High dose-intensity of irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in advanced cancer patients: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To assess, on a multicenter basis, the feasibility of treating advanced cancer patients with high-dose irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients who met the usual phase I criteria (26 men and nine women) were included. Primary tumor sites were colon, head and neck, unknown primary, kidney, liver, and others. All had been previously treated. Irinotecan was given at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (600 mg/m2) or the level below (500 mg/m2) as a 30-minute infusion once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were entered in the four participating centers at the MTD of 600 mg/m2. This dose level was clearly shown not to be feasible: 14 patients (78%) had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, with febrile episodes in 11 patients; grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in nine patients; and one toxic death occurred. Subsequently, 17 not heavily pretreated patients were included at 500 mg/m2 and carefully monitored. The safety of this dose level was considered acceptable: 41% of patients had grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 24% experienced grade 3 to 4 diarrhea, and no febrile granulocytopenia or toxic death occurred. Six partial responses were documented in metastatic colorectal cancer, all in patients who had previously received conventional chemotherapy, four in patients who had exhibited progressive disease under fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We plan to study the higher dose-intensity 500-mg/m2 level on good-risk and carefully monitored patients. This could enlarge the spectrum of tumors sensitive to irinotecan and improve the already good results observed in colorectal cancers.

Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: The objective of this multicenter study was to compare the therapeutic index of two different doses of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), who had failed to respond to previous chemotherapy. A total of 471 patients with MBC were randomized to receive intravenous paclitaxel at a dose of 175 or 135 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Better treatment results were achieved with high-dose (HD) versus low-dose (LD) paclitaxel: overall response rate, 29% versus 22% (P = .108); complete response (CR) rate, 5% versus 2% (P = .088); median time to disease progression, 4.2 versus 3.0 months (P = .027); and median survival time, 11.7 versus 10.5 months (P = .321). Patients previously exposed or resistant to anthracyclines were as likely to respond as those without such prior exposure. Treatment was well tolerated, as documented by the number of administered treatment courses (median, six v five; range, one 17 v one to 18), the low frequency of dose reductions (14% v 7%, P = .024), and the small number of patients (n = 9 or 4% vn = 5 or 2%) who required treatment discontinuation for adverse reactions. The incidence and severity of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were dose-related. After quality-of-life-adjusted time-to-progression analysis, the HD arm (175 mg/m2) retained its advantage over the LD arm (135 mg/m2). CONCLUSION: The results of this trial substantiate the activity of paclitaxel in the treatment of MBC. The observed superior efficacy with a dose of 175 mg/m2 over 135 mg/m2 suggests a dose-effect relationship. The clinical activity in anthracycline-resistant patients is particularly noteworthy. Paclitaxel in breast cancer needs further evaluation in large trials that use combination chemotherapy and involve earlier disease stages.

A dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of reversal of multidrug resistance with SDZ PSC 833 in combination with doxorubicin in patients with solid tumors.

Forty-two patients with advanced solid tumors were entered into a dose-finding study of the combination of doxorubicin with the cyclosporin analogue SDZ PSC 833 (PSC), given by oral route. Patients received PSC at escalating doses, ranging from 2.5 to 25 mg/kg/day, for 5 days, in doses given every 12 h. Doxorubicin was given by i.v. push on day 3 of PSC administration, 4 h after the morning dose of PSC. Pharmacokinetic analyses of PSC and doxorubicin were performed. A total of 38 patients received a combination of PSC and doxorubicin, and 27 received doxorubicin alone in the first course. The major toxicity of the combination was hematological and was significantly more severe than that with doxorubicin alone; severe myelosuppression was already observed at the first PSC dose level, which required doxorubicin dose reduction from 50 to 35 mg/m2. At all dose levels of PSC, up to 17.5 mg/kg/day, there were at least two patients with grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity, which was manageable in less heavily pretreated patients. A further PSC dose escalation was performed to 25 mg/kg/day, together with doxorubicin, at a further reduced dose of 20 mg/m2. At this dose, central nervous system toxicity became the most relevant side effect. The increase of toxicity in the combined treatment was supported by a significant increase of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity of doxorubicin (54%) and a 10-fold increase of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve to infinity of doxorubicinol. The pharmacological interaction was not dependent on the plasma concentration of PSC. The total body clearance of doxorubicin decreased by 30%. PSC plasma concentrations of >1 microM at the time of doxorubicin administration were, in general, found at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg/day or higher. One patient had a partial response. In conclusion, PSC plasma concentrations that can revert multidrug resistance in experimental models could be achieved in patients who have solid tumors and who are treated with doxorubicin. However, a marked pharmacological interaction was found between doxorubicin and PSC, which led to substantial increase in hematological toxicity and required marked reduction of the doxorubicin dose. Further study of PSC may be warranted, in association with the investigation of P-glycoprotein expression and concentration of drugs in the tumor tissues.

Breast cancer: chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced disease.

Chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer remains palliative. Although the majority of patients will experience an initial response or stabilisation of the disease, the survival is only modestly improved. The search for new drugs and more effective combinations must therefore continue. High-dose chemotherapy with or without autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) is an enthusiastic perspective of progress but the available data do not permit conclusions about the effectiveness of high-dose therapy compared with conventional treatment.

Phase II studies of docetaxel in the treatment of various solid tumours. EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group and the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

Docetaxel has been evaluated in six tumour types in a total of 189 patients entered into phase II studies. Treatment consisted of a 1 h intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. No premedication was administered for possible hypersensitivity reactions. Docetaxel was found to be effective as first-line chemotherapy for head and neck cancer (response rate 44%) gastric cancer (23%) and melanoma (14%) and as second-line chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas (21%; 95% confidence interval: 7.5%-43.7%). The results in colorectal and renal cancer were disappointing, with response rates of less than 10%. The most frequent adverse effects were alopecia (81%), grade III-IV leukocytopenia of short duration (66%) and skin reactions (52%). Hypersensitivity reactions were mild and occurred in 26% of patients. Docetaxel is an important new drug in the treatment of solid tumours.

Phase I study of paclitaxel and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary report on safety.

Attempting to develop a new active, convenient regimen, we initiated a phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) combined with epirubicin (Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to standard eligibility criteria, patients with chemotherapy-naive metastasis and at least one measurable lesion had to have left ventricular ejection fractions of at least 50%; the metastatic relapse had to have occurred more than 6 months after adjuvant treatment. Anthracycline-pretreated patients could not have received cumulative doses of more than 300 mg/m2 doxorubicin, 450 mg/m2 epirubicin, or 70 mg/m2 mitoxantrone. An intravenous bolus dose of epirubicin was followed by a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion, with courses repeated every 3 weeks. To date, seven dose levels have been investigated and 31 patients have been treated, 19 of whom had already received anthracyclines. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% and 19% of 123 courses, respectively, with five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity has been observed in 42% of patients and cardiac toxicity in four patients (13%), all of whom had already received anthracyclines. One patient experienced transient myocardial ischemia, one had an asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction, and two patients had clinical heart failure that required treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dose level 5 (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m2), with two of three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Reducing the epirubicin dose to 50 mg/m2, however, allowed the paclitaxel dose to be escalated to 250 mg/m2. At this dose level, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. At a preliminary response evaluation (dose levels 1 to 6), 11 patients (44%) had partial responses, 12 patients (48%) had stable disease, and disease progressed in two patients. We conclude that the combination paclitaxel/epirubicin is safe for patients with metastatic breast cancer and, at this early evaluation, shows promising antitumor activity. Additional patients will be treated at dose level 5 to confirm whether dose-limiting toxicity occurs at this step. Indeed, we took into consideration that dose-limiting toxicity observed at this particular dose level in two of three patients might be due to hazard, since paclitaxel dose escalation up to 250 mg/m2 was further possible in association with 50 mg/m2 epirubicin.

Phase I studies of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic offast cancer: the French experience.

In an attempt to develop new, active, and convenient outpatient combination-chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic breast cancer, we performed two phase I studies combining paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus anthracycline for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, without the use of hematopoietic growth factors. Study I was designed to test the tolerability and antitumor activity of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in combination with an epirubicin intravenous bolus. Study 2 explored a three-drug chemotherapy regimen: a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. If any dose-limiting events occurred in two or more of six patients in the first course of a given dose level, that dose level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting criteria included the following: neutrophils less than 0.25 x 10(9)/L lasting for > or = 5 days, any febrile neutropenia, World Health Organization grade 4 thrombocytopenia, World Health Organization grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity or grade > or = 3 mucositis for more than 5 days, and absence of hematologic recovery at day 35. In both studies, paclitaxel doses were escalated in subsequent groups of three to six patients. For study I, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (110 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2). To date 40 patients have entered the study at eight dose levels. Of the 181 cycles evaluated, grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 63% of courses, with only five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 43% of patients. Two patients experienced clinical heart failure. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached so far. At dose level 7 (paclitaxel [250 mg/m2]/epirubicin [50 mg/m2]), only one patient of six experienced febrile neutropenia. We are currently testing paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/epirubicin (75 mg/m2). Preliminary evaluation of response documents two complete and 16 partial responses in 37 evaluable patients (48% overall response rate). In study 2, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (150 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2)/cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2). To date, three dose levels have been investigated in 16 evaluable patients (82 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 80% of courses, and five episodes were associated with neutropenic fever. Grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% of patients. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached, and we are currently investigating dose level 4 (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2). These trials confirm the tolerability of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. The antitumor activity is encouraging.

Head and neck cancer: guidelines for chemotherapy.

Head and neck cancer is estimated to be one of the most prevalent cancers in the world. This tumour type accounts for 5% of all new cancer cases in the US and Europe each year. Patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck have a poor prognosis, with a median duration of survival between 4 and 6 months. During the past few years, screening for potentially active new compounds, new associations and new modalities of chemotherapy administration have had some degree of success. Clinical investigations have also focused on the addition of chemotherapy to locoregional treatment for patients with locally advanced disease. Induction chemotherapy or concomitant chemo- and radiation therapy can result in high response rates, and reduced incidence of distant metastases. However, there is no clear demonstration of any benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to locoregional therapy on overall survival in patients with resectable disease. In patients with resectable laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer, chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy can be considered as a standard treatment option for larynx preservation, keeping total laryngectomy reserved for salvage therapy. In patients with unresectable head and neck cancer, simultaneous chemoradiotherapy has been shown to improve locoregional control and survival, at the cost of greater toxicity. Outside clinical trials, this approach can also be considered as a standard therapy for unresectable disease.

Phase I study of RP 49532A, a new protein-synthesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

Giroline (RP 49532A) is a new protein-synthesis inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in experimental models. In the present phase I study, Giroline was given by 24-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 3 to 15 mg/m2 to 12 patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. The dose-limiting toxic effects were delayed hypotension and severe asthenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg/m2. Transient nausea and vomiting during infusion were reported at all dose levels. Mild reversible prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time was observed in most patients at dose levels above 3 mg/m2. No antitumor activity was observed. The toxicity profile of Giroline precludes further evaluation in cancer patients.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of S9788, a new multidrug-resistance reversal agent given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this phase I study were to evaluate the toxic effects and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S9788, a new modifier of multidrug resistance (MDR), when given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors; to achieve a potentially active plasma concentration of S9788; and to study the pharmacokinetics of both drugs. METHODS: A total of 26 patients (median age 58 years) entered the study. S9788 was given alone as a 30-min infusion at day 1 and in combination with a 50-mg/m2 bolus of doxorubicin at days 8 and 29. Dose levels of S9788 were escalated from 8 to 96 mg/m2 according to the modified Fibonacci scheme. Plasma samples were taken predose as well as during and up to 48 h after the beginning of infusion for S9788 and doxorubicin quantitation. Fractionated urine samples were also collected for up to 24 h for S9788 determination. RESULTS: The dose-limiting side effects of S9788 consisted of bradycardia, sometimes associated with faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m2. No enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed. One partial response (duration 140 days) was observed at 96 mg/m2 in a patient with multiple lung metastases from a refractory urothelial carcinoma. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 24 patients. Since the mean apparent elimination half-life of S9788 was 46 +/- 23 h and the last plasma sampling time was 48 h, only model-independent parameters were considered. Plasma levels of S9788 were below the limit of quantitation (4 x 10[-3] microM) before each drug administration. S9788 plasma levels of up to 3.7 microM could be obtained with this administration schedule. The urinary elimination of the unchanged drug was negligible, whatever the collection period. In spite of the large inter- and intraindividual variability, plasma pharmacokinetics of S9788 given as a 30-min i.v. infusion were linear up to 96 mg/m2 and were not modified by doxorubicin administration. Doxorubicin pharmacokinetic parameters did not seem to be influenced by S9788 coadministration. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity of S9788 consisted of bradycardia or clinical symptoms suggesting a vasovagal impact such as faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicin in this study were close to those usually described and were not influenced by escalation of the S9788 dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between S9788 and doxorubicin. The clinical tolerability of the combined treatment is in good agreement with the pharmacokinetic findings, since no enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed.

An image cytometric DNA-analysis in breast neoplasms. Parameters of DNA-aneuploidy and their relationship with conventional prognostic factors.

In this prospective study, an image cytometric DNA-analysis was performed in 86 women with breast neoplasms (72 primary invasive carcinomas and 14 benign lesions). Four DNA ploidy parameters were analysed: histogram type (according to AUER classification), DNA-index, tumor cells with DNA content above the 5n limit and DNA malignancy grade (DNA-MG, calculation according to Böcking). Their correlations with well established prognostic factors in breast carcinomas (tumor size, lymph node status, histologic grade, hormone receptor content) were studied. All but one benign lesions were diploid (13/14 cases), whereas the majority of the primary invasive breast carcinomas were aneuploid (58/72 cases). A predominance of carcinomas with a percentage of cells superior or equal to 1% with DNA content above the 5n limit was observed (54 cases out of 58). Most of the aneuploid tumors had a histogram type III or IV (53 cases) or a high DNA-index (50 cases). Of these 58 aneuploid cases, only 26 tumors had a DNA-MG superior to 1. Interestingly, 26 tumors had the 4 criteria of aneuploidy, 19 had 3 and 9 had 2 and only 4 tumors had one parameter. The DNA-MG was significantly related to hormonal receptors (p less than 0.001) and tumor size (p less than 0.01). The histogram types (Auer classification) and the DNA content above the 5n limit were correlated with histologic grade (SBR or SBRM) (p less than 0.02). Concerning the DNA-index no correlation was observed with well established prognostic factors. On the other hand no significant correlation was found between these new biologic variables and lymph node status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Future trends in chemotherapy and impact on the management of emesis]. / Perspectives en chimiothérapie et répercussions sur la prise en chargede l'émésis.

The treatment of cancer patients has improved over the few past years. The improvement includes new chemotherapy modalities and the new treatments for side effects. The introduction over the last 5 years of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, a recent class of antiemetic agents, and hematopoietic growth factors, has allowed oncologists to improve success rates and survival of cancer patients, by developing new cytotoxic agents and increasing drug doses and/or modifying the design and administration of conventional chemotherapy treatment schedules. At present, dose-intensifications of several cytotoxic agents are available. Pharmacomodulation with 5 FU and folinic acid is more emetogenic than 5 FU alone. In contrast, chronomodulation seems to be less emetogenic. For new cytotoxic agents and oral chemotherapy, the emetogenic potential differs according to the drug and the antiemetic treatment must be therefore adapted to each situation.

[Prognosis of operable breast cancers in women aged under forty years]. / Le pronostic des cancers du sein opérables des femmes de moins de 40 ans.

The present study is based on the data of a homogeneous series of 736 women with stage I and II operable breast cancer. The same methodology was used for treatment and follow-up. Eighty-seven patients were under 40 and 649 between 40 and 70 years ols. No statistical difference was noted between the distribution in these 2 groups regarding tumor size, the axillary or internal mammary nodal status or hormonal receptor levels. Small tumors were noted more frequently in the under 40 yr group. Overall survival was the same in both groups, independently of tumor size, axillary nodal status or hormonal receptors. Disease-free survival differed between the 2 groups: local relapse risk was 1.6 times higher for women under 40 yr, in relation to a higher frequency of conservative treatment in this group. No difference was noted for DFS in relation a tumor size, axillary nodal status of hormonal receptors.

[Prognostic factors in the response of a first line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer]. / Etude des facteurs pronostiques de la réponse à une chimiothérapie de première ligne dans le cancer du sein en phase avancée. Groupe ERASME.

Anthracyclines containing regimen are widely used in advanced breast cancer. The response to first line chemotherapy varies according to many individual factors and the theoretical response to a given protocol cannot predict the response of a patient. A randomized clinical trial (ERASME) was initiated in order to evaluate the more appropriate first line chemotherapy scheme in advanced breast cancer. Prognostic factors were included in a multiple logistic regression to explain the response after the first 3 chemotherapy courses (monthly FEC). Three factors were found to be statistically significant: adjuvant hormonotherapy, loco-regional metastases, adjuvant adriamycin containing regimen (pejorative prognostic factor). By combining these factors, this statistical model enables us to predict a response rate to a first line chemotherapy from 27 to 87%. Such a model can be taken into account in a decision-making procedure of first line chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

[Synthetic progestational hormones in the treatment of neoplastic cachexia]. / Utilité des progestatifs de synthèse dans le traitement de la cachexie néoplasique.

