Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: As Seen from the Perspective of the Patient.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve compression syndrome in the upper extremity and is one of the most common problems treated by hand surgeons. Despite its ubiquity-or perhaps because of it-there is a lack of unanimity regarding how best to treat CTS and what the options for treatment are. This study aimed to explore what patients find important when deciding on treatment of CTS in an effort to improve the physician-patient shared decision-making process. Methods: An online crowdsourcing platform was used to recruit participants for this study. Study participants were first led through a clinical scenario in which the symptoms of CTS were explained. They were then asked a series of questions regarding what was important to them when deciding upon treatment. A Likert scale was used for responses. Results: In total, 268 participant responses were included in the study. A majority of patients responded that all surveyed factors were either very important or important when considering treatment. The risk of surgery was most important, whereas postoperative pain was least important. The risk of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain and time out of work. The cost of surgery was significantly more important to patients than postoperative pain. Conclusions: Given the lack of consensus regarding an algorithm for the treatment of CTS, the patient's preference is increasingly important when formulating a treatment plan. The results of this study may better help physicians frame the discussion of treatment options for CTS with their patients.

Does Fibular Displacement Predict Tibial Malrotation in Simulated Tibia-Fibula Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial malrotation can occur with medullary nailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures. Fibular alignment has been proposed as a surrogate for axial plane reduction intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fibular alignment is a reliable marker of accurate tibial rotation. METHODS: Deidentified CT scans of 50 patients with normal tibial anatomy were selected. Using ImageJ software, we simulated osteotomies at three sites (proximal third, mid-diaphysis, and distal third). We overlaid adjacent CT slices and rotated them around the central axis of the tibia in 5° increments of external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR). At each increment, measurements of fibular overlap (%) were obtained from anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. To simulate fixation of the fibula, we repeated rotation around the axis of the fibula with and without a simulated medullary implant in the tibia. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included. The mean age was 62 years, average BMI was 25.8, and 28 of 50 patients (56%) were male. Earliest loss of fibular contact occurred at 24° ER and 22° IR at the proximal site. Contact was lost at 26° ER and 28° IR on the AP view and 42° ER and 29° IR on the lateral view. The mean fibular contact at each 5° increment was similar for ER and IR. Fibular contact was reduced to 50% at 10 to 15° of rotation in ER and IR at all sites. Tibial canal contact was lost at 24° in both ER and IR around the fibula. With a virtual medullary implant, the mean maximal rotation was 6°. DISCUSSION: Surgeons should be aware that 20° or more of malrotation is likely present when fibular contact is lost during medullary nailing of the tibia. Greater than 50% loss of contact should raise suspicion for malrotation. A fixed fibula and medullary tibial implant theoretically preclude significant tibial malrotation.

Biologic Augmentation during Meniscal Repair.

We reviewed the literature regarding utility of biologic augmentation in meniscal repair. We hypothesized that the addition of biologic augmentation during meniscal repair improves postoperative knee function and reduces risk of repair failure. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched. Included studies were clinical studies in humans, published in English, and reported use of biologic augmentation techniques in addition to meniscal repair (including platelet-rich plasma [PRP], fibrin clot, bone marrow stimulation, meniscal wrapping, and bioscaffolds) for treatment of knee meniscal tears. Outcome measures included repair failure, repeat knee arthroscopic surgery, and magnetic resonance imaging), visual analog scale for pain, the International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Lysholm's Knee Scoring Scale, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Study quality was assessed using the modified Coleman methodology score. Nineteen studies reported repair of 1,092 menisci including six studies that investigated fibrin clot augmentation, five studies that investigated PRP augmentation, three studies that investigated bone marrow stimulation augmentation, two studies that used meniscal wrapping augmentation, and three studies that used other techniques. The level of evidence ranged from I to IV and mean modified Coleman methodology score was 43 (range: 17-69), with higher scores noted in studies completed in recent years. PRP and bone marrow stimulation augmentation appear to decrease risk of failure in patients undergoing isolated meniscal repair but do not improve knee symptom scores. Fibrin clot and trephination augmentation techniques do not have sufficient evidence to support decreased failure risk at this time. Meniscal wrapping augmentation and scaffold implantation augmentation appear to be an attractive option to meniscectomy in complicated tears that are not candidates for repair alone, but further confirmatory studies are needed to support initial data. Evidence supporting augmentation of meniscal repair is limited at this time but suggests that the highest likelihood for effectiveness of augmentation is in the settings of isolated meniscal repair or meniscal repairs that would normally not be amenable to repair.

Patient preference for trigger finger treatment.

BACKGROUND: Trigger finger is a common disorder of the hand that can cause disabling symptoms. Treatment options range from conservative management with observation and splinting, to surgical release, but there is currently not a consensus on a treatment algorithm. AIM: To determine patient preference for the treatment of trigger finger using an online survey. METHODS: An online crowdsourcing platform, Amazon Mechanical Turk, was used to recruit participants for this study. Participants were led through a scenario in which they were diagnosed with trigger finger. They were then asked to rank their preference of treatment options from the following: Observation, splinting, corticosteroid injection, surgery. The results of the surveys were then analyzed using R software. RESULTS: Of 323 participants completed the survey. 7 participants were excluded because they failed to correctly answer the attention question, leaving 316 participants whose results were included. As a first choice for treatment 117 (37%) of the included participants chose observation, 86 (27%) chose splinting, 61 (19%) chose corticosteroid injection, and 52 (16%) chose surgery. The mean rank for observation was 2.26, for splinting was 2.30, for corticosteroid injection was 2.53, and for surgery was 2.91. The ranking of each treatment option was statistically different (P value < 0.05) from the others except for observation and splinting. CONCLUSION: The practice of shared decision making with patients is imperative to providing the best care possible. The results from this study, especially the preference for less invasive treatment, may help providers better frame discussion around treatment options of trigger fingers. This in turn, may increase patient satisfaction in the treatment of trigger finger.

Positive reframing: An important but underutilized coping strategy in youth athletes undergoing sports-related knee surgery.

CONTEXT: It is unknown how specific coping strategies are associated with the short-term outcomes among athletes following knee surgery. OBJECTIVE: 1) To determine whether specific coping strategies are associated with satisfaction, return to sport, self-reported knee function, or kinesiophobia following sports-related knee surgery. 2) To determine whether these associations vary by age, sex, or surgical procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Athletes (n=184 total; n=104 men, n=80 women; n=38 age <20 years, n=35 age 20-25, n=36 age 26-31, n=36 age 32-40, n=39 age >40) who underwent outpatient knee surgery were enrolled from a single center. Utilization of specific coping strategies (self-distraction, use of emotional or instrumental support, venting, positive reframing, and acceptance) was assessed pre-operatively with the Brief-COPE inventory. Relationship between coping strategies and post-operative satisfaction, return to sport, International Knee Documentation Committee-subjective (IKDC-S) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia scores at median 10.7 months follow-up were determined with consideration for age, sex, and surgical procedure. RESULTS: Return to prior level of sport was 72%, and satisfaction was 86%. Most coping strategies had age-specific utilization rates; positive reframing was utilized least frequently in ages <20 years. Satisfaction increased with greater positive reframing among ages <20 years and decreased with greater self-distraction among men. Return to sport was higher with greater positive reframing in ages <32 years. No coping strategies predicted IKDC-S scores. Greater positive reframing correlated with lower kinesiophobia in ages <20 years. Greater instrumental support correlated with lower kinesiophobia in ages >40 years. No other coping strategies were associated with outcomes. Surgical procedure was not related to association between coping strategies and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Coping strategies have age-specific associations with outcomes after knee surgery in athletes. Positive reframing is infrequently utilized in younger athletes. Greater use of positive reframing in this group may improve satisfaction, return to sport, and lower fear of re-injury.

COVID-19 Implications on Clinical Clerkships and the Residency Application Process for Medical Students.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant disruption to undergraduate medical education (UME). Although the immediate scheduling challenges are being addressed, there has been less discourse regarding how this pandemic will impact medical students in their preparation for and application to residency programs. While some historical disasters and pandemics provide a loose precedent for UME response during COVID-19, the impact of the current pandemic has surpassed any other events. COVID-19 will likely impact UME in the suspension of clinical rotations, alterations in grading, suspension or elimination of away rotations, changes in medical licensing exams, and ramifications on mental health. This review assesses governing medical bodies' recommendations regarding UME during the COVID-19 pandemic and how this may impact preparation for residency. In particular, residency programs will likely have to create new guidelines for assessing applicants during this unique cycle.