Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Restoration of motor function in paralyzed limbs using functional electrical stimulation (FES) is undermined by rapid fatigue associated with artificial stimulation. Typically, single electrodes are used to activate muscles with FES. However, due to the highly distributed branching of muscle nerves, a single electrode may not be able to activate the entire array of motor axons supplying a muscle. Therefore, stimulating muscle with multiple electrodes might enable access to a larger volume of muscle and thereby reduce fatigue. APPROACH: Accordingly, we compared the endurance times that ankle dorsiflexion could be sustained at 20% maximum voluntary force using feedback controlled stimulation (25 Hz) of human tibialis anterior (TA) using one or four percutaneous intramuscular electrodes. In addition, we measured endurance times in response to direct stimulation of the nerve supplying TA and during voluntary contraction. In all sessions involving electrical stimulation, an anesthetic nerve block proximal to the site of stimulation was used to isolate the effects of stimulation and alleviate discomfort. MAIN RESULTS: Endurance time associated with stimuli delivered by a single intramuscular electrode (84 ± 19 s) was significantly smaller than that elicited by four intramuscular electrodes (232 ± 123 s). Moreover, endurance time in response to nerve stimulation (787 ± 201 s) was not significantly different that that produced during voluntary contraction (896 ± 272 s). SIGNIFICANCE: Therefore, excessive fatigue associated with FES is probably due to the inability of conventional FES systems to enlist the full complement of motor axons innervating muscle and can be mitigated using multiple electrodes or nerve-based electrodes.

Distributed stimulation increases force elicited with functional electrical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The maximum muscle forces that can be evoked using functional electrical stimulation (FES) are relatively modest. The reason for this weakness is not fully understood but could be partly related to the widespread distribution of motor nerve branches within muscle. As such, a single stimulating electrode (as is conventionally used) may be incapable of activating the entire array of motor axons supplying a muscle. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine whether stimulating a muscle with more than one source of current could boost force above that achievable with a single source. APPROACH: We compared the maximum isometric forces that could be evoked in the anterior deltoid of anesthetized monkeys using one or two intramuscular electrodes. We also evaluated whether temporally interleaved stimulation between two electrodes might reduce fatigue during prolonged activity compared to synchronized stimulation through two electrodes. MAIN RESULTS: We found that dual electrode stimulation consistently produced greater force (~50% greater on average) than maximal stimulation with single electrodes. No differences, however, were found in the fatigue responses using interleaved versus synchronized stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: It seems reasonable to consider using multi-electrode stimulation to augment the force-generating capacity of muscles and thereby increase the utility of FES systems.