Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 26(6-7): 899-904, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36030191

RESUMEN

In 1998, an editorial from the International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP) on the occasion of the publication of Phase I by Zelefsky et al. on 3D radiotherapy dose escalation asked the question: "will more prove better?". More than 20 years later, several prospective studies have supported the authors' conclusions, making dose escalation a new standard in prostate cancer. The data from prospective randomized studies were ultimately disappointing in that they failed to show an overall survival benefit from dose escalation. However, there is a clear and consistent benefit in biochemical recurrence-free survival, which must be weighed on an individual patient basis against the potential additional toxicity of dose escalation. Techniques and concepts have become more and more precise, such as intensity modulated irradiation, simultaneous integrated boost, hypofractionated dose-escalation, pelvic irradiation with involved node boost or focal dose-escalation on gross recurrence after prostatectomy. The objective here was to summarize the prospective data on dose escalation in prostate cancer and in particular on recent advances in the field. In 2022, can we finally say that more has proven better?


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Braquiterapia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 43(3): 219-24, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708846

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study intended to compare frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes at blastocyst stage according to freezing methods, slow freezing versus vitrification and according to the type of endometrial preparation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 172 FET at blastocyst stage (day 5 or 6) were included retrospectively from April, 2007 to December, 2012. The FET outcomes from slow freezing (group 1, n=86) were compared with those from vitrification (group 2, n=86). More particularly, the survival rate after thawing, as well as implantation and pregnancy rates (clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates) were compared respectively between these two groups, after matching on women's age at freezing day, embryo number and embryo development stage for transfer. Furthermore, for each freezing method, FET outcomes were compared according to the type of endometrial preparation, i.e. natural cycle (group N) versus stimulated cycle (group S). RESULTS: The survival rate as well as implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher for FET after vitrification compared to FET after slow freezing (97% vs 85%, P<0.0001; 32% vs 20%, P=0.02; 43% vs 28%, P=0.04, respectively). By taking into account the number of transferred embryos for each group, the multiple pregnancy rate was three-fold higher in the group of FET after vitrification compared to the group of FET after slow freezing but not significantly (27.3% vs 8.3%, NS). However, FET outcomes were not affected significantly by the type of endometrial preparation whatever freezing methods. Nevertheless, the early spontaneous abortion (ESA) rate was lower in the case of embryos that were frozen by vitrification and transferred in natural cycle (group N2 vs group S2: 20% vs 47%, NS). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the survival rate after thawing at blastocyst stage (day 5 or 6) is significantly improved after freezing by vitrification compared to slow freezing method. Likewise, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates are significantly increased in the case of FET at blastocyst stage when these embryos were frozen by vitrification. The results obtained by vitrification are very satisfactory but are also associated with an increased multiple pregnancy rate. Moreover, FET associated with natural or stimulated cycle does not modify significantly the outcomes of attempts, whatever the freezing method. However, the risk of ESA is reduced in the case of FET with natural cycle and after embryo vitrification.


Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/fisiología , Criopreservación/métodos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Endometrio/fisiología , Adulto , Implantación del Embrión , Desarrollo Embrionario , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 38(1): 6-12, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20022277

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Tubal ligation tends to be a contraceptive method used by younger women. Regrets may then become more frequent. Although less tough today, microsurgical tubal reversal is a reliable technique and we report results taking into account exposure time and curing rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 42 cases operated from 1990 and 1997. The patients were selected following the same protocol and operated according to the same surgical way. The results were analyzed by Guzick biparametric method, and comparison assessed by Log-rank test. We compared results depending on age, type of sterilization (mechanical and non mechanical), duration of laparotomic time, and interval between sterilization and reversal. RESULTS: There is an overall hope of 80% of pregnancy at 49 months. Even if there is no statistical difference between the different parameters studied, there is a trend to better reversal results after mechanical sterilization and intervention duration less than 90 minutes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Microsurgical tubal reversal is a trustworthy technique, which may be offered to patients regretting their sterilization. Analyzing results by Guzick method is interesting, but insufficiently used although more precise to express a curing (= pregnancy) result than a simple Kaplan-Meier surviving curve. Microsurgical reversal may be proposed to carefully selected patients, even after 40 years.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Reversión de la Esterilización/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Eur J Biochem ; 101(2): 563-70, 1979 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-118005

RESUMEN

1. Alcohol oxidase (alcohol:oxygen oxidoreductase) was purified 22-fold from the brown rot fungus Poria contigua. The final enzyme preparation was homogeneous as judged by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and by sedimentation in an ultracentrifuge. The molecular weight was calculated to be 610000 +/- 5000 from sedimentation equilibrium experiments. Electrophoresis in sodium dodecylsulfate gels and electron microscopic analysis indicate that the enzyme is an octamer composed of eight probably identical subunits, each having a molecular weight of 79 000. The enzyme contains eight mol FAD/mol as the prosthetic group. 2. This alcohol oxidase oxidizes not only methanol but also lower primary alcohols (C2-C4), 2-propin-1-ol and formaldehyde. The apparent Km value for methanol is 0.2 mM, and that for formaldehyde 6.1 mM. Sodium azide was found to be a competitive inhibitor with respect to methanol. 3. The enzyme from the fungus Poria contigua is immunologically different from the alcohol oxidase isolated from the methanol-utilizing yeast Candida boidinii. Furthermore antiserum raised against this enzyme did not cross-react with the alcohol oxidase from the white rot fungus Polyporus obtusus.


Asunto(s)
Oxidorreductasas de Alcohol/metabolismo , Basidiomycota/enzimología , Polyporaceae/enzimología , Oxidorreductasas de Alcohol/aislamiento & purificación , Aminoácidos/análisis , Inmunodifusión , Inmunoelectroforesis , Cinética , Sustancias Macromoleculares , Peso Molecular , Espectrofotometría , Especificidad por Sustrato
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA