Viral prophylaxis in combined pancreas-kidney transplant recipients.

The purpose of this study was to analyze different regimens of viral prophylaxis after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT). Over a 4-year period, we performed 82 PKTs with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Four regimens of prophylaxis were studied. The first 30 patients received standard intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; 0.5 g/kg) for 6 doses and oral acyclovir for 3 months. The next 34 recipients received intravenous ganciclovir (2.5 mg/kg) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by oral acyclovir for 3 months. In the third group, patients were randomized to 5 doses over 2 months of either standard IVIG (n = 9) or CMV hyperimmune globulin (Cytogam; n = 9; 100-150 mg/kg) plus 2 weeks of i.v. ganciclovir followed by 3 months of oral acyclovir. The 4 groups were similar with respect to clinical, demographic, and immunologic variables, including donor and recipient CMV serologic status and blood transfusions. All patients were monitored for viral infections in the first 6 months after PKT. The regimens of prophylaxis resulted in (1) no major non-CMV (including no EBV) viral infections; (2) 3 cases of minor non-CMV viral infections (shingles); and (3) no differences in the incidence, timing, or severity of symptomatic CMV infections in the 4 groups. No death or graft loss was due to viral infection. Prophylaxis is effective in reducing the incidence of non-CMV viral infections and may reduce the severity of symptomatic CMV infection. However, we could not show any added benefit of either Cytogam or standard IVIG when used in combination with other antiviral agents. For economic as well as efficacy reasons, we recommended that IVIG preparations not be used routinely with antilymphocyte therapy but only in high-risk situations such as primary CMV exposure.

The safety and efficacy of a two-dose daclizumab (zenapax) induction therapy in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy with daclizumab has been shown to be efficacious in the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients. The routine use of antibody induction therapy in liver transplantation has not gained widespread acceptance, except in the cases of renal insufficiency. The recent approval of daclizumab prompted us to initiate this pilot study using induction therapy in those patients at risk for developing posttransplant renal insufficiency. METHODS: This nonrandomized study examined the use of daclizumab in 39 of the last 97 liver transplants performed at the University of Alabama in Birmingham. The daclizumab group received 2 mg/kg intravenously before organ engraftment, and 38 of the 39 received 1 mg/kg intravenously on postoperative day 5. The control group consisted of the remaining 58 contemporary patients. Additional immunosuppression consisted of steroids, tacrolimus, or microemulsion cyclosporine in all patients and mycophenolate mofetil in selected patients. RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics were not significantly different between the groups. In the induction group there were significantly fewer males, 14 (36%) vs. 34 (59%) (P=0.03). They had greater renal insufficiency at the time of transplant, serum creatine 1.9+/-0.37 mg/dl vs. 0.8+/-0.5; P=0.0009, and more patients were at higher acuity (status 1 and 2A): 12 (31%) vs. 3 (5%) P=0.0006 than in the noninduction group. By postoperative day 7, renal function improved in the induction group such that it was not significantly different from the noninduction group and remained similar throughout the rest of the follow-up. The induction group also experienced significantly less acute rejection, 7 (18%) vs. 23 (40%) (P=0.02) than in the noninduction group in the first 6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 6-month patient survival rates were similar in the induction group, 97.4%, 97.4%, and 97.4%, vs. non-induction 94.8%, 93.0%, and 93% (P=NS). The incidence of cytomegalovirus, in the first 6 months, in the induction group was four (10%) vs. five (9%) (P=NS) in the noninduction group. CONCLUSION: In the pilot study, induction therapy with daclizumab was safe, facilitated improvement in renal function, and appeared to reduce the incidence of acute rejection. Combination therapy with daclizumab may be an important adjunct in immunosuppressive strategies for liver transplant recipients.

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper. RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.

