Genomic analysis across 53 canine cancer types reveals novel mutations and high clinical actionability potential.

A genomic understanding of the oncogenic processes and individual variability of human cancer has steadily fueled improvement in patient outcomes over the past 20 years. Mutations within tumour tissues are routinely assessed through clinical genomic diagnostic assays by academic and commercial laboratories to facilitate diagnosis, prognosis and effective treatment stratification. The application of genomics has unveiled a wealth of mutation-based biomarkers in canine cancers, suggesting that the transformative principles that have revolutionized human cancer medicine can be brought to bear in veterinary oncology. To advance clinical genomics and genomics-guided medicine in canine oncology, we have developed and validated a canine cancer next-generation sequencing gene panel for the identification of multiple mutation types in clinical specimens. With this panel, we examined the genomic landscapes of 828 tumours from 813 dogs, spanning 53 cancer types. We identified 7856 alterations, encompassing copy number variants, single nucleotide variants, indels and internal tandem duplications. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical utility of these alterations by incorporating a biomarker framework from comprehensive curation of primary canine literature and inferences from human cancer genomic biomarker literature and clinical diagnostics. Remarkably, nearly 90% of the cases exhibited mutations with diagnostic, prognostic or therapeutic implications. Our work represents a thorough assessment of genomic landscapes in a large cohort of canine cancers, the first of its kind for its comprehensive inclusion of multiple mutation types and structured annotation of biomarkers, demonstrating the clinical potential of leveraging mutation-based biomarkers in veterinary oncology.

Genomic tumor analysis provides clinical guidance for the management of diagnostically challenging cancers in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility of a cancer genomic diagnostic assay (SearchLight DNA; Vidium Animal Health) for diagnostically ambiguous cancer cases. ANIMALS: 69 privately owned dogs with ambiguous cancer diagnoses and for which the genomic assay was performed. PROCEDURES: Genomic assay reports generated between September 28, 2020, and July 31, 2022, for dogs with malignancy or suspected malignancy were reviewed to determine the assay's clinical utility defined as providing diagnostic clarity, prognostic information, and/or therapeutic options. RESULTS: Genomic analysis provided diagnostic clarity in 37 of 69 cases (54%; group 1) and therapeutic and/or prognostic information in 22 of the remaining 32 cases (69%; group 2) for which the diagnosis remained elusive. Overall, the genomic assay was clinically useful in 86% (59/69) of cases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To our knowledge, this was the first study to evaluate the multifaceted clinical utility of a single cancer genomic test in veterinary medicine. Study findings supported the use of tumor genomic testing for dogs with cancer, particularly those that are diagnostically ambiguous and therefore inherently challenging to manage. This evidence-driven genomic assay provided diagnostic guidance, prognostic support, and therapeutic options for most patients with an unclear cancer diagnosis that would otherwise have an unsubstantiated clinical plan. Furthermore, 38% (26/69) of samples were easily obtained aspirates. Sample factors (sample type, percentage of tumor cells, and number of mutations) did not influence diagnostic yield. Our study demonstrated the value of genomic testing for the management of canine cancer.

Baseline mutational patterns and sustained MRD negativity in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma.

Early results of a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance in high-risk smoldering myeloma showed promising results that were previously published. Here, we provide novel insights into the genetic landscape of high-risk smoldering myeloma and information on sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with an expanded cohort of patients. Eighteen patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma were enrolled between 29 May 2012, and 14 January 2014. We included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in a parallel trial who received the same therapy (reference group). The overall response rate was 100%. With median potential follow-up of 43.3 months, 10 (63%) remain in MRD negativity, and the estimated 4-year progression-free and overall survival rates are 71% and 100%, respectively. Importantly, we report differences in mutational patterns in patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, reflected in a lower frequency of mutations in significant myeloma genes (6.6% vs 45%) and NFKB pathway genes (6.6% vs 25%). Treatment with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance was associated with a 100% response rate and 63% MRD negativity with a safety profile consistent with previous reports for this regimen. This study had a small numbers of participants, but there seemed to be important differences in the genetic landscape of patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma and those with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, suggestive of a more treatment-responsive biology in early disease.