RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the rate of endophthalmitis and visual outcomes in cases of OGI's without intraocular foreign bodies repaired within and greater than 24 hours from the time of injury. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 2,002 cases of OGI's presenting to a single institution. SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Patients with OGI's were admitted and managed according to a standardized protocol. METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING: The impact of timing of repair was assessed between those undergoing OGI repair within (i) 24 hours, (ii) 25-36 hours, and (iii) greater than 36 hours from the time of injury. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Rates of endophthalmitis and postoperative visual acuity of logMAR 1.3, logMAR 1.0, and logMAR 0.3 at 180 days and 1 year following open globe repair. RESULTS: 1,382 patients with OGI's were included, of which 75% were male with an average age of 41 years. Maximal zone of injury was zone 1 for 468 patients, zone 2 for 529 patients and zone 3 for 508 patients. 84% of all OGI's underwent repair within 24 hours from the time of injury, 9% from 25-36 hours, and 7% greater than 36 hours. Average preoperative visual acuity was hand motion. Risk factors associated with repair performed greater than 36 hours from the time of injury included female sex (p=0.042). Endophthalmitis was associated with time to repair greater than 36 hours (p=0.049) but not with 25-36 hours or zone of injury (p=0.111). Time to repair had no significant impact on visual acuity outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although repair of OGI's within 24 hours is the current standard of care, this study found no statistically significant difference in rates of endophthalmitis or visual outcomes in eyes undergoing repair within 24 hours of injury compared to repair extending to 25 to 36 hours . Endophthalmitis rates did increase after 36 hours. We recommend urgent repair of open globe injuries, but in certain circumstances, it may be reasonable to delay repair beyond 24 hours to optimize operating conditions.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To identify clinical characteristics of injured eyes associated with visual recovery in patients with open globe injuries (OGIs) and presenting with no light perception (NLP) vision. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SUBJECTS: All patients presenting to Massachusetts Eye and Ear with OGI and NLP vision from January 1999 to March 2022. METHODS: Manual data extraction to collect patient demographic characteristics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics of OGI injury, laceration versus rupture, history of intraocular surgery, time from injury to repair, timing of vitrectomy, lensectomy, choroidal drainage, and silicone oil placement, visual acuity (VA) at last follow-up, and subsequent B-scan ultrasound findings of retinal detachment, choroidal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, and disorganized intraocular contents. Patients with >1 week of follow-up and a documented VA at most recent follow-up were included. Exclusion criteria included age <10 years. Multivariable regression was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity recovery defined as light perception or better in patients with OGI and initial NLP vision. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven eyes with NLP vision after OGI were included. Twenty-five (17%) eyes regained vision at last follow-up. The majority of patients recovered light perception vision (n = 15, 60%) followed by 20/500 or better (n = 5, 20%), hand motions (n = 3, 12%), and counting fingers (n = 2, 8%). Most injuries were zone III (n = 102, 69%) and presented with rupture (n = 127, 86%). The mean time from OGI to surgical repair was 0.85 ± 1.7 days. B-scan was obtained in 104 (71%) cases. Pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 9 eyes (6%) with NLP at time of vitrectomy. Disorganized intraocular contents on B-scan (odd ratio, 0.170; 95% confidence interval, 0.042-0.681; P = 0.012) was the only clinical variable significantly associated with visual recovery, corresponding to a lack of visual improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of vision in OGI with NLP vision at presentation cannot be predicted based on presenting clinical features. B-scan findings of disorganized intraocular contents after initial OGI repair was the only factor negatively associated with vision recovery in this patient population. Therefore, all eyes presenting with an OGI and NLP vision should undergo primary repair in hopes of subsequent visual recovery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes , Recuperación de la Función , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/cirugía , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/fisiopatología , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adulto Joven , Vitrectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Anciano , Ceguera/etiología , Ceguera/fisiopatología , Ceguera/rehabilitación , Ceguera/diagnóstico , Ceguera/cirugíaRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to examine how demographics, etiology, and clinical examination findings are related to visual outcomes in subjects with open globe injury (OGI) across a large and generalizable sample. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data collected from the electronic medical records of four tertiary university centers for subjects with OGI presenting from 2018 to 2021. Demographic information, injury mechanisms, clinical exam findings, visual acuity (VA) at presentation and most recent follow-up were recorded. In subjects with bilateral OGIs, only right eyes were included. A modified ocular trauma score (OTS) using presenting VA, the presence of perforating injury, OGI, and afferent pupillary defect was calculated. The risk of subjects' demographic characteristics, ocular trauma etiology, clinical findings and modified OTS on the presence of monocular blindness at follow-up were assessed using univariable and multivariable regression models. 1426 eyes were identified. The mean age was 48.3 years (SD: ± 22.4 years) and the majority of subjects were men (N = 1069, 75.0%). Univariable analysis demonstrated that subjects of Black race were 66% (OR: 1.66 [1.25-2.20]; P < 0.001) more likely to have monocular blindness relative to White race at follow-up. OTS Class 1 was the strongest predictor of blindness (OR: 38.35 [21.33-68.93]; P < 0.001). Based on multivariable analysis, lower OTS category (OTS Class 1 OR: 23.88 [16.44-45.85]; P < 0.001) moderately predicted visual outcomes (R2 = 0.275, P < 0.001). OGI has many risks of poor visual outcome across patient groups that vary by demographic category, mechanism of injury, and clinical presentation. Our findings validate that a modified OTS remains a strong predictor of visual prognosis following OGI in a large and generalizable sample.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares Penetrantes/complicaciones , Anciano , Ceguera/etiología , Ceguera/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , AdolescenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Convention is to perform open globe injury (OGI) repair within 24 h to minimize risk of endophthalmitis. However, there are limited data assessing how time to operative repair (OR) within 24 h impacts postoperative visual acuity (VA). METHODS: Manual retrospective chart review of 633 eyes at Massachusetts Eye and Ear (MEE) with a diagnosis of OGI between 2012 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were primary repair ≤ 24 h after injury and ≥1 month follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted with postoperative VA as primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the subjects, 489 (77.3%) were male and 496 (78.4%) were white. Demographics of OGI wounds included 320 (50.6%) rupture and 313 (49.4%) laceration; 126 (19.9%) with rAPD, 189 (29.9%) zone 3 injuries, 449 (71.2%) uveal prolapse, and 110 (17.4%) intraocular foreign body. Final postoperative LogMAR VAs consisted of 31% with a VA < 1.7, 9% with a VA of 1.9, 18% with a VA of 2.3, 27% with a VA of 2.7, and 11% with a VA of 3.0. Multivariate analysis showed no significant correlation between time to OR and postoperative VA (p = 0.800) [95%CI: -0.01,0.01]. Older age (p < 0.001) [95%CI: 0.00,0.01], worse presenting VA (p < 0.001) [95%CI: 0.17,0.32], rAPD (p < 0.001) [95%CI: 0.65,1.0], mechanism of rupture (p < 0.001) [95%CI: 0.19,0.54], higher zone of injury (p < 0.001) [95%CI: 0.25,0.45], and uveal prolapse (p = 0.003) [95%CI: 0.09,0.42] were significantly associated with worse final VA. CONCLUSIONS: Time to repair of OGIs within 24 h does not influence final VA. Optimization of surgical and patient factors may contribute more significantly to final VA than prioritizing more rapid time to OR.