Novel indications for referral and care for simultaneous liver kidney transplant recipients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kidney dysfunction is challenging in liver transplant candidates to determine whether it is reversible or not. This review focuses on the pertinent data on how to best approach liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction in the current era after implementing the simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) allocation policy and safety net. RECENT FINDINGS: The implementation of the SLK policy inverted the steady rise in SLK transplants and improved the utilization of high-quality kidneys. Access to kidney transplantation following liver transplant alone (LTA) increased with favorable outcomes. Estimating GFR in liver transplant candidates remains challenging, and innovative methods are needed. SLK provided superior patient and graft survival compared to LTA only for patients with advanced CKD and dialysis at least 3 months. SLK can provide immunological protection against kidney rejection in highly sensitized candidates. Post-SLK transplant care is complex, with an increased risk of complications and hospitalization. SUMMARY: The SLK policy improved kidney access and utilization. Transplant centers are encouraged, under the safety net, to reserve SLK for liver transplant candidates with advanced CKD or dialysis at least 3 months while allowing lower thresholds for highly sensitized patients. Herein, we propose a practical approach to liver transplant candidates with kidney dysfunction.

Infliximab Induction Lacks Efficacy and Increases BK Virus Infection in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of the CTOT-19 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) of a kidney transplant (KTx) upregulates TNF α production that amplifies allograft inflammation and may negatively affect transplant outcomes. METHODS: We tested the effects of blocking TNF peri-KTx via a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-center, phase 2 clinical trial. A total of 225 primary transplant recipients of deceased-donor kidneys (KTx; 38.2% Black/African American, 44% White) were randomized to receive intravenous infliximab (IFX) 3 mg/kg or saline placebo (PLBO) initiated before kidney reperfusion. All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immunosuppression (IS) with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The primary end point was the difference between groups in mean 24-month eGFR. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary end point of 24-month eGFR between IFX (52.45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 48.38 to 56.52) versus PLBO (57.35 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 53.18 to 61.52; P =0.1). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, or graft loss/death. Immunosuppression did not differ, and day 7 post-KTx plasma analyses showed approximately ten-fold lower TNF ( P <0.001) in IFX versus PLBO. BK viremia requiring IS change occurred more frequently in IFX (28.9%) versus PLBO (13.4%; P =0.004), with a strong trend toward higher rates of BKV nephropathy in IFX (13.3%) versus PLBO (4.9%; P =0.06). CONCLUSIONS: IFX induction therapy does not benefit recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors on this IS regimen. Because the intervention unexpectedly increased rates of BK virus infections, our findings underscore the complexities of targeting peritransplant inflammation as a strategy to improve KTx outcomes.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02495077).

Changing landscape of living kidney donation and the role of telemedicine.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a decline in living kidney donation over the last two decades. Donors from low-income families or racial/ethnic minorities face greater disproportionate geographic, financial, and logistical barriers to completing lengthy and complex evaluations. This has contributed to the decreased proportion of these subgroups. The authors view telemedicine as a potential solution to this problem. RECENT FINDINGS: Since the initial decline of donors in 2005, biologically related donors have experienced a lack of growth across race/ethnicity. Conversely, unrelated donors have emerged as the majority of donors in recent years across race/ethnicity, except for unrelated black donors. Disparities in access to living kidney donation persist. Telemedicine using live-video visits can overcome barriers to access transplant centers and facilitate care coordination. In a U.S. survey, nephrologists, surgeons, coordinators, social workers, and psychologists/psychologists across transplant centers are favorably disposed to use telemedicine for donor evaluation/follow-up beyond the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, with the waning of relaxed telemedicine regulations under the Public Health Emergency, providers perceive payor policy and out-of-state licensing as major factors hindering telemedicine growth prospects. SUMMARY: Permanent federal and state policies that support telemedicine services for living kidney donation can enhance access to transplant centers and help overcome barriers to donor evaluation.

Kidney utilization and outcomes of liver transplant recipients who were listed for kidney after liver transplant after the implementation of safety net policy.

In 2017, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) established the safety net policy with set criteria for offering kidney transplantation (KT) for patients who developed end-stage renal disease between 60 and 365 days after liver transplant (LT). We provide an update on the impact of the policy. We analyzed UNOS data of liver recipients transplanted between 1987 and 2020 who developed acute kidney injury requiring dialysis within 60 days before or after LT and subsequently listed for KT. We identified 407 patients who were listed for kidney after LT before policy and 248 patients after policy. Median waiting time to KT was shorter after policy (324 days vs. 2827 days). There was a higher proportion of candidates who were listed for subsequent KT within 1-year after policy (94.8% vs. 63.6%). KT rate was also higher after policy (87.7 vs. 30.7 per 100 patient-years at risk). Most importantly, we started to observe a net negative kidney utilization in end-stage liver disease setting (i.e., summation of simultaneous liver kidney and kidney after liver transplant in the first-year after LT has decreased from 1086 to 876 transplants in 2019). Such findings are consistent with a more efficient system and more appropriate allocation of organs.

Leukocyte transcriptome indicators of development of infection in kidney transplant recipients.

After kidney transplantation, infection and death are important clinical complications, especially for the growing numbers of older patients with limited resilience to withstand adverse events. Evaluation of changes in gene expression in immune cells can reveal the underlying mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. A cohort of 60 kidney transplant recipients was evaluated. Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells 3 months after kidney transplantation was analyzed to compare differences between patients with infection and those who were infection-free in the first-year post-transplant. Pro-inflammatory genes such as IL1B, CCL4, and TNF were found to be downregulated in post-transplant PBMC from patients who developed infection. In contrast, genes involved in metabolism, HLA genes, and transcripts involved in type I interferon innate antiviral responses were found to be upregulated. Promoter-based bioinformatic analyses implicated increased activity of interferon regulatory factors, erythroid nuclear factor (E2), and CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) in patients who developed infections. Differential patterns of gene expression were observed in patients who developed infection after kidney transplantation, with patterns distinct from changes associated with patient age, suggesting possible mechanisms behind vulnerability to infection. Assessment of gene expression in blood may offer an approach for patient risk stratification and monitoring after transplantation.

Association between ethnicity and kidney transplant waitlist outcomes beyond estimated post-transplant survival score.

White kidney transplant candidates have the highest pre-transplant mortality rate compared to other ethnicities. The reason for a higher mortality rate is not well-understood. Estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) score has been used to predict patient survival after transplant and may be associated with pre-transplant survival. First-time kidney transplant candidates listed between 2015 and 2018 were identified from the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network database. Individuals listed for multiple organs, at multiple centers, and age <18 years were excluded. We examined the impact of ethnicity on waitlist mortality and delisting. A total of 114 806 candidates were included. The study population was categorized into four groups which were 43% white, 28% Black, 19.2% Hispanic, and 9.8% "other ethnicities." At 5.2 years, the cumulative incidences of death and delist were 32%, 31%, 29%, and 26%, respectively. Compared to whites, adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (aSHR) for death and delist among Black, Hispanics, and "other ethnicities" were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.95), 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), and 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80) after adjustment by EPTS along with other factors, respectively. After adjusting for EPTS score along with additional confounding factors and functional status at initial listing, white ethnicity was independently associated with an increased risk for death and delist.

Impact of donor obesity on allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation adjusted for kidney donor profile index - a national cohort study.

Obesity in deceased kidney donors is a known risk factor for poor allograft outcomes. The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) has been introduced to predict graft survival in deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). Obesity, however, is not included in KDPI. We study the impact of donor obesity on DDKT outcomes after adjusting for organ quality by KDPI. The Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data of DDKT from 2005 to 2017, with donor BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m2 and weight >80 kg were included. There was a total of 66 382 DDKTs with 10 917 death-censored graft failures. For KDPI ≤ 30%, the 10-year death-censored graft survival (DCGS) rates among donor BMI < 30, 30-35, 35-40, 40-45 and ≥45 kg/m2 groups were 75.9%, 75.4%, 76.1%, 74.9% and 79.6%, respectively. For KDPI > 30%, 10-year DCGS rates were 67.5%, 66.1%, 65.9%, 62.6% and 63.2%, respectively. After adjusting for known confounding factors including KDPI, donor obesity was not independently associated with an increased risk for graft failure. In DDKT with donor weight >80 kg, donor obesity was not associated with a lower long term DCGS compared to non-obesity when KDPI ≤ 30%.