A comparative analysis of results and morbidity in type I diabetics undergoing preemptive versus postdialysis combined pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Although combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT) has become a valid treatment option for selected type I diabetics, the timing of PKT relative to the degree of nephropathy remains controversial. We analyzed results and morbidity in 30 type I diabetics undergoing PKT after starting dialysis (PKT:D) versus 31 type I diabetics undergoing PKT prior to dialysis (PKT:ND). The two groups were similar with the respect to age, duration and severity of diabetes, gender, race, preservation time, retransplants, sensitization, HLA-matching, and CMV status. The mean preoperative serum creatinine was higher in the PKT:D group (9.9 +/- 3.4 vs. 3.9 +/- 1.9 mg/dl PKT:ND, P < 0.01). All patients were managed with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Actuarial patient survival is 100% (PKT:D) and 96.8% (PKT:ND). Renal and pancreas allograft survival are 97% and 93%, respectively, in both groups. The incidence of rejection, infection, operative complications, reflux pancreatitis, and total hospital days was similar in both groups. Long-term renal and pancreas allograft function and quality of life were like-wise comparable. No adverse coagulation or immunologic effects were noted in the PKT:ND group. Rehabilitation potential favored the PKT:ND group. PKT can be performed safely and effectively in the absence of uremia. In selected type I diabetics with significant nephropathy, we believe that PKT is the best treatment option and need not be considered as preemptive, especially in view of increasing waiting times and the variable progressive nature of diabetic complications.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome and venous emboli causing intracerebral hemorrhages after liver transplantation: a case report.

Increasing experience has fostered the acceptance of liver transplantation as a treatment for patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome. Morbidity and mortality is most commonly attributed to progressive arterial hypoxemia postoperatively. A cerebral hemorrhage has been reported in one patient with hepatopulmonary syndrome after transplantation. However, a postmortem examination of the brain was not performed and the pathogenesis or type of cerebral hemorrhage was undefined. We report on a patient with severe hepatopulmonary syndrome who developed multiple intracranial hemorrhages after transplantation. The intracerebral hemorrhages were most consistent with an embolic etiology on postmortem examination. We postulate that venous embolization, caused by the manipulation of a Swan Ganz catheter in a thrombosed central vein, resulted in pulmonary emboli that passed through dilated intrapulmonary vessels into the cerebral microcirculation. Special attention to central venous catheters and avoidance of manipulation may be warranted in subjects with severe hepatopulmonary syndrome after liver transplantation.

Cholelithiasis in pancreas and kidney transplant recipients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Vascularized pancreas transplantation (PTx) for type I diabetes mellitus results in euglycemia at the expense of chronic immunosuppression, hyperinsulinemia, and dyslipidemia. However, the effect of PTx on native biliary lithogenesis remains unknown. METHODS: To address this issue, we retrospectively studied 72 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients and compared them with patients both with (n = 35) and without (n = 52) diabetes mellitus undergoing kidney transplantation alone (KTA). All patients underwent pretransplantation abdominal ultrasonography, which was repeated at 6- to 12-month intervals after transplantation. PTx recipients were managed with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Kidney transplant recipients received cyclosporine and prednisone. RESULTS: Seventeen (30.4%) of 56 evaluable PTx recipients had gallstones at a mean interval of 13 months (range, 5 to 24) after PTx. Eleven patients underwent open cholecystectomy (with one surgical exploration of common bile duct for choledocholithiasis), three underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the other three are being managed expectantly. Gallstone analysis revealed predominantly cholesterol stones. The incidence of cholelithiasis in kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes mellitus was 27.3% and 12.2%, respectively (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplant and kidney transplant recipients with diabetes are predisposed to the development of gallstones compared with recipients without diabetes. An interaction between diabetes mellitus-induced gallbladder dysmotility and cyclosporine-induced cholestasis may be a possible mechanism. We recommend serial ultrasonographic examinations in pancreas transplant and kidney transplant recipients, and cholecystectomy in pancreas transplant recipients with cholelithiasis should be considered.

The role of intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy in liver transplant recipients after extensive destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system.

BACKGROUND: Extensive destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system after liver transplantation can be a catastrophic event. We present our experience with the use of intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy (IHCJ) in this setting. METHODS: From July 1985 through December 1991, 668 liver transplantations were performed in 583 patients. Seven patients required IHCJ. This technique involves creating an anastomosis between the jejunal mucosal and hepatic parenchyma/capsule with the use of a Roux-en-Y limb of bowel. There were four adults and three children. The clinical presentation included bile leak (n = 4), subhepatic abscess (n = 2), and intrahepatic abscess (n = 1). The probable cause of these events included hepatic arterial thrombosis (n = 4), occult bile leak (n = 2), and fungal cholangitis (n = 1). RESULTS: After IHCJ, six of the seven patients are currently alive, with a mean follow-up of 28 months. The current liver function test results include a mean bilirubin of 0.7 mg/dl (range, 0.4 to 1.9 mg/dl), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase of 69 units/L (range, 32 to 118 units/L), and gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase of 118 IU/L (range, 111 to 265 IU/L). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that IHCJ is a safe and effective alternative to retransplantation in liver recipients with extensive destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system.

