Comparative Effectiveness of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Versus Subdural Grids in Epilepsy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the outcomes of subdural electrode (SDE) implantations versus stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG), the 2 predominant methods of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) performed in difficult-to-localize drug-resistant focal epilepsy. METHODS: The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy created an international registry of iEEG patients implanted between 2005 and 2019 with ≥1 year of follow-up. We used propensity score matching to control exposure selection bias and generate comparable cohorts. Study endpoints were: (1) likelihood of resection after iEEG; (2) seizure freedom at last follow-up; and (3) complications (composite of postoperative infection, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or permanent neurological deficit). RESULTS: Ten study sites from 7 countries and 3 continents contributed 2,012 patients, including 1,468 (73%) eligible for analysis (526 SDE and 942 SEEG), of whom 988 (67%) underwent subsequent resection. Propensity score matching improved covariate balance between exposure groups for all analyses. Propensity-matched patients who underwent SDE had higher odds of subsequent resective surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.84) and higher odds of complications (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.74; unadjusted: 9.6% after SDE vs 3.3% after SEEG). Odds of seizure freedom in propensity-matched resected patients were 1.66 times higher (95% CI 1.21, 2.26) for SEEG compared with SDE (unadjusted: 55% seizure free after SEEG-guided resections vs 41% after SDE). INTERPRETATION: In comparison to SEEG, SDE evaluations are more likely to lead to brain surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy but have more surgical complications and lower probability of seizure freedom. This comparative-effectiveness study provides the highest feasible evidence level to guide decisions on iEEG. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:927-939.

Outcomes of resections that spare vs remove an MRI-normal hippocampus.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize seizure and cognitive outcomes of sparing vs removing an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-normal hippocampus in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed clinical, imaging, surgical, and histopathological data on 152 individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy and nonlesional hippocampi categorized into hippocampus-spared (n = 74) or hippocampus-resected (n = 78). Extra-hippocampal lesions were allowed. Pre- and postoperative cognitive data were available on 86 patients. Predictors of seizure and cognitive outcomes were identified using Cox-proportional hazard modeling followed by treatment-specific model reduction according to Akaike information criterion, and built into an online risk calculator. RESULTS: Seizures recurred in 40% within one postoperative year, and in 63% within six postoperative years. Male gender (P = .03), longer epilepsy duration (P < .01), normal MRI (P = .04), invasive evaluation (P = .02), and acute postoperative seizures (P < .01) were associated with a higher risk of recurrence. We found no significant difference in postoperative seizure freedom rates at 5 years between those whose hippocampus was spared and those whose hippocampus was resected (P = .17). Seizure outcome models built with pre- and postoperative data had bootstrap validated concordance indices of 0.65 and 0.72. The dominant hippocampus-spared group had lower rates of decline in verbal memory (39% vs 70%; P = .03) and naming (41% vs 79%; P = .01) compared to the hippocampus-resected group. Partial hippocampus sparing had the same risk of verbal memory decline as for complete removal. SIGNIFICANCE: Sparing or removing an MRI-normal hippocampus yielded similar long-term seizure outcome. A more conservative approach, sparing the hippocampus, only partially shields patients from postoperative cognitive deficits. Risk calculators are provided to facilitate clinical counseling.

Radiofrequency ablation during stereoelectroencephalography: from diagnostic tool to therapeutic intervention. Illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) during intracranial stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) was first described as a safe technique for creating lesions of epileptic foci in 2004. Since that time, the method has been applied as a diagnostic and/or palliative intervention. Although widely practiced in European epilepsy surgical programs, the technique has not been popularized in the United States given the lack of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved technologies permitting safe usage of in situ sEEG electrodes for this purpose. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present a case report of a young female patient with refractory left neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing sEEG electrode implantation, who underwent sEEG-guided RFTC via a stereotactic temperature-sensing pallidotomy probe. Although used as a diagnostic step in her workup, the patient has remained seizure-free for nearly 18 months. LESSONS: The use of in situ sEEG electrodes for RFTC remains limited in the United States. In this context, this case highlights a safe alternative and temporizing approach to performing diagnostic sEEG-guided RFTC, using a temperature-sensing pallidotomy probe to create small, precise stereotactic lesions. The authors caution careful consideration of this technique as a temporary work-around solution while also highlighting the rising need for new FDA-approved technologies for safe RFTC through in situ temperature-sensing sEEG electrodes.

The Clinical Utility of Surgical Histopathology in Predicting Seizure Outcomes in Patients with Rasmussen Encephalitis Undergoing Hemispherectomy.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship between the severity of pathology and seizure outcomes in patients who underwent hemispherectomy for Rasmussen encephalitis (RE) and to investigate which clinical factors correlated with severity of pathology. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected and reviewed pathology and clinical variables. We ascertained seizure outcomes using Engel's classification, and Pardo stages were used to grade pathology. RESULTS: We included 29 unique patients who underwent 34 hemispherectomy procedures for analysis. There was no statistically significant correlation between Pardo stage and seizure outcome (P = 1). Increasing duration of epilepsy (ß = 0.011, P = 0.02) and duration of hemiparesis (ß = 0.024, P = 0.01) were significantly associated with a more severe Pardo stage. In contrast, the presence of epilepsia partialis continua had a negative relationship with Pardo stage (ß = -0.49, P = 0.04). Twenty-six (89.75%) patients were Engel class I at the last follow-up, including all 5 patients who underwent redo hemispherectomy in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the progressive nature of RE, more severe pathology was associated with a longer duration of epilepsy and longer duration of hemiparesis, while the presence of epilepsia partialis continua was associated with less severe pathology. Results from this series suggest the degree of cortical involvement with RE as assessed on surgical histopathology does not correlate with seizure outcome after hemispherectomy, which appears to be more dependent on surgical technique/complete disconnection.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Epileptogenic Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy with periventricular nodular heterotopia (PVNH) lacks a conclusive surgical treatment strategy as eloquent cortex and important white matter tracts frequently overlay the deep periventricular nodules. Our goal was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for the treatment of epilepsy in PVNH. METHODS: Data on demographic characteristics, complications, visual outcomes, Engel classification at last follow-up, antiepileptic drug use, morbidity, and mortality among patients who underwent this procedure were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and January 2019, 5 patients underwent 6 LITT procedures for epilepsy with PVNH. One patient had residual nodules after their first procedure and underwent a second ablation. The average follow-up time was 12 months. Three patients were Engel class Ia, 1 patient was Engel class II, and 1 patient was Engel class III at last follow-up. Two patients were able to reduce their antiepileptic drugs postoperatively. Three patients had no changes in vision, 1 patient experienced a quadrantanopsia, and 1 patient had subjective blurry vision after their procedures. No patients experienced motor deficits, dysphasia, infection, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LITT appears to be a safe and promising option to provide seizure relief for patients with refractory epilepsy and PVNH that otherwise may not be surgical candidates. Some appropriately determined patients with refractory epilepsy may benefit from LITT before proceeding with an invasive intracranial evaluation. A larger sample size and long-term follow-up is necessary to further elucidate safety and efficacy.