The SPEER: An interprofessional team behavior rubric to optimize geriatric clinical care.

Geriatric patients with complex health care needs can benefit from interprofessional (IP) care; however, a major gap in health professional education is determining how to prepare future providers for IP collaboration. Effective IP team behavior assessment tools are needed to teach, implement, and evaluate IP practice skills. After review of IP evaluation tools, the Standardized Patient Encounter Evaluation Rubric (SPEER) was created to evaluate team dynamics in IP practice sites.Independent sample t-tests between faculty and learner SPEER scores showed learners scored themselves 15 points higher than their faculty scores (p < .001). Cronbach's α showed high internal consistency (α = 0.91). Paired t-tests found that learners identified improvements in the team's ability to address the patient's education needs and to allow the patients to voice their expectations. Faculty identified improvements in the teams' ability to make recommendations. Faculty evaluations of learner teams showed improvements in raw ratings on all but two items. Qualitative data analysis for emergent themes showed learners desired team functioning feedback and how teamwork could improve to provide optimal IP care.In conclusion, the SPEER can help faculty and learners identify growth in their teams' ability to perform key IP skills in clinical sites.

Novel model to teach health care delivery in geriatrics.

Introducing health policy to interprofessional graduate students, anchoring health policy to older adult health needs, while conveying how current policy issues will affect their individual careers is challenging, yet essential, for health profession education. This novel program integrated graduate level health profession learners from medicine, nurse practitioner, pharmacy, psychology, social work, physical therapy and occupational therapy disciplines. The aim was to embed health policy into an existing interprofessional (IP) geriatrics course at an academic medical center. Selection of disciplines was based on prior collaborative work and faculty interest. The objectives were to 1. Introduce current health policies that affect older adults; 2. Understand the effects of health policy and social determinants of health on the older adults in their future practice; 3. Challenge learners to apply their knowledge and develop health advocacy strategies for older adults; and 4) Teach the importance of teamwork in interprofessional practice within a geriatric population.The health policy curriculum impacted 487 learners for 12 sessions over three years. Four themes emerged with the sessions: health policy awareness, interprofessional appreciation, patient care "pearls," and pharmacological considerations in geriatrics. Each of the eight modules generated thoughtful recommendations by the learners, providing a glimpse into future workforce priorities.

Preparing a healthcare workforce for geriatrics care: an Interprofessional team based learning program.

BACKGROUND: Improving the care of older adults in our healthcare system involves teams working together. As the geriatrics population rises globally, health science learners need to be prepared to work collaboratively to recognize and treat common conditions in geriatrics. To enable workforce preparation, the Institute of Medicine and the National League for Nursing emphasize the need to implement interprofessional active learning activities for undergraduate healthcare learners at academic medical centers. METHODS: The Geriatrics Champions Program was a team-based learning activity created to meet this task. It was a 24-month program, repeated twice, that impacted 768 learners and 151 faculty from medicine, occupational therapy, physical therapy, nursing, social welfare, psychology, pharmacy and dietetics. Each class was intentionally divided into 20 interprofessional teams that met four times annually. Each session focused on one geriatrics domain. The objectives were centered around the specific geriatrics competencies for each health profession, divided into the eight domains written in the "American Geriatrics Society IM-FM Residency Competencies". Evaluation consisted of individual and team Readiness Assessment Tests (iRAT and tRAT). Surveys were also used to collect feedback using a Likert scale. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare iRAT and tRAT scores. Other analyses identified characteristics associated with tRAT performance group (Unpaired t-tests) and tRAT performance on the raw scale (Pearson correlation). Paired t-tests using a 7-level Likert Scale measured pre-post change in learner knowledge. RESULTS: Student tRAT scores were 30% higher than iRAT scores (p < 0.001). Teams were more likely to score 100% on the initial tRAT attempt if more team members attended the current session (p < 0.001), more health professions were represented by team members in attendance (p = 0.053), and the team had a better track record of past attendance (p < 0.01). In the post-program evaluation, learners felt this program was helpful for their career preparation in interprofessional geriatrics care. CONCLUSIONS: Learners understood that teams performed better than individuals in the care of older adults. Feedback from the learners and faculty was consistently positive and learners felt better prepared for geriatrics care. The program's benefits may extend beyond individual sessions.

Minimizing fall-related injuries in at-risk older adults: The falling safely training (FAST) study protocol.

Background: Falls are the leading cause of accidental injury among the elderly. Fall prevention is currently the main strategy to minimize fall-related injuries in at-risk older adults. However, the success of fall prevention programs in preventing accidental injury in elderly populations is inconsistent. An alternative novel approach to directly target fall-related injuries is teaching older adults movement patterns which reduce injury risk. The purpose of the current study will be to explore the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of teaching at-risk older adults safe-falling strategies to minimize the risk of injury. Methods/design: The Falling Safely Training (FAST) study will be a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 28 participants will be randomly assigned to four weeks of FAST or to an active control group with a 1:1 allocation. People aged ≥65 years, at-risk of injurious falls, and with normal hip bone density will be eligible. The FAST program will consist of a standardized progressive training of safe-falling movement strategies. The control group will consist of evidence-based balance training (modified Otago exercise program). Participants will undergo a series of experimentally induced falls in a laboratory setting at baseline, after the 4-week intervention, and three months after the intervention. Data on head and hip movement during the falls will be collected through motion capture. Discussion: The current study will provide data on the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of safe-falling training as a strategy to reduce fall impact and head motion, and potentially to reduce hip and head injuries in at-risk populations. Registration: The FAST study is registered at http://Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05260034).

Colorectal cancer screening, perceived discrimination, and low-income and trust in doctors: a survey of minority patients.

BACKGROUND: Completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening testing is lower among low-income and minority groups than the population as a whole. Given the multiple cancer screening health disparities known to exist within the U.S., this study investigated the relationship between perceived discrimination, trust in most doctors, and completion of Fecal Occult Blood Testing (FOBT) among a low-income, minority primary care population in an urban setting. METHODS: We recruited a convenience sample of adults over age 40 (n = 282) from a federally qualified community health center (70% African American). Participants completed a survey which included measures of trust in most doctors, perceived discrimination, demographics and report of cancer screening. RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of trust in most doctors, regardless of sex, race, education or income. High trust was associated with low perceived discrimination (p < 0.01). The trend was for older participants to express more trust (p = 0.09) and less perceived discrimination (p < 0.01). Neither trust nor discrimination was associated with race or education. Trust was higher among participants over 50 who were up-to-date on FOBT screening vs. those who were not (31 vs. 29 (median), p < 0.05 by T-test). Among those over 50, up-to-date FOBT screening was nearly associated with high trust (p < 0.06; 95% CI 0.99, 1.28) and low perceived discrimination (p < 0.01; 95% CI 0.76, 0.96). Nevertheless, in multivariate-modeling, age and income explained FOBT completion better than race, trust and discrimination. CONCLUSION: Perceived discrimination was related to income, but not race, suggesting that discrimination is not unique to minorities, but common to those in poverty. Since trust in most doctors trended toward being related to age, FOBT screening could be negatively influenced by low trust and perceived discrimination in health care settings. A failure to address these issues in middle-aged, low income individuals could exacerbate future disparities in CRC screening.

Late-Onset Hypogonadism and Testosterone Replacement in Older Men.

Late-onset hypogonadism is an underdiagnosed and easily treated condition defined by low serum testosterone levels in men older than 65 years. When treated, a significant improvement in quality of life may be reached in this rapidly rising sector of the population. During the evaluation, laboratory tests and a full medication review should be performed to exclude other illnesses or adverse effects from medications. The major goal of treatment in this population is treating the symptoms related to hypogonadism. There has not been clear evidence supporting universally giving older men with low serum testosterone levels and hypogonadal symptoms testosterone replacement therapy.

Optimizing strategies to improve interprofessional practice for veterans, part 1.

INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional patient care is a well-recognized path that health care systems are striving toward. The Veteran's Affairs (VA) system initiated interprofessional practice (IPP) models with their Geriatric Evaluation and Management (GEM) programs. GEM programs incorporate a range of specialties, including but not limited to, medicine, nursing, social work, physical therapy and pharmacy, to collaboratively evaluate veterans. Despite being a valuable resource, they are now faced with significant cut-backs, including closures. The primary goal of this project was to assess how the GEM model could be optimized at the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania VA to allow for the sustainability of this important IPP assessment. Part 1 of the study evaluated the IPP process using program, patient, and family surveys. Part 2 examined how well the geriatrician matched patients to specialists in the GEM model. This paper describes Part 1 of our study. METHODS: THREE STRATEGIES WERE USED: 1) a national GEM program survey; 2) a veteran/family satisfaction survey; and 3) an absentee assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 92 programs responded to the GEM IPP survey. Six strategies were shared to optimize IPP models throughout the country. Of the 34 satisfaction surveys, 80% stated the GEM clinic was beneficial, 79% stated their concerns were addressed, and 100% would recommend GEM to their friends. Of the 24 absentee assessments, the top three reasons for missing the appointments were transportation, medical illnesses, and not knowing/remembering about the appointment. Absentee rate diminished from 41% to 19% after instituting a reminder phone call policy. DISCUSSION: Maintaining the sustainability of IPP programs is crucial for the health of our veterans. This project uncovered tools to improve the GEM IPP model for our veterans that can be incorporated nationally. Despite the lengthy nature of IPP models, patients and families appreciated the thoroughness, requested transportation and food, and responded well to reminder phone calls. A keen eye on these issues and concomitant medical complexity needs to be observed when planning IPP models to ensure sustainability.