several important discrepancies from surgical attitudes declared by surgeons and real data derived from the reports available to the patients, suggesting heterogeneous management in clinical practice and, thus, a not rigorous adherence to the guidelines.

2.
Updates Surg ; 73(4): 1343-1348, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33900551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This is the first Western study presenting short-term results on patients older than 80 years affected by gastric cancer and treated with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. METHODS: A multicentre prospective database on patients suffering from distal gastric cancer with age of ≥ 80 undergone to distal gastrectomy was analysed retrospectively. End points were length of hospital stay (LoS) after surgery, and times to stool passage and solid diet initiation, as well as postoperative complications. Univariate analysis of the differences between "laparoscopic" and "open" groups was performed with non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Forty-six patients (median age: 83 years, median CCI: 5) undergone to distal gastrectomy were analysed. Seventeen out 46 patients (36.9%) underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and extended lymphadenectomy was achieved in 25 cases (25/46, 54.3%). Median number of removed and examined nodes was higher in laparoscopic than in open group. Median LoS was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (8 vs. 11 days). Complications occurred in 12 patients (26.1%): no significant differences between the two groups. There was a significant difference between the two surgical approaches in term of times for stool passage. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic approach seems to reduce the effect of the surgical trauma without compromising lymphadenectomy also in octogenarian patients with distal gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 7 Suppl 2: S109-11, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16895490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: One of the main benefits of minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery is the significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative infections. Possible explanations include the smaller incision, minimal use of central venous catheters for parenteral nutrition, faster mobilization, reduction in postoperative pain, and better preservation of immune system function with a limited inflammatory response to tissue injury. We compare the incidence of postoperative infections after the most common laparoscopic surgical procedures with that after the corresponding open operation, and review the possible mechanisms behind these results. METHOD: Review of the pertinent literature. RESULTS: Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as most retrospective studies, show a significant reduction in incisional complications with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with open surgery (mean 1.1% vs. 4%), as well as in urinary tract and pulmonary infections. In colorectal resection, laparoscopic surgery was characterized by a significant reduction in surgical site infections (mean 5% vs. 9.5%), and the infections that did occur tended to be less severe. Again, there were fewer urinary and pulmonary infections postoperatively. Acute appendicitis represents an interesting setting to study the effect of minimally invasive surgery on infections, as it involves a potentially contaminated field. Most of the results confirm that the rates of surgical site (mean 2% versus 8%) and respiratory (mean 0.3% versus 3%) infections favor laparoscopic surgery, but minimally invasive surgery seems to be characterized by a higher incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. The laparoscopic approach to splenectomy is clearly superior to standard laparotomy in terms of postoperative complications, including infections, although the rate of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection (OPSI) remains similar because this complication is related more to spleen removal than to the surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the literature is in agreement that laparoscopic surgery is associated with better preservation of immune function and a reduction of the inflammatory response compared with open surgery. The rate of postoperative infections seems to be significantly lower.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Humanos , Infecciones/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
4.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 7 Suppl 2: S113-6, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16895491

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is one of the most severe complications of acute pancreatitis (AP). Sequential surgical debridement represents one of the most effective treatments in terms of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this paper is to describe the quality of life and long-term results (e.g., nutritional, muscular, and pancreatic function) of patients treated by sequential necrosectomy at the Department of Surgery of the University of Insubria (Varese, Italy). METHODS: Data were collected on patients undergoing sequential surgical debridement as treatment for IPN. The severity of AP was evaluated using the Ranson criteria, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) Score, and the Sepsis Score, as well as the extent of necrosis. The surgical approach was through a midline or subcostal laparotomy, followed by exploration of the peritoneal cavity, wide debridement, and peritoneal lavage. The abdomen was either left open or closed partially with a surgical zipper, with multiple re-laparotomies scheduled until debridement of necrotic tissue was complete. The long-term evaluation focused on late morbidity, performance status, and abdominal wall function. RESULTS: In the majority of patients (68%), mixed flora were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the microorganism identified most commonly (59%), often associated with Candida albicans or C. glabrata. The mean total hospital stay was 71+/-38 days (range 13-146 days), of which 24+/-19 days (range 0-66 days) were in the intensive care unit. Eight patients died, the deaths being caused by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in seven patients and hemorrhage from the splenic artery in one. Normal exocrine and endocrine pancreatic function was observed in 28 patients (88%). At discharge, four patients had steatorrhea, which was temporary. Eight patients (23%) developed pancreatic pseudocysts, and in six, cystogastostomy was performed. Most patients (29/32, 91%) developed a post-operative hernia, but only five required surgical repair. All patients had a Short Form (SF)-36 score>60%, and 20 of the 32 patients (68%) had scores>70-80% (good quality of life). The worst scores were related to alcoholic pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of pancreatic failure (exocrine and endocrine function) is not related to the amount of pancreatic necrosis. Even with a need for repeated laparotomy and multiple surgical procedures, the abdominal wall capacity as well as long-term quality of life remain excellent.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , APACHE , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candida albicans/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/microbiología , Pancreatitis/fisiopatología , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 3(2): 147-53, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16515381

RESUMEN

Advances in technology continue at a rapid pace affecting several aspects of life; medicine is no exception. Minimally invasive surgery is, by its nature, a highly technological specialty of surgical practice. The development of new instruments and new technologies during the last few years have allowed complex procedures that were previously considered unsuitable for minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this article is to review some of these advances and the impact they are having on the managements of different surgical problems.


Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/tendencias , Ablación por Catéter/instrumentación , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/tendencias , Terapia por Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Terapia por Ultrasonido/tendencias , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Terapia por Ultrasonido/métodos
6.
World J Surg Oncol ; 3: 78, 2005 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16384538

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are infrequent and diagnosis and prognosis could be troublesome. We present short and long term results of surgical resection for GIST at the Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, during a period of 17 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients' data, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure and survival data were analyzed retrospectively. Tumors were divided in risk classes using the classification proposed by Fletcher, based on tumor size and number of mitosis. RESULTS: Between 1987 and 2004, 25 patients underwent surgical resection for GIST. Stomach was the most common site of localization. Complete resection was achieved in 88% cases, while in 12% radical resection was not possible. The mean tumor size was 9.2 cm (1.2-30 cm): <5 cm diameter in 14/25 cases (56%), 5-10 cm in 5/25 (20%) and >10 cm in 6/25 (24%). Mitotic count was <10/50 HPF in 68% (17/25) and >10/50 in 32% (8/25). Using Fletcher's classification, tumors were divided in very low (11/25, 44%), low (4/25, 16%), intermediate (6/25, 24%) and high-risk (4/25, 16%) groups. The 5-year overall survival was 65% and 34% respectively with a statistically significant difference between tumors <5 cm and >10 cm in diameter and between complete and incomplete resection. High-risk tumors had a significantly shorter survival than low or very low risk. CONCLUSION: Our experience confirms that GIST's are uncommon and aggressive cancers. The prognosis is strictly related to tumor size and number of mitosis. Although significant advances on new chemotherapeutic regimes have been made, to date, only radical surgery offers the chance of long-term survival.

7.
World J Surg Oncol ; 3: 69, 2005 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16232324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This experimental study was designed to investigate the differences in pattern of local growth and diffusion of colorectal cancer cells injected into either mesenteric (M) or antimesenteric (AM) sides of the colon. METHODS: A total of 1 x 10(6) colonic adenocarcinoma cells (line DHD/K12-TRb) were injected into the cecal wall of BDIX syngeneic male rats at an M or AM site of the colon. At six weeks after injection, all animals were sacrificed and the presence or absence of tumor in the cecum as well as regional metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis were determined. RESULTS: Six weeks after injection, macroscopic tumor growth was observed in 27/37 (72%) animals in group M and 21/32 (65%) in group AM (P = 0.98). In group AM, diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis was present in 19/21 rats (90.4%) versus 3/27 rats (11%) in group M; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.025). Regional mesenteric lymph nodes were the only location in which tumor was detected in 23/27 rats (85%) in group M versus 2/21 (9.5%) in group AM; this difference too was statistically significant (P = 0.031) CONCLUSION: The patterns of diffusion of tumors implanted in mesenteric and antimesenteric sites of the colon appear to be different, although the reason for this is not clear.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA