Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mult Scler ; 26(14): 1866-1876, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31762387

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is given as two annual courses. Patients with continued disease activity may receive as-needed additional courses. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of additional alemtuzumab courses in the CARE-MS (Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif® Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis) studies and their extensions. METHODS: Subgroups were based on the number of additional alemtuzumab courses received. Exclusion criteria: other disease-modifying therapy (DMT); <12-month follow-up after last alemtuzumab course. RESULTS: In the additional-courses groups, Courses 3 and 4 reduced annualized relapse rate (12 months before: 0.73 and 0.74, respectively; 12 months after: 0.07 and 0.08). For 36 months after Courses 3 and 4, 89% and 92% of patients were free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening, respectively, with 20% and 26% achieving 6-month confirmed disability improvement. Freedom from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity increased after Courses 3 and 4 (12 months before: 43% and 53%, respectively; 12 months after: 73% and 74%). Safety was similar across groups; serious events occurred irrespective of the number of courses. CONCLUSION: Additional alemtuzumab courses significantly improved outcomes, without increased safety risks, in CARE-MS patients with continued disease activity after Course 2. How this compares to outcomes if treatment is switched to another DMT instead remains unknown.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Esclerosis Múltiple , Alemtuzumab , Humanos , Interferón beta-1a , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia
2.
Neuromodulation ; 19(6): 616-22, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27434115

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) screening assesses response to a test dose of ITB on spasticity and function and identifies adverse reactions. METHOD: An expert panel consulted on best practices after conducting an extensive literature search and conducting an online survey. RESULTS: A successful trial may confirm predetermined goals, which may include improved mobility/positioning, decreased time/improved independence for activities, less home exercise, better wheelchair tolerance, decreased caregiver time, improved sleep, and reduced pain, or may modify goals and expectations. Individuals should not be tested in the presence of active medical issues (e.g., MS exacerbations, active urinary tract infection, nonhealing wounds). Oral antispasmodics can be weaned before trial if a goal is to eliminate them. The standard baclofen test dose is a 50-mcg bolus, 25 mcg in very small children or patients who rely on spasticity for mobility. Patients unresponsive to the standard dose may require 75 mcg or 100 mcg; 24 hours should elapse between bolus doses. Cardiopulmonary parameters should be checked frequently during the first two hours postinjection, and spasticity measures assessed at least twice within four hours. Observation continues until the patient is stable and recovers from hypertonia. Adverse events include spinal headaches, nausea/vomiting, urinary retention, hypotension, seizures, drowsiness/sedation, respiratory depression, and coma. Before implantation, team members must discuss starting dose, drug concentration, delivery mode, pump size and location, and catheter tip placement. Patients/caregivers should understand the commitment necessary for ITB therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Screening helps identify appropriate candidates for ITB.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Espinales , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
3.
Neuromodulation ; 19(6): 607-15, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27434197

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: When spasticity interferes with comfort, function, activities of daily living, mobility, positioning, or caregiver assistance, patients should be considered for intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy. METHODS: An expert panel consulted on best practices. RESULTS: ITB can be considered for problematic spasticity involving muscles/muscle groups during all phases of diseases, including progressive neurologic diseases. ITB alone or with other treatments should not be exclusively reserved for individuals who have failed other approaches. ITB combined with rehabilitation can be effective in certain ambulatory patients. ITB is also highly effective in managing spasticity in children, who may suffer limb deformity, joint dislocation, and poor motor function from spasticity and muscle tightness on the growing musculoskeletal system. Spasticity management often allows individuals to achieve higher function. When cognition is impaired, ITB controls spasticity without the cognitive side effects of some oral medications. Goal setting addresses expectations and treatment in the framework of pathology, impairment, and disability. ITB is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to baclofen, which is rare, or active infection. Some patients with an adverse reaction to oral baclofen may be mistakenly classified as having an allergic reaction and may benefit from ITB. Relative contraindications include unrealistic goals, unmanageable mental health issues, psychosocial factors affecting compliance, and financial burden. Vascular shunting for hydrocephalus is not a contraindication, but concurrent use may affect cerebrospinal fluid flow. Seizures or prior abdominal or pelvic surgery should be discussed before proceeding to an ITB screening test. CONCLUSIONS: ITB should be considered when spasticity interferes with comfort or function.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/administración & dosificación , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Selección de Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Neuromodulation ; 19(6): 632-41, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27434299

