Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Histopathology ; 84(5): 847-862, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233108

RESUMEN

AIMS: To conduct a definitive multicentre comparison of digital pathology (DP) with light microscopy (LM) for reporting histopathology slides including breast and bowel cancer screening samples. METHODS: A total of 2024 cases (608 breast, 607 GI, 609 skin, 200 renal) were studied, including 207 breast and 250 bowel cancer screening samples. Cases were examined by four pathologists (16 study pathologists across the four speciality groups), using both LM and DP, with the order randomly assigned and 6 weeks between viewings. Reports were compared for clinical management concordance (CMC), meaning identical diagnoses plus differences which do not affect patient management. Percentage CMCs were computed using logistic regression models with crossed random-effects terms for case and pathologist. The obtained percentage CMCs were referenced to 98.3% calculated from previous studies. RESULTS: For all cases LM versus DP comparisons showed the CMC rates were 99.95% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 99.90-99.97] and 98.96 (95% CI = 98.42-99.32) for cancer screening samples. In speciality groups CMC for LM versus DP showed: breast 99.40% (99.06-99.62) overall and 96.27% (94.63-97.43) for cancer screening samples; [gastrointestinal (GI) = 99.96% (99.89-99.99)] overall and 99.93% (99.68-99.98) for bowel cancer screening samples; skin 99.99% (99.92-100.0); renal 99.99% (99.57-100.0). Analysis of clinically significant differences revealed discrepancies in areas where interobserver variability is known to be high, in reads performed with both modalities and without apparent trends to either. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing LM and DP CMC, overall rates exceed the reference 98.3%, providing compelling evidence that pathologists provide equivalent results for both routine and cancer screening samples irrespective of the modality used.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Patología Clínica , Humanos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Microscopía/métodos , Patología Clínica/métodos , Femenino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 42(11): 1623-1626, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27785896

RESUMEN

Malignant transformation of epidermal cyst is rare, with most cases arising in the head and neck. Here, we report a case of squamous cell carcinoma arising from a longstanding epidermal cyst in the right vulva of a 65-year-old woman. The patient presented with a sudden increase in size of the cyst over 6 weeks to the size of a golf ball. Excisional biopsy and histology indicated moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma within an epidermal cyst (FIGO stage IB). Strong p16 immunopositivity was also demonstrated and the potential significance of this is discussed. Limited right hemivulvectomy and right groin node dissection were performed.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Quiste Epidérmico/diagnóstico , Quiste Epidérmico/patología , Neoplasias de la Vulva/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vulva/patología , Anciano , Transformación Celular Neoplásica , Femenino , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA