Workflow-centred open-source fully automated lung volumetry in chest CT.

AIM: To develop a robust open-source method for fully automated extraction of total lung capacity (TLC) from computed tomography (CT) images and to demonstrate its integration into the clinical workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using only open-source software, an algorithm was developed based on a region-growing method that does not require manual interaction. Lung volumes calculated from reconstructions with different kernels (TLCCT) were assessed. To validate the algorithm calculations, the results were correlated to TLC measured by pulmonary function testing (TLCPFT) in a subgroup of patients for which this information was available within 3 days of the CT examination. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were analysed retrospectively. Manual review revealed poor segmentation results in 13 (4.5%) patients. In the validation subgroup, the correlation between TLCCT and TLCPFT was r=0.87 (p<0.001). Measurements showed excellent agreement between the two reconstruction kernels with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.99. Calculation of the volumes took an average of 5 seconds (standard deviation: 3.72 seconds). Integration of the algorithm into the departments of the PACS environment was successful. A DICOM-encapsulated PDF document with measurements and an overlay of the segmentation results was sent to the PACS to allow the radiologists to detect false measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm developed allows fast and fully automated calculation of lung volume without any additional input from the radiologist. The algorithm delivers excellent segmentation in >95% of cases with significant positive correlations between lung volume on CT and TLC on PFT.

Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology and medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was designed using SurveyMonkey, and was sent out to students at three major medical schools. It consisted of various sections aiming to evaluate the students' prior knowledge of AI in radiology and beyond, as well as their attitude towards AI in radiology specifically and in medicine in general. Respondents' anonymity was ensured. RESULTS: A total of 263 students (166 female, 94 male, median age 23 years) responded to the questionnaire. Around 52% were aware of the ongoing discussion about AI in radiology and 68% stated that they were unaware of the technologies involved. Respondents agreed that AI could potentially detect pathologies in radiological examinations (83%) but felt that AI would not be able to establish a definite diagnosis (56%). The majority agreed that AI will revolutionise and improve radiology (77% and 86%), while disagreeing with statements that human radiologists will be replaced (83%). Over two-thirds agreed on the need for AI to be included in medical training (71%). In sub-group analyses male and tech-savvy respondents were more confident on the benefits of AI and less fearful of these technologies. CONCLUSION: Contrary to anecdotes published in the media, undergraduate medical students do not worry that AI will replace human radiologists, and are aware of the potential applications and implications of AI on radiology and medicine. Radiology should take the lead in educating students about these emerging technologies. KEY POINTS: • Medical students are aware of the potential applications and implications of AI in radiology and medicine in general. • Medical students do not worry that the human radiologist or physician will be replaced. • Artificial intelligence should be included in medical training.