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Troubleshooting helps optimize intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy in cases of underdose, overdose, and infection. METHODS: An expert panel of 21 multidisciplinary physicians currently managing >3200 ITB patients was convened, and using standard methodologies for guideline development, created an organized approach to troubleshooting ITB. They conducted a structured literature search that identified 263 peer-reviewed papers, and used results from an online survey of 42 physicians currently managing at least 25 ITB patients each. RESULTS: The panel developed two algorithms. The first was for loss-of-efficacy and applies to patients with previously well-controlled hypertonia on a stable dosing regimen who have increased spasticity Evaluation includes a targeted history (onset, duration, course, exacerbating/relieving factors, medications, recent procedures), physical examination (neuromuscular, vital signs, mental status), radiologic/laboratory testing (catheter imaging, noxious stimuli, infection, rising CK levels), and pump telemetry (pump interrogation, reservoir volume). Rapidly progressing hypertonia with autonomic instability or hypotonia and somnolence require emergent care and perhaps hospitalization. The second algorithm was for emergent care and describes treatment of overdose or withdrawal, which requires immediate care in a monitored setting and restoration of ITB delivery. The previous dosing schedule can be used in withdrawal of short duration; 10-20 mg every six hours can be used in longer-duration withdrawal. Supportive care includes maintenance of airway, respiration, and circulation. Seizure prevention should be considered, along with pump reprogramming or interruption, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and sequential lumbar punctures/drains. Physostigmine and flumazenil are not usually advised. Superficial infections can be treated with oral antibiotics, and deep infections with broad-spectrum IV antibiotics (e.g., cefazolin, clindamycin, vancomycin). Explantation is often required. A new pump can be implanted in a new site under IV antibiotic coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Orderly troubleshooting helps ensure patient safety.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Neuromodulation ; 19(6): 623-31, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27433993

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy aims to reduce spasticity and provide functional control. METHOD: An expert panel consulted on best practices. RESULTS: Pump fill and drug delivery can be started intraoperatively, with monitoring for at least eight hours. Initiate with the 500 mcg/mL concentration. The starting daily dose should be twice the effective bolus screening dose, or the screening dose if the patient had a prolonged response (greater than eight hours) or negative reactions. Oral antispasmodics can be weaned, one drug at a time beginning with oral baclofen after ITB begins. Assessment should occur within 24 hours of a dose change. For adults, daily dose increases may be 5% to 15% once every 24 hours for cerebral-origin spasticity and 10% to 30% once every 24 hours for spinal-origin spasticity. Daily dose increases can be 5% to 15% once every 24 hours for children. Inpatients should be assessed at least every 24 hours and receive rehabilitation. Step dosing can be used for outpatients who cannot return daily. Dosing options include simple continuous dosing, variable 24-hour flex dosing, or regularly scheduled boluses. Patients/caregivers should understand the care plan, responsibilities, and possible side-effects. Low-reservoir alarm dates and refill schedules should be written down, along with emergency contact information. A higher concentration at refill can extend refill intervals, and a bridge bolus must be programmed. Time changes may affect flex dosing. Pump replacement should be scheduled at least three months in advance. CONCLUSIONS: ITB dosing is multistep and individualized.


