A Comparison of Two Types of Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Therapy in Immunological High-Risk Kidney Recipients: A Prospective Randomized Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Induction treatment with rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulins (ATGs) is frequent used in kidney transplant recipients with donorspecific HLA antibodies and shows acceptable outcomes. The two commonly used ATGs, Thymoglobulin and ATG-F have slightly different antigen profile and antibody concentrations. The two compounds have never been directly compared in a prospective trial in immunological high-risk recipients. Therefore we performed a prospective randomized controlled study comparing the two compounds in immunological high-risk kidney recipients in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: Immunological high-risk kidney recipients, defined as the presence of HLA DSA but negative CDC-B and T-cell crossmatches were randomized 1:1 to receive ATG-F or Thymoglobulin. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis included 35 patients. There was no immediate infusion reaction observed with both compounds. No PTLD or malignancy occurred during the follow-up in both groups. The incidence of viral and bacterial infections was similar in both groups (p = 0.62). The cumulative incidence of clinical and subclinical antibody mediated allograft rejection as well as T-cell mediated allograft rejection during the first year between ATG-F and Thymoglobulin was similar (35% versus 19%; p = 0.30 and 11% versus 18%; 0.54 respectively). The two-year graft function was similar with a median eGFR of 56 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 21-128) (ATG-F-group) and 51 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 22-132) (Thymo-group) (p = 0.69). CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences between the compared study drugs for induction treatment in immunological high-risk patients regarding safety and efficacy during follow-up with good allograft function at 2 years after transplantation.

Transplant-associated microangiopathy (TAM) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

We studied occurrence, risk factors and outcome of patients with transplant-associated microangiopathy (TAM) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A total of 221 consecutive patients were transplanted between 1995 and 2002. TAM is defined as evidence of hemolysis and schistocytes in the first 100 days. Outcomes analyzed included TAM and overall survival. Of 221 patients, 68 had TAM. The cumulative incidence was 31 (25-38)% at 100 days. Patients with TAM had higher LDH, higher bilirubin, higher creatinine and more often neurologic symptoms. TAM was not associated with stem cell source, cyclosporine levels and was not more frequent in recent years. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for TAM included donor type, age, gender, ABO-incompatibility and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). In patients with TAM, 1-year survival was lower than in patients without TAM (27 +/- 18% for TAM with high schistocyte counts; 53 +/- 15% for TAM with low schistocyte counts; vs 78 +/- 7% in patients without TAM; P<0.0001). TAM was independently associated with mortality adjusting for donor type, age and aGvHD occurrence and severity. TAM is frequent after HSCT and is associated with mortality even after adjustment for aGvHD grade. Risk factors of TAM are similar to aGvHD. TAM may represent endothelial damage driven by donor-host interactions.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study with sublingual immunotherapy in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis to grass pollen.

UNLABELLED: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been recognized as a viable alternative to subcutaneous immunotherapy for respiratory allergies both in adults and children, but clinical documentation about safety and efficacy in children is still poor. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of SLIT in children who are sensitized to grass pollen. METHODS: Children with a clinical history of intermittent rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without mild asthma and positive skin prick tests to grass pollen, were selected to participate in a 2-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study with SLIT, using a grass extract (ALK-Abellò). RESULTS: 22 children were analyzed at the end of the study. No relevant side effects occurred in the active group. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.05; Mann-Whitney test) in favor of the active group (n = 10) could be shown for drug consumption during the second year, as well as a significant improvement as compared to the first year of SLIT (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small number of patients, our data suggest that SLIT with a grass pollen extract is well tolerated in children and is able to significantly reduce drug consumption during the second year of treatment. Studies in larger groups of children sensitized to both grass and tree pollens are needed to definitively assess the role of SLIT in intermittent, seasonal rhinitis and pollen asthma.