RESUMEN
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a prominent human and livestock pathogen investigated widely using omic technologies. Critically, due to availability, low visibility or scattered resources, robust network and statistical contextualisation of the resulting data is generally under-represented. Here, we present novel meta-analyses of freely-accessible molecular network and gene ontology annotation information resources for S. aureus omics data interpretation. Furthermore, through the application of the gene ontology annotation resources we demonstrate their value and ability (or lack-there-of) to summarise and statistically interpret the emergent properties of gene expression and protein abundance changes using publically available data. This analysis provides simple metrics for network selection and demonstrates the availability and impact that gene ontology annotation selection can have on the contextualisation of bacterial omics data.
Asunto(s)
Biología Computacional/métodos , Ontología de Genes , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Anotación de Secuencia Molecular , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , HumanosAsunto(s)
Trastornos de la Menstruación/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , HisteroscopíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic venous leg ulcers are a significant cause of pain, immobility and decreased quality of life for patients with these wounds. In view of this, research efforts are focused on multiple factors in the wound environment to obtain information regarding the healing of ulcers. OBJECTIVES: Chronic wound fluid (CWF), containing a complex mixture of proteins, is an important modulator of the wound environment, and therefore we hypothesized that these proteins may be indicators of the status of wounds and their potential to heal or otherwise. To explore this we developed and validated a proteomic approach to analyse CWF. METHODS: In this study, pooled CWF was depleted of high abundant proteins using immunoaffinity chromatography. The flow-through and bound fractions were collected, concentrated, desalted and analysed using a range of techniques. Each fraction was further separated using two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and 2D liquid chromatography and analysed using mass spectrometry (MS). RESULTS: Western blot analysis against three high abundant proteins confirmed the selective removal of these proteins from CWF. Critically, one-dimensional and 2D gel electrophoresis indicated that subsequent removal of these proteins enhanced the ability to detect proteins in low abundance in CWF. Further, MS demonstrated that depletion of these abundant proteins increased the detection of other proteins in these samples. CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained indicate that this approach significantly improves separation of proteins present in low concentrations in CWF. This will facilitate the identification of biomarkers in samples collected from patients with ulcers and lead to improved patient therapies and wound care approaches.
Asunto(s)
Exudados y Transudados/química , Proteínas/aislamiento & purificación , Proteómica/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Western Blotting , Cromatografía de Afinidad , Cromatografía Liquida , Electroforesis en Gel Bidimensional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masas , Pronóstico , Úlcera Varicosa/diagnóstico , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Heridas y Lesiones/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The most frequent indication for hysterectomy is menorrhagia, even though the uterus is normal in a large number of patients. Transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) is a less drastic alternative, but success rates have varied and menorrhagia can recur. We have tested the hypothesis that the difference in the proportion of women dissatisfied and requiring further surgery within 3 years of TCRE or hysterectomy would be no more than 15%. METHODS: 202 women with symptomatic menorrhagia were recruited to a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial to compare the two interventions. TCRE and hysterectomy were randomly assigned in a ratio of two to one. The primary endpoints were women's satisfaction and need for further surgery. The patients' psychological and social states were monitored before surgery, then annually with a questionnaire. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Data were available for 172 women (56 hysterectomy, 116 TCRE); 26 withdrew before surgery and four were lost to follow-up. Satisfaction scores were higher for hysterectomy than for TCRE throughout follow-up (median 2 years), but the differences were not significant (at 3 years 27 [96%] of 28 in hysterectomy group vs 46 [85%] of 54 in TCRE group were satisfied; p = 0.16). 25 (22%) women in the TCRE group and five (9%) in the hysterectomy group required further surgery (relative risk 0.46 [95% CI 0.2-1.1], p = 0.053). TCRE had the benefits of shorter operating time, fewer complications, and faster rates of recovery. INTERPRETATION: TCRE is an acceptable alternative to hysterectomy in the treatment of menorrhagia for many women with no other serious disorders.
Asunto(s)
Endometrio/cirugía , Histerectomía , Menorragia/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the success of out-patient diagnostic hysteroscopy. METHOD: Retrospective review of 1000 consecutive out-patient hysteroscopies. RESULTS: Hysteroscopy was successfully performed in 96%. Cervical dilatation was required in 15.0% and local anaesthesia was administered in 31.4%; 77.3% of those requiring cervical dilatation received local anaesthesia. Intrauterine pathology was noted in 49.3%. The procedure failed in 40 (4%) patients for the following reasons: pain or anxiety in 23, cervical stenosis in 11, equipment failure in 4, and extreme uterine retroversion and inadvertent false cavity formation in one case each. CONCLUSION: Out-patient diagnostic hysteroscopy is a safe, well tolerated and successful investigation procedure in the majority of patients and should be the procedure of choice for suspected intrauterine pathology.