Asunto(s)
Baclofeno/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones Espinales/métodos , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/administración & dosificación , Espasticidad Muscular/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales/normas , Estudios Longitudinales
6.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 49: 102717, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33476880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab significantly improved clinical and MRI outcomes vs. subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in the CARE-MS trials (NCT00530348, NCT00548405), with sustained efficacy in 2 consecutive extensions (NCT00930553, NCT02255656 [TOPAZ]). METHODS: Post hoc analysis of 8-year alemtuzumab efficacy and safety in pooled CARE-MS patients (N=811) stratified by baseline age (≥18 to ≤25, >25 to ≤35, >35 to ≤45, >45 to ≤55 years). RESULTS: Compared with SC IFNB-1a over 2 years across age cohorts, alemtuzumab lowered annualized relapse rates (ARR; 0.22-0.24 vs. 0.38-0.51), improved or stabilized disability (freedom from 6-month confirmed disability worsening [CDW]: 85%-92% vs. 62%-88%; achievement of 6-month confirmed disability improvement [CDI]: 20%-31% vs. 13%-25%), increased proportions free of MRI disease activity (70%-86% vs. 42%-63% per year), and slowed brain volume loss (BVL; -0.45% to -0.87% vs. -0.50% to -1.39%). Through Year 2, the treatment effect with alemtuzumab did not significantly differ among age groups for ARR (p-interaction=0.6325), 6-month CDW-free (p-interaction=0.4959), 6-month CDI (p-interaction=0.9268), MRI disease activity-free (p-interaction=0.6512), and BVL (p-interaction=0.4970). Alemtuzumab remained effective on outcomes through Year 8 across age groups. Age-related increases in malignancies (≤45 years: 0.9%-2.2% vs. >45 years: 8.1%) and deaths (0%-1.7% vs. 7.0%) were observed. Serious infections also increased from the youngest (5.1%) to oldest (12.8%) age cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Alemtuzumab had greater efficacy than SC IFNB-1a over 2 years across comparable age groups, with no significant differences between alemtuzumab-treated age groups. Efficacy on relapse, disability, and MRI outcomes continued through Year 8 across age groups. Age-related increases in serious infections, malignancies, and deaths were observed.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Alemtuzumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Interferón beta-1a , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord ; 14: 1756286420982134, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035833

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the 2-year CARE-MS I and II trials, alemtuzumab 12 mg administered on 5 consecutive days at core study baseline and on 3 consecutive days 12 months later significantly improved outcomes versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Here, we present the final 6-year CARE-MS extension trial results (CAMMS03409), and compare outcomes over 6 years in patients randomized to both treatment groups at core study baseline. METHODS: Over a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab patients (alemtuzumab-only) received as-needed additional alemtuzumab (⩾12 months apart) for disease activity after course 2. SC IFNB-1a patients who entered the extension discontinued SC IFNB-1a and received 2 alemtuzumab 12 mg courses (IFN-alemtuzumab), followed by additional, as-needed, alemtuzumab. RESULTS: Through year 6, 63% of CARE-MS I and 50% of CARE-MS II alemtuzumab-only patients received neither additional alemtuzumab nor other disease-modifying therapy, with lasting suppression of disease activity, improved disability, and slowing of brain volume loss (BVL). In CARE-MS I patients (treatment-naive; less disability; shorter disease duration), disease activity and BVL were significantly reduced in IFN-alemtuzumab patients, similar to alemtuzumab-only patients at year 6. Among CARE-MS II patients (inadequate response to prior treatment; more disability; longer disease duration), alemtuzumab significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, including BVL, in IFN-alemtuzumab patients; however, disability outcomes were less favorable versus alemtuzumab-only patients. Safety profiles, including infections and autoimmunities, following alemtuzumab were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the high efficacy of alemtuzumab over 6 years, with a similar safety profile between treatment groups. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553.

8.
Pediatr Neurol ; 40(1): 31-3, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19068251

RESUMEN

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis is now recognized, but the association with ethnicity has not been well studied. In a retrospective review at a major teaching facility, 46 pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis patients were identified; of these, 24 were African-American black and 19 were European-origin white. Both groups were similar in mean age at onset (black, 13.6 +/- 3.36 years; white, 13.68 +/- 3.42 years) and total duration of follow-up (black, 42.7 +/- 43.5 months; white, 38.2 +/- 35.3 months), with no significant difference in time to onset of disease-modifying therapy (black, 11.2 +/- 4.7 months; white, 12.4 +/- 5.1 months). The percentage of females was higher in the black than in the white group (83% vs 47%; P = 0.014). The annualized relapse rate was significantly higher in the black than in the white group (1.80 +/- 1.14 vs 1.13 +/- 0.50; P < 0.001). These findings are consistent with data suggesting a more aggressive disease phenotype among African-American blacks with adult-onset multiple sclerosis. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to confirm the findings.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Esclerosis Múltiple/etnología , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Edad de Inicio , Niño , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Expert Rev Neurother ; 15(6): 575-86, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25924547

RESUMEN

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is approved for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in 57 countries worldwide, with more than 2 million patient-years of exposure and over 20 years of continuous clinical use without new safety concerns. GA has an overall favorable risk-benefit profile: 30% reduced annual relapse rate and decreased brain lesion activity. In clinically definite MS or clinically isolated syndrome, GA slows brain atrophy, which may be related to its unique anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective mechanisms of action. Early treatment with GA delays the onset of clinically definite MS more effectively than late treatment in clinically isolated syndrome. GA is not associated with immunosuppression, autoimmune disease, infections or development of neutralizing antibodies. A new three-times-weekly formulation of GA is available to potentially reduce the incidence of injection-related side effects. Other safety advantages of GA include its pregnancy rating (Category B) and limited uncontrolled data suggesting that tolerability is similar in children with MS.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Glatiramer/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Embarazo
10.
Stem Cells Transl Med ; 4(3): 252-60, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25593207

RESUMEN

In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in identifying novel mechanisms and new medications that regulate immune cell function in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, a significant unmet need is the identification of the mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration, because patients continue to manifest brain atrophy and disability despite current therapies. Neural and mesenchymal stem cells have received considerable attention as therapeutic candidates to ameliorate the disease in preclinical and phase I clinical trials. More recently, progress in somatic cell reprogramming and induced pluripotent stem cell technology has allowed the generation of human "diseased" neurons in a patient-specific setting and has provided a unique biological tool that can be used to understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration. In the present review, we discuss the application and challenges of these technologies, including the generation of neurons, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) from patients and novel stem cell and OPC cellular arrays, in the discovery of new mechanistic insights and the future development of MS reparative therapies.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Esclerosis Múltiple , Células-Madre Neurales , Oligodendroglía , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos Fase I como Asunto , Humanos , Inflamación , Esclerosis Múltiple/metabolismo , Esclerosis Múltiple/patología , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Células-Madre Neurales/metabolismo , Células-Madre Neurales/patología , Células-Madre Neurales/trasplante , Oligodendroglía/metabolismo , Oligodendroglía/patología
11.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 3(5): 404-412, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24175156

RESUMEN

Preliminary studies have suggested that a high salt diet may play a role in the development of autoimmune disease and possibly multiple sclerosis (MS). Promising clinical trial results for 2 new therapies for MS have been reported. Dimethyl fumarate, also known by its investigational name BG-12, became the third oral disease-modifying therapy for MS to be Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved in March 2013. Interestingly, dimethyl fumarate served as the active compound used for the treatment of psoriasis for decades. Alemtuzumab remains under investigation and is not currently FDA-approved for treatment of MS. Other drugs currently approved for alternative indications are being investigated for use in MS. Additionally, an investigation of alternative dosing strategies for glatiramer acetate suggests that patients may benefit from a higher dose formulation and less frequent medication administration. Advances in basic science research have identified another potential autoantigenic target in MS, KIR4.1, which may provide further insight into MS pathophysiology.

12.
JAMA Neurol ; 70(3): 398-402, 2013 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23338729

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical, radiological, and histopathological features of a fatal case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with natalizumab. We will use this case to review PML risk stratification and diagnosis. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Tertiary referral center hospitalized care. PATIENT: A 55-year-old, JC virus (JCV) antibody-positive patient with multiple sclerosis who died of PML after receiving 45 infusions of natalizumab. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brain magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid JCV DNA polymerase chain reaction results. RESULTS: The patient developed subacute onset of bilateral blindness following his 44th dose of natalizumab. Ophthalmologic examination was normal, the brain magnetic resonance imaging was not suggestive of PML, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis did not reveal the presence of JCV DNA. The patient was subsequently treated for a presumed multiple sclerosis relapse with high-dose corticosteroids. Two weeks after his 45th dose of natalizumab, he developed hemiplegia that evolved into quadriparesis. Repeated magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid studies were diagnostic for PML. Postmortem histopathological analysis demonstrated PML-associated white matter and cortical demyelination. CONCLUSIONS: The risks and benefits of natalizumab must be reassessed with continued therapy duration. When there is high clinical suspicion for PML in the setting of negative test results, close clinical vigilance is indicated, natalizumab treatment should be suspended, and JCV polymerase chain reaction testing and brain magnetic resonance imaging scans should be repeated.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/complicaciones , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Leucoencefalopatía Multifocal Progresiva/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico , Natalizumab , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA