Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 51
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Respir J ; 61(2)2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229045

RESUMEN

Pleural infection is a common condition encountered by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in managing pleural infection with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified: 1) epidemiology of pleural infection, 2) optimal antibiotic strategy, 3) diagnostic parameters for chest tube drainage, 4) status of intrapleural therapies, 5) role of surgery and 6) current place of outcome prediction in management. The literature revealed that recently updated epidemiological data continue to show an overall upwards trend in incidence, but there is an urgent need for a more comprehensive characterisation of the burden of pleural infection in specific populations such as immunocompromised hosts. There is a sparsity of regular analyses and documentation of microbiological patterns at a local level to inform geographical variation, and ongoing research efforts are needed to improve antibiotic stewardship. The evidence remains in favour of a small-bore chest tube optimally placed under image guidance as an appropriate initial intervention for most cases of pleural infection. With a growing body of data suggesting delays to treatment are key contributors to poor outcomes, this suggests that earlier consideration of combination intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) with concurrent surgical consultation should remain a priority. Since publication of the MIST-2 study, there has been considerable data supporting safety and efficacy of IET, but further studies are needed to optimise dosing using individualised biomarkers of treatment failure. Pending further prospective evaluation, the MIST-2 regimen remains the most evidence based. Several studies have externally validated the RAPID score, but it requires incorporating into prospective intervention studies prior to adopting into clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Enfermedades Pleurales , Cirujanos , Adulto , Humanos , Etiquetas de Secuencia Expresada , Tubos Torácicos
2.
Sleep Breath ; 25(2): 947-950, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851587

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The optimal mode of long-term positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for obesity-hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is not clear. The objectives of this study were to analyze whether or not patients with severe OHS treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remained controlled with this therapy over the long term and to investigate which variables were associated with CPAP failure and the need to switch to non-invasive ventilation (NIV). METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, patients admitted to the hospital because of severe OHS between 1996 and 2015 were analyzed. A multiple regression analysis was performed in order to determine which variables were associated with either CPAP success or failure to maintain long-term control. RESULTS: Of 126 consecutive patients, 115 accepted long-term PAP treatment. CPAP or NIV treatment was prescribed according to a protocol that included overnight polysomnographic PAP titration. Follow-up time was 8.0 ± 4.8 years. At the end of this period, 29% of CPAP-treated patients had been re-assigned to NIV because of recurrence of global respiratory failure. High levels of obesity, weight gain, lower FEV1/FVC values and the need for nocturnal supplementary oxygen independently predicted CPAP failure. CONCLUSION: CPAP therapy for severe OHS in patients who have these risk factors should be closely monitored in the long-term for possible treatment failure.


Asunto(s)
Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Síndrome de Hipoventilación por Obesidad/terapia , Anciano , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación no Invasiva , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Environ Res ; 179(Pt B): 108812, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31698297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between do-it-yourself activities entailing the exposure to carcinogenic substances and the risk of lung cancer. METHODS: We pooled individual data from different case-control studies conducted in Northwestern Spain which investigated residential radon and lung cancer. Cases had an anatomopathologically confirmed primary lung cancer and controls were selected at the pre-surgery unit with uncomplicated surgeries. Both cases and controls were older than 30 years with no previous cancer history. All participants were interviewed face-to-face using a specific questionnaire. Painting, model building, furniture refinishing and woodworking or home carpentry were the do-it-yourself activities considered risky due to exposure to carcinogenic agents. RESULTS: We included 1528 cases and 1457 controls. Practicing do-it-yourself risk activities was more frequent among cases: 16.0% were exposed to carcinogenic exposures during leisure time, compared to 11.8% for controls. The overall adjusted OR for lung cancer risk among individuals who practiced do-it-yourself risk activities, was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.36-2.31); this was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.51-3.11) when the analysis was restricted to individuals who performed these activities for at least 10 years. These risks were greater when the analyses were carried out exclusively among never-smokers, with the respective ORs being 2.04 (95% CI: 1.38-3.01) and 3.10 (95% CI: 1.78-5.40). CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that do-it-yourself activities involving exposure to certain carcinogens are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, both in ever and never-smokers.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Carcinógenos Ambientales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Radón , Factores de Riesgo , España
4.
Environ Res ; 172: 713-718, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30903971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using a pooled case-control study design, including only never-smokers, we have assessed the association of residential radon exposure with the subsequent occurrence of lung cancer. We also investigated whether residential radon poses a different risk specifically for adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We pooled individual data from different case-control studies conducted in recent years in Northwestern Spain which investigated residential radon and lung cancer. All participants were never-smokers. Cases had a confirmed biopsy of primary lung cancer. Hospital controls were selected at pre-surgery units, presenting for non-complex surgical procedures. They were interviewed using a standardized instrument. Residential radon was measured using alpha track detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory at the University of Santiago de Compostela. RESULTS: A total of 1415 individuals, 523 cases and 892 controls were included. We observed an odds ratio of 1.73 (95%CI: 1.27-2.35) for individuals exposed to ≥ 200 Bq/m3 compared with those exposed to ≤100 Bq/m3. Lung cancer risk for adenocarcinoma was 1.52 (95%CI: 1.14-2.02) using the same categories for radon exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Residential radon is a clear risk factor for lung cancer in never-smokers. Our data suggest that radon exposure is associated with all histological types of lung cancer and also with adenocarcinoma, which is currently the most frequent histological type for this disease.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , No Fumadores , Radón , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Vivienda , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , No Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Radón/toxicidad , Factores de Riesgo , España
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 28(3): 521-527, 2018 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29140412

RESUMEN

Background: Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer in developed countries but the etiology of lung cancer risk in never smokers (LCRINS) is largely unknown. We aim to assess the effects of alcohol consumption, in its different forms, on LCRINS. Methods: We pooled six multi-center case-control studies developed in the northwest of Spain. Cases and controls groups were composed of never smokers. We selected incident cases with anatomopathologically confirmed lung cancer diagnoses. All participants were personally interviewed. We performed two groups of statistical models, applying unconditional logistic regression with generalized additive models. One considered the effect of alcohol type consumption and the other considered the quantity of each alcoholic beverage consumed. Results: A total of 438 cases and 863 controls were included. Median age was 71 and 66, years, respectively. Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histological type, comprising 66% of all cases. We found that any type of wine consumption posed an OR of 2.20 OR 95%CI 1.12-4.35), and spirits consumption had an OR of 1.90 (95%CI 1.13-3.23). Beer consumption had an OR of 1.33 (95%CI 0.82-2.14). These results were similar when women were analyzed separately, but for men there was no apparent risk for any alcoholic beverage. The dose-response analysis for each alcoholic beverage revealed no clear pattern. Conclusions: Wine and spirits consumption might increase the risk of LCRINSs, particularly in females. These results have to be taken with caution given the limitations of the present study.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , No Fumadores/psicología , No Fumadores/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bebidas Alcohólicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , España/epidemiología , Vino/efectos adversos , Vino/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Respiration ; 94(1): 38-44, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities are very common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), contributing to the overall severity of the disease. The relative prevalence of comorbidities in COPD caused by biomass smoke (B-COPD), compared with COPD related to tobacco (T-COPD), is not well known. OBJECTIVES: To establish if both types of COPD are associated with a different risk for several major comorbidities. METHOD: The prevalence of comorbidities was compared in 863 subjects with B-COPD (n = 179, 20.7%) or T-COPD (n = 684, 79.2%). Multivariate analysis was carried out to explore the independent relationship between comorbidities and type of exposure. RESULTS: Three comorbidities were more frequent in T-COPD than in B-COPD: ischemic heart disease (11.5 vs. 5.0%, respectively, p = 0.01), peripheral vascular disease (9.2 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.006), and peptic ulcer disease (4.8% vs. 0, p = 0.005). After correcting for potential confounding variables, the risk of ischemic heart disease was lower in B-COPD than in T-COPD (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16-0.69, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ischemic heart disease is significantly lower in B-COPD than in T-COPD, suggesting a different systemic effect of both types of smoke in COPD patients.


Asunto(s)
Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Humo/efectos adversos , Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomasa , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología
7.
Eur Respir J ; 48(5): 1462-1470, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27799390

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess if residential radon exposure might cause EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements in never-smokers.We designed a multicentre case-control study in a radon-prone area (Galicia, Spain); only lung cancer cases were included in the study. We obtained residential radon measurements and clinical information for all the participants. We compared the median values of residential radon between patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements versus those without them.323 patients were included. Median age was 70 years and 19.5% were males. 42 and 15% of patients were EGFR- and ALK-positive, respectively. The most frequent EGFR alterations were exon 19 deletions and exon 21 (L858R) single-point substitution mutations. ALK-positive patients were 10 years younger than ALK-negative patients. Residential radon levels were two-fold higher in patients with exon 19 deletions compared with patients with exon 21 (L858R) single-point substitution mutations (216 versus 118 Bq·m-3; p=0.057). There were no differences in residential radon levels by EGFR mutation status. ALK-positive patients (n=12) essentially had two-fold residential radon levels compared with ALK-negative patients (290 versus 164 Bq·m-3, respectively).Residential radon may have a role in the molecular signature of lung cancer in never-smokers, although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to support this hypothesis.


Asunto(s)
Receptores ErbB/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Mutación , Radón , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quinasa de Linfoma Anaplásico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Exones , Femenino , Eliminación de Gen , Reordenamiento Génico , Vivienda , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar , España
8.
Eur Respir J ; 47(3): 947-53, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26699724

RESUMEN

Our aim was to describe the characteristics of a case-series of never-smoker small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases.Cases of SCLC were selected from a prospective, multicenter, hospital-based case-control study performed in Spain. Participants were never-smokers older than 30 years with an anatomo-pathological confirmation of primary lung cancer. We collected clinical and epidemiological variables according to the study's protocol.We included 19 SCLC cases, 18 females (94.7%), median age 75 years (interquartile range (IQR) 70-80 years). Median residential radon concentration was 195 Bq·m(-3) (IQR 130-229 Bq·m(-3)). 10 patients had limited disease and nine had extended disease. Median survival was 242 days (IQR 94-496 days); 1- and 2-year survival were 36.8% and 17.6%, respectively. Survival was much higher for individuals with limited disease than for those with extended disease (median 336 versus 235 days; 1-year survival 50% versus 22.2% and 2-year survival 27% versus 0%, respectively). Performance status at diagnosis was closely related to survival.SCLC is an infrequent, highly aggressive disease in never-smokers. Survival is poor, even for limited disease. Age at diagnosis in SCLC is higher than that observed for never-smokers with adenocarcinoma. Residential radon exposure is higher than the action levels recommended by the World Health Organization.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Radón/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/diagnóstico , Fumar , España
10.
Lung ; 193(4): 497-503, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25926292

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about survival and prognostic factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) due to biomass smoke exposure (BS-COPD). OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the value of two indices of COPD severity: BODEx (body mass index, obstruction, dyspnea, and previous severe exacerbations) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) categories system (ABCD) to predict all-cause mortality in BS-COPD, compared with COPD due to tobacco (T-COPD); (2) to verify the usefulness of 2 comorbidity indices, Charlson index and COTE (COPD comorbidity index); and (3) to put side by side the value of these indices. METHODS: 612 consecutive COPD patients were retrospectively studied. Prognostic factors were evaluated taking into account the exposure to biomass or tobacco smoke. The relative predictive values of the prognostic indices were compared using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Mortality in the BS-COPD and T-COPD groups was not significantly different, when sex was taken into account. BODEx, Charlson and COTE indices-but not type of exposure-predicted mortality in multivariate analysis. The value of the C-statistic for the BODEx index was not different than that of GOLD ABCD for BS-COPD, but was higher for T-COPD. The discriminatory value of the Charlson index was higher than that of COTE for BS-COPD, but no significant differences were found for T-COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Multidimensional indices of COPD severity and comorbidity predict all-cause mortality in BS-COPD. The behavior of the different indices is different for BS-COPD and T-COPD.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/etiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humo/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Área Bajo la Curva , Biomasa , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fumar/efectos adversos
11.
Eur Respir J ; 44(4): 994-1001, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25034571

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of lung cancer in never-smokers and to ascertain if environmental tobacco smoke modifies the effect of residential radon. We designed a multicentre hospital-based case-control study in a radon-prone area (Galicia, Spain). All participants were never-smokers. Cases had an anatomopathologically confirmed primary lung cancer and controls were recruited from individuals undergoing minor, non-oncological surgery. Residential radon was measured using alpha track detectors. We included 521 individuals, 192 cases and 329 controls, 21% were males. We observed an odds ratio of 2.42 (95% CI 1.45-4.06) for individuals exposed to ≥200 Bq·m(-3) compared with those exposed to <100 Bq·m(-3). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure at home increased lung cancer risk in individuals with radon exposure>200 Bq·m(-3). Individuals exposed to environmental tobacco smoke and to radon concentrations>200 Bq·m(-3) had higher lung cancer risk than those exposed to lower radon concentrations and exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Residential radon increases lung cancer risk in never-smokers. An association between residential radon exposure and environmental tobacco smoke on the risk of lung cancer might exist.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Radón/efectos adversos , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , España
12.
Environ Res ; 132: 33-7, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24742725

RESUMEN

We aim to assess the relationship between leisure time activities related to exposure to carcinogenic substances and lung cancer risk in a hospital-based case-control study performed in never smokers. We included never smoking cases with anatomopathologically confirmed lung cancer and never smoking controls undergoing trivial surgery, at 8 Spanish hospitals. The study was conducted between January 2011 and June 2013. Participants were older than 30 and had no previous neoplasms. All were personally interviewed focusing on lifestyle, environmental tobacco smoke exposure, occupational history and leisure time activities (including duration of such activities). Results were analyzed through logistic regression and adjusted also by residential radon and education level. We included 513 never smokers, 191 cases and 322 controls. The OR for those performing the studied leisure time activities was 1.43 (95%CI 0.78-2.61). When we restricted the analysis to those performing do-it-yourself activities for more than 10 years the OR was 2.21 (95%CI 0.93-5.27). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure did not modify this association. The effect for the different lung cancer histological types was very close to significance for adenocarcinoma but only when these activities were performed for more than 10 years. We encourage health professionals to recommend protective measures for those individuals while performing these hobbies to reduce the risk of lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Carcinógenos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Actividades Recreativas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , España/epidemiología
13.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 4727, 2023 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36959236

RESUMEN

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) comprises approximately 10% of all lung cancer cases. Tobacco is its main risk factor; however, occupation might play a role in this specific lung cancer subtype. The effect of occupation on SCLC risk has been hardly studied and therefore we aim to assess the role of occupation on the risk of SCLC. To do this, we designed a multicentric, hospital-based, case-control study. Cases consisted exclusively in SCLC patients and controls were recruited from patients having minor surgery at the participating hospitals. Face to face interviews emphasizing occupation and tobacco consumption were held and residential radon was also measured. Logistic regression models were adjusted with odds ratios with 95%CI as estimations of the effect. 423 cases and 905 controls were included. Smoking prevalence was higher in cases compared to controls. Those who worked in known-risk occupations for lung cancer showed an OR of 2.17 (95%CI 1.33; 3.52), with a similar risk when men were analysed separately. The results were adjusted by age, sex, smoking and indoor radon exposure. Those who worked in known-risk occupations and were moderate or heavy smokers had a SCLC risk of 12.19 (95%CI 5.68-26.38) compared with never or moderate smokers who had not worked in such occupations. Occupation is a relevant risk factor of SCLC, and it seems that its effect is boosted when tobacco smoking is present.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radón , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Masculino , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/etiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Radón/efectos adversos , Radón/análisis , Ocupaciones
14.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1199666, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37305128

RESUMEN

Introduction: Lung ultrasound (LUS) has proven to be a more sensitive tool than radiography (X-ray) to detect alveolar-interstitial involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia. However, its usefulness in the detection of possible pulmonary alterations after overcoming the acute phase of COVID-19 is unknown. In this study we proposed studying the utility of LUS in the medium- and long-term follow-up of a cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and methods: This was a prospective, multicentre study that included patients, aged over 18 years, at 3 ± 1 and 12 ± 1 months after discharge after treatment for COVID-19 pneumonia. Demographic variables, the disease severity, and analytical, radiographic, and functional clinical details were collected. LUS was performed at each visit and 14 areas were evaluated and classified with a scoring system whose global sum was referred to as the "lung score." Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) was performed in 2 anterior areas and in 2 posterior areas in a subgroup of patients. The results were compared with high-resolution computed tomography (CT) images reported by an expert radiologist. Results: A total of 233 patients were included, of whom 76 (32.6%) required Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission; 58 (24.9%) of them were intubated and non-invasive respiratory support was also necessary in 58 cases (24.9%). Compared with the results from CT images, when performed in the medium term, LUS showed a sensitivity (S) of 89.7%, specificity (E) 50%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 78.8%, while the diagnostic usefulness of X-ray showed an S of 78% and E of 47%. Most of the patients improved in the long-term evaluation, with LUS showing an efficacy with an S of 76% and E of 74%, while the X-ray presented an S of 71% and E of 50%. 2D-SWE data were available in 108 (61.7%) patients, in whom we found a non-significant tendency toward the presentation of a higher shear wave velocity among those who developed interstitial alterations, with a median kPa of 22.76 ± 15.49) versus 19.45 ± 11.39; p = 0.1). Conclusion: Lung ultrasound could be implemented as a first-line procedure in the evaluation of interstitial lung sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia.

15.
Respirology ; 17(8): 1269-74, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22897169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although it has been reported that pulmonary hypertension is more frequent in patients with obesity-hypoventilation syndrome than in patients with 'pure' obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, little is known about the haemodynamic repercussions of this entity. The aim was to describe the haemodynamic status, as assessed by echocardiography and 6-min walk test (6MWT), of patients with a newly diagnosed, most severe form of obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, and to evaluate the impact of non-invasive ventilation in these patients. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, and single-centre follow-up study was conducted. At baseline, patients underwent echocardiography, spirometry, static lung volume measurement, 6MWT, overnight pulse-oximetry and polygraphic recording. Changes in echocardiography and 6MWT were assessed after 6 months of non-invasive ventilation. Right ventricular overload was defined on the basis of right ventricular dilatation, hypokinesis, paradoxical septal motion and/or pulmonary hypertension. RESULTS: Thirty patients (20 women; mean age 69 ± 11) were tested. The percentage of patients with right ventricular overload did not change significantly after non-invasive ventilation (43.3-41.6%; P = 0.24). In patients with right ventricular overload at diagnosis, pulmonary artery systolic pressure decreased significantly at six months (58 ± 11 to 44 ± 12 mm Hg; P = 0.014), and mean distance on 6MWT increased from 350 ± 110 to 426 ± 78 m (P = 0.006), without significant changes in body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular overload is a frequent finding in patients with the most severe form of obesity-hypoventilation syndrome. Treatment with non-invasive ventilation is associated with a decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure at six months and an increase in the distance covered during the 6MWT.


Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica/fisiología , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Síndrome de Hipoventilación por Obesidad/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Hipoventilación por Obesidad/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oximetría/métodos , Polisomnografía/métodos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/instrumentación , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/fisiopatología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/terapia
16.
Acta Radiol ; 53(7): 728-31, 2012 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22850574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence and clinical significance of pulmonary residual thrombosis 6 months after an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are still not well-known. PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between residual vascular obstruction and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence or death. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was repeated in 97 consecutive patients 6 months after an acute episode of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism. We assessed the long-term consequences of residual thrombosis on vital status and incidence of recurrent VTE. RESULTS: Six patients were lost for follow-up. The remaining 91 patients were classified according to the presence (Group 1: 18 cases) or absence (Group 2: 73 cases) of residual pulmonary vascular obstruction. After a mean ± SD of 2.91 ± 0.99 years, there were eight (8.8%) deaths and 11 (12.1%) VTE recurrences. Groups 1 and 2 did not differ in the incidence of death or VTE recurrence. CONCLUSION: Persistent pulmonary vascular obstruction on 6-month CTPA did not predict long-term adverse outcome events.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía/métodos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ácidos Triyodobenzoicos , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicaciones , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidad , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia
17.
Ann Thorac Med ; 17(4): 193-198, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36387759

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caused by biomass smoke (B-COPD) has some differences from tobacco-induced-COPD (T-COPD), but acute exacerbations (AECOPD) have not been well characterized in B-COPD. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence, characteristics and outcomes of AECOPD in B-COPD with those of T-COPD. METHODS: A retrospective observational study that included consecutive patients seen at a specialized COPD clinic (2008-2021). The incidence of severe AECOPD that required hospital admission was studied. For the first AECOPD, the following variables were recorded: fever, coexistence of pneumonia, purulent sputum, eosinophil count, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, hypercapnia, and respiratory acidosis. Outcome variables were intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of hospital stay, and mortality within 1 month of hospital admission. RESULTS: Of 1060 subjects, 195 (18.4%) belonged to the B-COPD group and 865 (81.6%) to the T-COPD group. During a follow-up of 67.9 (37.8-98.8) months, 75 (38.4%) patients in the B-COPD group and 319 (36.8%) in the T-COPD group suffered at least one severe AECOPD. The only difference between groups was in a higher risk of ICU admission for the T-COPD group. The incidence, characteristics, and the rest of the outcomes of AECOPD were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: AECOPD are similar events for B-COPD and T-COPD and should be managed similarly.

18.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 58(7): 542-546, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35312555

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Residential radon is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, there is little information regarding the association between elevated radon levels and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of SCLC in general population through a multicentric case-control study. METHODS: A multicentric hospital-based case-control study was designed including 9 hospitals from Spain and Portugal, mostly including radon-prone areas. Indoor radon was measured using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 375 cases and 902 controls were included, with 24.5% of cases being women. The median number of years living in the measured dwelling was higher than 25 years for both cases and controls. There was a statistically significant association for those exposed to concentrations higher than the EPA action level of 148Bq/m3, with an Odds Ratio of 2.08 (95%CI: 1.03-4.39) compared to those exposed to concentrations lower than 50Bq/m3. When using a dose-response model with 100Bq/m3 as a reference, it can be observed a linear effect for small cell lung cancer risk. Smokers exposed to higher radon concentrations pose a much higher risk of SCLC compared to smokers exposed to lower indoor radon concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Radon exposure seems to increase the risk of small cell lung cancer with a linear dose-response pattern. Tobacco consumption may also produce an important effect modification for radon exposure.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Radón , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Vivienda , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Radón/toxicidad , Factores de Riesgo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/etiología
19.
Eur J Echocardiogr ; 12(10): 756-61, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21846648

RESUMEN

AIMS: Persistent, echocardiography-assessed right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) and/or pulmonary hypertension (PHT) are relatively frequent findings after an acute pulmonary embolism (PE). It has been suggested that echocardiography might predict long-term adverse events. Our objectives were to evaluate the prognostic value of RVD or isolated PHT 6 months after an acute PE with regard to all-cause mortality or venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a previous study, echocardiography was used to assess RVD or PHT on admission and 6 months after an acute PE in 101 consecutive, haemodynamically stable pulmonary patients. We assessed the subsequent vital status and incidence of recurrent VTE in these patients. Six patients were lost for follow-up. The other 95 patients were categorized as those (i) with RVD or PHT 6 months after PE (17 cases, 17.8%) and (ii) patients with neither RVD nor PHT (78 cases, 82.1%). After a mean±SD of 2.8±1.06 years, there were 9 (9.4%) deaths and 12 (12.6%) VTE recurrences. At multivariate analysis, only age predicted all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR): 1.081, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003-1.166, P=0.004]. RVD or PHT persistence did not appear to increase the risk of mortality or recurrent VTE. CONCLUSION: Persistent echocardiographic signs of right ventricular pressure overload 6 months after an acute PE did not predict long-term adverse outcome events in this study.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidad , Infarto Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto Pulmonar/etiología , Recurrencia , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/etiología
20.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744027

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Residential radon is considered the second cause of lung cancer and the first in never smokers. Nevertheless, there is little information regarding the association between elevated radon levels and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aimed to assess the effect of residential radon exposure on the risk of SCLC in general population through a multicentric case-control study. METHODS: A multicentric hospital-based case-control study was designed including 9 hospitals from Spain and Portugal, mostly including radon-prone areas. Indoor radon was measured using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors at the Galician Radon Laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 375 cases and 902 controls were included, with 24.5% of cases being women. The median number of years living in the measured dwelling was higher than 25 years for both cases and controls. There was a statistically significant association for those exposed to concentrations higher than the EPA action level of 148Bq/m3, with an Odds Ratio of 2.08 (95%CI: 1.03-4.39) compared to those exposed to concentrations lower than 50Bq/m3. When using a dose-response model with 100Bq/m3 as a reference, it can be observed a linear effect for small cell lung cancer risk. Smokers exposed to higher radon concentrations pose a much higher risk of SCLC compared to smokers exposed to lower indoor radon concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Radon exposure seems to increase the risk of small cell lung cancer with a linear dose-response pattern. Tobacco consumption may also produce an important effect modification for radon exposure.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA