RESUMEN
In modern obstetric practice, providers will encounter patients for whom opioid use in pregnancy is reasonable or even necessary. A "one-size-fits-all" approach to the counseling and management of such patients is misguided. Understanding indications for ongoing opioid use in pregnancy is essential to patient-centered care. Specifically, recognition of the nuanced differences between opioid dependence and opioid use disorder is crucial for appropriate diagnosis, screening for common concurrent conditions, adequately counseling about individualized maternal and perinatal risks, and accurate documentation of diagnoses and medical decision-making. In this paper, we explore the current typical scenarios in which opioid use in pregnancy may be encountered, ongoing opioid prescribing should be considered, and provide a guide for the obstetric provider to navigate the antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum periods. KEY POINTS: · Opioid use in pregnant and postpartum individuals is not rare.. · Obstetric providers may elect to assume opioid prescribing.. · Obstetric providers are positioned to optimize outcomes for the mother-infant dyad..
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo PospartoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report a case of arachnoiditis as a complication of epidural blood patch procedures and to systematically review the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and treatment modalities reported in the literature. BACKGROUND: Epidural blood patching is an effective treatment for low-pressure headache secondary to spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak or iatrogenic post-dural puncture. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is believed to be a rare headache disorder, but recently has been diagnosed at higher frequencies, making it an important differential diagnosis for intractable headaches. Arachnoiditis has surfaced as a rare complication of epidural blood patching. Symptom presentation does not always correlate with evidence of meningeal enhancement on imaging. Optimal methods for treatment remain largely unknown. METHODS: Databases Embase and PubMed were searched for all published studies on arachnoiditis post-epidural blood patch using a combination of the following medical subject headings and keywords: arachnoiditis, arachnoid inflammation, adverse event, and epidural blood patch. All original English-language articles that described arachnoid and/or meningeal inflammation in conjunction with epidural blood patch procedures were included for analysis. Title and abstract screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seven other cases of arachnoiditis post-blood patch placement have been documented, most of which were diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging. Six of these were a result of a spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery. Common symptoms reported were headache, back and radicular pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness. There are currently no proven consensus-based treatment recommendations available. While intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone taper was found to be effective in the case presented, the benefit of other multi-modal therapies was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Headache specialists who treat postural headache should be aware of arachnoiditis as a potentially severe complication of epidural blood patch. The case presented is the first of its kind to report arachnoiditis as a complication of high-volume blood patch for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. More studies are required to determine suitable treatment options for post-epidural blood patch arachnoiditis.
Asunto(s)
Aracnoiditis/etiología , Parche de Sangre Epidural/efectos adversos , Hipotensión Intracraneal/terapia , Cefalea Pospunción de la Duramadre/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the safety of and long-term pain relief due to intravenous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of chronic pain in a tertiary pain management clinic. Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Medical records were reviewed from 233 adult chronic pain patients who underwent one to three lidocaine infusions. The initial lidocaine challenge consisted of 1,000 mg/h administered intravenously for up to 30 minutes until infusion was complete, full pain resolution, the patient requested to stop, side effects (SEs) became intolerable, and/or if there were any safety concerns. Subsequent infusions were tailored to patient response. Data reviewed included pain diagnosis, lidocaine dose, SEs, and duration of pain relief documented at a follow-up visit. Results: Patients primarily had neuropathic pain (80%), were 94% white, 58% were female, and there was an average pain duration of 7.9 years. SEs were usually mild and transient, including perioral tingling, dizziness, tinnitus, and nausea/vomiting, and they were uncommon after the initial infusion. Overall, 41% of patients showed long-lasting pain relief, with positive response to the initial infusion associated with receiving and benefitting from subsequent infusions. Benefit by pain diagnoses varied from 32% to 58%. Conclusions: Our retrospective study in a heterogeneous population with chronic pain suggests that intravenous lidocaine is a safe treatment. Data also suggest long-term pain relief in a significant proportion of patients. Additional study is important in order to delineate patient selection, determine optimal dosing and treatment frequency, assess pain reduction and duration, and treatment cost-effectiveness.
Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Opioids are commonly used to treat postoperative pain; however, guidelines vary regarding safe opioid use after hip arthroscopy. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purposes were to (1) identify risk factors for persistent opioid use, (2) assess the effect of opioid use on outcomes, and (3) describe common opioid prescribing patterns after hip arthroscopy. It was hypothesized that preoperative opioid use would affect complication rates and result in greater postoperative opioid use. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence 3. Methods: The Utah State All Payer Claims Database was queried for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between January 2013 and December 2017. Included were patients ≥14 years of age at index surgery with continuous insurance. Patients were separated into acute (<3 months) and chronic (≥3 months) postoperative opioid use groups. Primary outcomes included revision surgery, complications (infection, pulmonary embolism/deep venous thrombosis, death), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital admissions. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify factors associated with the outcomes. Results: Included were 2835 patients (mean age, 47 years; range, 14-64 years), of whom 2544 were in the acute opioid use and 291 were in the chronic opioid use group. Notably, 91% of the patients in the chronic group took opioid medications preoperatively, and they were more than twice as likely to carry a mental health diagnosis (P < .01). Patients in the acute group had a significantly shorter initial prescription duration, took fewer opioid pills, and had fewer refills than those in the chronic group (P < .01 for all). Patients in the chronic group had a significantly higher risk of postoperative ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; P = .008), hospital admission (OR, 3.02; P = .002), and additional surgery (P = .003), as well as infection (OR, 2.55; P < .001) and hematoma (OR, 2.43; P = .030). Patients who had used opioids before hip arthroscopy were more likely to need more refills (P < .01). A formal opioid use disorder diagnosis correlated significantly with postoperative hospital admissions (OR, 3.83; P = .044) and revision hip arthroscopy (OR, 4.72; P = .003). Conclusion: Mental health and substance use disorders were more common in patients with chronic postoperative opioid use, and chronic postoperative opioid use was associated with greater likelihood of postoperative complications. Preoperative opioid use was significantly correlated with chronic postoperative opioid use and with increased refill requests after index arthroscopy.
RESUMEN
Fibromyalgia syndrome is a chronic pain disorder and defies definitively efficacious therapy. In this review, we summarize the results from the early treatment research as well as recent research evaluating the pharmacological, interventional and nonpharmacological therapies. We further discuss future directions of fibromyalgia syndrome management; we specifically focus on the issues that are associated with currently available treatments, such as the need for personalized approach, new technologically oriented and interventional treatments, the importance of understanding and harnessing placebo effects and enhancement of patient engagement in therapy.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Fibromialgia/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Femenino , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
This study sought to characterize the performance of patients with schizophrenia, as compared with healthy participants, on a memory task that required encoding of items to different depths. Participants included 21 individuals with schizophrenia and 26 healthy controls. During the encoding phase of the study, participants processed successively presented words in two ways: perceptually (by making a decision as to whether the letter "a" was present in the word) or semantically (by making a living/nonliving decision for each word). During the recognition phase of the study, participants were presented with a list of words containing items that had been presented during the encoding phase (during either the letter decision task or the semantic decision task), as well as items that had not been seen before (foils). Though patients with schizophrenia performed more poorly overall on the recognition task, recognition was facilitated by semantic encoding to an equivalent degree in both groups. In other words, while significant main effects were present for group and encoding, no groupxencoding condition was present. This result is consistent with previous findings of a lack of qualitative differences in performance on learning and memory tasks between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. It also suggests that strategies that place constraints on the encoding processes used by patients may help improve the efficiency with which they learn and remember information.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Memoria/etiología , Reconocimiento en Psicología , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Memoria/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de WechslerRESUMEN
Patients with schizophrenia typically demonstrate impairments on semantic and letter fluency tasks but it is possible that these tests demand subtly different cognitive processing: a lexical search based on phonology or orthography or a semantic search based on organization of semantic networks by dimension or attribute. Differences in the performance between these two tasks may imply whether deficits involve difficulties in accessing or traversing connectivities in the semantic system, as opposed to those based on linguistic units. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed 13 studies (N=915) in an attempt to clarify whether schizophrenic patients are in fact differentially impaired in semantic fluency. Results from analyses indicated that schizophrenic patients are disproportionately deficient in category fluency (d=1.23 for semantic and 1.01 for letter fluency with minimal overlap of confidence intervals of weighted d's) suggesting that compromises the semantic system may be present in schizophrenia and perhaps play a role in the symptomatic anomalies exhibited in this patient population.