Systematic review of reconstruction techniques for accelerated quantitative MRI.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the techniques that address undersampling artifacts in accelerated quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI). METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Coherence Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases for studies, published before July 2022 proposing reconstruction techniques for accelerated qMRI. Studies are reviewed according to inclusion criteria, and included studies are categorized based on the methodology used. RESULTS: A total of 292 studies included in the review are categorized. A technical overview of each category is provided, and the categories are described in a unified mathematical framework. The distribution of the reviewed studies over time, application domain, and parameters of interest is illustrated. CONCLUSION: An increasing trend in the number of articles that propose new techniques for accelerated qMRI reconstruction indicates the importance of acceleration in qMRI. The techniques are mostly validated for relaxometry parameters and brain scans. The categories of techniques are compared based on theoretical grounds, highlighting existing trends and potential gaps in the field.

Time efficiency analysis for undersampled quantitative MRI acquisitions.

To realize Quantitative MRI (QMRI) with clinically acceptable scan time, acceleration factors achieved by conventional parallel imaging techniques are often inadequate. Further acceleration is possible using model-based reconstruction. We propose a theoretical metric called TEUSQA: Time Efficiency for UnderSampled QMRI Acquisitions to inform sequence design and sample pattern optimisation. TEUSQA is designed for a particular class of reconstruction techniques that directly estimate tissue parameters, possibly using prior information to regularize the estimation. TEUSQA can be used to evaluate undersampling patterns for multi-contrast QMRI sequences targeting any tissue parameter. To verify the time efficiency predicted by TEUSQA, we performed Monte Carlo simulations and an accelerated parameter mapping with two sequences (Inversion prepared fast spin echo for T1 and T2 mapping and 3D GRASE for T2 and B0 inhomogeneity mapping). Using TEUSQA, we assessed several ways to generate undersampling patterns in silico, providing insight into the relation between sample distribution and time efficiency for different acceleration factors. The time efficiency predicted by TEUSQA was within 15% of that observed in the Monte Carlo simulations and the prospective acquisition experiment. The assessment of undersampling patterns showed that a class of good patterns could be obtained by low-discrepancy sampling. We believe that TEUSQA offers a valuable instrument for developers of novel QMRI sequences pushing the boundaries of acceleration to achieve clinically feasible protocols. Finally, we applied a time-efficient undersampling pattern selected using TEUSQA for a 32-fold accelerated scan to map T1 & T2 mapping of a healthy volunteer.