RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older drivers have one of the highest motor vehicle crash (MVC) rates per kilometer driven, largely due to the functional effects of the accumulation, and progression of age-associated medical conditions that eventually impact on fitness-to-drive. Consequently, physicians in many jurisdictions are legally mandated to report to licensing authorities patients who are judged to be medically at risk for MVCs. Unfortunately, physicians lack evidence-based tools to assess the fitness-to-drive of their older patients. This paper reports on a pilot study that examines the acceptability and association with MVC of components of a comprehensive clinical assessment battery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acceptability to participants of components of a comprehensive assessment battery, and to explore potential predictors of MVC that can be employed in front-line clinical settings. METHODS: Case-control study of 10 older drivers presenting to a tertiary care hospital emergency department after involvement in an MVC and 20 age-matched controls. RESULTS: The measures tested were generally found to be acceptable to participants. Positive associations (p=0.05) with past or current MVCs were found for components of the MMSE (e.g. orientation to time, spelling WORLD backwards), components of the Driving Habits Questionnaire, components of the Ottawa Driving and Dementia Toolkit questions for patients, the response that participants were "bothered a great deal by Diabetes Mellitus", and the Timed Toe Tap Test. CONCLUSIONS: Based on their degree of acceptability to patients and their positive associations with MVC, the MMSE, the Driving Habits Questionnaire, the Ottawa Driving and Dementia Toolkit patient questions merit further study regarding their ability to identify older drivers at high risk of future motor vehicle crashes. Given the paucity of physical examination measures that are theoretically linked to fitness-to-drive, the new physical examination tests introduced in this paper (e.g. the Timed Toe Tap Test, the Peripheral Vision Finger Test, the Neck Rotation Finger Test, and the Coin-catch Reaction Time Test) represent additions to this field of research and also merit consideration for further study.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Examen de Aptitud para la Conducción de Vehículos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Demencia/diagnóstico , Demencia/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Movimientos de la Cabeza , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Escala del Estado Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Destreza Motora , Ontario , Proyectos Piloto , Desempeño Psicomotor , Tiempo de Reacción , Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Campos Visuales , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Hip fractures are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Both fall prevention strategies and bone integrity/osteoporosis assessment should be addressed in this population. This study's goal was to evaluate the management of potential re-fracture risk after a hip fracture in an acute care setting. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who were admitted with a hip fracture over the course of one year to the Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, Ottawa, Canada. The charts of 147 patients with hip fractures met the inclusion criteria. Use of sedatives on admission was significant (24.5%). Fifty (34%) had some form of osteoporosis management ordered during their hospital stay. The medication recommendations consisted of only 14% being prescribed Vitamin D and 15.6% being prescribed calcium supplementation. Merely 7 (4.8%) patients of the total sample were prescribed bisphosphonates at time of discharge. This study documents a significant care gap in re-fracture management at the time of acute hospitalization after an acute hip fracture. Interventions are required to increase the awareness that this problem is not being addressed at the time of hospitalization and that on discharge, patients will need follow-up by the treating community physician.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/terapia , Hospitales/normas , Registros Médicos , Osteoporosis/terapia , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Canadá , Suplementos Dietéticos , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Osteoporosis/prevención & control , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
This study examined the effect of the Driving and Dementia Toolkit on physician knowledge and confidence gained and the anticipated change in patient assessment and evaluated the extent to which physicians found the material to be useful. Before receiving the driving toolkit, 301 randomly selected primary care physicians received a copy of the pretest questionnaire; 145 responded and met the eligibility criteria. This group was then sent the toolkit, a satisfaction a survey, and a posttest questionnaire. Physicians were faxed the questionnaires (with up to three reminders) and telephoned if necessary. Changes in pre- and posttest results were analyzed using the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test nonparametric procedures included in SPSS, Version 10.0, and paired-samples t test. Pre- and posttest data were available and could be matched for 86 physicians (59.3%) response. Knowledge and confidence increased significantly (P=.05) for most of the toolkit content questions. There was also a clear intent on the part of study participants to begin including additional pertinent questions in the patient/caregivers interview when assessing a patient's fitness to drive. On a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high), overall satisfaction with the toolkit rated an average of 8.4. Use of the toolkit resulted in a clear improvement in physicians' reported knowledge of and confidence in dealing with dementia and driving. Future applications of similar innovative continuing education models can be used for other areas such as disclosure of dementia diagnosis, capacity assessments, or end-of life issues.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conducción de Automóvil , Demencia/diagnóstico , Educación Médica Continua , Geriatría/educación , Médicos de Familia/educación , Atención Primaria de Salud , Canadá , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
This paper reports the findings of a descriptive, exploratory, qualitative study of patient and caregiver perspectives of the disclosure of a dementia diagnosis. Data were collected at 3 points in time: (1) the disclosure meeting, (2) patient and caregiver interviews, and (3) focus group interviews. Thirty patient-caregiver dyads participated in the disclosure meetings at the Geriatric Day Hospital at the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada. Within a week of the disclosure of diagnosis, 27 (90%) patients and 29 (97%) caregivers were interviewed in their homes, and 12 caregivers participated in 3 focus group interviews within 1 month after the disclosure meeting. Most patients and caregivers said they preferred full disclosure of the diagnosis. Patients expressed satisfaction with the physician providing the diagnosis and with their caregivers being present at the disclosure meeting, however, wanted more information about their condition. Caregivers provided further insight regarding the patient response, and suggested the need to emphasize hope in the face of a difficult diagnosis, the use of progressive disclosure to allow the person (and caregivers) to prepare, and the provision of detail about the disease and its progression.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Demencia , Pacientes , Revelación de la Verdad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To provide background for physicians'in-office assessment of medical fitness to drive, including legal risks and responsibilities. To review opinion-based approaches and current attempts to promote evidence-based strategies for this assessment. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsyclNFO, Ageline, and Sociofile were searched from 1966 on for articles on health-related and medical aspects of fitness to drive. More than 1500 papers were reviewed to find practical approaches to, or guidelines for, assessing medical fitness to drive in primary care. Only level III evidence was found. No evidence-based approaches were found. MAIN MESSAGE: Three practical methods of assessment are discussed: the American Medical Association guidelines, SAFE DRIVE, and CanDRIVE. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence-based information to help physicians make decisions regarding medical fitness to drive. Current approaches are primarily opinion-based and are of unknown predictive value. Research initiatives, such as the CanDRIVE program of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, can provide empiric data that would allow us to move from opinion to evidence.