RESUMEN
We describe the spatiotemporal course of cortical high-gamma activity, hippocampal ripple activity and interictal epileptiform discharges during an associative memory task in 15 epilepsy patients undergoing invasive EEG. Successful encoding trials manifested significantly greater high-gamma activity in hippocampus and frontal regions. Successful cued recall trials manifested sustained high-gamma activity in hippocampus compared to failed responses. Hippocampal ripple rates were greater during successful encoding and retrieval trials. Interictal epileptiform discharges during encoding were associated with 15% decreased odds of remembering in hippocampus (95% confidence interval 6-23%). Hippocampal interictal epileptiform discharges during retrieval predicted 25% decreased odds of remembering (15-33%). Odds of remembering were reduced by 25-52% if interictal epileptiform discharges occurred during the 500-2000 ms window of encoding or by 41% during retrieval. During encoding and retrieval, hippocampal interictal epileptiform discharges were followed by a transient decrease in ripple rate. We hypothesize that interictal epileptiform discharges impair associative memory in a regionally and temporally specific manner by decreasing physiological hippocampal ripples necessary for effective encoding and recall. Because dynamic memory impairment arises from pathological interictal epileptiform discharge events competing with physiological ripples, interictal epileptiform discharges represent a promising therapeutic target for memory remediation in patients with epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Hipocampo/fisiopatología , Recuerdo Mental/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Electrocorticografía , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Memoria/etiología , Trastornos de la Memoria/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor cortex is broadly investigated to modulate functional outcomes such as motor function, sleep characteristics, or pain. The most common montages that use two large electrodes (25-35 cm2 ) placed over the area of motor cortex and contralateral supraorbital region (M1-SO montages) require precise measurements, usually using the 10-20 EEG system, which is cumbersome in clinics and not suitable for applications by patients at home. The objective was to develop and test novel headgear allowing for reproduction of the M1-SO montage without the 10-20 EEG measurements, neuronavigation, or TMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Points C3/C4 of the 10-20 EEG system is the conventional reference for the M1 electrode. The headgear was designed using an orthogonal, fixed-angle approach for connection of frontal and coronal headgear components. The headgear prototype was evaluated for accuracy and replicability of the M1 electrode position in 600 repeated measurements compared to manually determined C3 in 30 volunteers. Computational modeling was used to estimate brain current flow at the mean and maximum recorded electrode placement deviations from C3. RESULTS: The headgear includes navigational points for accurate placement and assemblies to hold electrodes in the M1-SO position without measurement by the user. Repeated measurements indicated accuracy and replicability of the electrode position: the mean [SD] deviation of the M1 electrode (size 5 × 5 cm) from C3 was 1.57 [1.51] mm, median 1 mm. Computational modeling suggests that the potential deviation from C3 does not produce a significant change in brain current flow. CONCLUSIONS: The novel approach to M1-SO montage using a fixed-angle headgear not requiring measurements by patients or caregivers facilitates tDCS studies in home settings and can replace cumbersome C3 measurements for clinical tDCS applications.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Simulación por Computador , Electrodos , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Corteza Motora , Neuronavegación , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Autoimmune encephalitis can be followed by treatment-resistant epilepsy. Understanding its predictors and mechanisms are crucial to future studies to improve autoimmune encephalitis outcomes. Our objective was to determine the clinical and imaging predictors of postencephalitic treatment-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study (2012-2017) of adults with autoimmune encephalitis, both antibody positive and seronegative but clinically definite or probable. We examined clinical and imaging (as defined by morphometric analysis) predictors of seizure freedom at long term follow-up. RESULTS: Of 37 subjects with adequate follow-up data (mean 4.3 yrs, SD 2.5), 21 (57 %) achieved seizure freedom after a mean time of 1 year (SD 2.3), and one third (13/37, 35 %) discontinued ASMs. Presence of mesial temporal hyperintensities on the initial MRI was the only independent predictor of ongoing seizures at last follow-up (OR 27.3, 95 %CI 2.48-299.5). Morphometric analysis of follow-up MRI scans (n = 20) did not reveal any statistically significant differences in hippocampal, opercular, and total brain volumes between patients with postencephalitic treatment-resistant epilepsy and those without. SIGNIFICANCE: Postencephalitic treatment-resistant epilepsy is a common complication of autoimmune encephalitis and is more likely to occur in those with mesial temporal hyperintensities on acute MRI. Volume loss in the hippocampal, opercular, and overall brain on follow-up MRI does not predict postencephalitic treatment-resistant epilepsy, so additional factors beyond structural changes may account for its development.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso , Epilepsia , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/complicaciones , Epilepsia/etiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive method of neuromodulation using low-intensity direct electrical currents. This method of brain stimulation presents several potential advantages compared to other techniques, as it is noninvasive, cost-effective, broadly deployable, and well-tolerated provided proper equipment and protocols are administered. Even though tDCS is apparently simple to perform, correct administration of the tDCS session, especially the electrode positioning and preparation, is vital for ensuring reproducibility and tolerability. The electrode positioning and preparation steps are traditionally also the most time consuming and error-prone. To address these challenges, modern tDCS techniques, using fixed-position headgear and pre-assembled sponge electrodes, reduce complexity and setup time while also ensuring that the electrodes are consistently placed as intended. These modern tDCS methods present advantages for research, clinic, and remote-supervised (at home) settings. This article provides a comprehensive step-by-step guide for administering a tDCS session using fixed-position headgear and pre-assembled sponge electrodes. This guide demonstrates tDCS using commonly applied montages intended for motor cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation. As described, selection of the head size and montage-specific headgear automates electrode positioning. Fully assembled pre-saturated snap-electrodes are simply affixed to the set position snap-connectors on the headgear. The modern tDCS method is shown to reduce setup time and reduce errors for both novice and expert operators. The methods outlined in this article can be adapted to different applications of tDCS as well as other forms of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS). However, since tES is application specific, as appropriate, any methods recipe is customized to accommodate subject, indication, environment, and outcome specific features.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Electrodos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Higher tDCS current may putatively enhance efficacy, with tolerability the perceived limiting factor. OBJECTIVE: We designed and validated electrodes and an adaptive controller to provide tDCS up to 4â¯mA, while managing tolerability. The adaptive 4â¯mA controller included incremental ramp up, impedance-based current limits, and a Relax-mode where current is transiently decreased. Relax-mode was automatically activated by self-report VAS-pain score >5 and in some conditions by a Relax-button available to participants. METHODS: In a parallel-group participant-blind design with 50 healthy subjects, we used specialized electrodes to administer 3 daily session of tDCS for 11â¯min, with a lexical decision task as a distractor, in 5 study conditions: adaptive 4â¯mA, adaptive 4â¯mA with Relax-button, adaptive 4â¯mA with historical-Relax-button, 2â¯mA, and sham. A tablet-based stimulator with a participant interface regularly queried VAS pain score and also limited current based on impedance and tolerability. An Abort-button provided in all conditions stopped stimulation. In the adaptive 4â¯mA with Relax-button and adaptive 4â¯mA with historical-Relax-button conditions, participants could trigger a Relax-mode ad libitum, in the latter case with incrementally longer current reductions. Primary outcome was the average current delivered during each session, VAS pain score, and adverse event questionnaires. Current delivered was analyzed either excluding or including dropouts who activated Abort (scored as 0 current). RESULTS: There were two dropouts each in the adaptive 4â¯mA and sham conditions. Resistance based current attenuation was rarely activated, with few automatic VAS pain score triggered relax-modes. In conditions with Relax-button option, there were significant activations often irrespective of VAS pain score. Including dropouts, current across conditions were significantly different from each other with maximum current delivered during adaptive 4â¯mA with Relax-button. Excluding dropouts, maximum current was delivered with adaptive 4â¯mA. VAS pain score and adverse events for the sham was only significantly lower than the adaptive 4â¯mA with Relax-button and adaptive 4â¯mA with historical-Relax-button. There was no difference in VAS pain score or adverse events between 2â¯mA and adaptive 4â¯mA. CONCLUSIONS: Provided specific electrodes and controllers, adaptive 4â¯mA tDCS is tolerated and effectively blinded, with acceptability likely higher in a clinical population and absence of regular querying. Indeed, presenting participants with overt controls increases rumination on sensation.
Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Escala Visual Analógica , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/fisiopatología , Autoinforme , Método Simple Ciego , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The cranial nerves are the pathways through which environmental information (sensation) is directly communicated to the brain, leading to perception, and giving rise to higher cognition. Because cranial nerves determine and modulate brain function, invasive and non-invasive cranial nerve electrical stimulation methods have applications in the clinical, behavioral, and cognitive domains. Among other neuromodulation approaches such as peripheral, transcranial and deep brain stimulation, cranial nerve stimulation is unique in allowing axon pathway-specific engagement of brain circuits, including thalamo-cortical networks. In this review we amalgamate relevant knowledge of 1) cranial nerve anatomy and biophysics; 2) evidence of the modulatory effects of cranial nerves on cognition; 3) clinical and behavioral outcomes of cranial nerve stimulation; and 4) biomarkers of nerve target engagement including physiology, electroencephalography, neuroimaging, and behavioral metrics. Existing non-invasive stimulation methods cannot feasibly activate the axons of only individual cranial nerves. Even with invasive stimulation methods, selective targeting of one nerve fiber type requires nuance since each nerve is composed of functionally distinct axon-types that differentially branch and can anastomose onto other nerves. None-the-less, precisely controlling stimulation parameters can aid in affecting distinct sets of axons, thus supporting specific actions on cognition and behavior. To this end, a rubric for reproducible dose-response stimulation parameters is defined here. Given that afferent cranial nerve axons project directly to the brain, targeting structures (e.g. thalamus, cortex) that are critical nodes in higher order brain networks, potent effects on cognition are plausible. We propose an intervention design framework based on driving cranial nerve pathways in targeted brain circuits, which are in turn linked to specific higher cognitive processes. State-of-the-art current flow models that are used to explain and design cranial-nerve-activating stimulation technology require multi-scale detail that includes: gross anatomy; skull foramina and superficial tissue layers; and precise nerve morphology. Detailed simulations also predict that some non-invasive electrical or magnetic stimulation approaches that do not intend to modulate cranial nerves per se, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), may also modulate activity of specific cranial nerves. Much prior cranial nerve stimulation work was conceptually limited to the production of sensory perception, with individual titration of intensity based on the level of perception and tolerability. However, disregarding sensory emulation allows consideration of temporal stimulation patterns (axon recruitment) that modulate the tone of cortical networks independent of sensory cortices, without necessarily titrating perception. For example, leveraging the role of the thalamus as a gatekeeper for information to the cerebral cortex, preventing or enhancing the passage of specific information depending on the behavioral state. We show that properly parameterized computational models at multiple scales are needed to rationally optimize neuromodulation that target sets of cranial nerves, determining which and how specific brain circuitries are modulated, which can in turn influence cognition in a designed manner.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/fisiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Cognición/fisiología , Nervios Craneales/fisiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiopatología , Nervios Craneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Nervios Craneales/fisiopatología , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Humanos , Neuroimagen/métodos , Estimulación Transcraneal de Corriente Directa/métodos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodosRESUMEN
Slow oscillations and spindle activity during non-rapid eye movement sleep have been implicated in memory consolidation. Closed-loop acoustic stimulation has previously been shown to enhance slow oscillations and spindle activity during sleep and improve verbal associative memory. We assessed the effect of closed-loop acoustic stimulation during a daytime nap on a virtual reality spatial navigation task in 12 healthy human subjects in a randomized within-subject crossover design. We show robust enhancement of slow oscillation and spindle activity during sleep. However, no effects on behavioral performance were observed when comparing real versus sham stimulation. To explore whether memory enhancement effects were task specific and dependent on nocturnal sleep, in a second experiment with 19 healthy subjects, we aimed to replicate a previous study that used closed-loop acoustic stimulation to enhance memory for word pairs. The methods used were as close as possible to those used in the original study, except that we used a double-blind protocol, in which both subject and experimenter were unaware of the test condition. Again, we successfully enhanced slow oscillation and spindle power, but again did not strengthen associative memory performance with stimulation. We conclude that enhancement of sleep oscillations may be insufficient to enhance memory performance in spatial navigation or verbal association tasks, and provide possible explanations for lack of behavioral replication.
Asunto(s)
Ondas Encefálicas/fisiología , Encéfalo/fisiología , Memoria/fisiología , Sueño/fisiología , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Consolidación de la Memoria/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The adoption of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is encouraged by portability and ease-of-use. However, the preparation of tDCS electrodes remains the most cumbersome and error-prone step. Here, we validate the performance of the first "dry" electrodes for tDCS. A "dry electrode" excludes 1) any saline or other electrolytes, that are prone to spread and leaving a residue; 2) any adhesive at the skin interface; or 3) any electrode preparation steps except the connection to the stimulator. The Multilayer Hydrogel Composite (MHC) dry-electrode design satisfied these criteria. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Over an exposed scalp (supraorbital (SO) regions of forehead), we validated the performance of the first "dry" electrode for tDCS against the state-of-the-art conventional wet sponge-electrode to test the hypothesis that whether tDCS can be applied with a dry electrode with comparable tolerability as conventional "wet" techniques? METHODS: MHC dry-electrode performance was verified using a skin-phantom, including mapping voltage at the phantom surface and mapping current inside the electrode using a novel biocompatible flexible printed circuit board current sensor matrix (fPCB-CSM). MHC dry-electrode performance was validated in a human trial including tolerability (VAS and adverse events), skin redness (erythema), and electrode current mapping with the fPCB-CSM. Experimental data from skin-phantom stimulation were compared against a finite element method (FEM) model. RESULTS: Under the tested conditions (1.5â¯mA and 2â¯mA tDCS for 20â¯min using MHC-dry and sponge-electrode), the tolerability was improved, and the erythema and adverse-events were comparable between the MHC dry-electrode and the state-of-the-art sponge electrodes. CONCLUSION: Dry (residue-free, non-spreading, non-adhesive, and no-preparation-needed) electrodes can be tolerated under the tested tDCS conditions, and possibly more broadly used in non-invasive electrical stimulation.