Peripheral blood CD34+ cell count reliably predicts autograft yield.

A reliable measure to predict peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft CD34+ cell content is required to optimize the timing of PBPC collection. We prospectively examined the peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell count in 59 consecutive patients with various malignancies and analyzed the correlation between the PB CD34+ cell count and various parameters in the PBPC autograft. Two hundred and thirty-five collections were performed with a median of 4.0 collections per patient (range, 2-10). The median PB CD34+ cell count at the time of collection was 39 x 10(6)/1 (range, 0.0-285.6). The PBPC autograft parameters measured were the CD34+ cell, colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and mononuclear cell (MNC) content. There was a strong linear correlation between PB CD34+ cells/l and autograft CD34+ cells/kg (r = 0.8477). The correlation with CFU-GM/kg (r = 0.5512) was weaker. There was no correlation between autograft CD34+ cells/kg and PB WBC (r= 0.0684), PB MNC (r = 0.1518) or PB platelet count (r = 0.2010). At our institution we aim to obtain a minimum of 0.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg with each day of collection. We demonstrate that such a collection can be reliably obtained if the PB CD34+ cell count exceeds 5.0 x 10(6)/l.

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel delivered every 35 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. Eighteen patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 54 treatment cycles, 44 were delivered and 11 patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were interstitial pneumonitis and mucositis with moderately severe diarrhea (n = 3) and rash (n = 3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 17 patients with evaluable disease, 16 patients responded with six patients achieving a complete remission and an additional four patients achieving no detectable disease (negative restaging including PET scan) but a persistently abnormal bone scan. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival was 11 months with the median overall survival not reached. The recommended doses for phase II/III studies are cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2).

Docetaxel effectively mobilizes peripheral blood CD34+ cells.

We prospectively evaluated docetaxel (100 mg/m2) with G-CSF (10 microg/kg S.C., daily) for mobilization efficiency in 26 patients with breast cancer. The minimum target yield was >4.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (optimum = 9 x 10(6)/kg), sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT). The peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were day 8 and day 9. Seven collections began on day 7, 16 on day 8 and three on day 9. The median peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) CD34+ cell content ranged from 1.2 to 5.9 x 10(6)/kg per day during days 7 to 11 with a median CD34+ content of the total 72 PBPC collections of 3.4 x 10(6)/kg (0.07-15.6). Fifteen patients obtained a PBPC collection exceeding 5 x 10(6)/kg on a single day of collection. Following a median 3 days collection for each patient (range 2-4), the median total CD34+ for all individual sets of collections was 9.7 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.0-28.4). We were able to achieve the minimum CD34+ cell target yield in 22 of 26 patients with one cycle of mobilisation chemotherapy and in two of these patients a second collection yielded sufficient cells. Twenty-two patients have subsequently received repetitive HDT and PBPC transplantation with 57 cycles of HDT having been delivered. For all 57 cycles, the median time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l and 1.0 x 10(9)/l was 10 days (range 8-22) and 11 days (range 8-23), respectively. The median time to platelets greater than 20 x 10(9)/l, 50 x 10(9)/l and 100 x 10(9)/l was 13 days (range 11-23), 17 days (range 12-53) and 23 days (range 18-70), respectively. We conclude that docetaxel with G-CSF effectively mobilises PBPCs with apheresis needing to be commenced approximately 8 days after docetaxel administration.

Intensive leukapheresis in the management of cytopenias in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and lymphocytic lymphoma.

The role of leukapheresis was explored in the management of anaemia and thrombocytopenia complicating the accumulation of lymphoid cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and lymphoma. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of this procedure in correcting these complicating features and to assess the length of response and the clinical well being of the patients. Twenty such patients with either chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or lymphocytic lymphoma were studied using a Continuous Flow Cell Separator (Aminco Celltrifuge). All had persistent significant anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia prior to the institution of leukapheresis. The procedure was carried out on alternate days until significant reduction in total circulating lymphoid cells had been achieved, an average of 2.9 x 10(11) cells being removed on each occasion. Thirteen of the twenty patients showed a significant elevation of both haemoglobin and platelet level concomitant with reduction in lymphoid cells. A reduction in organomegaly was also observed. These patients were classified as "responders," but the other patients failed to show correction of the haematologic parameters. This procedure permitted a number of responder patients to receive more specific treatment but in some it obviated the necessity for any further management for up to 12 months. Surface marker studies were also carried out on the lymphocytes of these patients. The patients who showed the best response to leukapheresis had cells characteristic of those seen in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. The reduction of cells (82%) was greater in those who responded to this treatment than in the non-responder group (72%). The procedure was well tolerated by all patients and overall provided a long-term control of disease which outweighed the initial cost incurred.

Comparison of COBE Spectra software version 4.7 PBSC and version 6.0 auto PBSC program.

Until recently, the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) has been semi-automated by using the COBE Spectra, with the operator manually maintaining the position of the white cells being collected. The COBE Spectra Version 6.0 apheresis device offers the user an automated program for the collection of PBPC. In this study, we compared the new software Version 6.0 to that of Version 4.7. Patients (n = 46) undergoing PBPC collection were allocated to cell processing with either Version 4.7 (n = 24) or Version 6.0 (n = 22). The CD34+ cell count, mononuclear cell (MNC) count, white cell count (WCC), hemoglobin (Hb), and platelet content in the autograft product by using the two versions were compared. We divided the analysis into three subsets according to peripheral blood (PB) CD34 content: <10x10(6)/L, 10-50x10(6)/L and >50x10(6)/L. Analysis of the three subsets showed no statistical difference between results obtained when the starting PB CD34+ cell count was 10-50x10(6)/L (P=0.08) or >50x10(6)/L (P=0.4065). At lower starting PB CD34+ cell counts of <10x10(6)/L, Version 4.7 was superior (P=0.0167). However, autograft platelet contamination of the autograft was significantly higher using Version 4.7 (P=<0.0001).

Repetitive high-dose therapy with ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and conventional-dose paclitaxel delivered every 28 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 69 treatment cycles, 59 were delivered and fifteen patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were renal tubular acidosis, encephalopathy, mucositis and enterocolitis. There was one treatment-related hemorrhagic death. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses for phase II or III studies are ifosfamide (10 g/m2), thiotepa (350 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2).