[Therapeutic plasma exchange: a review of the literature]. / Aferesi ed evidenze in letteratura.

Therapeutic plasma exchange is an extracorporeal plasmapheresis method for removing high-molecular-weight pathogens and toxins from the circulation. It can be indicated in many clinical conditions, both kidney-related and non-kidney-related. This review focuses on clinical trials related to Goodpasture syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and acute renal insufficiency due to multiple myeloma. It also discusses the difficulties and opportunities associated with the development of a randomized controlled multicenter study and of a web-based database. Finally, we report a summary of the risks and complications of therapeutic plasma exchange and how we can update the information on their frequency and seriousness by means of a longitudinal prospective multicenter study open to all centers performing the procedure.

[Clinical results of convective therapies]. / Risultati clinici delle terapie convettive secondo l'EBM.

Convective therapies can be a good additional option in extracorporeal renal replacement therapy, but so far the clinical evidence in their favor is rather scarce. In this review the results of the most important studies are discussed, grouped by main outcomes: intradialytic cardiovascular stability, beta2-microglobulin, mortality, calcium-phosphorus metabolism, and possible effect on anemia. In general, the use of convective therapies for reimbursement reasons but without any clear clinical benefit is not justified. The fractional division of convective therapies into various subtypes and the use of different levels of convection among centers make their widespread clinical implementation unlikely in the near future. No firm conclusions can be drawn right now and more controlled clinical trials on convective therapies will be needed to clarify their role in renal replacement therapy.

Predictors of first ischemic lower limb ulcer in dialysis patients: an observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lower limb ischemia affects the quality of life, physical activity and life expectancy of dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with ischemic foot ulcers considering clinical, laboratory and therapeutic domains. METHODS: This observational cohort study was based on data from the Nephrology and Dialysis Department database of Alessandro Manzoni Hospital, Lecco (Italy). All of the incident patients who started dialysis between 1 January 1999 and 29 February 2012 were enrolled, excluding temporary guests, patients with acute renal failure and patients with previous limb ischemia or amputation. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the predictors in each domain, which were matched in the final model. A time-dependent approach was used to take into account the evolution of some of the prognostic covariates. RESULTS: Of the 526 incident dialysis patients, 120 developed a lower limb ischemic lesion after a median of 13 months. The incidence of new ulcers was constant during the study period (6 per 100 person-years), but higher in the diabetics with a relative rate of 4.5. The variables significantly related to an increased risk of lower limb ulcers were age, male gender, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, treatment with proton pump inhibitors, iron, anticoagulants and calcium-based binders, and blood levels of phosphorus, triglycerides and C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: The incidence of lower limb ulcers was highest during the early dialysis follow-up and was associated with, in addition to diabetes, modifiable laboratory and therapeutic predictors such as anticoagulants, proton pump inhibitors, calcium-containing binders, calcimimetics and iron.

The role of blood volume reduction in the genesis of intradialytic hypotension.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to investigate the role of relative blood volume (RBV) reduction on intradialytic hypotension. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients on chronic hemodialysis therapy were considered a priori normotensive (reference group A), intradialytic hypotension prone (group B), and hypertensive (group C). RBV was continuously monitored, and diastolic and systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were measured at 20-minute intervals during three dialysis sessions. RESULTS: Intradialytic RBV reduction was -13.8% +/- 7.0% and similar in the three groups (P = 0.841). SBP and RBV decreased during dialysis, with a sharp initial decrease (in the first 20 minutes for SBP and the first 40 minutes for RBV), followed by a slower decrease. The lying bradycardic response before dialysis was less in group B than group A (a decrease of 3 +/- 7 versus 9 +/- 9 beats/min; P < 0.001). When symptomatic hypotension occurred, RBV reduction was not significantly different from that recorded at the same time during hypotension-free sessions (-13.9% +/- 6.4% versus -12.7% +/- 5.2%; P = 0.149). Group, baseline plasma-dialysate sodium gradient, RBV line irregularity, and early RBV and HR reduction during dialysis influenced the relative risk for symptomatic hypotension with a sensitivity of 80% versus 30% for RBV alone. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in reduction in RBV in the three groups and no critical RBV level for the appearance of symptomatic hypotension. With variables easily available within 40 minutes of dialysis, RBV monitoring increases the prediction of symptomatic hypotension.

Ionic dialysance allows an adequate estimate of urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: An adequate estimation of urea distribution volume (V) in hemodialysis patients is useful to monitor protein nutrition. Direct dialysis quantification (DDQ) is the gold standard for determining V, but it is impractical for routine use because it requires equilibrated postdialysis plasma water urea concentration. The single pool variable volume urea kinetic model (SPVV-UKM), recommended as a standard by Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI), does not need a delayed postdialysis blood sample but it requires a correct estimate of dialyser urea clearance. METHODS: Ionic dialysance (ID) may accurately estimate dialyzer urea clearance corrected for total recirculation. Using ID as input to SPVV-UKM, correct V values are expected when end-dialysis plasma water urea concentrations are determined in the end-of-session blood sample taken with the blood pump speed reduced to 50 mL/min for two minutes (U(pwt2')). The aim of this study was to determine whether the V values determined by means of SPVV-UKM, ID, and U(pwt2') (V(ID)) are similar to those determined by the "gold standard" DDQ method (V(DDQ)). Eighty-two anuric hemodialysis patients were studied. RESULTS: V(DDQ) was 26.3 +/- 5.2 L; V(ID) was 26.5 +/- 4.8 L. The (V(ID)-V(DDQ)) difference was 0.2 +/- 1.6 L, which is not statistically significant (P= 0.242). Anthropometric volume (V(A)) calculated using Watson equations was 33.6 +/- 6.0 L. The (V(A)-V(DDQ)) difference was 7.3 +/- 3.3 L, which is statistically significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anthropometric-based V values overestimate urea distribution volume calculated by DDQ and SPVV-UKM. ID allows adequate V values to be determined, and circumvents the problem of delayed postdialysis blood samples.