Kidney/pancreas transplantation: a review of the current status.

KPT has become the treatment of choice for many Type I diabetics with impending or actual end-stage renal disease. The techniques of organ procurement, surgical transplantation, and postoperative management are well established. The current 1- and 3-year patient and graft survival rates are at least equal to those obtained in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients receiving kidney transplants alone. Although there is significant associated morbidity unique to the pancreas transplant, this is usually manageable without influencing the outcome. With the improvement in quality of life and the potential for arresting diabetic complications, KPT is a procedure that should be seriously considered for many Type I diabetic patients with advanced nephropathy.

Multimodality treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors in a single Western institution series.

There are few Western studies evaluating prognostic factors for survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the influence on survival of various therapeutic options including orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). A retrospective analysis was performed of 122 patients with HCC treated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from January 1990 through December 1999. Clinicopathologic and treatment factors were analyzed with overall survival as the main outcome variable. Median age was 62 years. Most patients were male (74%) and white (79%). Eighty patients (66%) had associated cirrhosis. Sixty-three percent of patients presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III or IV tumors. The median follow-up for survivors was 22 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates for the entire cohort were 46%, 24%, and 17%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, ablative surgery (P = 0.003), AJCC stages I and II (P = 0.0012), and absence of vascular invasion (P = 0.0001) were found to be independent favorable characteristics. Forty-four patients underwent surgical resection (including OLT, n = 20) or a surgical ablative procedure. All but two nonsurgical patients died of disease. The actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for this group were 80%, 71%, and 61%, respectively. On multivariate analysis of the surgical group, only vascular invasion was associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.001). OLT was associated with a favorable prognosis on univariate analysis (P = 0.02). Forty percent of patients who received transplants underwent local/regional treatment before transplantation and the outcome in these patients was no different from that in other transplant patients. Surgical treatment is the only potential curative option for HCC, and qualifying for liver transplantation may be a favorable prognostic factor in surgical patients. Local/regional therapy prior to transplantation may provide a bridge to OLT without an increase in tumor-related mortality.

Selective use of Sandostatin in vascularized pancreas transplantation.

Despite improving results, the management of exocrine complications after pancreas transplantation remains problematic. During a 30-month period, we performed 65 pancreas transplants with bladder drainage. A total of 23 patients (35%) were managed with a long-acting somatostatin analogue (Sandostatin) for persistent hyperamylasemia or allograft pancreatitis. Sandostatin was begun at a mean of 29 days after transplant with a mean duration of therapy of 13 days. Sandostatin therapy was associated with significant reductions in the serum, urine, and peritoneal fluid amylase levels (p < 0.05). Sandostatin also caused a decrease in cyclosporine levels during oral cyclosporine use. In patients receiving Sandostatin, pancreas allograft survival was 83%. We conclude that pancreatitis remains a major cause of morbidity after pancreas transplantation. The selective use of Sandostatin can result in excellent graft salvage with low morbidity. Sandostatin appears to be safe and effective in reducing the exocrine output of the denervated pancreas allograft but also reduces cyclosporine levels.

Surgical complications in solitary pancreas and combined pancreas-kidney transplantations.

The benefits of pancreas transplantation (PT) must be weighed against the morbidity associated with the operative procedure and long-term immunosuppression. Over a 32-month period, we performed 73 PTs including 61 combined pancreas-kidney transplants (PKT) and 12 solitary PTs. In the PKT group, 25 reoperations were performed in 18 patients (29.5%) at a mean of 39 +/- 12 days after transplant. In the solitary PT group, 16 reoperations were performed in 8 recipients (66.7%, p = 0.03) at a mean of 87 +/- 12 days after PT (p < 0.01). In the PKT group, pancreas allograft survival was 93.4%. Vascular thrombosis resulted in the loss of two pancreas allografts. In the solitary PT group, pancreas allograft survival was 50% (p < 0.001), with 6 transplant pancreatectomies performed for either infectious (5) or vascular (1) complications. Surgical complications after PT are common (35.6% in this series), occur earlier in patients who undergo PKT, and are more frequent and morbid in patients undergoing solitary PT, especially after a previous kidney transplant. An aggressive surgical approach can lead to a high rate of pancreas allograft salvage without jeopardizing either the patient or the renal allograft.