Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 26(8): 1085-92, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22938827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standard surgical treatment of infrarenal aortoiliac obstructive disease is abdominal aortobifemoral bypass (AABFB). However, alternative surgical procedures may be considered in cases of juxtarenal Leriche syndrome and previous aortofemoral graft obstruction. We present midterm results of 20 consecutive patients who underwent thoracic aortobifemoral bypass (TABFB) either as primary or secondary procedure. METHOD: Between 1999 and 2010, 20 patients who were diagnosed to have juxtarenal Leriche syndrome (n = 17) and failure of previous AABFB graft (n = 3) were enrolled. The patients were classified according to the Rutherford classification. Mean follow-up period was 60.9 ± 38.3 months. Mean preoperative ankle-brachial index on the left lower extremity was 0.18 and on the right lower extremity was 0.20. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with the diagnosis of juxtarenal Lercihe syndrome were primarily and three patients were secondarily (for treatment of failed previous AABFB graft) treated using TABFB procedure. The mean ankle-brachial index at last follow-up was 0.75 on the left lower extremity and 0.76 on the right. One-year patency rate was 100%, and 5-year patency rate was 94%. CONCLUSION: TABFB precludes the risk of renal artery embolization in cases of juxtarenal obstruction, without adding any risk of morbidity and mortality. Its long-term patency is similar or even superior to conventional surgical bypass techniques. We propose its use as an initial treatment in juxtarenal Leriche syndrome as well as a remedial procedure in cases with previous AABFB graft occlusion.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Síndrome de Leriche/cirugía , Anciano , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Humanos , Síndrome de Leriche/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Leriche/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
Heart Surg Forum ; 15(2): E84-9, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22543342

RESUMEN

AIM: The goal was to determine the effectiveness of the posterior pericardiotomy technique in preventing the development of early and late pericardial effusions (PEs) and to determine the role of anxiety level for the detection of late pericardial tamponade (PT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided 100 patients randomly into 2 groups, the posterior pericardiotomy group (n = 50) and the control group (n = 50). All patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG), valvular heart surgery, or combined valvular and CABG surgeries were included. The posterior pericardiotomy technique was performed in the first group of 50 patients. Evaluations completed preoperatively, postoperatively on day 1, before discharge, and on postoperative days 5 and 30 included electrocardiographic study, chest radiography, echocardiographic study, and evaluation of the patient's anxiety level. Postoperative causes of morbidity and durations of intensive care unit and hospital stays were recorded. RESULTS: The 2 groups were not significantly different with respect to demographic and operative data (P > .05). Echocardiography evaluations revealed no significant differences between the groups preoperatively; however, before discharge the control group had a significantly higher number of patients with moderate, large, and very large PEs compared with the pericardiotomy group (P < .01). There were 6 cases of late PT in the control group, whereas there were none in the pericardiotomy group (P < .05). Before discharge and on postoperative day 15, the patients in the pericardiotomy group showed significant improvement in anxiety levels (P = .03 and .004, respectively). No differences in postoperative complications were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Pericardiotomy is a simple, safe, and effective method for reducing the incidence of PE and late PT after cardiac surgery. It also has the potential to provide a better quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Taponamiento Cardíaco/epidemiología , Taponamiento Cardíaco/prevención & control , Derrame Pericárdico/epidemiología , Derrame Pericárdico/prevención & control , Pericardiectomía/métodos , Pericardiectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
3.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 19(6): 435-40, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23411849

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Short term results of on-pump and off-pump techniques in patients undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) were investigated in this study. METHODS: A total of 14.430 patients have undergone isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in our clinic from 1998 to 2010. Of these patients, 105 patients who have undergone redo CABG, 53 (50.5%) were operated with cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump) and 52 (49.5%) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump). Early results for which on or off-pump techniques were independent risk factors were determined with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall mortality in patients undergoing redo CABG was 12.3% with a 11.5% mortality in the off-pump group and 13.2% mortality in the on-pump group and the difference was not statistically significant (p >0.05). Blood product transfusion requirement (p <0.05, OR: 3.620, 95% CI: 1.295-10.119), new onset atrial fibrillation rhythm (AFR) (p <0.05, OR: 13.357, 95% CI: 1.656-107.721), prolonged ventilation (p <0.05, OR: 9.066, 95% CI: 1.091-75.323) and duration of hospitalization (p <0.01, OR: 5.252, 95% CI: 1.784-15.459) were significantly higher in the on-pump group. The number of patients with postoperative low cardiac output was significantly higher in the off-pump group (p <0.05, OR: 5.337, 95% CI: 1.094-26.043). The ratio of complete bypass was significantly higher in the on-pump group compared to the off-pump group (p <0.05, OR: 2.913, 95% CI: 1.204-7.046). CONCLUSION: Despite the lower morbidity and mortality in the off-pump group, the rate of target vessel bypass grafting was lower. Off-pump technique may be considered as a safer option for cardiopulmonary bypass in the high risk population.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria Off-Pump/métodos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Anciano , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/métodos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 40(1): 34-41, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23466680

RESUMEN

This study compares the medium-term results of De Vega, modified De Vega, and ring annuloplasty techniques for the correction of tricuspid insufficiency and investigates the risk factors for recurrent grades 3 and 4 tricuspid insufficiency after repair. In our clinic, 93 patients with functional tricuspid insufficiency underwent surgical tricuspid repair from May 2007 through October 2010. The study was retrospective, and all the data pertaining to the patients were retrieved from hospital records. Functional capacity, recurrent tricuspid insufficiency, and risk factors aggravating the insufficiency were analyzed for each patient. In the medium term (25.4 ± 10.3 mo), the rates of grades 3 and 4 tricuspid insufficiency in the De Vega, modified De Vega, and ring annuloplasty groups were 31%, 23.1%, and 6.1%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction, < 0.50), pulmonary artery pressure ≥60 mmHg, and the De Vega annuloplasty technique were risk factors for medium-term recurrent grades 3 and 4 tricuspid insufficiency. Medium-term survival was 90.6% for the De Vega group, 96.3% for the modified De Vega group, and 97.1% for the ring annuloplasty group. Ring annuloplasty provided the best relief from recurrent tricuspid insufficiency when compared with DeVega annuloplasty. Modified De Vega annuloplasty might be a suitable alternative to ring annuloplasty when rings are not available.


Asunto(s)
Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Arterial , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca/mortalidad , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Arteria Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/mortalidad , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda
5.
Cardiovasc J Afr ; 24(7): 247-50, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24217299

RESUMEN

AIM: The aims of this study were to determine the early mortality rate in low-risk coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients and examine the causes of death, to identify problems that could be avoided in future surgeries. METHODS: All low-risk patients (EuroSCORE ≤ 2) who died after CABG were included. Their peri-operative information was meticulously studied by internal and independent external reviewers to identify causes of death, which were classified as: cardiac or non-cardiac; and a further division as: (1) non-preventable, (2) preventable (technical error), and (3) preventable (system error). RESULTS: Early mortality was 0.93% (24/2570). Eleven patients (45.8%) were classified as preventable deaths. In six of them the main problem was identified as graft thrombosis, which was secondary to a technical error of either the harvesting or anastomosis of the left internal mammarian artery. There were also five system errors identified as delays in the treatment of an identified and potentially reversible problem. CONCLUSION: Correction of technical and system errors, such as harvesting of the left internal mammarian artery, haemostasis during surgery, and establishing standard protocols for the transfer of patients from ward to intensive care units will eventually lead to improvement in both the quality of care and patient outcomes, even in low-risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía/epidemiología
6.
Trop Doct ; 41(4): 227-9, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21878439

RESUMEN

Antibiotic treatment, surgical intervention and postoperative antibiotic regimens are recommended for the treatment of brucella endocarditis (BE). Our clinical antibiotic regimens involve a triple antibiotic regimen for treating BE before the operation. The combination of three antibiotics is continued for at least six months and until the titres of the Wright serologic test are diminished to 1:160 levels. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the effects of combined medical and surgical treatments on survival and relapse rates in the periods of mid to late terms. We investigated 13 patients who were treated between January 1993 and June 2009. Our clinical observations led us to use a combination of rifampicin (900 mg twice a day), streptomycin (12 to 16 mg/kg/24 h intramuscularly) and doxycycline (200 mg/kg twice a day); rifampicin, tetracycline (8 mg/kg three times a day) and cotrimoxazole (15 mg/kg twice a day) or rifampicin, doxycycline and cotrimoxazole regimen for treating BE before the operation. This treatment should be continued for at least six months after surgery in order to prevent relapses.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Válvula Aórtica , Brucelosis , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endocarditis Bacteriana/mortalidad , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA