Frequency of ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) - A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) may cause ischaemic stroke and intracranial haemorrhage. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of the afore-mentioned outcomes. METHODS: We performed a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42022355704) systematic review and meta-analysis accessing PubMed until 7 November 2022. The inclusion criteria were: (1) original publication, (2) adult patients (≥18 years), (3) enrolling patients with PRES and/or RCVS, (4) English language and (5) outcome information. Outcomes were frequency of (1) ischaemic stroke and (2) intracranial haemorrhage, divided into subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used. RESULTS: We identified 848 studies and included 48 relevant studies after reviewing titles, abstracts and full text. We found 11 studies on RCVS (unselected patients), reporting on 2746 patients. Among the patients analysed, 15.9% (95% CI 9.6%-23.4%) had ischaemic stroke and 22.1% (95% CI 10%-39.6%) had intracranial haemorrhage. A further 20.3% (95% CI 11.2%-31.2%) had SAH and 6.7% (95% CI 3.6%-10.7%) had IPH. Furthermore, we found 28 studies on PRES (unselected patients), reporting on 1385 patients. Among the patients analysed, 11.2% (95% CI 7.9%-15%) had ischaemic stroke and 16.1% (95% CI 12.3%-20.3%) had intracranial haemorrhage. Further, 7% (95% CI 4.7%-9.9%) had SAH and 9.7% (95% CI 5.4%-15%) had IPH. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke are common outcomes in PRES and RCVS. The frequency reported in the individual studies varied considerably.

Time for "code ICH"? - Workflow metrics of hyperacute treatments and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge about uptake and workflow metrics of hyperacute treatments in patients with non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in the emergency department are scarce. METHODS: Single centre retrospective study of consecutive patients with ICH between 01/2018-08/2020. We assessed uptake and workflow metrics of acute therapies overall and according to referral mode (stroke code, transfer from other hospital or other). RESULTS: We enrolled 332 patients (age 73years, IQR 63-81 and GCS 14 points, IQR 11-15, onset-to-admission-time 284 minutes, IQR 111-708minutes) of whom 101 patients (35%) had lobar haematoma. Mode of referral was stroke code in 129 patients (38%), transfer from other hospital in 143 patients (43%) and arrival by other means in 60 patients (18%). Overall, 143 of 216 (66%) patients with systolic blood pressure >150mmHG received IV antihypertensive and 67 of 76 (88%) on therapeutic oral anticoagulation received prothrombin complex concentrate treatment (PCC). Forty-six patients (14%) received any neurosurgical intervention within 3 hours of admission. Median treatment times from admission to first IV-antihypertensive treatment was 38 minutes (IQR 18-72minutes) and 59 minutes (IQR 37-111 minutes) for PCC, with significant differences according to mode of referral (p<0.001) but not early arrival (≤6hours of onset, p=0.92). The median time in the emergency department was 139 minutes (IQR 85-220 minutes) and among patients with elevated blood pressure, only 44% achieved a successful control (<140mmHG) during ED stay. In multivariate analysis, code ICH concordant treatment was associated with significantly lower odds for in-hopsital mortality (aOR 0.30, 95%CI 0.12-0.73, p=0.008) and a non-significant trends towards better functional outcome measured using the modified Rankin scale score at 3 months (aOR for ordinal shift 0.54 95%CI 0.26-1.12, p=0.097). CONCLUSION: Uptake of hyperacute therapies for ICH treatment in the ED is heterogeneous. Treatment delays are short but not all patients achieve treatment targets during ED stay. Code ICH concordant treatment may improve clinical outcomes. Further improvements seem achievable advocating for a "code ICH" to streamline acute treatments.

The History of Endovascular Stroke Treatment: From Local Intraarterial Fibrinolysis to Stent Retriever Thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Acute thromboembolic occlusions of large intracranial arteries are associated with high rates of permanent disability and mortality. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients resulted in an inadequate rate of recanalization and has had limited clinical success. Various endovascular procedures have been attempted to remove intracranial thrombi and reopen occluded vessels. These technical innovations led to the publication of initial case reports, but the methods ultimately did not endure. Endovascular treatment of acute cerebral ischemia was performed only rarely and in selected centers as part of individualized curative attempts. The Solitaire stent was originally developed to treat intracranial aneurysms through stent-assisted coil occlusion. The suggestion that this stent could also be used for intracranial thrombectomy was made as early as 2003 and was clinically confirmed in 2008. Releasing a Solitaire stent into an embolically occluded large cerebral artery, with an incubation time of approximately 3 minutes and slow retraction of the stent, has led to unprecedented success rates of thrombus removal and (sub)total recanalization in more than 90 % of patients. METHODS: This review article aimed to describe the steps in the development of endovascular stroke therapy, beginning with intra-arterial thrombolysis and early technical innovations leading to the eventual success of stent retriever thrombectomy. CONCLUSION: The potential for mechanical recanalization of acutely occluded large cerebral arteries could not be fully exploited until the advent of stent retriever thrombectomy. The entire concept of stroke treatment fundamentally changed after complete and rapid recanalization first became possible. Randomized controlled trials have shown superiority of stent retriever thrombectomy over IVT. An unparalleled boom in endovascular stroke therapy followed. KEY POINTS: · The history of endovascular stroke treatment was marked by setbacks in the first three decades.. · Stent retriever thrombectomy is the first procedure enabling recanalization of acute large intracranial artery occlusions in more than 90 % of patients.. · Stent retriever thrombectomy has transformed stroke care and neuroradiology in unprecedented ways.. · Further technical improvements will enable even faster, safer, complete recanalization in the near future.. · Further improvements in clinical outcomes will probably be determined by aspects beyond endovascular methods alone..