RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Kentucky prohibited elective medical procedures from 3/18/2020-4/27/2020. We sought to determine if cessation of elective procedures in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms interpreted at the open echocardiography lab at Norton Children's Hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted comparing proportions of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms performed pre-COVID (3/21/2019-4/28/2019) and during COVID (3/19/2020-4/27/2020). Transthoracic echocardiogram indication was determined by chart review and echocardiogram reports. Indication appropriateness was evaluated using paediatric appropriate use criteria for initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiogram or CHD follow-up as applicable. RESULTS: Of transthoracic echocardiograms pre-COVID, 100 (37.7%) were rarely appropriate versus 18 (20.2%) during COVID. Pre-COVID, paediatric cardiologists tended to order fewer rarely appropriate transthoracic echocardiograms than paediatricians (35.9% versus 46.4%), although this difference was not statistically significant. Cardiologists ordered the majority of outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms during COVID (77/89, 86.5%), limiting the ability to compare transthoracic echocardiogram indications by provider type. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms with (13.0%) abnormal studies pre-COVID versus 7 (15.5%) during COVID. CONCLUSION: While elective procedures were prohibited in Kentucky during the COVID-19 pandemic, a decrease in the proportion of rarely appropriate outpatient paediatric transthoracic echocardiograms was observed. There was no significant difference in diagnostic yield of initial outpatient transthoracic echocardiograms between time periods, suggesting that clinically significant echocardiogram findings were still detected despite more prudent utilisation of echocardiography during this time.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Ecocardiografía , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the distribution of antibiotic use in individual children over time. The amoxicillin index is a recently proposed metric to assess first-line antibiotic prescribing to children. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of continuously enrolled Medicaid children using enrollment claims from 2012 to 2017. Pharmacy claims were used to identify antibiotic prescription data. RESULTS: Among 169 724 children with 6 years of Medicaid enrollment, 10 804 (6.4%) had no antibiotic prescription claims during the study period; 43 473 (25.6%) had 1-3 antibiotics; 34 318 (20.2%) had 4-6 antibiotics; 30 994 (18.3%) had 7-10; 35 018 (20.6%) had 11-20; and 15 117 (8.9%) children had more than 20 antibiotic prescriptions. Overall, the population had a median total of 6 antibiotic prescriptions during the study period, but use was higher in certain patient groups: younger age (8 antibiotic fills over the 6-year period, [IQR 4-14]), White children (7 [IQR 3-13], compared to 3 [IQR 1-6] in Black children), rural settings (9 [IQR 4-15]) and chronic conditions (8 [IQR 4-15]). Higher-use groups also had lower rates of amoxicillin fills, reported as amoxicillin indices. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use is common among most children insured by Kentucky Medicaid. A number of fills over time were higher in younger children, and in White children, children living in rural settings and children with chronic conditions. Patients with higher recurrent antibiotic use are important targets for designing high-impact antibiotic stewardship efforts.