Cachexia frequently occurs in cancer patients. Indeed, this syndrome affects about 50% of hospitalized patients. This clinical entity may be described by different characteristics: appetite and weight loss, several metabolic abnormalities, possible influence of cytokines, poor prognosis. During the last decade, several papers have shown the beneficial activity of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and megestrol acetate (MA) in cancer cachexia. Seven randomized trials emphasized their activity on patients weight and appetite. Megestrol acetate doses in those trials are different: from 160 mg/24 h to 1600 mg/24 h; this drug is similar to MPA in terms of clinical and pharmacological properties. Iatrogenic toxicity due to MA and MPA is mild, but numerous questions still subsist: optimal date of introduction during the course of the disease, posology, treatment duration and its impact on quality of life of cancer patients.

[Prognostic value of lympho node micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry. Study of 168 cases of breast cancer with a 10-year follow-up]. / Valeur pronostique des micrométastases ganglionnaires détectées par analyse immunohistochimique. A propos de 168 cas de carcinomes mammaires suivis pendant plus de 10 ans.

The authors reported a retrospective pathological study of 168 patients classified PT2N- treated by Patey mastectomy completed by axillary and internal mammary lymph node removal. The size of micrometastases ranged from 0.012 to 0.87 millimeters. All 2800 lymph nodes were examined, using successively HPS and IHC procedures. Detection of micrometastases has been improved by immunohistochemical staining on paraffin embedded sections using anticytokeratin MAb clone antiKL1. The 168 patients were divided into two groups. The first one included 31 patients IHC+ out of 168 (18.5%); there were 47 micrometastatic nodes with negatives nodes out of 2800 (1,67%). The second group included 137 patients (81.5%) out of 168 with negative nodes. If we consider the PT2N-clinical status, it appears a percentage of 16 to 20% of patients developing recurrence within ten years after surgical treatment. There was no significant difference concerning the disease--free survival at ten years. Variability in metastatic node involvement spread led us to distinguish 3 subgroups of uneven prognostic value. The relative risk of relapse ranged from 1 (ICH + 1) to 1.94 (ICH + 2 and 3) merged. Do PT2N- group with recurrence and ICH + group concern the same patients? We cannot statistically prove that micrometastatic nodes are a bad prognostic factor by further studies which are required.

FAC (fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) as second line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing under FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The cross-over resistance between different anthracyclines in breast carcinoma has not been largely evaluated in clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed prior first line FEC chemotherapy (fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, every 4 weeks) were treated with a combination of fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 4 weeks (FAC). RESULTS: Five patients achieved partial responses, ranging in duration from 5 to 8 months. The main toxicity was cardiac, with congestive heart failure documented in five patients. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate an absence of cross resistance of doxorubicin in some epirubicin-resistant patients.

Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies.

BACKGROUND: CPT-11 (irinotecan), a camptothecin-derived anticancer agent with DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitory activity, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activity in solid tumour models including multidrug-resistant tumours. This review details the rationale for the dosage schedule of CPT-11 selected for phase II studies, based on the results of 3 European phase I dose-escalating trials in patients with solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks (schedule 1), once daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks (schedule 2) or once weekly every 3 out of 4 weeks (schedule 3). RESULTS: Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the major dose-limiting toxicities in all of the studies. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 115 and 145 mg/m2/day for schedules 2 and 3, respectively. With schedule 1, diarrhoea became dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 but was manageable with high-dose loperamide therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 350 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks was chosen for further evaluation in early phase II studies, since this dosage regimen allowed the highest dose intensity with the least toxicity and was convenient for outpatient use. The place of higher doses (with intensive antidiarrhoeal support) and other administration schedules (e.g., protracted infusion) warrant further investigation.

Phase II study of rhizoxin in squamous cell head and neck cancer. The EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group.

To test the anti-tumour activity of rhizoxin in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer, we performed a phase II study. Eligibility required histologically proven squamous cell head and neck cancer. Patients could only have received one prior chemotherapy. Patients were entered if WHO PS was < or = 2 and organ functions were normal. Treatment consisted of rhizoxin 1.5-2.0 mg m-2 i.v. bolus injection once every 3 weeks. Thirty-two patients entered the study. All were eligible, 31 were evaluable for toxicity and 25 for response. Toxicity mainly consisted of pain at the tumour site and leucocytopenia. Mild asthenia and stomatitis were also observed. Two objective partial responses, lasting 7.5 and 3.5 months, were seen. Rhizoxin at this dose and schedule has minor activity in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck cancer.