Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 113
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Allergy ; 73(2): 490-497, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent efficacy studies of asthma biologics have included highly enriched patient populations. Using a similar approach, we examined factors that predict response to omalizumab to facilitate selection of patients most likely to derive the greatest clinical benefit from therapy. METHODS: Data from two phase III clinical trials of omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma were examined. Differences in rates of asthma exacerbations between omalizumab and placebo groups during the 16-week inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose-stable phase were evaluated with respect to baseline blood eosinophil counts (eosinophils <300/µL [low] vs ≥300/µL [high]) and baseline markers of asthma severity (emergency asthma treatment in prior year, asthma hospitalization in prior year, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1 ; FEV1 <65% vs ≥65% predicted], inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate dose [<600 vs ≥600 µg/day], and long-acting beta-agonist [LABA] use [yes/no]). RESULTS: Adults/adolescents (N = 1071) were randomized to receive either omalizumab (n = 542) or placebo (n = 529). In the 16-week ICS dose-stable phase, rates of exacerbations requiring ≥3 days of systemic corticosteroid treatment were 0.066 and 0.147 with omalizumab and placebo, respectively, representing a relative rate reduction in omalizumab-treated patients of 55% (95% CI, 32%-70%; P = .002). For patients with eosinophils ≥300/µL or with more severe asthma, this rate reduction was significantly more pronounced. CONCLUSION: In patients with allergic asthma, baseline blood eosinophil levels and/or clinical markers of asthma severity predict response to omalizumab.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Allergy ; 70(9): 1160-8, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26042362

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New treatment options are required for patients with asthma not sufficiently controlled with inhaled therapies. In a Phase 2a trial, CYT003, a Toll-like receptor-9 agonist immunomodulator, improved asthma control during inhaled glucocorticosteroid reduction in patients with allergic asthma. This double-blind Phase 2b study assessed the efficacy and safety of CYT003 in patients with persistent moderate-to-severe allergic asthma not sufficiently controlled on standard inhaled glucocorticosteroid therapy with/without long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). METHODS: Overall, 365 patients received seven doses of subcutaneous CYT003 (0.3, 1, or 2 mg) or placebo as add-on therapy to conventional controller medication. Change from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was the primary outcome; secondary outcomes included change in forced expiratory volume, Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and safety. RESULTS: All groups, including placebo, showed a clinically important improvement in ACQ score; however, there was no significant difference between the CYT003 and placebo groups at week 12 (least-squares mean difference 0.3 mg: -0.027 [95% confidence interval -0.259 to 0.204]; 1 mg: 0.097 [-0.131 to 0.325]; 2 mg: 0.081 [-0.148 to 0.315]). No significant differences were seen in secondary outcomes. CYT003 was well tolerated; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were injection site reactions. Due to lack of efficacy, the study was prematurely terminated at the end of the treatment phase with no further follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Toll-like receptor-9 agonism with CYT003 showed no additional benefit in patients with insufficiently controlled moderate-to-severe allergic asthma receiving standard inhaled glucocorticosteroid therapy with or without LABAs.


Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligonucleótidos/uso terapéutico , Receptor Toll-Like 9/agonistas , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligonucleótidos/administración & dosificación , Oligonucleótidos/efectos adversos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur Respir J ; 44(2): 304-23, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24925919

RESUMEN

The objective of Integrated Care Pathways for Airway Diseases (AIRWAYS-ICPs) is to launch a collaboration to develop multi-sectoral care pathways for chronic respiratory diseases in European countries and regions. AIRWAYS-ICPs has strategic relevance to the European Union Health Strategy and will add value to existing public health knowledge by: 1) proposing a common framework of care pathways for chronic respiratory diseases, which will facilitate comparability and trans-national initiatives; 2) informing cost-effective policy development, strengthening in particular those on smoking and environmental exposure; 3) aiding risk stratification in chronic disease patients, using a common strategy; 4) having a significant impact on the health of citizens in the short term (reduction of morbidity, improvement of education in children and of work in adults) and in the long-term (healthy ageing); 5) proposing a common simulation tool to assist physicians; and 6) ultimately reducing the healthcare burden (emergency visits, avoidable hospitalisations, disability and costs) while improving quality of life. In the longer term, the incidence of disease may be reduced by innovative prevention strategies. AIRWAYSICPs was initiated by Area 5 of the Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. All stakeholders are involved (health and social care, patients, and policy makers).


