The effect of one-time abutment placement on clinical and radiographic outcomes: A 5-year randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term (5 years) clinical efficacy of the one-abutment one-time protocol (test) versus the standard of care by placing the definitive abutment on the day of the prosthetic delivery (control). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 39 subjects with 60 implants were randomly allocated to either the test or the control group. Changes in the radiographic interproximal bone levels (DIB), modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth, modified plaque index, papilla fill (Jemt score), incidence of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis as well as patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were collected and compared at 1, 3 and 5 years. RESULTS: At 5 years, the control group showed a greater, although not statistically significant, change in mean DIB values (0.97 mm vs. 0.53 mm). Regarding the other clinical parameters evaluated, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups at any time point. At 5 years, 51% of the implants presented peri-implant mucositis (25.5% in the control and 23.5% in the test), and only one implant in the test group developed peri-implantitis. CONCLUSIONS: The connection and disconnection of healing abutments during the healing period was not associated with higher long-term bone loss. Clinical outcomes and PROMs were similar between groups.

Efficacy of adjunctive measures in peri-implant mucositis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To answer the following PICO question: In systemically healthy humans with peri-implant mucositis, what is the efficacy of patient-performed or administered (by prescription) measures used adjunctively to submarginal instrumentation, as compared to submarginal instrumentation alone or combined with a negative control, in terms of reducing bleeding on probing (BOP), in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with at least 3 months of follow-up? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases were searched until April 2022. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and predictive intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Sixteen parallel RCTs corresponding to 14 studies with low/moderate risk of bias were included. Test groups showed greater reductions in BOP (%) than control groups (nstudies  = 16; npatients  = 650; WMD = 14.25%; 95% CI [9.06-19.45]; p < .001; I2  = 98.7%). The greatest WMD in BOP reductions (%) were obtained by antiseptics (ns  = 5; np  = 229; WMD = 22.72%; 95% CI [19.40-26.04]; p < 0.001; I2  = 94.8%), followed by probiotics (ns  = 6; np  = 260; WMD = 12.11%; 95% CI [3.20-21.03]; p = .008; I2  = 93.3%) and systemic antibiotics (ns  = 3; np  = 101; WMD = 5.97%; 95% CI [1.34-10.59]; p = .012; I2  = 58.1%). Disease resolution was scarcely reported (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: Significant clinical improvements can be obtained when professional submarginal instrumentation is combined with patient-performed or administered (by prescription) adjunctive measures, although a complete disease resolution may not be achieved.

Effect of orthodontic therapy in periodontitis and non-periodontitis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

AIM: To answer these PICO questions: #1: In adult patients with malocclusion, what are the effects of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) on clinical attachment level (CAL) changes in treated periodontitis patients with a healthy but reduced periodontium compared to non-periodontitis patients? #2: In adult patients with treated periodontitis and malocclusion, which is the efficacy of skeletal anchorage devices compared to conventional systems in terms of orthodontic treatment outcomes? MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven databases were searched until June 2020 looking for randomized, non-randomized trials and case series. Mean effects (ME) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies with high risk of bias were included. PICO#1: In 26 patients without periodontitis and in 69 treated periodontitis patients, minimal changes in periodontal outcomes were reported after orthodontic therapy (p > 0.05). A significant CAL gain (mm) (ME = 3.523; 95% CI [2.353; 4.693]; p < 0.001) was observed in 214 patients when periodontal outcomes were retrieved before a combined periodontal and orthodontic therapy. PICO#2: Orthodontic variables were scarcely reported, and objective assessment of the results on orthodontic therapy was missing. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a small number of low-quality studies, in non-periodontitis and in stable treated periodontitis patients, OTM had no significant impact on periodontal outcomes.

Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinse, as an adjunct to professional plaque removal (PPR) and mechanical hygiene, in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PiM) and gingivitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients displaying PiM in, at least, one implant were included in this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Subjects received PPR (at baseline and 6-month visits) and were instructed to rinse, twice daily, during 1 year with the tested mouth rinse or a placebo. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included in the study and 46 attended the final visit. In the teeth and implants with inflammation, a higher reduction in BOP was observed in the test group. Statistically significant differences between groups were only observed in the lingual sites of the teeth with gingivitis (mean difference = 11.96%; 95% confidence interval [1.09; 22.83]; p = 0.03). Overall, compliance and satisfaction were good, even though staining were higher for the test group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of mechanical debridement with a 0.03% CHX and 0.05% CPC mouth rinse may have adjunctive benefits in the management of gingivitis, and it is associated with a higher degree of staining. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The control of gingivitis can be improved, after professional mechanical debridement, with toothbrushing and the supplementary use of a 0.03% CHX and 0.05% CPC mouth rinse at home. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03533166.

Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse, as an adjunct to professionally and patient-administered mechanical plaque removal, in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (PiM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients displaying PiM in, at least, one implant were included in this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Subjects received professional prophylaxis (baseline and 6 months) and were instructed to regular oral hygiene practices and to rinse, twice daily, with the test or placebo mouth rinses, during one year. Clinical, radiographic and microbiological outcomes were evaluated at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Disease resolution was defined as absence of bleeding on probing (BOP). Data were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA, Student's t and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included and 46 attended the final visit (22 in control and 24 in test group). In the test group, there was a 24.49% greater reduction in BOP at the buccal sites (95% confidence interval [3.65-45.34%]; p = 0.002) than in controls. About 58.3% of test implants and 50% controls showed healthy peri-implant tissues at final visit (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the test mouth rinse demonstrated some adjunctive benefits in the treatment of PiM. Complete disease resolution could not be achieved in every case.

Safety and performance of a novel collagenated xenogeneic bone block for lateral alveolar crest augmentation for staged implant placement.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance and safety of placing a collagenated xenogeneic bone block (CXBB) graft for the lateral bone augmentation of the alveolar crest prior to implant placement. MATERIAL & METHODS: In patients with single or multiple tooth gaps and a severe horizontal collapse of the alveolar ridge, a ridge augmentation procedure was performed using CXBB fixated with osteosynthesis screws to the atrophic bone crest and complemented with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles (DBBM) and a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM). Patients were examined with CBCT prior to and 24 weeks after the augmentation. Twenty-six weeks postoperatively, a re-entry procedure was performed to evaluate the bone width and availability for adequate implant placement. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received 28 CXBB, and in 13 patients, a re-entry procedure was performed. Eleven patients (84.6%) gained enough bone volume for implant insertion without additional contouring or secondary bone augmentation. The mean crest width at baseline was 2.83 mm (SD 0.57), and the mean crest width at re-entry was 6.90 mm (SD 1.22), with a mean ridge width increase of 4.12 mm (SD 1.32). Soft tissue dehiscence occurred during the follow-up in 5 of 14 patients (35.7%) at various time points. In addition, there was a high incidence of early implant loss (30.8% [patient-based]). CONCLUSIONS: CXBB achieved significant horizontal crestal width gains allowing a secondary implant placement in the majority of the patients. However, the occurrence of soft tissue dehiscence may notably affect the outcome of the subsequent implant therapy.

Effect of one-time placement of the definitive abutment versus multiple healing abutment disconnections and reconnections during the prosthetic phase on radiographic and clinical outcomes: A 12-month randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect on clinical and radiological outcomes of the one-abutment, one-time protocol (test) versus placing the definitive abutment on the day of functional loading after having disconnected and connected three times the healing abutment during the prosthetic phase (control). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with 80 implants were randomly allocated to either the test or the control group. Changes in the radiographic marginal bone levels (MBLs), clinical outcomes, prosthetic-related outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were assessed and compared 6 and 12 months after functional loading. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with 74 implants were followed at 12 months. A statistically significant bone remodeling was observed in both groups following implant placement. MBLs were significantly greater in the control group at the 6- (-0.13 mm vs. -0.61 mm) and 12-month visits (-0.01 mm vs. -0.53 mm). Bone loss was significantly greater in the control group from surgery to 6 and 12 months and from loading to 6 and 12 months. The abutment height was significantly greater in the test group, however, there were no significant differences in the restorative angle. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for the measured clinical variables (probing depth, plaque, and bleeding index) and PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Disconnecting and reconnecting the healing abutment was associated with significantly higher bone loss after 12 months, as compared to the placement of the definitive abutment at implant installation.

U3 snoRNP associates with fibrillarin a component of the scleroderma clumpy nucleolar domain.

Serum from patients with scleroderma recognizes the clumpy autoantigen. The present studies addressed the issue as to whether the clumpy nucleolar autoantigen recognized by scleroderma serum is fibrillarin-U3 snoRNP. Clones encoding for clumpy autoantigen were immunodetected from a lambdagt11 HeLa cell random-primed library with the serum from a patient with diffuse scleroderma and autoautoantibodies against clumpy autoantigen. Sequences from the recombinant phages were amplified by PCR and subcloned into a pCRII vector. The DNA was sequenced by a dideoxy termination reaction. Ten lambdagt11 clumpy clones were detected by immunoscreening. One containing the glycine-rich and RNP2 fibrillarin domains was expressed in lysogenic bacteria. The recombinant proteins were used to elicit antibodies in rabbits, and these exhibited clumpy nucleolar reactivity. The recombinant fibrillarin tested by ELISA was recognized by the clumpy scleroderma serum from the majority of patients. In situ hybridization assays showed that the fibrillarin tagged by the elicited antibodies was colocalized with U3 snoRNP in the nucleolus in a clumpy manner and coprecipitated the U3 snoRNP. In conclusion, the fibrillarin-U3 snoRNP complex is the major component of the clumpy subcellular domain. Therefore these molecules constitute an important target of scleroderma autoantibodies.