Outcomes of small pediatric donor kidney transplants according to donor weight.

A small pediatric deceased donor (SPD) weight cutoff whether to transplant as en bloc (EB) or single pediatric (SP) kidney is uncertain. Using UNOS/OPTN data (2000-2019), 27 875 SPDs were divided by (i) EB (11.4%) or SP (88.6%) and (ii) donor weight [≤10 (5.4%), >10-15 (8.3%), >15-18 (3.7%), >18-20 (2.9%), and >20 kg (79.7%)]. SP >20 kg and adult deceased donors (grouped by Kidney Donor Profile Index, KDPI, <30, 30-85, and >85) were used as references. The primary outcome was 10-year graft failure. In SP <10 kg, the hazard ratio (HR) for overall graft failure was 1.64 (1.38-2.20) compared with EB <10 kg, and 1.45 (1.18-1.80) compared with SP >20 kg. In SP >10-15 kg, HR was 1.31 (1.12-1.54) compared with EB >10-15 kg, and 1.04 (0.91-1.18) compared with SP >20 kg. In SP >15 kg, the risk was the same as SP >20 kg. Ten-year overall graft survival of SP 12 kg was comparable to SP >20 kg (62% vs. 57%). Ten-year death censored graft failure of SP >10-15 kg (70%) and SP >15-18 kg (70%) was like the adult donors with KDPI 30-85 (67%). In conclusion, we recommend single kidney transplants from SPDs with weight >12 kg to adult recipients in centers with experience in SPD transplants to optimize organ utilization.

Early cytomegalovirus DNAemia and antiviral dose adjustment in high vs intermediate risk kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively affect outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients, despite the advent of strategies for preemptive surveillance and prophylaxis. The impact is especially great for CMV seronegative recipients of donor seropositive organs, who typically lack the ability to control CMV infection at the time of transplantation. METHODS: We reviewed episodes of CMV DNAemia in a modern cohort of kidney transplant recipients over a 3-year period at a high-volume transplant center to investigate the frequency of DNAemia during antiviral prophylaxis. RESULTS: Despite receipt of antiviral prophylaxis per current guidelines, 75 cases of CMV DNAemia were observed in the first 100 days after transplantation. For high risk patients, median time to DNAemia was 75 days after transplantation, and the majority of patients had experienced dose-reduction of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency. Review of CMV seropositive intermediate risk patients demonstrated DNAemia occurring earlier after transplantation compared with high risk patients with a median time of 64 days (P = .029). The impact of valganciclovir dose adjustment was less notable in the intermediate risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines recommend beginning routine surveillance for CMV after the completion of antiviral prophylaxis. Our findings suggest that closer monitoring may be beneficial, especially for high risk patients at risk for DNAemia. Patients requiring dose adjustment of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency may be at increased risk for CMV DNAemia. Improved methods for CMV prophylaxis and evaluation of immunologic risk for CMV DNAemia and disease are needed to improve patient outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Evaluation of Renal Disease in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Renal dysfunction in cirrhosis is common and is associated with increased mortality. Identifying and treating reversible causes of renal disease can significantly improve outcomes. The etiology, approach, and evaluation of renal disease in this group of patients is similar to the noncirrhosis patient, with a few specific caveats. Renal disease may be unrelated to the cause of cirrhosis (eg, prerenal acute kidney injury, acute tubular necrosis), occur as a manifestation of the same systemic disease responsible for the liver disease (eg, chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection) or as a consequence of cirrhosis (hepatorenal syndrome). Kidney impairment may be underrecognized in patients with cirrhosis due to over-reliance on creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate equations used in clinical practice. The first steps of evaluation for the renal disease include a thorough medical history to identify the underlying cause of cirrhosis and any potential trigger for renal dysfunction, physical examination, and review of prior laboratory records for baseline renal function. Renal imaging and urinalysis should be performed on all cirrhotic patients with renal dysfunction to establish the presence of urinary obstruction, chronicity and intrinsic renal disease.

Time to second kidney transplantation in young adults after failed pediatric kidney transplant.

BACKGROUND: Under the current kidney allocation system, pediatric candidates listed prior to age 18 receive priority for high-quality deceased donor organs. This has resulted in a decline in living donor transplantation in pediatrics, despite superior outcomes of living donor transplantation. Due to a young age at transplantation, most pediatric kidney transplant recipients require re-transplantation. The effects of a previously failed deceased donor vs a previously failed living donor on re-transplant candidates are unknown. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we examined 2772 re-transplant recipients aged 18-30 years at time of relisting for second KT from 2000 to 2018 with history of prior pediatric KT (age ≤ 18 years). RESULTS: PFLDKT recipients compared to those with PFDDKT had shorter median waiting times and dialysis time regardless of their second donor type (14.0 vs 20.3 months, and 19.1 vs 34.5 months, respectively). PFLDKT recipients had higher re-transplant rates (adjusted HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.27, and adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.95-1.15 when calculating from time of relisting and time of returning to dialysis, respectively). PFDDKT recipients were more likely to have higher median PRA levels (90% vs 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Re-transplant candidates who received a previous deceased donor as a child had a higher level of sensitization, longer waiting time, and dialysis exposure compared to those with PFLDKT. Among primary pediatric kidney transplant candidates, consideration should be considered for living donor transplantation, despite the priority for deceased donor organs, to avoid increased sensitization and longer waiting times for with re-transplantation.

Current Status of Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation in the United States.

On August 10, 2017, a formal policy was enacted in the United States that defined listing criteria for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation and priority for patients who received a liver transplantation (LT) and subsequently developed significant kidney disease after LT. This article reviews and summarizes the rationale for such policies, the policies themselves, and the potential impact on LT candidates.

Current opinions in nephrology and hypertension: kidney transplantation in patients with plasma cell dyscrasias.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Plasma cell dyscrasias encompass a group of hematological disorders characterized by increased production of immunoglobulins by clonal B cells. Kidney involvement is common. Significant advances in the treatment of plasma cell dyscrasias have resulted in improved survival and may permit kidney transplantation in candidates previously denied transplantation. Treatments may also have effects on kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation. RECENT FINDING: The available evidence suggests that transplantation of candidates with nonmultiple myeloma plasma cell dyscrasias provides good outcome with low recurrence rates, so long as the disease has been treated with a complete or good partial response prior to transplantation. Candidates with a history untreated MGRS or a history of multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence posttransplant. Kidney transplant recipients who develop plasma cell dyscrasias post transplantation have an increased risk of death and thalidomide-based regimens may increase the risk of rejection. SUMMARY: Transplant candidates with a history of plasma cell dyscrasia who are in remission should not be excluded from transplantation. Individuals with multiple myeloma have a high rate of recurrence and myeloma post kidney transplant must be managed carefully.

Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Increased access to transplantation for highly sensitized candidates following implementation of the kidney allocation system (KAS) has been mostly due to higher use of organs with a lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI; a quality metric for donated kidneys), although changes in allocation of these organs was not intended. It is unclear whether clinical outcomes have changed in association with these changes. We investigated the use of kidneys with low and high KDPI scores over time and whether KDPI score affects patient and graft survival differently across varying levels of allosensitization. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult (aged ≥18 years) recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant between October 1, 2009, and September 30, 2017 (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database; n = 84,451). PREDICTORS: Calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) level (0%, 1%-79%, 80%-89%, 90%-98%, and 99%-100%) and KDPI score (≤20%, 21%-85%, and >85%). OUTCOMES: Death, graft loss. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Time to event. RESULTS: Allocation of kidneys with KDPI scores ≤ 20% and KDPI scores of 21% to 85% to recipients with cPRA levels ≥ 99% increased 4-fold following implementation of the KAS with little change in allocation of kidneys with KDPI scores > 85%. Patient survival and graft loss were strongly associated with KDPI score, whereas the association with cPRA level was minimal. There was no evidence of a differential effect of KDPI scores across the range of cPRA levels on patient survival (P for interaction=0.06-0.9) or graft loss (P for interaction=0.5-0.9). Patient survival at 5 years among the 5 cPRA groups ranged from 87.2% to 89.8% for recipients of kidneys with KDPI scores ≤ 20% (P=0.2), 82.8% to 85.5% for KDPI scores of 21% to 85% (P=0.04), and 70.2% to 79.2% for KDPI scores > 85% (P=0.2). Cumulative incidence of graft loss by cPRA level ranged from 7.7% to 10.6% for recipients of kidneys with KDPI scores ≤ 20% (P=0.2), 11.8% to 15.0% for KDPI scores of 21% to 85% (P < 0.001), and 19.8% to 29.7% for KDPI scores > 85% (P = 0.4). LIMITATIONS: Lack of data for crossmatches, donor-specific antibodies, and immunomodulation. CONCLUSIONS: Highly sensitized recipients received kidneys with lower KDPI scores following implementation of the KAS, reducing access to these kidneys by less-sensitized candidates. KDPI score has a stronger association with patient survival and graft loss than cPRA level. The association of KDPI score with these outcomes was not modified by the recipient's level of sensitization. The impact of the redistribution of kidneys with low KDPI scores on outcomes among less-sensitized recipients needs further evaluation.

Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Kidney delayed graft function (kDGF) remains a challenging problem following simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) with a reported incidence up to 40%. Given the scarcity of renal allografts, it is crucial to minimize the development of kDGF among SLKT recipients to improve patient and graft outcomes. We sought to assess the role of preoperative recipient and donor/graft factors on developing kDGF among recipients of SLKT. METHODS: A retrospective review of 194 patients who received SLKT in the period from January 2004 to March 2017 in a single center was performed to assess the effect of preoperative factors on the development of kDGF. RESULTS: Kidney delayed graft function was observed in 95 patients (49%). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor history of hypertension, cold static preservation of kidney grafts [versus using hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (HPMP)], donor final creatinine, physiologic MELD, and duration of delay of kidney transplantation after liver transplantation were significant independent predictors for kDGF. kDGF is associated with worse graft function and patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney delayed graft function has detrimental effects on graft function and graft survival. Understanding the risks and combining careful perioperative patient management, proper recipient selection and donor matching, and graft preservation using HPMP would decrease kDGF among SLKT recipients.

Combined Dual-Kidney Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Review of United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network Data Between 2002 and 2012.

In kidney-alone recipients, dual-kidney transplantation using "higher-risk" donor organs has shown outcomes comparable to those of single-kidney transplantation using extended criteria donor (ECD) organs. To investigate the feasibility of a similar approach with combined kidney-liver transplantation, we identified 22 dual-kidney liver transplantations (DKLTs) and 3044 single-kidney liver transplantations (SKLTs) performed in the United States between 2002 and 2012 using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data. We compared donor/recipient characteristics as well as graft/recipient survival between DKLT recipients and SKLT recipients of "higher-risk" kidneys (ECD and high kidney donor profile index [KDPI; >85%] donors). Despite having overall similar donor and recipient characteristics compared with both "higher-risk" donor groups, recipient survival in the DKLT group at 36 months was markedly inferior at 40.9% (compared with 67.5% for ECD SKLT recipients and 64.5% for high-KDPI SKLT recipients); nondeath-censored graft survival did not differ. Death was the most common cause of graft loss in all groups. Contrary to dual-kidney transplantation data in kidney-alone recipients, DKLT recipients in our study had inferior survival when compared with SKLT recipients of "higher-risk" donor kidneys. These findings would suggest that dual kidney-liver transplantation has an uncertain role as a strategy to expand the existing kidney donor pool in combined transplantation.

Screening Coccidioides serology in kidney transplant recipients: A 10-year cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at risk for reactivation and complicated infection due to Coccidioides. Pre-transplant serological screening should provide benefit for patients from endemic areas. We evaluated Coccidioides seroprevalence by area of residence in KTRs at a major transplant program in Los Angeles. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses of adult KTRs who underwent transplantation at UCLA between 2007-2016. Patients with Coccidioides serology by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) before or within 14 days from transplantation were included. Patients were classified as living in highly, established, suspected, or not endemic areas by their residential zip code. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of Coccidioides IgG and IgM were 1.4% and 2.8%, respectively. Of patients with positive serology, 31.4% had isolated IgG and 66.3% isolated IgM. Patients from established and highly endemic areas had IgG seropositivity of 3.7% versus 1.3% for patients living in suspected endemic areas(P < .01). Rates of IgM seropositivity were 3.7% compared to 2.8% respectively (P = .28). No patients from non-endemic areas had positive screening serology. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-transplant serological screening for Coccidioides is recommended in kidney transplant candidates from endemic areas. We observed high seroprevalence among patients from highly and established endemic areas, for whom universal prophylaxis is recommended. For residents from less well-established areas of endemicity, serological screening showed benefit in identifying patients at risk. In patients with isolated EIA IgM, performing repeat and confirmatory tests is recommended. Patients from non-endemic areas had low risk of infection, however, a thorough social history is necessary to evaluate risk.

Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

Histologic analysis of the allograft biopsy specimen is the standard method used to differentiate rejection from other injury in kidney transplants. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a noninvasive test of allograft injury that may enable more frequent, quantitative, and safer assessment of allograft rejection and injury status. To investigate this possibility, we prospectively collected blood specimens at scheduled intervals and at the time of clinically indicated biopsies. In 102 kidney recipients, we measured plasma levels of dd-cfDNA and correlated the levels with allograft rejection status ascertained by histology in 107 biopsy specimens. The dd-cfDNA level discriminated between biopsy specimens showing any rejection (T cell-mediated rejection or antibody-mediated rejection [ABMR]) and controls (no rejection histologically), P<0.001 (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve [AUC], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.61 to 0.86). Positive and negative predictive values for active rejection at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 61% and 84%, respectively. The AUC for discriminating ABMR from samples without ABMR was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Positive and negative predictive values for ABMR at a cutoff of 1.0% dd-cfDNA were 44% and 96%, respectively. Median dd-cfDNA was 2.9% (ABMR), 1.2% (T cell-mediated types ≥IB), 0.2% (T cell-mediated type IA), and 0.3% in controls (P=0.05 for T cell-mediated rejection types ≥IB versus controls). Thus, dd-cfDNA may be used to assess allograft rejection and injury; dd-cfDNA levels <1% reflect the absence of active rejection (T cell-mediated type ≥IB or ABMR) and levels >1% indicate a probability of active rejection.

Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection Precipitated by Lenalidomide Treatment for Multiple Myeloma.

Patients who develop malignancy after kidney transplantation typically undergo a reduction in immunosuppression and referral to an oncologist for chemotherapeutic considerations for the management of their malignancy. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy agents can result in kidney transplant injury, but the decision about which agents to be used has largely been determined by oncologists without the involvement of nephrologists. More recently, several classes of drugs with immunomodulatory actions have been approved for the treatment of cancer, including multiple myeloma. Activation of the immune system against malignant cells may have unintended consequences in solid-organ transplant recipients, who require suppression of the immune system to avoid transplant rejection. In this report, we present a case of acute kidney transplant rejection in a 65-year-old woman following administration of the newer immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma. A greater awareness of the mechanisms of newly introduced chemotherapy agents and discussion with the treating oncologist and patient are paramount in caring for patients who develop malignancy following transplantation.