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Respiratorios/terapia , Envejecimiento , Asma/terapia , Toma de Decisiones , Europa (Continente) , Unión Europea , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Área sin Atención Médica , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Organización Mundial de la Salud
4.
Allergy ; 69(9): 1119-40, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25039248

RESUMEN

The goal of asthma treatment is to control the disease according to guidelines issued by bodies such as the Global Initiative for Asthma. Effective control is dependent upon evaluation of symptoms, initiation of appropriate treatment and minimization of the progressive adverse effects of the disease and its therapies. Although individual outcome measures have been shown to correlate with asthma control, composite endpoints are preferred to enable more accurate and robust monitoring of the health of the individual patient. A number of validated instruments are utilized to capture these component endpoints; however, there is no consensus on the optimal instrument for use in clinical trials. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) has been shown to be a valid, reliable instrument that allows accurate and reproducible assessment of asthma control that compares favourably with other commonly used instruments. This analysis provides a summary of the use of ACQ in phase II, III and IV asthma trials. Comparisons between the ACQ and other instruments are also presented. Our analysis suggests that the ACQ is a valid and robust measure for use as a primary or secondary endpoint in future clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Determinación de Punto Final/métodos , Determinación de Punto Final/normas , Humanos
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 130(5): 1049-62, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23040884

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma represent global health problems for all age groups. Asthma and rhinitis frequently coexist in the same subjects. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) was initiated during a World Health Organization workshop in 1999 (published in 2001). ARIA has reclassified AR as mild/moderate-severe and intermittent/persistent. This classification closely reflects patients' needs and underlines the close relationship between rhinitis and asthma. Patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are confronted with various treatment choices for the management of AR. This contributes to considerable variation in clinical practice, and worldwide, patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals are faced with uncertainty about the relative merits and downsides of the various treatment options. In its 2010 Revision, ARIA developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of AR and asthma comorbidities based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. ARIA is disseminated and implemented in more than 50 countries of the world. Ten years after the publication of the ARIA World Health Organization workshop report, it is important to make a summary of its achievements and identify the still unmet clinical, research, and implementation needs to strengthen the 2011 European Union Priority on allergy and asthma in children.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/epidemiología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Animales , Asma/clasificación , Asma/complicaciones , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/clasificación , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/complicaciones , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/clasificación , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/complicaciones , Organización Mundial de la Salud
6.
Allergy ; 67(8): 976-97, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22702533

RESUMEN

Asthma is the most common chronic lower respiratory disease in childhood throughout the world. Several guidelines and/or consensus documents are available to support medical decisions on pediatric asthma. Although there is no doubt that the use of common systematic approaches for management can considerably improve outcomes, dissemination and implementation of these are still major challenges. Consequently, the International Collaboration in Asthma, Allergy and Immunology (iCAALL), recently formed by the EAACI, AAAAI, ACAAI, and WAO, has decided to propose an International Consensus on (ICON) Pediatric Asthma. The purpose of this document is to highlight the key messages that are common to many of the existing guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences, thus providing a concise reference. The principles of pediatric asthma management are generally accepted. Overall, the treatment goal is disease control. To achieve this, patients and their parents should be educated to optimally manage the disease, in collaboration with healthcare professionals. Identification and avoidance of triggers is also of significant importance. Assessment and monitoring should be performed regularly to re-evaluate and fine-tune treatment. Pharmacotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment. The optimal use of medication can, in most cases, help patients control symptoms and reduce the risk for future morbidity. The management of exacerbations is a major consideration, independent of chronic treatment. There is a trend toward considering phenotype-specific treatment choices; however, this goal has not yet been achieved.


Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Adolescente , Asma/clasificación , Asma/prevención & control , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido
7.
Allergy ; 67(1): 18-24, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22050279

RESUMEN

This pocket guide is the result of a consensus reached between members of the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2) LEN) and Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA). The aim of the current pocket guide is to offer a comprehensive set of recommendations on the use of skin prick tests in allergic rhinitis-conjunctivitis and asthma in daily practice. This pocket guide is meant to give simple answers to the most frequent questions raised by practitioners in Europe, including 'practicing allergists', general practitioners and any other physicians with special interest in the management of allergic diseases. It is not a long or detailed scientific review of the topic. However, the recommendations in this pocket guide were compiled following an in-depth review of existing guidelines and publications, including the 1993 European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology position paper, the 2001 ARIA document and the ARIA update 2008 (prepared in collaboration with GA(2) LEN). The recommendations cover skin test methodology and interpretation, allergen extracts to be used, as well as indications in a variety of settings including paediatrics and developing countries.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Pruebas Cutáneas/normas , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/inmunología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología
8.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 158(3): 216-31, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22382913

RESUMEN

Concepts of disease severity, activity, control and responsiveness to treatment are linked but different. Severity refers to the loss of function of the organs induced by the disease process or to the occurrence of severe acute exacerbations. Severity may vary over time and needs regular follow-up. Control is the degree to which therapy goals are currently met. These concepts have evolved over time for asthma in guidelines, task forces or consensus meetings. The aim of this paper is to generalize the approach of the uniform definition of severe asthma presented to WHO for chronic allergic and associated diseases (rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis) in order to have a uniform definition of severity, control and risk, usable in most situations. It is based on the appropriate diagnosis, availability and accessibility of treatments, treatment responsiveness and associated factors such as comorbidities and risk factors. This uniform definition will allow a better definition of the phenotypes of severe allergic (and related) diseases for clinical practice, research (including epidemiology), public health purposes, education and the discovery of novel therapies.


Asunto(s)
Asma/fisiopatología , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Asma/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Urticaria/complicaciones , Urticaria/epidemiología
9.
Tuberk Toraks ; 60(1): 92-7, 2012.
Artículo en Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22554377

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis and asthma represent global health problems for all age groups. Asthma and rhinitis frequently co-exist in the same subjects. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) was initiated during a World Health Organization (WHO) workshop in 1999 and was published in 2001. ARIA has reclassified allergic rhinitis as mild/moderate-severe and intermittent/persistent. This classification schema closely reflects the impact of allergic rhinitis on patients. In its 2010 Revision, ARIA developed clinical practice guidelines for the management of allergic rhinitis and asthma co-morbidities based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). ARIA has been disseminated and implemented in over 50 countries of the world. In Turkey, it is important to make a record of ARIA achievements and to identify the still unmet clinical, research and implementation needs in order to strengthen the 2011 EU Priority on allergy and asthma in children.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/epidemiología , Asma/clasificación , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/clasificación , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
10.
Allergy ; 66(6): 765-74, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496059

RESUMEN

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is one of the treatments for allergic rhinitis. However, for allergists, nonspecialists, regulators, payers, and patients, there remain gaps in understanding the evaluation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although treating the same diseases, RCTs in SIT and pharmacotherapy should be considered separately for several reasons, as developed in this study. These include the severity and persistence of allergic rhinitis in the patients enrolled in the study, the problem of the placebo, allergen exposure (in particular pollen and mite), the analysis and reporting of the study, the level of symptoms of placebo-treated patients, the clinical relevance of the efficacy of SIT, the need for a validated combined symptom-medication score, the differences between children and adults and pharmacoeconomic analyses. This statement reviews issues raised by the interpretation of RCTs in sublingual immunotherapy. It is not possible to directly extrapolate the rules or parameters used in medication RCTs to SIT. It also provides some suggestions for the research that will be needed. Interestingly, some of the research questions can be approached with the available data obtained from large RCTs.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Administración Sublingual , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Ácaros/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/fisiopatología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Allergy ; 65(10): 1212-21, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20887423

RESUMEN

The links between asthma and rhinitis are well characterized. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines stress the importance of these links and provide guidance for their prevention and treatment. Despite effective treatments being available, too few patients receive appropriate medical care for both diseases. Most patients with rhinitis and asthma consult primary care physicians and therefore these physicians are encouraged to understand and use ARIA guidelines. Patients should also be informed about these guidelines to raise their awareness of optimal care and increase control of the two related diseases. To apply these guidelines, clinicians and patients need to understand how and why the recommendations were made. The goal of the ARIA guidelines is to provide recommendations about the best management options for most patients in most situations. These recommendations should be based on the best available evidence. Making recommendations requires the assessment of the quality of available evidence, deciding on the balance between benefits and downsides, consideration of patients' values and preferences, and, if applicable, resource implications. Guidelines must be updated as new management options become available or important new evidence emerges. Transparent reporting of guidelines facilitates understanding and acceptance, but implementation strategies need to be improved.


Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Asma/prevención & control , Asma/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Técnicas de Planificación , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/prevención & control , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/prevención & control , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia
12.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 39(6): 788-97, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19302249

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab (Xolair) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody with proven efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe persistent allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma. OBJECTIVE: To review clinical study data to assess the safety profile of omalizumab. METHODS: We analysed the safety of omalizumab using data from completed clinical studies (up to 1 year) involving more than 7500 patients with asthma, rhinitis or related conditions and up to 4 years in one study of patients with severe allergic asthma, as well as post-marketing safety data. Analysis focuses on the risk of immune-system effects, hypersensitivity reactions, malignant neoplasia, parasitic infections and thrombocytopenia. RESULTS: Omalizumab exhibited a good safety and tolerability profile that was maintained up to 4 years in one study. The incidence of anaphylaxis was 0.14% in omalizumab-treated patients and 0.07% in control patients. No omalizumab-treated patient developed measurable anti-omalizumab antibodies. Post-marketing, based on estimated exposure of 57,300 patients (June 2003-December 2006), the frequency of anaphylaxis attributed to omalizumab use was estimated to be at least 0.2% of patients. Current clinical trial data do not support an increased risk of malignant neoplasia or thrombocytopenia with omalizumab. CONCLUSION: Data indicate that the proven efficacy of add-on omalizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe or severe allergic asthma is accompanied by a favourable safety and tolerability profile.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antiidiotipos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Infecciones/inmunología , Neoplasias/inmunología , Omalizumab , Trombocitopenia/inmunología
13.
Eur Respir J ; 32(3): 545-54, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18757695

RESUMEN

Concepts of asthma severity and control are important in the evaluation of patients and their response to treatment but the terminology is not standardised and the terms are often used interchangeably. This review, arising from the work of an American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force, identifies the need for separate concepts of control and severity, describes their evolution in asthma guidelines and provides a framework for understanding the relationship between current concepts of asthma phenotype, severity and control. "Asthma control" refers to the extent to which the manifestations of asthma have been reduced or removed by treatment. Its assessment should incorporate the dual components of current clinical control (e.g. symptoms, reliever use and lung function) and future risk (e.g. exacerbations and lung function decline). The most clinically useful concept of asthma severity is based on the intensity of treatment required to achieve good asthma control, i.e. severity is assessed during treatment. Severe asthma is defined as the requirement for (not necessarily just prescription or use of) high-intensity treatment. Asthma severity may be influenced by the underlying disease activity and by the patient's phenotype, both of which may be further described using pathological and physiological markers. These markers can also act as surrogate measures for future risk.


Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria
14.
Allergy ; 63(8): 953-61, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18691297

RESUMEN

Exercise-induced (EI) hypersensitivity disorders are significant problems for both recreational and competitive athletes. These include EI-asthma, EI-bronchoconstriction, EI-rhinitis, EI-anaphylaxis and EI-urticaria. A group of experts from the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology met to discuss the pathogenesis of these disorders and how to diagnose and treat them, and then to develop a consensus report. Key words (exercise with asthma, bronchoconstriction, rhinitis, urticaria or anaphylaxis) were used to search Medline, the Cochrane database and related websites through February 2008 to obtain pertinent information which, along with personal reference databases and institutional experience with these disorders, were used to develop this report. The goal is to provide physicians with guidance in the diagnosis, understanding and management of EI-hypersensitivity disorders to enable their patients to safely return to exercise-related activities.


Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Asma Inducida por Ejercicio/etiología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Rinitis/etiología , Síndrome , Urticaria/etiología
15.
J Clin Invest ; 79(4): 1197-203, 1987 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3549781

RESUMEN

Using a sensitive single isotope enzymatic assay we measured bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid histamine in asymptomatic normal (nonallergic), allergic rhinitic, and allergic asthmatic subjects. Normal subjects were found to have little or no detectable amounts of histamine in BAL fluid (11 +/- 11 pg/ml), and few BAL fluid mast cells. In comparison, the allergic rhinitics and allergic asthmatics had much higher amounts of BAL fluid histamine (113 +/- 53 and 188 +/- 42 pg/ml, respectively), and a significantly greater number of BAL fluid mast cells. Furthermore, despite having equivalent baseline pulmonary function values, allergic asthmatics with BAL fluid histamine levels greater than 100 pg/ml required only 7 +/- 2 breath units of methacholine to induce a 20% drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (PD20FEV1) while asthmatics with BAL fluid histamine levels less than 100 pg/ml required 49 +/- 19 breath units (P less than 0.05). These data suggest that allergic asthmatics have ongoing lung mast cell degranulation that might contribute to the etiology of airway hyperresponsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Asma/inmunología , Histamina/análisis , Compuestos de Metacolina , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/complicaciones , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/complicaciones , Cloruro de Metacolina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alveolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/inmunología , Irrigación Terapéutica
16.
J Clin Invest ; 80(5): 1507-11, 1987 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3680512

RESUMEN

We measured bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid histamine levels in allergic asthmatics and nonallergic normal subjects after local airway antigen and cold 22 degrees C normal saline challenges. Immediately after instillation of antigen through a bronchoscope wedged into a subsegmental airway, all 17 allergic asthmatics but none of the nine normal subjects had visible airway constriction. The asthmatics had a concomitant mean increase in BAL histamine of 23% (P = 0.005), whereas the normals had no change in BAL histamine. Among the allergic asthmatics, the change in BAL histamine content in response to antigen directly correlated with the control (baseline) BAL histamine content (r = 0.66, P = 0.003). Moreover, asthmatics with large antigen-induced changes in BAL histamine had greater airway methacholine sensitivity than did asthmatics without measurable increases in BAL histamine (8 +/- 2 vs. 41 +/- 31 breath units). Neither asthmatics nor normal subjects had airway constriction or changes in BAL histamine levels in response to nonspecific challenge with cold saline. Our data suggest that when allergic asthmatics are exposed to relevant antigens they have in vivo lung mast cell degranulation which results in airway constriction and contributes to nonspecific airway hyperresponsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos/inmunología , Asma/inmunología , Mastocitos/fisiología , Adulto , Asma/metabolismo , Pruebas de Provocación Bronquial , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/citología , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/metabolismo , Histamina/metabolismo , Humanos
18.
Arch Intern Med ; 152(5): 1025-32, 1992 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1580706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A history (or lack thereof) of penicillin allergy is known to be unreliable in predicting reactions on subsequent administration of the drug. This study tests the usefulness of four penicillin allergen skin tests in the prediction of IgE-mediated reactions subsequent to administration of penicillin. METHODS: Eight centers cooperated in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases trial of the predictive value of skin testing with major and minor penicillin derivatives. Hospitalized adults were tested with a major determinant (octa-benzylpenicilloyl-ocytalysine) and a minor determinant mixture and its components (potassium benzylpenicillin, benzylpenicilloate, and benzylpenicilloyl-N-propylamine). Patients then received a therapeutic course of penicillin and were observed, for 48 hours, for adverse reactions compatible with an IgE-mediated immediate or accelerated allergy. RESULTS: Among 726 history-positive patients, 566 with negative skin tests received penicillin and only seven (1.2%) had possibly IgE-mediated reactions. Among 600 history-negative patients, 568 with negative skin tests received penicillin and none had a reaction. Only nine of the 167 positive skin test reactors received a penicillin agent and then usually by cautious incremental dosing. Two (22%) of these nine patients had reactions compatible with IgE-mediated immediate or accelerated penicillin allergy; both were positive to the two determinants. CONCLUSIONS: These data corroborate previous data about the negative predictive value of negative skin tests to these materials. The reaction rate in skin test-positive patients was significantly higher than in those with negative skin tests, demonstrating the positive predictive value of positive tests to both major and minor determinants. The number of patients positive only to the major determinant or only to the minor determinant mix was too small to draw conclusions about the positive predictive value of either reagent alone.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Pruebas Cutáneas , Adulto , Bencenoacetamidas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Penicilina G/análogos & derivados , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
19.
J Immunol Methods ; 152(1): 115-21, 1992 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1640106

RESUMEN

The measurement of histamine in samples obtained from human lung is important in determining the roles of histamine and mast cells in normal and disease states. We, therefore, compared different assays for the measurement of histamine in human lung samples. Both a single isotope enzymatic assay and a radioimmunoassay (RIA) were capable of accurately measuring the low concentrations of histamine (0.05-2.0 ng/ml) normally found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The RIA was also able to measure histamine levels up to 1500 ng/ml in human lung tissue samples. Moreover, the RIA measurement of high levels of histamine in lung samples compared favorably to an automated spectrofluorometric method. Unlike either the single isotope enzymatic assay or the automated spectrofluorometric assay which have effective capabilities at less than and greater than 2 ng/ml, respectively, the RIA can accurately measure histamine levels from 0.05 to 1500 ng/ml. Since the RIA is easier to perform, less costly, and has a wider range of effectiveness, this assay should prove valuable in assessing histamine levels from a variety of human lung samples, thereby, providing an avenue to elucidate the roles of histamine and mast cells in lung functions.


Asunto(s)
Histamina/análisis , Pulmón/química , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/química , Histamina/normas , Humanos , Técnicas para Inmunoenzimas/normas , Radioinmunoensayo/métodos , Radioinmunoensayo/normas , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia
20.
J Immunol Methods ; 55(3): 347-53, 1982 Dec 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7166649

RESUMEN

In order to obtain mononuclear cells from peripheral human blood for the study of cell surface receptors, it was necessary to effectively eliminate contaminating platelets. The usual Hypaque-Ficoll isolation procedures were found to produce mononuclear cells contaminated with 10-1000 platelets per mononuclear cell (by phase microscopy). Multiple slow speed centrifugations reduced the contamination to 5-10 platelets per mononuclear cell. However, centrifugation of EDTA-anticoagulated blood through Hypaque (D20(20) 1.060) at 400 X g for 5 min at 22 degrees C followed by the usual Hypaque-Ficoll gradient reduced platelet contamination to less than 1 platelet per 2 mononuclear cells. Thus, a rapid and simple gradient procedure is capable of significantly reducing platelet contamination of mononuclear cell preparations and should facilitate the analysis of mononuclear cell receptors and functions.


Asunto(s)
Plaquetas , Separación Celular/métodos , Linfocitos , Monocitos , Centrifugación por Gradiente de Densidad/métodos , Diatrizoato/farmacología , Diatrizoato de Meglumina/farmacología , Combinación de Medicamentos/farmacología , Ficoll/farmacología , Humanos , Receptores Adrenérgicos/análisis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA